Page 7 of 9

Re: Lee Froch v George Groves

Posted: 11 Mar 2014, 19:17
by SNG
They only last five years. As I found out recently.

Re: Lee Froch v George Groves

Posted: 11 Mar 2014, 19:55
by followthecamel
orbtastic wrote:One thing's for sure, I know where to go if I need some carpet carrying.


The comment about Matalan suits got me. Good old "bumboclart you mon" insults, we need more of them.
:OhYes: pmsl

Re: Lee Froch v George Groves

Posted: 11 Mar 2014, 20:42
by lefty
SNG wrote:They only last five years. As I found out recently.
I didnt even know that! Luckily my school was so atrocious that I didnt even get any but yet it doesnt matter.

Re: Lee Froch v George Groves

Posted: 12 Mar 2014, 03:40
by digzee
Final round wrote:
Teddy's Toupee wrote: Matryoshka.
Babushka :-)
That means grandmother right? I do love Russian girls...

Re: Lee Froch v George Groves

Posted: 12 Mar 2014, 04:05
by lefthook82
G0mez wrote:
ALI wrote:
I agree.

Hearn needs to show more respect to Groves but seems more interested in riding Carl's co*k. I do like Hearn and what he is doing for British boxing, but the smirking from him on the pitch at Wembly left a bad taste in my mouth, i thought he had more class than that.

On another note, i'd love for Groves to bring along a big bruiser of a mate to the next presser, one more than willing to stick one on Lee Froch's melon.
I agree. It also left a very bad taste in my mouth.

Eddie should have pulled out a hanky and wiped away George's tears, then maybe gave him the business of a good solicitor, afterall he was saying he would be contacting one because Carl "put his hands on me."

That other note you mention, yes, agree there too.

I think all of Groves mates who have been telling Lee that their mother was a "fat b*tch" and that he needs to stay away from the press conference, because they were gonna "shank" him, really need to step up a gear.
About as classless a response as we've come to expect from you

Re: Lee Froch v George Groves

Posted: 12 Mar 2014, 04:16
by mickey1975
GOmez is a good poster, but goes into a childish, sarcastic mode when attempting to defend the indefensible from Team Froch. If he has a good point, he makes a case, if not (ie Lee Froch) then he doesn't.

Re: Lee Froch v George Groves

Posted: 12 Mar 2014, 04:41
by Yes We Can
mickey1975 wrote:GOmez is a good poster, but goes into a childish, sarcastic mode when attempting to defend the indefensible from Team Froch. If he has a good point, he makes a case, if not (ie Lee Froch) then he doesn't.
Gomez doesn't hide his loyalty to Carl, and i personally have no problem with that.

I have no doubt there are some planks on the internet that have attached themselves to GG and sent hideous threats, just as i have no doubt some of team froch has sent there won questionable tweets and Pm's.

Anyone else notice "Porky Russ" has been a bit quieter lately? anything been said to him by Carl/ Eddie etc?

How this minor shove and a bit of "bullshhhhhhhit" during a press conference has made 7 pages i dont know.

Re: Lee Froch v George Groves

Posted: 12 Mar 2014, 04:57
by los2
G0mez wrote:
ALI wrote:
I agree.

Hearn needs to show more respect to Groves but seems more interested in riding Carl's co*k. I do like Hearn and what he is doing for British boxing, but the smirking from him on the pitch at Wembly left a bad taste in my mouth, i thought he had more class than that.

On another note, i'd love for Groves to bring along a big bruiser of a mate to the next presser, one more than willing to stick one on Lee Froch's melon.
I agree. It also left a very bad taste in my mouth.

Eddie should have pulled out a hanky and wiped away George's tears, then maybe gave him the business of a good solicitor, afterall he was saying he would be contacting one because Carl "put his hands on me."

That other note you mention, yes, agree there too.

I think all of Groves mates who have been telling Lee that their mother was a "fat b*tch" and that he needs to stay away from the press conference, because they were gonna "shank" him, really need to step up a gear.
out of order about his mother but the comments she made about groves before first fight werent called for......

Re: Lee Froch v George Groves

Posted: 12 Mar 2014, 07:32
by thepocketrocket
los2 wrote:
G0mez wrote:
ALI wrote:
I agree.

Hearn needs to show more respect to Groves but seems more interested in riding Carl's co*k. I do like Hearn and what he is doing for British boxing, but the smirking from him on the pitch at Wembly left a bad taste in my mouth, i thought he had more class than that.

On another note, i'd love for Groves to bring along a big bruiser of a mate to the next presser, one more than willing to stick one on Lee Froch's melon.
I agree. It also left a very bad taste in my mouth.

Eddie should have pulled out a hanky and wiped away George's tears, then maybe gave him the business of a good solicitor, afterall he was saying he would be contacting one because Carl "put his hands on me."

That other note you mention, yes, agree there too.

I think all of Groves mates who have been telling Lee that their mother was a "fat b*tch" and that he needs to stay away from the press conference, because they were gonna "shank" him, really need to step up a gear.
out of order about his mother but the comments she made about groves before first fight werent called for......
What did she say?

Re: Lee Froch v George Groves

Posted: 12 Mar 2014, 07:46
by The Insider
thepocketrocket wrote:

What did she say?
She said he's been a very naughty boy.

http://youtu.be/plZRe1kPWZw

Re: Lee Froch v George Groves

Posted: 12 Mar 2014, 08:42
by MarkMcBurney
los2 wrote:
G0mez wrote:
ALI wrote:
I agree.

