3/1 FNF RBR.

For RBR threads only
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: 3/1 FNF RBR.

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

Blodhemn wrote:More like it's a pretty pointless thing to mention.
Yeah, that's why you're so on about it. You're the one that brought up that fight.
Rover
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 7323
Joined: 20 Aug 2011, 00:28

Re: 3/1 FNF RBR.

Post by Rover »

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
Blodhemn wrote:More like it's a pretty pointless thing to mention.
Yeah, that's why you're so on about it. You're the one that brought up that fight.
:lol:
EduardosFist
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 238
Joined: 17 Feb 2010, 02:13

Re: 3/1 FNF RBR.

Post by EduardosFist »

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
Blodhemn wrote:More like it's a pretty pointless thing to mention.
Yeah, that's why you're so on about it. You're the one that brought up that fight.
The whole conversation doesn't make much sense tbh.
Goliath
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 187
Joined: 01 Aug 2007, 16:59

Re: 3/1 FNF RBR.

Post by Goliath »

Rover wrote:
Goliath wrote:and new!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


a new star is born.....wow what a warrior
New star? No.
He'll unify atleast 2 belts @ Featherweight...I'll bet you money on that

Red Rover Red Rover...
Blodhemn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2848
Joined: 04 Jun 2006, 20:30

Re: 3/1 FNF RBR.

Post by Blodhemn »

Saad just hates Martinez. It's cool.
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: 3/1 FNF RBR.

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

EduardosFist wrote:
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
Blodhemn wrote:More like it's a pretty pointless thing to mention.
Yeah, that's why you're so on about it. You're the one that brought up that fight.
The whole conversation doesn't make much sense tbh.
Martinez wasn't a known entity. He was on a Showtime or HBO under card, don't recall which one in a fight that totally sucked. I'm of the opinion that he got more positive publicity from getting screwed than he would have from a dull win. That may have helped him land the Williams fight.

Why it's turning into a big deal, you'd have to ask Blod.
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: 3/1 FNF RBR.

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

Blodhemn wrote:Saad just hates Martinez. It's cool.
And the responses get even weaker.
Rover
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 7323
Joined: 20 Aug 2011, 00:28

Re: 3/1 FNF RBR.

Post by Rover »

Goliath wrote:
Rover wrote:
Goliath wrote:and new!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


a new star is born.....wow what a warrior
New star? No.
He'll unify atleast 2 belts @ Featherweight...I'll bet you money on that

Red Rover Red Rover...
Ah, and whom will he beat? Garcia? PDL/Mares? John?
Your last comment was your typical stupidity.
Blodhemn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2848
Joined: 04 Jun 2006, 20:30

Re: 3/1 FNF RBR.

Post by Blodhemn »

A big deal? It's no deal. My first point was regarding punching power. Then you went on an anti Martinez crusade.
Rover
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 7323
Joined: 20 Aug 2011, 00:28

Re: 3/1 FNF RBR.

Post by Rover »

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
EduardosFist wrote:
SaadOffTheDeck wrote: Yeah, that's why you're so on about it. You're the one that brought up that fight.
The whole conversation doesn't make much sense tbh.
Martinez wasn't a known entity. He was on a Showtime or HBO under card, don't recall which one in a fight that totally sucked. I'm of the opinion that he got more positive publicity from getting screwed than he would have from a dull win. That may have helped him land the Williams fight.

Why it's turning into a big deal, you'd have to ask Blod.
HBO.
EduardosFist
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 238
Joined: 17 Feb 2010, 02:13

Re: 3/1 FNF RBR.

Post by EduardosFist »

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
EduardosFist wrote:
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
Yeah, that's why you're so on about it. You're the one that brought up that fight.
The whole conversation doesn't make much sense tbh.
Martinez wasn't a known entity. He was on a Showtime or HBO under card, don't recall which one in a fight that totally sucked. I'm of the opinion that he got more positive publicity from getting screwed than he would have from a dull win. That may have helped him land the Williams fight.

Why it's turning into a big deal, you'd have to ask Blod.
LOL. Not really. It's both of you discussing it, with you taking it further to begin with.

Anyway, back on topic. Anyone else hoping just a little bit Gradovich got robbed so we could have another Teddy Atlas explosion?
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: 3/1 FNF RBR.

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

Blodhemn wrote:A big deal? It's no deal. My first point was regarding punching power. Then you went on an anti Martinez crusade.
No I didn't.
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: 3/1 FNF RBR.

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

EduardosFist wrote:
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
EduardosFist wrote:
The whole conversation doesn't make much sense tbh.
Martinez wasn't a known entity. He was on a Showtime or HBO under card, don't recall which one in a fight that totally sucked. I'm of the opinion that he got more positive publicity from getting screwed than he would have from a dull win. That may have helped him land the Williams fight.

Why it's turning into a big deal, you'd have to ask Blod.
LOL. Not really. It's both of you discussing it, with you taking it further to begin with.

Anyway, back on topic. Anyone else hoping just a little bit Gradovich got robbed so we could have another Teddy Atlas explosion?
Taking what further? A good way to stay on topic is not question something off topic.
Blodhemn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2848
Joined: 04 Jun 2006, 20:30

Re: 3/1 FNF RBR.

