BoxRec

DMA1987 wrote:

columbo wrote:

kaiserbill wrote:You have advanced neurosyphilis?

It's all falling into place now.

Yeah im doomed. My knob is in the final stages of decomposition and also as you state, my brain is also heavily affected

Is that because your knob is on your head?

DMA1987 wrote:

columbo wrote:

kaiserbill wrote:You have advanced neurosyphilis?

It's all falling into place now.

Yeah im doomed. My knob is in the final stages of decomposition and also as you state, my brain is also heavily affected

Is that because your knob is on your head?

kaiserbill wrote:I must say though, that it should be a very entertaining fight, whilst it lasts.

The build up should be interesting, in a slow-motion train wreck sort of way.

DMA1987 wrote:

columbo wrote:

kaiserbill wrote:You have advanced neurosyphilis?

It's all falling into place now.

Yeah im doomed. My knob is in the final stages of decomposition and also as you state, my brain is also heavily affected

Is that because your knob is on your head?

palooka wrote:No, it seemed quick; I've just had a glance through this thread and can't understand all the arguments, missed out big time not being on here 24/7. Nothing personal lefty, just thought it was a good, quick put down/pun.

kaiserbill wrote:

Finn wrote:

columbo wrote:
Your debate with Finn is just that. However I don't think you need to be quite so condescending and arrogant about it. It gets too personal on here at times.

Yeah i think plenty of us are guilty of that at times on here. However its water of a ducks back i went to uni and im 32.

Dr Bill im fairly sure your argument was that "who are you" was not a sports chant in the UK and that hayes fans were just being disrespectful to wlad at the weigh in - you argued it to the death despite being told by numerous poster it was. Which sport it was is irrelevant - didnt it turn out you arent even british or something? Thats where the whole i play rugby argument came in because you came to england once on a rugby tour? so knew britain. I cant really remember its was years ago.

Finn, my thrust was that it was a distasteful chant, used by certain elements.
It has never been used by any rugby crowd for just those reasons.
Rather be complimentary to the opposition, as it does reflect on your team/champion that the opposition have the guts to be there to compete. Their best efforts reflect upon your own teams/champions efforts, particularly if you end up victorious.

I'm quite aware it is used in certain sports. Doesn't mean I like it, nor that it has always been used in the past.
Travelling widely, I can honestly say that, apart from football fans in other nations, it is almost unheard of by foreign fans of other sports, particularly at something as innocuous as a weigh in.
It's why it is looked down upon with bewilderment when it happens overseas by the travelling fans at things such as the weigh in.

I may or may not be originally British.... it hardly matters now in any event at this point in my life.
I've lived for various parts of my life in London, Ely, Cornwall, Preston, and Bristol.

It was years ago, so perhaps we should just agree to disagree.

kaiserbill wrote:

Finn wrote:

columbo wrote:
Your debate with Finn is just that. However I don't think you need to be quite so condescending and arrogant about it. It gets too personal on here at times.

Yeah i think plenty of us are guilty of that at times on here. However its water of a ducks back i went to uni and im 32.

Dr Bill im fairly sure your argument was that "who are you" was not a sports chant in the UK and that hayes fans were just being disrespectful to wlad at the weigh in - you argued it to the death despite being told by numerous poster it was. Which sport it was is irrelevant - didnt it turn out you arent even british or something? Thats where the whole i play rugby argument came in because you came to england once on a rugby tour? so knew britain. I cant really remember its was years ago.

Finn, my thrust was that it was a distasteful chant, used by certain elements.
It has never been used by any rugby crowd for just those reasons.
Rather be complimentary to the opposition, as it does reflect on your team/champion that the opposition have the guts to be there to compete. Their best efforts reflect upon your own teams/champions efforts, particularly if you end up victorious.

I'm quite aware it is used in certain sports. Doesn't mean I like it, nor that it has always been used in the past.
Travelling widely, I can honestly say that, apart from football fans in other nations, it is almost unheard of by foreign fans of other sports, particularly at something as innocuous as a weigh in.
It's why it is looked down upon with bewilderment when it happens overseas by the travelling fans at things such as the weigh in.

I may or may not be originally British.... it hardly matters now in any event at this point in my life.
I've lived for various parts of my life in London, Ely, Cornwall, Preston, and Bristol.

It was years ago, so perhaps we should just agree to disagree.

DMA1987 wrote:

kaiserbill wrote:

DMA1987 wrote:Stop being so personal Bill you condescending tosser.

I fear the irony in your own post is obviously completely unintentional, and thus lost on you.

It's like a bad Ben Stiller comedy.

What's irony? Is that a medical thing?

columbo wrote:
Need the number of the samaritans?

Crazyboy wrote:

DMA1987 wrote:

kaiserbill wrote:
I fear the irony in your own post is obviously completely unintentional, and thus lost on you.

It's like a bad Ben Stiller comedy.

What's irony? Is that a medical thing?

nah its that thing the missus uses sometimes....i think its called that anyway

palooka wrote:I talked to Tysons' father in law this morning and he was under the impression that the Haye bout had been agreed, signed for in September.

damianhucker1 wrote:Press conference 11th July .

palooka wrote:

damianhucker1 wrote:Press conference 11th July .

That might be lively.

damianhucker1 wrote:

palooka wrote:

damianhucker1 wrote:Press conference 11th July .

That might be lively.

Dont think theyll need to be seperated by a metal fence but the banter should certainly be interesting .

kaiserbill wrote:

Teddy's Toupee wrote:Did the Holocaust happen, kaiserbill?

What a bizarre post.

Of course it did.

MarkMcBurney wrote:If Wladimir Klitschko couldn't knock David Haye down/out I'd suggest Tyson Fury might struggle.

rhino222 wrote:my opinion is to always be aware of a fighter that likes to fight. adam booth is a shrewd customer and he knows fury likes to fight and he knows fury is dangerous. haye will have to knock fury down more than once to win, maybe 3 or 4 times.

but......does fury have the power to trouble haye ???....(well...monte barratt did and fury is better than him!!)... I think fury can beat haye, but he has to land, that's where the issue is, haye is fast and very very powerful. fury is ok speed wise but not lightening quick. who will land first?.....and often enough.