Page 7 of 8

Re: 1991 Larry Holmes vs

Posted: 09 Jun 2010, 20:16
by Goodnight, Irene
mugabi wrote:
Goodnight, Irene wrote:
mugabi wrote: you on the other hand are an incorrigible troll and retard and a total nut job who should be sectioned under the mental health act!
the only embarrasment here is you and your foam at the mouth conviction that george foreman was a lousy infighter and that a 43 year old larry holmes would beat a 25 year old foreman! :lol: is there any chance you could take a swim in the english channel while typing your reply at least that way there is a slim chance you might do us all a favour and drown in your own sea of stupidity

the offer of a truce to you is withdrawn but the offer of a truce is still open to irene
I think your idea of a truce is I stop being me. That's a compromise no reasonable person can make.
yes i think that was the line of argument saddam hussien used at his trial prior to his life imprisonment when explaining why he hadnt ceased trying to build weapons of mass destruction

I see your point
That's quite a comparison --- someone like myself to Saddam Hussein. I guess Saad wasn't wrong when he said the pressure's gotten to you. Guess you just don't have the endurance of The Duke when all's said & done, eh?

Re: 1991 Larry Holmes vs

Posted: 09 Jun 2010, 20:17
by Goodnight, Irene
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
Goodnight, Irene wrote:Nice try, but we both know the people I speak to aren't writing informal, "text speech." They are people who literally do not comprehend the basic principles I've outlined. When someone writes, 'ur,' or, 'u're' that is text-speech, not when they write, 'your' as though, 'you're' does not exist. You know that perfectly well. Your post is an attempt to hood-wink.

Ur is infinitely more intelligent than "Your a retard".
Perhaps so. You will notice he has dropped the argument that people were using text speech like a bag of hot potatoes. He didn't believe it, & he was never going to convince me that weas the case, either.

Re: 1991 Larry Holmes vs

Posted: 09 Jun 2010, 20:18
by raylawpc
Goodnight, Irene wrote:
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
Goodnight, Irene wrote:Nice try, but we both know the people I speak to aren't writing informal, "text speech." They are people who literally do not comprehend the basic principles I've outlined. When someone writes, 'ur,' or, 'u're' that is text-speech, not when they write, 'your' as though, 'you're' does not exist. You know that perfectly well. Your post is an attempt to hood-wink.

Ur is infinitely more intelligent than "Your a retard".
Perhaps so. You will notice he has dropped the argument that people were using text speech like a bag of hot potatoes. He didn't believe it, & he was never going to convince me that weas the case, either.
Uh, you misspelled "was" . . . :wink: :wink: :wink: (Sorry, Irene, I couldn't resist. . .)

Re: 1991 Larry Holmes vs

Posted: 09 Jun 2010, 20:23
by Goodnight, Irene
That's true, & I know exactly why, too --- my hands are fvcking frozen! :lol:

In fairness to me, never is the amount of times I pulled someone up for making a mistake where I thought it was the result of a typo, as opposed to someone who did not understand school-level distinctions in the language --- a fact I have absolutely zero doubt will be lost on Mugabi & Raffy.

Re: 1991 Larry Holmes vs

Posted: 09 Jun 2010, 20:24
by raylawpc
Yeah, but its still wrong . . . :shame: :wink: :shame: :wink:

Re: 1991 Larry Holmes vs

Posted: 09 Jun 2010, 20:27
by SaadOffTheDeck
Goodnight, Irene wrote:That's true, & I know exactly why, too --- my hands are fvcking frozen! :lol:

In fairness to me, never is the amount of times I pulled someone up for making a mistake where I thought it was the result of a typo, as opposed to someone who did not understand school-level distinctions in the language --- a fact I have absolutely zero doubt will be lost on Mugabi & Raffy.

Yup, the only reason I ever said anything to him was because he decided to use your a retard as an attempt to assault my intelligence. Anyone with a brain would have done the same. Yet this clown tries to say it's the Queens English. :lol:

I make grammatical errors all the time. I don't use spell check when I'm shooting the shit on Boxing and my sentence structure is average at best. But my prophetic phrases are gold...

"LOL, I didn't feel like hurting Mugabi's feelings and spending 4 days in a childish internet argument. But Morrison destroying Holmes may be the worst prediction I have ever read."

