Page 7 of 10

Re: 3/1 FNF RBR.

Posted: 02 Mar 2013, 01:00
by SaadOffTheDeck
Blodhemn wrote:More like it's a pretty pointless thing to mention.
Yeah, that's why you're so on about it. You're the one that brought up that fight.

Re: 3/1 FNF RBR.

Posted: 02 Mar 2013, 01:01
by Rover
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
Blodhemn wrote:More like it's a pretty pointless thing to mention.
Yeah, that's why you're so on about it. You're the one that brought up that fight.
:lol:

Re: 3/1 FNF RBR.

Posted: 02 Mar 2013, 01:02
by EduardosFist
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
Blodhemn wrote:More like it's a pretty pointless thing to mention.
Yeah, that's why you're so on about it. You're the one that brought up that fight.
The whole conversation doesn't make much sense tbh.

Re: 3/1 FNF RBR.

Posted: 02 Mar 2013, 01:03
by Goliath
Rover wrote:
Goliath wrote:and new!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


a new star is born.....wow what a warrior
New star? No.
He'll unify atleast 2 belts @ Featherweight...I'll bet you money on that

Red Rover Red Rover...

Re: 3/1 FNF RBR.

Posted: 02 Mar 2013, 01:03
by Blodhemn
Saad just hates Martinez. It's cool.

Re: 3/1 FNF RBR.

Posted: 02 Mar 2013, 01:05
by SaadOffTheDeck
EduardosFist wrote:
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
Blodhemn wrote:More like it's a pretty pointless thing to mention.
Yeah, that's why you're so on about it. You're the one that brought up that fight.
The whole conversation doesn't make much sense tbh.
Martinez wasn't a known entity. He was on a Showtime or HBO under card, don't recall which one in a fight that totally sucked. I'm of the opinion that he got more positive publicity from getting screwed than he would have from a dull win. That may have helped him land the Williams fight.

Why it's turning into a big deal, you'd have to ask Blod.

Re: 3/1 FNF RBR.

Posted: 02 Mar 2013, 01:06
by SaadOffTheDeck
Blodhemn wrote:Saad just hates Martinez. It's cool.
And the responses get even weaker.

Re: 3/1 FNF RBR.

Posted: 02 Mar 2013, 01:07
by Rover
Goliath wrote:
Rover wrote:
Goliath wrote:and new!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


a new star is born.....wow what a warrior
New star? No.
He'll unify atleast 2 belts @ Featherweight...I'll bet you money on that

Red Rover Red Rover...
Ah, and whom will he beat? Garcia? PDL/Mares? John?
Your last comment was your typical stupidity.

Re: 3/1 FNF RBR.

Posted: 02 Mar 2013, 01:07
by Blodhemn
A big deal? It's no deal. My first point was regarding punching power. Then you went on an anti Martinez crusade.

Re: 3/1 FNF RBR.

Posted: 02 Mar 2013, 01:09
by Rover
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
EduardosFist wrote:
SaadOffTheDeck wrote: Yeah, that's why you're so on about it. You're the one that brought up that fight.
The whole conversation doesn't make much sense tbh.
Martinez wasn't a known entity. He was on a Showtime or HBO under card, don't recall which one in a fight that totally sucked. I'm of the opinion that he got more positive publicity from getting screwed than he would have from a dull win. That may have helped him land the Williams fight.

Why it's turning into a big deal, you'd have to ask Blod.
HBO.

Re: 3/1 FNF RBR.

Posted: 02 Mar 2013, 01:11
by EduardosFist
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
EduardosFist wrote:
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
Yeah, that's why you're so on about it. You're the one that brought up that fight.
The whole conversation doesn't make much sense tbh.
Martinez wasn't a known entity. He was on a Showtime or HBO under card, don't recall which one in a fight that totally sucked. I'm of the opinion that he got more positive publicity from getting screwed than he would have from a dull win. That may have helped him land the Williams fight.

Why it's turning into a big deal, you'd have to ask Blod.
LOL. Not really. It's both of you discussing it, with you taking it further to begin with.

Anyway, back on topic. Anyone else hoping just a little bit Gradovich got robbed so we could have another Teddy Atlas explosion?

Re: 3/1 FNF RBR.

Posted: 02 Mar 2013, 01:11
by SaadOffTheDeck
Blodhemn wrote:A big deal? It's no deal. My first point was regarding punching power. Then you went on an anti Martinez crusade.
No I didn't.

Re: 3/1 FNF RBR.

Posted: 02 Mar 2013, 01:14
by SaadOffTheDeck
EduardosFist wrote:
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
EduardosFist wrote:
The whole conversation doesn't make much sense tbh.
Martinez wasn't a known entity. He was on a Showtime or HBO under card, don't recall which one in a fight that totally sucked. I'm of the opinion that he got more positive publicity from getting screwed than he would have from a dull win. That may have helped him land the Williams fight.

Why it's turning into a big deal, you'd have to ask Blod.
LOL. Not really. It's both of you discussing it, with you taking it further to begin with.

Anyway, back on topic. Anyone else hoping just a little bit Gradovich got robbed so we could have another Teddy Atlas explosion?
Taking what further? A good way to stay on topic is not question something off topic.

