Stuart Hall v Martin Ward

tear up
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1832
Joined: 06 Dec 2010, 12:25

Re: Stuart Hall v Martin Ward

Post by tear up »

Off the subject lads lookin forward to watchin stuy bash butler up in the late rounds
Hagler2002
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3512
Joined: 28 Dec 2005, 07:04

Re: Stuart Hall v Martin Ward

Post by Hagler2002 »

tear up wrote:Off the subject lads lookin forward to watchin stuy bash butler up in the late rounds
Are you going m8? I'll be at this one so if you are I'll let you buy me a pint. Don't be bringing that big dimwit Bilton with you mind ;-)
davie
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6763
Joined: 21 Aug 2010, 00:45

Re: Stuart Hall v Martin Ward

Post by davie »

nick885 wrote:
davie wrote:
"Ah another one that has never been in a ring"........

Got that far and stopped reading!
A pish opinion that undermines every other word written after it
If you stopped reading you wouldn't have been commenting, Haskins/Mcdonall fan then.
no i stopped reading after that one comment and posted the reply

i'm not a particular fan of any of the british bantamweights. neither do i have any issue with them.
i wish them all the best. but there are injustices in the sport and this whole saga is a bit embarrasing
tear up
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1832
Joined: 06 Dec 2010, 12:25

Re: Stuart Hall v Martin Ward

Post by tear up »

Hagler2002 wrote:
tear up wrote:Off the subject lads lookin forward to watchin stuy bash butler up in the late rounds
Are you going m8? I'll be at this one so if you are I'll let you buy me a pint. Don't be bringing that big dimwit Bilton with you mind ;-)
Yes going mate the goods is s good lad mate just a bit of banta he prob s won't be going mate he in training for a charity fight with s kid called mush the tool who is a good lad but mad mate the place is a going to be a sell out it's for miles for men cancer all In a good cause but look forward to having a beer with ya pal who ya takin to win
nick885
Middleweight
Posts: 298
Joined: 05 Apr 2014, 18:05

Re: Stuart Hall v Martin Ward

Post by nick885 »

tear up wrote:Off the subject lads lookin forward to watchin stuy bash butler up in the late rounds
4 / 5 round ko, butler hasn't a chance
tear up
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1832
Joined: 06 Dec 2010, 12:25

Re: Stuart Hall v Martin Ward

Post by tear up »

Think it will go late rounds been watchin butler and he does get caught with some nasty shots off super or fly weights hall s like a feather weight know butler got done nice shots but hall does him for me
nick885
Middleweight
Posts: 298
Joined: 05 Apr 2014, 18:05

Re: Stuart Hall v Martin Ward

Post by nick885 »

tear up wrote:Think it will go late rounds been watchin butler and he does get caught with some nasty shots off super or fly weights hall s like a feather weight know butler got done nice shots but hall does him for me
Depends, if hall lands heavy at the start butler isn't as solid as malinga and I don't believe he will be able take the punishment. Either way hall will be criticised if he knocks butler out early and criticised if he doesn't, if he fights McDonnell or Haskins later he will be criticised.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Stuart Hall v Martin Ward

Post by Horse »

nick885 wrote:Either way hall will be criticised if he knocks butler out early and criticised if he doesn't, if he fights McDonnell or Haskins later he will be criticised.
No, he won't.

Stop making a fool of yourself.
nick885
Middleweight
Posts: 298
Joined: 05 Apr 2014, 18:05

Re: Stuart Hall v Martin Ward

Post by nick885 »

Horse wrote:
nick885 wrote:Either way hall will be criticised if he knocks butler out early and criticised if he doesn't, if he fights McDonnell or Haskins later he will be criticised.
No, he won't.

Stop making a fool of yourself.
He has been constantly criticised on hear and other sites, I know I'm family
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Stuart Hall v Martin Ward

Post by palooka »

I think that the majority of posters were pleased for Stuey when he won the title and thought he had been lucky to get the shot. He won a good fight fair and square. The Ward defence got a little stick because there are other boxers in the division more highly rated than Ward - who is a good boxer. The bout ended to a cut and it was inconclusive really who was the better man. I've not seen anything but admiration on here for how well Hall has done - lots of people mention how genuine and decent he is and it's been nice to see someone 'real' who's lived a bit of life then go on to succeed.

Maybe because you are very close to Stuey you magnify anything critical of him?
nick885
Middleweight
Posts: 298
Joined: 05 Apr 2014, 18:05

Re: Stuart Hall v Martin Ward

Post by nick885 »

palooka wrote:I think that the majority of posters were pleased for Stuey when he won the title and thought he had been lucky to get the shot. He won a good fight fair and square. The Ward defence got a little stick because there are other boxers in the division more highly rated than Ward - who is a good boxer. The bout ended to a cut and it was inconclusive really who was the better man. I've not seen anything but admiration on here for how well Hall has done - lots of people mention how genuine and decent he is and it's been nice to see someone 'real' who's lived a bit of life then go on to succeed.

Maybe because you are very close to Stuey you magnify anything critical of him?
Lot of posts saying he is only good enough to be a domestic champ not above that level
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Stuart Hall v Martin Ward

Post by palooka »

There's lots of boxers that'd love to be British champ. Domestic level was the very most Stuey would have realistically thought of a year ago.

It used to be the thing that a boxer proved to be the best in Britain, then the best in Europe and then have a go at a world title. It's a strange state of affairs when a world champion isn't the best in their country; saying that I don't think there's anyone on here that begrudges Stuey anything - he got the chance out of the blue and took it - everyone would have done the same.
nick885
Middleweight
Posts: 298
Joined: 05 Apr 2014, 18:05

Re: Stuart Hall v Martin Ward

Post by nick885 »

palooka wrote:There's lots of boxers that'd love to be British champ. Domestic level was the very most Stuey would have realistically thought of a year ago.

It used to be the thing that a boxer proved to be the best in Britain, then the best in Europe and then have a go at a world title. It's a strange state of affairs when a world champion isn't the best in their country; saying that I don't think there's anyone on here that begrudges Stuey anything - he got the chance out of the blue and took it - everyone would have done the same.
And now he is training full time he is more powerful, faster and a more skilled fighter than he was when he fought McDonnell and Haskins.
GlobalBox
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2037
Joined: 10 Jun 2007, 02:57

Re: Stuart Hall v Martin Ward

Post by GlobalBox »

5/2 Hall is with bet365, seems way too big for me, can't make me mind up on the fight which means I would be 5/6 each so there is definite value in Hall
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Stuart Hall v Martin Ward

Post by palooka »

nick885 wrote:
palooka wrote:There's lots of boxers that'd love to be British champ. Domestic level was the very most Stuey would have realistically thought of a year ago.

It used to be the thing that a boxer proved to be the best in Britain, then the best in Europe and then have a go at a world title. It's a strange state of affairs when a world champion isn't the best in their country; saying that I don't think there's anyone on here that begrudges Stuey anything - he got the chance out of the blue and took it - everyone would have done the same.
And now he is training full time he is more powerful, faster and a more skilled fighter than he was when he fought McDonnell and Haskins.
Then none of us knows how good he is then, I'd not seen Malinga box before so couldn't say for certain he was a top class fellow. I said earlier that I liked that he'd lived a life before becoming a serious boxer - it's an inspiration. Stuey and Jamie are bound to knock heads again and if he's improving as much as you say then it'll be a good scrap.

If Stuey is training full time then he may prove a lot of doubters wrong, similar to Steve Robinson; you can't knock people for waiting to see though, they don't see him in the gym or day to day.
Post Reply