Re: 1991 Larry Holmes vs

Posted: 09 Jun 2010, 20:28
by Bricks
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
mugabi wrote:
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Feel free to stop embarassing yourself at anytime. Though quoting one of your own epic and illiterate novels with another is a tough way to win over a crowd. Why don't you try a noble approach and shut up? I know it goes against the principles of your trolling, but it's the best way to end a retarded battle that you started.

edit: BTW, Tommy Morrison still had putrid stamina.
you on the other hand are an incorrigible troll and retard and a total nut job who should be sectioned under the mental health act!
the only embarrasment here is you and your foam at the mouth conviction that george foreman was a lousy infighter and that a 43 year old larry holmes would beat a 25 year old foreman! :lol: is there any chance you could take a swim in the english channel while typing your reply at least that way there is a slim chance you might do us all a favour and drown in your own sea of stupidity

the offer of a truce to you is withdrawn but the offer of a truce is still open to irene

Blah, blah blah, your pathetic nature is shown in your offer of a "truce". You're the only one that is upset. Your existence means nothing to me, I wish you no harm. I'm just not the type to sit around and eat insults without responding. All of this is because you can't handle a differing opinion.

You love to toss around troll but you have 80 posts bickering to every one about Boxing. Just shut your pie hole and it's over. Put me on ignore and stop following me around like a love sick teenager. Better yet, learn to deal with people not agreeing with your ass backwards opinions.

The most amusing part is your "truce" would only last until the next time I laughed at one of your insane Boxing posts. Poor me, the truce offer is withdrawn from the internet thug. Whatever will I do?

Get a life, I take more intelligent dumps than your posts.
hhhmmm who is writing novels now? Than again i should be flattered, since imitation is the sincerest form of flattery.

You have managed to post 1000 more posts than me despite being here less time than me.all of them were your usual garbage and abuse. I think its undisputed you are the forum troll :DDD

im going to bed now. Some of us have proffesional careersto go to and dont live off welfare and spend all our days trolling boxing forums looking for spelling mistakes and telling any one who will listen that george foreman was a lousy infighter! Lmfao

Re: 1991 Larry Holmes vs

Posted: 09 Jun 2010, 20:34
by Goodnight, Irene
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
Goodnight, Irene wrote:That's true, & I know exactly why, too --- my hands are fvcking frozen! :lol:

In fairness to me, never is the amount of times I pulled someone up for making a mistake where I thought it was the result of a typo, as opposed to someone who did not understand school-level distinctions in the language --- a fact I have absolutely zero doubt will be lost on Mugabi & Raffy.

Yup, the only reason I ever said anything to him was because he decided to use your a retard as an attempt to assault my intelligence. Anyone with a brain would have done the same. Yet this clown tries to say it's the Queens English. :lol:

I make grammatical errors all the time. I don't use spell check when I'm shooting the poop on Boxing and my sentence structure is average at best. But my prophetic phrases are gold...

"LOL, I didn't feel like hurting Mugabi's feelings and spending 4 days in a childish internet argument. But Morrison destroying Holmes may be the worst prediction I have ever read."
I have to admit, I laughed out loud when I saw him brazenly attribute his inability to distinguish, 'your,' from, 'you're' as the result of the Queen's English :OhYes:

Comedy gold :bow:

Re: 1991 Larry Holmes vs

Posted: 09 Jun 2010, 20:34
by Goodnight, Irene
raylawpc wrote:Yeah, but its still wrong . . . :shame: :wink: :shame: :wink:
Indeed, it is. As is your use of, "its" :wink:

Re: 1991 Larry Holmes vs

Posted: 09 Jun 2010, 20:36
by Bricks
Goodnight, Irene wrote:
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
Goodnight, Irene wrote:Nice try, but we both know the people I speak to aren't writing informal, "text speech." They are people who literally do not comprehend the basic principles I've outlined. When someone writes, 'ur,' or, 'u're' that is text-speech, not when they write, 'your' as though, 'you're' does not exist. You know that perfectly well. Your post is an attempt to hood-wink.

Ur is infinitely more intelligent than "Your a retard".
Perhaps so. You will notice he has dropped the argument that people were using text speech like a bag of hot potatoes. He didn't believe it, & he was never going to convince me that weas the case, either.
than by your own logic you must be one of the 'uneducated pre elementary school level educated adults' you hate so much as you are incapable of spelling 'was'. You wrote 'weas'.

