Page 7 of 7
Re: Khan conspiracy
Posted: 18 Jan 2012, 02:54
by hitman_hatton1
ArtOfWar wrote:Springfield, NJ, January 8, 2012 - At this point in time the IBF has decided to break its silence and provide some clarification on the matter of Mr. Mustafa Ameen’s presence at the IBF/WBA championship bout between Amir Khan and Lamont Peterson. Initially, the organization chose not to publicly address this matter to preserve the integrity of the hearing scheduled for the appeal filed by Golden Boy promotions on the ruling of the aforementioned bout. The sole purpose in doing so was with the intentions that all parties, and most importantly, the panelists could go into this hearing with clear minds and no preconceptions or prejudices.
Mr. Mustafa Ameen does outreach work for the IBF’s SARB/Education Fund. This fund was initially created to financially assist retired professional boxers experiencing monetary difficulties. Shortly over a year ago, IBF President Daryl Peoples and Mr. Ameen agreed that he would network on behalf of the organization with the purpose of connecting with these fighters in order for the IBF to provide them with some financial assistance. Mr. Ameen’s role with the organization is limited to just this. He is not an employee or an official of the organization, nor does he receive any monetary compensation from the organization for his efforts.
Previous to the Khan-Peterson bout, the IBF made a request for the Washington, D.C. Boxing and Wrestling Commission to extend Mr. Ameen the courtesy of a credential to enter the arena. Mr. Ameen was not assigned by the IBF to officiate this bout. Despite all that has transpired, at this point the IBF has not changed its stance and plans on moving forth with the hearing as scheduled on Wednesday, January 18, 2012. Mr. Ameen will be present at the hearing to explain his actions and what transpired during the bout between him and Mr. Welsh, the WBA supervisor.
still no one is claiming any responsibility for this.
what a mess.
Re: Khan conspiracy
Posted: 18 Jan 2012, 05:16
by earsjohn
And now Camp Peterson are planning to appeal the WBA decision to order a rematch.
This is pathetic all round. Not sure which is more shambolic - this constant back on forth fighting over worthless belts (being rendered even more worthless by these shenanigans) or the tedious pissing-contest that is Floyd v Manny. In both cases, I don't care who is right or wrong, just stop all the bullcrap and sort it out in the ring.
Re: Khan conspiracy
Posted: 18 Jan 2012, 06:16
by tear up
Re: Khan conspiracy
Posted: 18 Jan 2012, 07:06
by Srebmun
It's not a news flash per sa, been in the news since y/day.
Re: Khan conspiracy
Posted: 18 Jan 2012, 09:23
by tear up
Srebmun wrote:
It's not a news flash per sa, been in the news since y/day.
pardon me sir

Re: Khan conspiracy
Posted: 18 Jan 2012, 19:16
by gobbles
MachoMan09 wrote:The most important lesson to take from this whole sorry episode is that 9+9+9 = 27 (all day long).
Unless Joe Cooper deducted a point
Re: Khan conspiracy
Posted: 19 Jan 2012, 07:13
by loaded_gloves
GBP & Khan's Campaign of Misinformation continues.
Re: Khan conspiracy
Posted: 19 Jan 2012, 07:33
by earsjohn
loaded_gloves wrote:GBP & Khan's Campaign of Misinformation continues.
This the campaign that sees the guy they complain about give an interview to the BBC in which he says, in relation to WBA supervisor Michael Walsh,
"I noticed one error and a subsequent error. I assisted him in correcting it without touching anything. I happened to look down, I believe at the end of the third round, I looked down and I saw Mr Welsh's score," he added. "I saw, I believe, it could have been nine, nine and nine - which is 27 all day long. There was an error. It might have been 26 or 28 but he was off by a point or two. I happened to look down and I said 'Michael, nine times three is 27'. He said 'oh my God' and corrected himself. And he said 'I'm not feeling well this evening, thank you very much'."
Boxing is surely the only sport where the scorekeeper can't add and takes assistance from a random stranger who has no official business being at ringside.
It's not misinformation that there was an unnecessary delay in totaling the scores, that were subsequently read out incorrectly by a man who has made a near $1/2bn dollar fortune through reading things out in the ring.
Khans whining about not deserving to lose the fight (it was a close one that could have gone either way, certainly no robbery IMO) has clouded some peoples views to some of the more worrying happenings that have come to light. What will ultimately happen? There'll be a rematch, the stink of meddling and outside interference will be swept under the carpet (as that's what the commissions want) and everyone will go on their merry way.
Sniff of corruption in cricket? Criminal cases, lifetime bans, hefty fines, taskforces set up to tackle the threat
Stench of corruption in football? Relegations and titles stripped, imprisonment, fines and bans, taskforces set up to tackle the threat.
Whiff of corruption in boxing? Nothing to see here, move along, "I've never seen any bent fights in my 30+ years in the sport" - F Warren, No, no I was in the ring to help the 85 year old giffer carry the belt into the ring.
Re: Khan conspiracy
Posted: 19 Jan 2012, 18:10
by Final round
earsjohn wrote:loaded_gloves wrote:GBP & Khan's Campaign of Misinformation continues.
This the campaign that sees the guy they complain about give an interview to the BBC in which he says, in relation to WBA supervisor Michael Walsh,
"I noticed one error and a subsequent error. I assisted him in correcting it without touching anything. I happened to look down, I believe at the end of the third round, I looked down and I saw Mr Welsh's score," he added. "I saw, I believe, it could have been nine, nine and nine - which is 27 all day long. There was an error. It might have been 26 or 28 but he was off by a point or two. I happened to look down and I said 'Michael, nine times three is 27'. He said 'oh my God' and corrected himself. And he said 'I'm not feeling well this evening, thank you very much'."
Boxing is surely the only sport where the scorekeeper can't add and takes assistance from a random stranger who has no official business being at ringside.
It's not misinformation that there was an unnecessary delay in totaling the scores, that were subsequently read out incorrectly by a man who has made a near $1/2bn dollar fortune through reading things out in the ring.
Khans whining about not deserving to lose the fight (it was a close one that could have gone either way, certainly no robbery IMO) has clouded some peoples views to some of the more worrying happenings that have come to light. What will ultimately happen? There'll be a rematch, the stink of meddling and outside interference will be swept under the carpet (as that's what the commissions want) and everyone will go on their merry way.
Sniff of corruption in cricket? Criminal cases, lifetime bans, hefty fines, taskforces set up to tackle the threat
Stench of corruption in football? Relegations and titles stripped, imprisonment, fines and bans, taskforces set up to tackle the threat.
Whiff of corruption in boxing? Nothing to see here, move along, "I've never seen any bent fights in my 30+ years in the sport" - F Warren, No, no I was in the ring to help the 85 year old giffer carry the belt into the ring.
Helping him add up! just brilliant..
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/boxing/16622940.stm
Re: Khan conspiracy
Posted: 19 Jan 2012, 22:08
by crusader
it never ends........
Re: Khan conspiracy
Posted: 20 Jan 2012, 05:22
by Finn
Apparently Walsh has now got severe depression and has become uncontactable as well.
Re: Khan conspiracy
Posted: 20 Jan 2012, 05:28
by earsjohn
kingfinn wrote:Apparently Walsh has now got severe depression and has become uncontactable as well.
Maybe he's been trying to return calls, but keeps getting the numbers wrong?
Re: Khan conspiracy
Posted: 20 Jan 2012, 15:41
by Finn
earsjohn wrote:kingfinn wrote:Apparently Walsh has now got severe depression and has become uncontactable as well.
Maybe he's been trying to return calls, but keeps getting the numbers wrong?
