Page 7 of 10
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Posted: 20 Apr 2014, 00:01
by gilgamesh
Hopkins has completely taken over the momentum of the fight. I'll let you guys know if Shumenov is able to win another round on my card, the way it looks now Hopkins will cruise the rest of the way to a comfortable decision.
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Posted: 20 Apr 2014, 00:01
by lefty
Cure for insomnia this fight. Anyone see Hopkins beating Stevenson on this?
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Posted: 20 Apr 2014, 00:02
by MachoTime
columbo wrote:Cure for insomnia this fight. Anyone see Hopkins beating Stevenson on this?
No
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Posted: 20 Apr 2014, 00:02
by diddy
In on the Killtaker wrote:diddy wrote:Shumenov makes Cloud look like Tyson.
Your mother makes Gianna Michaels look like a chaste nun.
I don't know who Gianna Michaels is but considering you do I'm sure
she is white trash.
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Posted: 20 Apr 2014, 00:02
by lefty
Shumenov a complete sucker for that right hand.
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Posted: 20 Apr 2014, 00:04
by expe
79-75 Hopkins
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Posted: 20 Apr 2014, 00:04
by diddy
columbo wrote:Shumenov a complete sucker for that right hand.
I wonder why. Look where his left is.
This dude is awful. He'll never be on a major network again.
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Posted: 20 Apr 2014, 00:05
by lefty
diddy wrote:columbo wrote:Shumenov a complete sucker for that right hand.
I wonder why. Look where his left is.
This dude is awful. He'll never be on a major network again.
I dont think it would matter even if he had his left glove up.He doesnt see it coming.
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Posted: 20 Apr 2014, 00:07
by diddy
columbo wrote:diddy wrote:columbo wrote:Shumenov a complete sucker for that right hand.
I wonder why. Look where his left is.
This dude is awful. He'll never be on a major network again.
I dont think it would matter even if he had his left glove up.He doesnt see it coming.
HOW DOES A GUY NOT HAVE A TRAINER FOR A WORLD TITLE
FIGHT?!? Hopkins needs a trainer but this guy doesn't?!
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Posted: 20 Apr 2014, 00:07
by expe
89-83 Hopkins
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Posted: 20 Apr 2014, 00:09
by lefty
diddy wrote:columbo wrote:
I dont think it would matter even if he had his left glove up.He doesnt see it coming.
HOW DOES A GUY NOT HAVE A TRAINER FOR A WORLD TITLE
FIGHT?!? Hopkins needs a trainer but this guy doesn't?!
Yeah i noticed that
.... I thougt Stitch was training him lol.
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Posted: 20 Apr 2014, 00:09
by Baby Face Finster
Why did I even bother staying up to watch this card after Porter-Malignaggi?
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Posted: 20 Apr 2014, 00:09
by big train express
bernard hopkins is possibly the most boring fighter ever. i cant wait until hes out of the picture.
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Posted: 20 Apr 2014, 00:09
by ikorolev
Shumenov was saying that he had a plan how to beat Hopkins. What was that ? Breaking Bernard's hands with his face ?
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Posted: 20 Apr 2014, 00:09
by lefty
expe wrote:89-83 Hopkins
Who's the fighter on our feed co-commentating mate? I cant figure out who the voice belongs to.
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Posted: 20 Apr 2014, 00:11
by MachoTime
HOW DOES A GUY NOT HAVE A TRAINER FOR A WORLD TITLE
FIGHT?!? Hopkins needs a trainer but this guy doesn't?!
Good Question. Don't recall ever seeing this.
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Posted: 20 Apr 2014, 00:12
by expe
99-92 Hopkins
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Posted: 20 Apr 2014, 00:12
by expe
columbo wrote:expe wrote:89-83 Hopkins
Who's the fighter on our feed co-commentating mate? I cant figure out who the voice belongs to.
Think Buncey said Brian/Bryan Adams.
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Posted: 20 Apr 2014, 00:13
by lefty
Shumenov got some long ass arms. Not helping him much though.
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Posted: 20 Apr 2014, 00:14
by MachoTime
knockdown.
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Posted: 20 Apr 2014, 00:14
by lefty
expe wrote:columbo wrote:expe wrote:89-83 Hopkins
Who's the fighter on our feed co-commentating mate? I cant figure out who the voice belongs to.
Think Buncey said Brian/Bryan Adams.
He's doing my head in whoever he is.
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Posted: 20 Apr 2014, 00:14
by lefty
If Hopkins knocks Shumenov out il laugh my arse off
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Posted: 20 Apr 2014, 00:16
by lefty
Shumenov fighting like he's about 50
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Posted: 20 Apr 2014, 00:16
by Baby Face Finster
It's a credit to Joe Calzaghe that he didn't let Bernard dictate the pace to his liking the way he has done with so many of his fights in the last 6 years.
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Posted: 20 Apr 2014, 00:16
by JeanClaude Van Damme
Joe still got dropped by an old man.