Dont worry i realise the first stage of any problem is admitting it. I am here for you. Dont worry i'm here to tell you you're not stupid. You lack education that is clear but that doesn't mean your daddy was right to beat you and call you stupid

Its okay i realise you are still in denial we will get there together. I am also willing to send to you my infant school books so that you can learn to spell 'was'.

Re: 1991 Larry Holmes vs

Posted: 09 Jun 2010, 20:38
by SaadOffTheDeck
mugabi wrote:
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
mugabi wrote: you on the other hand are an incorrigible troll and retard and a total nut job who should be sectioned under the mental health act!
the only embarrasment here is you and your foam at the mouth conviction that george foreman was a lousy infighter and that a 43 year old larry holmes would beat a 25 year old foreman! :lol: is there any chance you could take a swim in the english channel while typing your reply at least that way there is a slim chance you might do us all a favour and drown in your own sea of stupidity

the offer of a truce to you is withdrawn but the offer of a truce is still open to irene

Blah, blah blah, your pathetic nature is shown in your offer of a "truce". You're the only one that is upset. Your existence means nothing to me, I wish you no harm. I'm just not the type to sit around and eat insults without responding. All of this is because you can't handle a differing opinion.

You love to toss around troll but you have 80 posts bickering to every one about Boxing. Just shut your pie hole and it's over. Put me on ignore and stop following me around like a love sick teenager. Better yet, learn to deal with people not agreeing with your ass backwards opinions.

The most amusing part is your "truce" would only last until the next time I laughed at one of your insane Boxing posts. Poor me, the truce offer is withdrawn from the internet thug. Whatever will I do?

Get a life, I take more intelligent dumps than your posts.
hhhmmm who is writing novels now? Than again i should be flattered, since imitation is the sincerest form of flattery.

You have managed to post 1000 more posts than me despite being here less time than me.all of them were your usual garbage and abuse. I think its undisputed you are the forum troll :DDD

im going to bed now. Some of us have proffesional careersto go to and dont live off welfare and spend all our days trolling boxing forums looking for spelling mistakes and telling any one who will listen that george foreman was a lousy infighter! Lmfao
And some of us with careers can spell professional. Good night sweet prince!

Re: 1991 Larry Holmes vs

Posted: 09 Jun 2010, 20:42
by Bricks
raylawpc wrote:Yeah, but its still wrong . . . :shame: :wink: :shame: :wink:
thanks for exposing this ray. It will help the education process for irene. He is still
in denial about the fact all his arrogance derives from his lack of education being of australian convict stock and all this nit picking spelling mistakes is to do with his own self hatred at his being uneducated and his daddy calling him stupid.


Dont worry we will help heal irene's pain and hypocrisy.

Again i thank you for your valuable service in correcting irene's poor spelling due to his lack of education

Re: 1991 Larry Holmes vs

Posted: 09 Jun 2010, 20:46
by SaadOffTheDeck
mugabi wrote:
raylawpc wrote:Yeah, but its still wrong . . . :shame: :wink: :shame: :wink:
thanks for exposing this ray. It will help the education process for irene. He is still
in denial about the fact all his arrogance derives from his lack of education being of australian convict stock and all this nit picking spelling mistakes is to do with his own self hatred at his being uneducated and his daddy calling him stupid.


Dont worry we will help heal irene's pain and hypocrisy.

Again i thank you for your valuable service in correcting irene's poor spelling due to his lack of education

Wow, not only can you post while driving, but you're able to as you sleep. I'm starting to feel sorry for you now. I'm done, consider your "truce" in action. Just try not to get riled into a frenzy the next time I disagree with your opinion on a mythical fight.

Re: 1991 Larry Holmes vs

Posted: 09 Jun 2010, 20:54
by Bricks
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
mugabi wrote:
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
Blah, blah blah, your pathetic nature is shown in your offer of a "truce". You're the only one that is upset. Your existence means nothing to me, I wish you no harm. I'm just not the type to sit around and eat insults without responding. All of this is because you can't handle a differing opinion.

You love to toss around troll but you have 80 posts bickering to every one about Boxing. Just shut your pie hole and it's over. Put me on ignore and stop following me around like a love sick teenager. Better yet, learn to deal with people not agreeing with your ass backwards opinions.

The most amusing part is your "truce" would only last until the next time I laughed at one of your insane Boxing posts. Poor me, the truce offer is withdrawn from the internet thug. Whatever will I do?

