Yeah, that's why you're so on about it. You're the one that brought up that fight.Blodhemn wrote:More like it's a pretty pointless thing to mention.
3/1 FNF RBR.
-
SaadOffTheDeck
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 19602
- Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38
Re: 3/1 FNF RBR.
Re: 3/1 FNF RBR.
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Yeah, that's why you're so on about it. You're the one that brought up that fight.Blodhemn wrote:More like it's a pretty pointless thing to mention.
-
EduardosFist
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 238
- Joined: 17 Feb 2010, 02:13
Re: 3/1 FNF RBR.
The whole conversation doesn't make much sense tbh.SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Yeah, that's why you're so on about it. You're the one that brought up that fight.Blodhemn wrote:More like it's a pretty pointless thing to mention.
Re: 3/1 FNF RBR.
He'll unify atleast 2 belts @ Featherweight...I'll bet you money on thatRover wrote:New star? No.Goliath wrote:and new!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
a new star is born.....wow what a warrior
Red Rover Red Rover...
Re: 3/1 FNF RBR.
Saad just hates Martinez. It's cool.
-
SaadOffTheDeck
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 19602
- Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38
Re: 3/1 FNF RBR.
Martinez wasn't a known entity. He was on a Showtime or HBO under card, don't recall which one in a fight that totally sucked. I'm of the opinion that he got more positive publicity from getting screwed than he would have from a dull win. That may have helped him land the Williams fight.EduardosFist wrote:The whole conversation doesn't make much sense tbh.SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Yeah, that's why you're so on about it. You're the one that brought up that fight.Blodhemn wrote:More like it's a pretty pointless thing to mention.
Why it's turning into a big deal, you'd have to ask Blod.
-
SaadOffTheDeck
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 19602
- Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38
Re: 3/1 FNF RBR.
And the responses get even weaker.Blodhemn wrote:Saad just hates Martinez. It's cool.
Re: 3/1 FNF RBR.
Ah, and whom will he beat? Garcia? PDL/Mares? John?Goliath wrote:He'll unify atleast 2 belts @ Featherweight...I'll bet you money on thatRover wrote:New star? No.Goliath wrote:and new!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
a new star is born.....wow what a warrior
Red Rover Red Rover...
Your last comment was your typical stupidity.
Re: 3/1 FNF RBR.
A big deal? It's no deal. My first point was regarding punching power. Then you went on an anti Martinez crusade.
Re: 3/1 FNF RBR.
HBO.SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Martinez wasn't a known entity. He was on a Showtime or HBO under card, don't recall which one in a fight that totally sucked. I'm of the opinion that he got more positive publicity from getting screwed than he would have from a dull win. That may have helped him land the Williams fight.EduardosFist wrote:The whole conversation doesn't make much sense tbh.SaadOffTheDeck wrote: Yeah, that's why you're so on about it. You're the one that brought up that fight.
Why it's turning into a big deal, you'd have to ask Blod.
-
EduardosFist
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 238
- Joined: 17 Feb 2010, 02:13
Re: 3/1 FNF RBR.
LOL. Not really. It's both of you discussing it, with you taking it further to begin with.SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Martinez wasn't a known entity. He was on a Showtime or HBO under card, don't recall which one in a fight that totally sucked. I'm of the opinion that he got more positive publicity from getting screwed than he would have from a dull win. That may have helped him land the Williams fight.EduardosFist wrote:The whole conversation doesn't make much sense tbh.SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
Yeah, that's why you're so on about it. You're the one that brought up that fight.
Why it's turning into a big deal, you'd have to ask Blod.
Anyway, back on topic. Anyone else hoping just a little bit Gradovich got robbed so we could have another Teddy Atlas explosion?
-
SaadOffTheDeck
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 19602
- Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38
Re: 3/1 FNF RBR.
No I didn't.Blodhemn wrote:A big deal? It's no deal. My first point was regarding punching power. Then you went on an anti Martinez crusade.
-
SaadOffTheDeck
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 19602
- Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38
Re: 3/1 FNF RBR.
Taking what further? A good way to stay on topic is not question something off topic.EduardosFist wrote:LOL. Not really. It's both of you discussing it, with you taking it further to begin with.SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Martinez wasn't a known entity. He was on a Showtime or HBO under card, don't recall which one in a fight that totally sucked. I'm of the opinion that he got more positive publicity from getting screwed than he would have from a dull win. That may have helped him land the Williams fight.EduardosFist wrote:
The whole conversation doesn't make much sense tbh.
Why it's turning into a big deal, you'd have to ask Blod.
Anyway, back on topic. Anyone else hoping just a little bit Gradovich got robbed so we could have another Teddy Atlas explosion?