Hearn needs to show more respect to Groves but seems more interested in riding Carl's co*k. I do like Hearn and what he is doing for British boxing, but the smirking from him on the pitch at Wembly left a bad taste in my mouth, i thought he had more class than that.

On another note, i'd love for Groves to bring along a big bruiser of a mate to the next presser, one more than willing to stick one on Lee Froch's melon.
I agree. It also left a very bad taste in my mouth.

Eddie should have pulled out a hanky and wiped away George's tears, then maybe gave him the business of a good solicitor, afterall he was saying he would be contacting one because Carl "put his hands on me."

That other note you mention, yes, agree there too.

I think all of Groves mates who have been telling Lee that their mother was a "fat b*tch" and that he needs to stay away from the press conference, because they were gonna "shank" him, really need to step up a gear.
out of order about his mother but the comments she made about groves before first fight werent called for......
IT seems the apple didn't fall far from the tree...

Re: Lee Froch v George Groves

Posted: 12 Mar 2014, 08:51
by fasteddie
im a fan of both of these boxers but wtf is lee froch doing at a press conference? what is his purpose,is he a fighter involved in the main event? no. is he a promotor of either fighter? no. is he a manager of either? no. is he a cornerman of either? no. so he shouldnt be there,i hope groves puts froch to kip now after seeing this and why is froch disrespecting groves like he did the first time round? is he gonna try and say groves is disrespecting him now cause all ive seen is froch dis groves throughout both build ups not the other way round. groves teach them both a lesson mate :TU:

Re: Lee Froch v George Groves

Posted: 12 Mar 2014, 08:52
by fasteddie
also is lee a homosexual? all he has on his twitter is picks of d*cks

Re: Lee Froch v George Groves

Posted: 12 Mar 2014, 08:55
by rossij8
fasteddie wrote:im a fan of both of these boxers but wtf is lee froch doing at a press conference? what is his purpose,is he a fighter involved in the main event? no. is he a promotor of either fighter? no. is he a manager of either? no. is he a cornerman of either? no. so he shouldnt be there,i hope groves puts froch to kip now after seeing this and why is froch disrespecting groves like he did the first time round? is he gonna try and say groves is disrespecting him now cause all ive seen is froch dis groves throughout both build ups not the other way round. groves teach them both a lesson mate :TU:

LF coughing and shouting bull5hit live on Sky Sports news as GG was talking didn't look good for Team Froch

Re: Lee Froch v George Groves

Posted: 12 Mar 2014, 08:56
by palooka
Teddy's Toupee wrote:
palooka wrote:I'm not moralistic, in fact I'm barely moral. I like to watch boxing and I don't like it when it's all over the front pages with articles written by anti boxing journalists because a build up has boiled over. I'm middle aged and can remember that it does the sport no good. (Though if Froch did push Groves again I'd laugh if Groves chinned him - or if the gingerbread man was David Haye and he chinned Lee Froch).
But are you ethical?
I'm not wealthy enough to have ethics

Re: Lee Froch v George Groves

Posted: 12 Mar 2014, 10:02
by Datsue
palooka wrote:
Teddy's Toupee wrote:
palooka wrote:I'm not moralistic, in fact I'm barely moral. I like to watch boxing and I don't like it when it's all over the front pages with articles written by anti boxing journalists because a build up has boiled over. I'm middle aged and can remember that it does the sport no good. (Though if Froch did push Groves again I'd laugh if Groves chinned him - or if the gingerbread man was David Haye and he chinned Lee Froch).
But are you ethical?
I'm not wealthy enough to have ethics

:lol: :bow:

I'm nicking that.

Re: Lee Froch v George Groves

Posted: 12 Mar 2014, 10:17
by Teddy's Toupee
palooka wrote:
Teddy's Toupee wrote:
palooka wrote:I'm not moralistic, in fact I'm barely moral. I like to watch boxing and I don't like it when it's all over the front pages with articles written by anti boxing journalists because a build up has boiled over. I'm middle aged and can remember that it does the sport no good. (Though if Froch did push Groves again I'd laugh if Groves chinned him - or if the gingerbread man was David Haye and he chinned Lee Froch).
But are you ethical?
I'm not wealthy enough to have ethics
But wealthy enough to have a sunbed tan and your teeth whitened. :shame:

Re: Lee Froch v George Groves

Posted: 12 Mar 2014, 10:22
by palooka
Not wealthy enough to eat at Cosmos 3 times a week.

Re: Lee Froch v George Groves

Posted: 12 Mar 2014, 10:31
by lefty
:OhYes:

Re: Lee Froch v George Groves

Posted: 12 Mar 2014, 10:36
by palooka
Can it columbo else we'll get a mini bus up for a Kent away day :OhYes:

Re: Lee Froch v George Groves

Posted: 12 Mar 2014, 10:40
by lefty
I think it will be like a luxury break for ya :OhYes:

Re: Lee Froch v George Groves

Posted: 12 Mar 2014, 10:42
by palooka
hahaha yes, how the other half lives

Re: Lee Froch v George Groves

Posted: 12 Mar 2014, 10:53
by Teddy's Toupee
palooka wrote:Not wealthy enough to eat at Cosmos 3 times a week.
Cosmo's and Landmark in Sheffield once a week (but not on the same day).

Re: Lee Froch v George Groves

Posted: 12 Mar 2014, 10:54
by palooka
You still taking your own plate?

Re: Lee Froch v George Groves

Posted: 12 Mar 2014, 10:57
by Teddy's Toupee
They put a stop to it when it took two members of staff to carry it before I'd even put any food on it.