Re: Lee Froch v George Groves
Posted: 11 Mar 2014, 19:17
They only last five years. As I found out recently.
orbtastic wrote:One thing's for sure, I know where to go if I need some carpet carrying.
The comment about Matalan suits got me. Good old "bumboclart you mon" insults, we need more of them.
I didnt even know that! Luckily my school was so atrocious that I didnt even get any but yet it doesnt matter.SNG wrote:They only last five years. As I found out recently.
That means grandmother right? I do love Russian girls...Final round wrote:Babushka :-)Teddy's Toupee wrote: Matryoshka.
About as classless a response as we've come to expect from youG0mez wrote:I agree. It also left a very bad taste in my mouth.ALI wrote:
I agree.
Hearn needs to show more respect to Groves but seems more interested in riding Carl's co*k. I do like Hearn and what he is doing for British boxing, but the smirking from him on the pitch at Wembly left a bad taste in my mouth, i thought he had more class than that.
On another note, i'd love for Groves to bring along a big bruiser of a mate to the next presser, one more than willing to stick one on Lee Froch's melon.
Eddie should have pulled out a hanky and wiped away George's tears, then maybe gave him the business of a good solicitor, afterall he was saying he would be contacting one because Carl "put his hands on me."
That other note you mention, yes, agree there too.
I think all of Groves mates who have been telling Lee that their mother was a "fat b*tch" and that he needs to stay away from the press conference, because they were gonna "shank" him, really need to step up a gear.
Gomez doesn't hide his loyalty to Carl, and i personally have no problem with that.mickey1975 wrote:GOmez is a good poster, but goes into a childish, sarcastic mode when attempting to defend the indefensible from Team Froch. If he has a good point, he makes a case, if not (ie Lee Froch) then he doesn't.
out of order about his mother but the comments she made about groves before first fight werent called for......G0mez wrote:I agree. It also left a very bad taste in my mouth.ALI wrote:
I agree.
Hearn needs to show more respect to Groves but seems more interested in riding Carl's co*k. I do like Hearn and what he is doing for British boxing, but the smirking from him on the pitch at Wembly left a bad taste in my mouth, i thought he had more class than that.
On another note, i'd love for Groves to bring along a big bruiser of a mate to the next presser, one more than willing to stick one on Lee Froch's melon.
Eddie should have pulled out a hanky and wiped away George's tears, then maybe gave him the business of a good solicitor, afterall he was saying he would be contacting one because Carl "put his hands on me."
That other note you mention, yes, agree there too.
I think all of Groves mates who have been telling Lee that their mother was a "fat b*tch" and that he needs to stay away from the press conference, because they were gonna "shank" him, really need to step up a gear.
What did she say?los2 wrote:out of order about his mother but the comments she made about groves before first fight werent called for......G0mez wrote:I agree. It also left a very bad taste in my mouth.ALI wrote:
I agree.
Hearn needs to show more respect to Groves but seems more interested in riding Carl's co*k. I do like Hearn and what he is doing for British boxing, but the smirking from him on the pitch at Wembly left a bad taste in my mouth, i thought he had more class than that.
On another note, i'd love for Groves to bring along a big bruiser of a mate to the next presser, one more than willing to stick one on Lee Froch's melon.
Eddie should have pulled out a hanky and wiped away George's tears, then maybe gave him the business of a good solicitor, afterall he was saying he would be contacting one because Carl "put his hands on me."
That other note you mention, yes, agree there too.
I think all of Groves mates who have been telling Lee that their mother was a "fat b*tch" and that he needs to stay away from the press conference, because they were gonna "shank" him, really need to step up a gear.
She said he's been a very naughty boy.thepocketrocket wrote:
What did she say?
IT seems the apple didn't fall far from the tree...los2 wrote:out of order about his mother but the comments she made about groves before first fight werent called for......G0mez wrote:I agree. It also left a very bad taste in my mouth.ALI wrote:
I agree.
Hearn needs to show more respect to Groves but seems more interested in riding Carl's co*k. I do like Hearn and what he is doing for British boxing, but the smirking from him on the pitch at Wembly left a bad taste in my mouth, i thought he had more class than that.
On another note, i'd love for Groves to bring along a big bruiser of a mate to the next presser, one more than willing to stick one on Lee Froch's melon.
Eddie should have pulled out a hanky and wiped away George's tears, then maybe gave him the business of a good solicitor, afterall he was saying he would be contacting one because Carl "put his hands on me."
That other note you mention, yes, agree there too.
I think all of Groves mates who have been telling Lee that their mother was a "fat b*tch" and that he needs to stay away from the press conference, because they were gonna "shank" him, really need to step up a gear.
fasteddie wrote:im a fan of both of these boxers but wtf is lee froch doing at a press conference? what is his purpose,is he a fighter involved in the main event? no. is he a promotor of either fighter? no. is he a manager of either? no. is he a cornerman of either? no. so he shouldnt be there,i hope groves puts froch to kip now after seeing this and why is froch disrespecting groves like he did the first time round? is he gonna try and say groves is disrespecting him now cause all ive seen is froch dis groves throughout both build ups not the other way round. groves teach them both a lesson mate
I'm not wealthy enough to have ethicsTeddy's Toupee wrote:But are you ethical?palooka wrote:I'm not moralistic, in fact I'm barely moral. I like to watch boxing and I don't like it when it's all over the front pages with articles written by anti boxing journalists because a build up has boiled over. I'm middle aged and can remember that it does the sport no good. (Though if Froch did push Groves again I'd laugh if Groves chinned him - or if the gingerbread man was David Haye and he chinned Lee Froch).
palooka wrote:I'm not wealthy enough to have ethicsTeddy's Toupee wrote:But are you ethical?palooka wrote:I'm not moralistic, in fact I'm barely moral. I like to watch boxing and I don't like it when it's all over the front pages with articles written by anti boxing journalists because a build up has boiled over. I'm middle aged and can remember that it does the sport no good. (Though if Froch did push Groves again I'd laugh if Groves chinned him - or if the gingerbread man was David Haye and he chinned Lee Froch).
But wealthy enough to have a sunbed tan and your teeth whitened.palooka wrote:I'm not wealthy enough to have ethicsTeddy's Toupee wrote:But are you ethical?palooka wrote:I'm not moralistic, in fact I'm barely moral. I like to watch boxing and I don't like it when it's all over the front pages with articles written by anti boxing journalists because a build up has boiled over. I'm middle aged and can remember that it does the sport no good. (Though if Froch did push Groves again I'd laugh if Groves chinned him - or if the gingerbread man was David Haye and he chinned Lee Froch).
Cosmo's and Landmark in Sheffield once a week (but not on the same day).palooka wrote:Not wealthy enough to eat at Cosmos 3 times a week.