Re: 3/1 FNF RBR.
Ok Rover.SaadOffTheDeck wrote:No I didn't.Blodhemn wrote:A big deal? It's no deal. My first point was regarding punching power. Then you went on an anti Martinez crusade.
-
SaadOffTheDeck
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 19602
- Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38
Re: 3/1 FNF RBR.
You're the one in Rover mode. What did I say that was 'hating'? That he looked like shit in the fight? That Martinez/Cintron was dull?Blodhemn wrote:Ok Rover.SaadOffTheDeck wrote:No I didn't.Blodhemn wrote:A big deal? It's no deal. My first point was regarding punching power. Then you went on an anti Martinez crusade.
-
SaadOffTheDeck
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 19602
- Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38
Re: 3/1 FNF RBR.
He doesn't mind. Yesterday when I questioned by he made 59 posts in a row in the same thread, he smiled and blasted out 30 more. Though in Rover's defense, he doesn't usually twist everything around because he got confused.DetroitHxC wrote:You guys, he can hear you!
Re: 3/1 FNF RBR.
You called?Blodhemn wrote:Ok Rover.SaadOffTheDeck wrote:No I didn't.Blodhemn wrote:A big deal? It's no deal. My first point was regarding punching power. Then you went on an anti Martinez crusade.
Re: 3/1 FNF RBR.
Blodhemn wrote:Ok Rover.
Hahahaha...classic
Re: 3/1 FNF RBR.
DetroitHxC wrote:You guys, he can hear you!
-
EduardosFist
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 238
- Joined: 17 Feb 2010, 02:13
Re: 3/1 FNF RBR.
lol You are so confused. The topic of robbery came up before the scorecards were read tonight. Blodhemn says even knocking people out doesn't guarantee victory, mentioning Martinez/Cintron. Then you went off on a tangent about how Martinez looked like shit, and that the controversy around the fight "helped" him. How was that even relevant?SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Taking what further? A good way to stay on topic is not question something off topic.EduardosFist wrote:LOL. Not really. It's both of you discussing it, with you taking it further to begin with.SaadOffTheDeck wrote: Martinez wasn't a known entity. He was on a Showtime or HBO under card, don't recall which one in a fight that totally sucked. I'm of the opinion that he got more positive publicity from getting screwed than he would have from a dull win. That may have helped him land the Williams fight.
Why it's turning into a big deal, you'd have to ask Blod.
Anyway, back on topic. Anyone else hoping just a little bit Gradovich got robbed so we could have another Teddy Atlas explosion?
Re: 3/1 FNF RBR.
Nah, don't mind at all, though I blasted out waaaay more than 30 more after you came into that thread.SaadOffTheDeck wrote:He doesn't mind. Yesterday when I questioned by he made 59 posts in a row in the same thread, he smiled and blasted out 30 more. Though in Rover's defense, he doesn't usually twist everything around because he got confused.DetroitHxC wrote:You guys, he can hear you!
Rover had himself a lot of catching up to do!
Re: 3/1 FNF RBR.
I try.SouthpawStephen wrote:Rover wrote:You called?Blodhemn wrote: Ok Rover.You are a good sport Rover.
:)
Re: 3/1 FNF RBR.
Ya...lol...he called you a clown...which last time I checked is what u rRover wrote:
Last edited by Goliath on 02 Mar 2013, 01:33, edited 1 time in total.
-
SaadOffTheDeck
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 19602
- Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38
Re: 3/1 FNF RBR.
He mentioned Martinez/Cintron, I mentioned something else about the fight.EduardosFist wrote:lol You are so confused. The topic of robbery came up before the scorecards were read tonight. Blodhemn says even knocking people out doesn't guarantee victory, mentioning Martinez/Cintron. Then you went off on a tangent about how Martinez looked like shit, and that the controversy around the fight "helped" him. How was that even relevant?SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Taking what further? A good way to stay on topic is not question something off topic.EduardosFist wrote:
LOL. Not really. It's both of you discussing it, with you taking it further to begin with.
Anyway, back on topic. Anyone else hoping just a little bit Gradovich got robbed so we could have another Teddy Atlas explosion?
Then you were confused so I spelled out what I meant.
Then you said, lets stay on topic. Which is evidently now the same topic you wanted to stop discussing.
I hate to break it to you, internet threads veer from time to time. Since this fight is already over, what's the big deal? Do you have more to say? By all means. The floor is yours! Lets talk about Billy Dib's jab!
-
EduardosFist
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 238
- Joined: 17 Feb 2010, 02:13
Re: 3/1 FNF RBR.
LOL. Wow. I was simply pointing out that you took it further to begin with. And I was right.