Get a life, I take more intelligent dumps than your posts.
hhhmmm who is writing novels now? Than again i should be flattered, since imitation is the sincerest form of flattery.

You have managed to post 1000 more posts than me despite being here less time than me.all of them were your usual garbage and abuse. I think its undisputed you are the forum troll :DDD

im going to bed now. Some of us have proffesional careersto go to and dont live off welfare and spend all our days trolling boxing forums looking for spelling mistakes and telling any one who will listen that george foreman was a lousy infighter! Lmfao
And some of us with careers can spell professional. Good night sweet prince!
so my keypad sticks on a letter at 1.50am and lo and behold mr troll is there to nitpick! Lol

what is the career of a man like you? Apart from troll king?

Let me guess welfare cheat! Got it in one! Good night sweet princess!

Re: 1991 Larry Holmes vs

Posted: 09 Jun 2010, 21:00
by Bricks
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
mugabi wrote:
raylawpc wrote:Yeah, but its still wrong . . . :shame: :wink: :shame: :wink:
thanks for exposing this ray. It will help the education process for irene. He is still
in denial about the fact all his arrogance derives from his lack of education being of australian convict stock and all this nit picking spelling mistakes is to do with his own self hatred at his being uneducated and his daddy calling him stupid.


Dont worry we will help heal irene's pain and hypocrisy.

Again i thank you for your valuable service in correcting irene's poor spelling due to his lack of education

Wow, not only can you post while driving, but you're able to as you sleep. I'm starting to feel sorry for you now. I'm done, consider your "truce" in action. Just try not to get riled into a frenzy the next time I disagree with your opinion on a mythical fight.
ok lets see how long your 'truce' lasts you have given your word now dont
embarass yourself by breaking it.

The truce with saad will be honoured this end as long as he sticks to it.

Re: 1991 Larry Holmes vs

Posted: 09 Jun 2010, 21:53
by SaadOffTheDeck
mugabi wrote:
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
mugabi wrote: hhhmmm who is writing novels now? Than again i should be flattered, since imitation is the sincerest form of flattery.

You have managed to post 1000 more posts than me despite being here less time than me.all of them were your usual garbage and abuse. I think its undisputed you are the forum troll :DDD

im going to bed now. Some of us have proffesional careersto go to and dont live off welfare and spend all our days trolling boxing forums looking for spelling mistakes and telling any one who will listen that george foreman was a lousy infighter! Lmfao
And some of us with careers can spell professional. Good night sweet prince!
so my keypad sticks on a letter at 1.50am and lo and behold mr troll is there to nitpick! Lol

what is the career of a man like you? Apart from troll king?

Let me guess welfare cheat! Got it in one! Good night sweet princess!

Don't you see the irony of insulting what a complete stranger may do for a living and mispelling the core of your insult? i'm sure you will take this as another "attack". But you really ought to think about what you're saying. It's just too easy.

But I'm really sorry i hurt your feelings. None of this is serious to me and i should back off when you're so obvioulsy affected by it.

Re: 1991 Larry Holmes vs

Posted: 09 Jun 2010, 23:42
by Goodnight, Irene
mugabi wrote:
raylawpc wrote:Yeah, but its still wrong . . . :shame: :wink: :shame: :wink:
thanks for exposing this ray. It will help the education process for irene. He is still
in denial about the fact all his arrogance derives from his lack of education being of australian convict stock and all this nit picking spelling mistakes is to do with his own self hatred at his being uneducated and his daddy calling him stupid.


Dont worry we will help heal irene's pain and hypocrisy.

Again i thank you for your valuable service in correcting irene's poor spelling due to his lack of education
LMAO! Take another look at this...

"In fairness to me, never is the amount of times I pulled someone up for making a mistake where I thought it was the result of a typo, as opposed to someone who did not understand school-level distinctions in the language --- a fact I have absolutely zero doubt will be lost on Mugabi & Raffy." - Goodnight, Irene

^^^& with all the predictability of a moth to a flame, you proved my point. I guess when you're that desparate, you'll clutch at anything to divert from your own, genuine short-comings --- even typos. That's unfortunate, but nowhere near as damning as you walking straight into this punch.

Like I said, though --- I had no doubt, & my, ahem, "faith" in you was duly re-paid.

