BoxRec

thepocketrocket wrote:Second threat in one thread...you are really in for a short shelf life. Mug.

I'm not judging anyone for their lifestyle choices..they can do whatever they choose. But as a professional athlete they have to be aware that it will negatively affect them. And they will not be able to look back at the end of their career and say 'I did all I could there'

Retirement is a long time time to ponder that.

danconnollyeire wrote:

thepocketrocket wrote:Second threat in one thread...you are really in for a short shelf life. Mug.

I'm not judging anyone for their lifestyle choices..they can do whatever they choose. But as a professional athlete they have to be aware that it will negatively affect them. And they will not be able to look back at the end of their career and say 'I did all I could there'

Retirement is a long time time to ponder that.

If you think that's a treat you are a tiny little man

I just said you wouldn't say it to my face... fact not threat...

So you respect that opinion of basically noone of the site you write for?

thepocketrocket wrote:

danconnollyeire wrote:

thepocketrocket wrote:Second threat in one thread...you are really in for a short shelf life. Mug.

I'm not judging anyone for their lifestyle choices..they can do whatever they choose. But as a professional athlete they have to be aware that it will negatively affect them. And they will not be able to look back at the end of their career and say 'I did all I could there'

Retirement is a long time time to ponder that.

If you think that's a treat you are a tiny little man

I just said you wouldn't say it to my face... fact not threat...

So you respect that opinion of basically noone of the site you write for?

Internet troll? HA that's hilarious. Tell you what I'm in Manchester next week can call me it to my face or if you're ever near Repton...

Numpty boy, you are the one who jumped in on a convo between me and Clinton saying you you would tell me to feck off and I would. I have never spoken to you and to be fair, after using that as an opening gambit, I have no interest in you. You are a nobody. Even people who disagreed with my point didn't get like that. You are just some loudmouth or an internet troll. I have wasted far too much time on the likes of you.

There were plenty like Macho who agreed with my point. Even Clinton said my point was fair.

I respect anyone who is on this site, as long as they are respectful in their argument. You are the kind of person who belongs on the General Forum.

thepocketrocket wrote:ZZZZ. Catch ya later Danny Boy

twenty six wrote:14 quality posts there Danny boy.

clintonmcphilbin wrote:

IRLangmaid25 wrote:I watched the while back and I do feel because of the timekeeping screw up Shane McPhilbin was denied an opportunity to try and finish off Enzo Mac there and then in the first round because Enzo Mac was all over the joint because McPhilbin was landing the bigger shots trying to take him out in the early rounds, he gave it all it but but he did not get the break because of the time keeping screw which gave Enzo Mac time to get himself together again and get back into the fight and from which used his superior championship experience to grind out the points win. Do I feel Enzo Mac should hang them up, he has dished plenty of knockouts but he has also been on the wrong end of an awful such as David Haye at the O2 bill and Alexander Frenkel on the Magnificent 7 bill.

As for McPhilbin, do I feel he deserves a crack at the Lonsdale belt. Yes perhaps he should but I think should have an eliminator to earn it rather than be given a rematch on a platter.

but if there was a screw up then he dont only deserve a stright shot at the title but to get the title back as enzo as failed this test. Am not going to say to much about it but shane as to train hard to make cruiser as half is fights where at heavy and as a amateur boxed at super-heavy. And he would of done the same test as enzo that night.

thepocketrocket wrote:

twenty six wrote:14 quality posts there Danny boy.

Would you say that to his face??

danconnollyeire wrote:

thepocketrocket wrote:

twenty six wrote:14 quality posts there Danny boy.

Would you say that to his face??

Like I've said ever in London pop in to Repton... of course you wouldn't. You're a petty namecalling internet troll

thepocketrocket wrote:ZZZZZZZ

danconnollyeire wrote:Ha good automated response from such an intellegent writer

Hiding behind your zzzzz like you do your keyboard cos you couldn't handle real face to face conversations with ppl like me and Shane

danconnollyeire wrote:

thepocketrocket wrote:ZZZZZZZ

Ha you really are a faggot... tell you what I'm in Manchester in 2 week, I'll PM you my number

thepocketrocket wrote:

danconnollyeire wrote:

thepocketrocket wrote:ZZZZZZZ

Ha you really are a faggot... tell you what I'm in Manchester in 2 week, I'll PM you my number

Oh please do...could have some proper fun with that!!

danconnollyeire wrote:

thepocketrocket wrote:

twenty six wrote:14 quality posts there Danny boy.

Would you say that to his face??

Like I've said ever in London pop in to Repton... of course you wouldn't. You're a petty namecalling internet troll

thepocketrocket wrote:Like I've said ever in London pop in to Repton... of course you wouldn't. You're a petty namecalling internet troll

danconnollyeire wrote:

thepocketrocket wrote:Like I've said ever in London pop in to Repton... of course you wouldn't. You're a petty namecalling internet troll

If anything your both as bad as each other. And getting miles off topic.

tear up wrote:I think Dickinson beat them all but will have a great fight with SIMMons and think there s too many key board pussy s on ere ha ha only jokin I'm
Not in this key board fight so leave us out ha