Post by Blodhemn »

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
Blodhemn wrote:A big deal? It's no deal. My first point was regarding punching power. Then you went on an anti Martinez crusade.
No I didn't.
Ok Rover. :salut:
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: 3/1 FNF RBR.

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

Blodhemn wrote:
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
Blodhemn wrote:A big deal? It's no deal. My first point was regarding punching power. Then you went on an anti Martinez crusade.
No I didn't.
Ok Rover. :salut:
You're the one in Rover mode. What did I say that was 'hating'? That he looked like shit in the fight? That Martinez/Cintron was dull?
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: 3/1 FNF RBR.

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

DetroitHxC wrote:You guys, he can hear you!
He doesn't mind. Yesterday when I questioned by he made 59 posts in a row in the same thread, he smiled and blasted out 30 more. Though in Rover's defense, he doesn't usually twist everything around because he got confused.
Rover
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 7323
Joined: 20 Aug 2011, 00:28

Re: 3/1 FNF RBR.

Post by Rover »

Blodhemn wrote:
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
Blodhemn wrote:A big deal? It's no deal. My first point was regarding punching power. Then you went on an anti Martinez crusade.
No I didn't.
Ok Rover. :salut:
You called?
Goliath
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 187
Joined: 01 Aug 2007, 16:59

Re: 3/1 FNF RBR.

Post by Goliath »

Blodhemn wrote:Ok Rover. :salut:

Hahahaha...classic
Rover
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 7323
Joined: 20 Aug 2011, 00:28

Re: 3/1 FNF RBR.

Post by Rover »

DetroitHxC wrote:You guys, he can hear you!
:OhYes:
EduardosFist
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 238
Joined: 17 Feb 2010, 02:13

Re: 3/1 FNF RBR.

Post by EduardosFist »

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
EduardosFist wrote:
SaadOffTheDeck wrote: Martinez wasn't a known entity. He was on a Showtime or HBO under card, don't recall which one in a fight that totally sucked. I'm of the opinion that he got more positive publicity from getting screwed than he would have from a dull win. That may have helped him land the Williams fight.

Why it's turning into a big deal, you'd have to ask Blod.
LOL. Not really. It's both of you discussing it, with you taking it further to begin with.

Anyway, back on topic. Anyone else hoping just a little bit Gradovich got robbed so we could have another Teddy Atlas explosion?
Taking what further? A good way to stay on topic is not question something off topic.
lol You are so confused. The topic of robbery came up before the scorecards were read tonight. Blodhemn says even knocking people out doesn't guarantee victory, mentioning Martinez/Cintron. Then you went off on a tangent about how Martinez looked like shit, and that the controversy around the fight "helped" him. How was that even relevant?
Rover
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 7323
Joined: 20 Aug 2011, 00:28

Re: 3/1 FNF RBR.

Post by Rover »

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
DetroitHxC wrote:You guys, he can hear you!
He doesn't mind. Yesterday when I questioned by he made 59 posts in a row in the same thread, he smiled and blasted out 30 more. Though in Rover's defense, he doesn't usually twist everything around because he got confused.
Nah, don't mind at all, though I blasted out waaaay more than 30 more after you came into that thread.
Rover had himself a lot of catching up to do!
Rover
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 7323
Joined: 20 Aug 2011, 00:28

Re: 3/1 FNF RBR.

Post by Rover »

SouthpawStephen wrote:
Rover wrote:
Blodhemn wrote: Ok Rover. :salut:
You called?
:lol: You are a good sport Rover. :bow:
I try.
:)
Goliath
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 187
Joined: 01 Aug 2007, 16:59

Re: 3/1 FNF RBR.

Post by Goliath »

Rover wrote:
Ya...lol...he called you a clown...which last time I checked is what u r
Last edited by Goliath on 02 Mar 2013, 01:33, edited 1 time in total.
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: 3/1 FNF RBR.

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

EduardosFist wrote:
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
EduardosFist wrote:
LOL. Not really. It's both of you discussing it, with you taking it further to begin with.

Anyway, back on topic. Anyone else hoping just a little bit Gradovich got robbed so we could have another Teddy Atlas explosion?
Taking what further? A good way to stay on topic is not question something off topic.
lol You are so confused. The topic of robbery came up before the scorecards were read tonight. Blodhemn says even knocking people out doesn't guarantee victory, mentioning Martinez/Cintron. Then you went off on a tangent about how Martinez looked like shit, and that the controversy around the fight "helped" him. How was that even relevant?
He mentioned Martinez/Cintron, I mentioned something else about the fight.

Then you were confused so I spelled out what I meant.

Then you said, lets stay on topic. Which is evidently now the same topic you wanted to stop discussing.

I hate to break it to you, internet threads veer from time to time. Since this fight is already over, what's the big deal? Do you have more to say? By all means. The floor is yours! Lets talk about Billy Dib's jab!
EduardosFist
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 238
Joined: 17 Feb 2010, 02:13

Re: 3/1 FNF RBR.

Post by EduardosFist »

LOL. Wow. I was simply pointing out that you took it further to begin with. And I was right.
Post Reply