Re: 3/1 FNF RBR.

Posted: 02 Mar 2013, 01:16
by Blodhemn
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
Blodhemn wrote:A big deal? It's no deal. My first point was regarding punching power. Then you went on an anti Martinez crusade.
No I didn't.
Ok Rover. :salut:

Re: 3/1 FNF RBR.

Posted: 02 Mar 2013, 01:17
by SaadOffTheDeck
Blodhemn wrote:
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
Blodhemn wrote:A big deal? It's no deal. My first point was regarding punching power. Then you went on an anti Martinez crusade.
No I didn't.
Ok Rover. :salut:
You're the one in Rover mode. What did I say that was 'hating'? That he looked like shit in the fight? That Martinez/Cintron was dull?

Re: 3/1 FNF RBR.

Posted: 02 Mar 2013, 01:19
by SaadOffTheDeck
DetroitHxC wrote:You guys, he can hear you!
He doesn't mind. Yesterday when I questioned by he made 59 posts in a row in the same thread, he smiled and blasted out 30 more. Though in Rover's defense, he doesn't usually twist everything around because he got confused.

Re: 3/1 FNF RBR.

Posted: 02 Mar 2013, 01:23
by Rover
Blodhemn wrote:
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
Blodhemn wrote:A big deal? It's no deal. My first point was regarding punching power. Then you went on an anti Martinez crusade.
No I didn't.
Ok Rover. :salut:
You called?

Re: 3/1 FNF RBR.

Posted: 02 Mar 2013, 01:23
by Goliath
Blodhemn wrote:Ok Rover. :salut:

Hahahaha...classic

Re: 3/1 FNF RBR.

Posted: 02 Mar 2013, 01:24
by Rover
DetroitHxC wrote:You guys, he can hear you!
:OhYes:

Re: 3/1 FNF RBR.

Posted: 02 Mar 2013, 01:25
by EduardosFist
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
EduardosFist wrote:
SaadOffTheDeck wrote: Martinez wasn't a known entity. He was on a Showtime or HBO under card, don't recall which one in a fight that totally sucked. I'm of the opinion that he got more positive publicity from getting screwed than he would have from a dull win. That may have helped him land the Williams fight.

Why it's turning into a big deal, you'd have to ask Blod.
LOL. Not really. It's both of you discussing it, with you taking it further to begin with.

Anyway, back on topic. Anyone else hoping just a little bit Gradovich got robbed so we could have another Teddy Atlas explosion?
Taking what further? A good way to stay on topic is not question something off topic.
lol You are so confused. The topic of robbery came up before the scorecards were read tonight. Blodhemn says even knocking people out doesn't guarantee victory, mentioning Martinez/Cintron. Then you went off on a tangent about how Martinez looked like shit, and that the controversy around the fight "helped" him. How was that even relevant?

Re: 3/1 FNF RBR.

Posted: 02 Mar 2013, 01:26
by Rover
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
DetroitHxC wrote:You guys, he can hear you!
He doesn't mind. Yesterday when I questioned by he made 59 posts in a row in the same thread, he smiled and blasted out 30 more. Though in Rover's defense, he doesn't usually twist everything around because he got confused.
Nah, don't mind at all, though I blasted out waaaay more than 30 more after you came into that thread.
Rover had himself a lot of catching up to do!

Re: 3/1 FNF RBR.

Posted: 02 Mar 2013, 01:27
by Rover
SouthpawStephen wrote:
Rover wrote:
Blodhemn wrote: Ok Rover. :salut:
You called?
:lol: You are a good sport Rover. :bow:
I try.
:)

Re: 3/1 FNF RBR.

Posted: 02 Mar 2013, 01:27
by Goliath
Rover wrote:
Ya...lol...he called you a clown...which last time I checked is what u r

Re: 3/1 FNF RBR.

Posted: 02 Mar 2013, 01:28
by SaadOffTheDeck
EduardosFist wrote:
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
EduardosFist wrote:
LOL. Not really. It's both of you discussing it, with you taking it further to begin with.

Anyway, back on topic. Anyone else hoping just a little bit Gradovich got robbed so we could have another Teddy Atlas explosion?
Taking what further? A good way to stay on topic is not question something off topic.
lol You are so confused. The topic of robbery came up before the scorecards were read tonight. Blodhemn says even knocking people out doesn't guarantee victory, mentioning Martinez/Cintron. Then you went off on a tangent about how Martinez looked like shit, and that the controversy around the fight "helped" him. How was that even relevant?
He mentioned Martinez/Cintron, I mentioned something else about the fight.

Then you were confused so I spelled out what I meant.

Then you said, lets stay on topic. Which is evidently now the same topic you wanted to stop discussing.

I hate to break it to you, internet threads veer from time to time. Since this fight is already over, what's the big deal? Do you have more to say? By all means. The floor is yours! Lets talk about Billy Dib's jab!

Re: 3/1 FNF RBR.

Posted: 02 Mar 2013, 01:29
by EduardosFist
LOL. Wow. I was simply pointing out that you took it further to begin with. And I was right.