Page 7 of 7
Re: 1/26 Matthysse/Dallas and undercard RBR.
Posted: 27 Jan 2013, 01:07
by Blodhemn
Dats dat powah from dat Amino 5000.
Re: 1/26 Matthysse/Dallas and undercard RBR.
Posted: 27 Jan 2013, 01:10
by EduardosFist
SouthpawStephen wrote:Yes he has a chance Jim. He answered yes to your question. How do you not understand that???
I said the same fuking thing.
Re: 1/26 Matthysse/Dallas and undercard RBR.
Posted: 27 Jan 2013, 01:11
by Diamond WEAPON
SouthpawStephen wrote:Yes he has a chance Jim. He answered yes to your question. How do you not understand that???
Jim Grey just went full retard
Re: 1/26 Matthysse/Dallas and undercard RBR.
Posted: 27 Jan 2013, 01:13
by Blodhemn
Lol Zab was ringside and was like 'he know! Im numba one!' like it made him so happy that Matthysse said he has a shot against Garcia.
Re: 1/26 Matthysse/Dallas and undercard RBR.
Posted: 27 Jan 2013, 01:13
by Diamond WEAPON
SouthpawStephen wrote:Jim: Do you think Zab has a chance at beating Danny Garcia?
Translator: Yes
Jim: What does that mean? I don't understand.
Maybe Jim can use some Amino 4500 to jumpstart that grey matter
Re: 1/26 Matthysse/Dallas and undercard RBR.
Posted: 27 Jan 2013, 01:13
by Diamond WEAPON
Blodhemn wrote:Lol Zab was ringside and was like 'he know! Im numba one!' like it made him so happy that Matthysse said he has a shot against Garcia.
Re: 1/26 Matthysse/Dallas and undercard RBR.
Posted: 27 Jan 2013, 01:16
by gilgamesh
Happened a lot earlier than I expected, but yeah Matthysse runs over Dallas like I expected. Hopefully Showtime steps up their broadcasts from these mediocre cards.
Re: 1/26 Matthysse/Dallas and undercard RBR.
Posted: 27 Jan 2013, 01:17
by Baby Face Finster
Danny Garcia isn't going anywhere near Matthysse if he appreciates his health.
Re: 1/26 Matthysse/Dallas and undercard RBR.
Posted: 27 Jan 2013, 01:18
by gilgamesh
Diamond WEAPON wrote:SouthpawStephen wrote:Yes he has a chance Jim. He answered yes to your question. How do you not understand that???
Jim Grey just went full retard
Jim is an absolute idiot, he should've been fired before he ever got started.
Re: 1/26 Matthysse/Dallas and undercard RBR.
Posted: 27 Jan 2013, 01:24
by Rover
Diamond WEAPON wrote:SouthpawStephen wrote:Yes he has a chance Jim. He answered yes to your question. How do you not understand that???
Jim Grey just went full retard
Just?
Re: 1/26 Matthysse/Dallas and undercard RBR.
Posted: 27 Jan 2013, 01:25
by Rover
Diamond WEAPON wrote:SouthpawStephen wrote:Jim: Do you think Zab has a chance at beating Danny Garcia?
Translator: Yes
Jim: What does that mean? I don't understand.
Maybe Jim can use some Amino 4500 to jumpstart that grey matter
You're more of an optimist than I.
Re: 1/26 Matthysse/Dallas and undercard RBR.
Posted: 27 Jan 2013, 01:43
by Blodhemn
I know it's futile but I'll be cheering for Zab against Garcia.
Re: 1/26 Matthysse/Dallas and undercard RBR.
Posted: 27 Jan 2013, 01:51
by Rover
Blodhemn wrote:I know it's futile but I'll be cheering for Zab against Garcia.
I'll be cheering for Zab to get the ever-loving shit beaten out of him against Garcia.
Re: 1/26 Matthysse/Dallas and undercard RBR.
Posted: 27 Jan 2013, 01:53
by Blodhemn
I hope Zab dances all night long to victory and kisses Angel on the mouth after.
Re: 1/26 Matthysse/Dallas and undercard RBR.
Posted: 27 Jan 2013, 02:56
by Rover
One of the Showtime crew stated that Zab would say Matthysse is the hardest puncher he's fought or something like that. I think Zab would pick Tszyu there.
Re: 1/26 Matthysse/Dallas and undercard RBR.
Posted: 27 Jan 2013, 03:20
by BAD INTENTIONS
Rover wrote:One of the Showtime crew stated that Zab would say Matthysse is the hardest puncher he's fought or something like that. I think Zab would pick Tszyu there.
You must remember something in order to judge its quality.
Re: 1/26 Matthysse/Dallas and undercard RBR.
Posted: 27 Jan 2013, 23:21
by Rover
BAD INTENTIONS wrote:Rover wrote:One of the Showtime crew stated that Zab would say Matthysse is the hardest puncher he's fought or something like that. I think Zab would pick Tszyu there.
You must remember something in order to judge its quality.
Good point.