Re: 1991 Larry Holmes vs

Posted: 09 Jun 2010, 23:44
by Goodnight, Irene
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
mugabi wrote:
SaadOffTheDeck wrote: And some of us with careers can spell professional. Good night sweet prince!
so my keypad sticks on a letter at 1.50am and lo and behold mr troll is there to nitpick! Lol

what is the career of a man like you? Apart from troll king?

Let me guess welfare cheat! Got it in one! Good night sweet princess!

Don't you see the irony of insulting what a complete stranger may do for a living and mispelling the core of your insult? i'm sure you will take this as another "attack". But you really ought to think about what you're saying. It's just too easy.

But I'm really sorry i hurt your feelings. None of this is serious to me and i should back off when you're so obvioulsy affected by it.
"Urineeie" --- even words he makes up, you can't help feel he has somehow spelled incorrectly. That's a special kind of stupid --- the kind whose mind's eye sees Morrison comatosing Holmes.

Re: 1991 Larry Holmes vs

Posted: 10 Jun 2010, 03:25
by hitman09
Had this been in CS, it would have been locked by now.

Re: 1991 Larry Holmes vs

Posted: 10 Jun 2010, 05:01
by Robinson
So everyone agrees.

Larry Holmes is the BEST head to head HW ever.

I do agree guys. :)

Re: 1991 Larry Holmes vs

Posted: 10 Jun 2010, 10:23
by raylawpc
Goodnight, Irene wrote:
raylawpc wrote:Yeah, but its still wrong . . . :shame: :wink: :shame: :wink:
Indeed, it is. As is your use of, "its" :wink:
You're right. I used it as a possessive pronoun instead of as a contraction. However, I am not the self-appointed boxrec grammar police. In your case, I was merely making a citizens arrest. :wink: :wink: :wink:

Re: 1991 Larry Holmes vs

Posted: 10 Jun 2010, 10:25
by raylawpc
mugabi wrote:
raylawpc wrote:Yeah, but its still wrong . . . :shame: :wink: :shame: :wink:
thanks for exposing this ray. It will help the education process for irene. He is still
in denial about the fact all his arrogance derives from his lack of education being of australian convict stock and all this nit picking spelling mistakes is to do with his own self hatred at his being uneducated and his daddy calling him stupid.


Dont worry we will help heal irene's pain and hypocrisy.

Again i thank you for your valuable service in correcting irene's poor spelling due to his lack of education
You read too much into it. Irene is a friend, and a good guy. I was just pulling his chain a bit with all this grammar discussion.

Re: 1991 Larry Holmes vs

Posted: 10 Jun 2010, 11:33
by Raff The Frenchman
Robinson wrote:So everyone agrees.

Larry Holmes is the BEST head to head HW ever.

I do agree guys. :)
I don't refering to the thread, 1992 Lewis would beat a 43 y old Holmes.

Re: 1991 Larry Holmes vs

Posted: 10 Jun 2010, 12:47
by Bricks
Goodnight, Irene wrote:
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
mugabi wrote: so my keypad sticks on a letter at 1.50am and lo and behold mr troll is there to nitpick! Lol

what is the career of a man like you? Apart from troll king?

Let me guess welfare cheat! Got it in one! Good night sweet princess!

Don't you see the irony of insulting what a complete stranger may do for a living and mispelling the core of your insult? i'm sure you will take this as another "attack". But you really ought to think about what you're saying. It's just too easy.

But I'm really sorry i hurt your feelings. None of this is serious to me and i should back off when you're so obvioulsy affected by it.
"Urineeie" --- even words he makes up, you can't help feel he has somehow spelled incorrectly. That's a special kind of stupid --- the kind whose mind's eye sees Morrison comatosing Holmes.

Of course a man who calls himself Irene must be a sound judge of what is stupid and what isn't stupid!: :TU: Just a bit of light humour now that we're all friends!

Back to topic, Irene how do you think George Foreman of a 74 vintage would have done against Vitali? While we are at it what about the 91 vintage? Just wondering since at the very least one thing we have in common is we admire Foreman. :TU:

Re: 1991 Larry Holmes vs

Posted: 10 Jun 2010, 23:47
by Robinson
Raff The Frenchman wrote:
Robinson wrote:So everyone agrees.

Larry Holmes is the BEST head to head HW ever.

I do agree guys. :)
I don't refering to the thread, 1992 Lewis would beat a 43 y old Holmes.
All I see there is that Holmes at 43 was awesome :P


Yeah I know that mate ;) I just find it interesting that the lads here are getting
upset over how cool Larry is as a fighter.