BoxRec

punchoutsb wrote:

koolkc107 wrote: Nope, not going to do your research for you.

I try not to get in the habit of proving the obvious.

I will give you a hint tho.

This website has rankings. Use them. You will see the fistful right away.

It's not my research, because I didn't make the outlandish claim.

So you can continue acting like a bitch, or you can simply name names.

But I think we both know what you'll do

Acting like a bitch?

I'm not the one having a period over someone besmirching the beloved Wlad Stiffco.

That would be you, lady.

This is just pathetic. You couldn't pay me to watch this.

He's fighting the guy Al Haymon used as his WBC placeholder after he retired, only 5 years too late, just like Manny. And after how many PED busts? I thought he was against that sort of thing.

koolkc107 wrote:

punchoutsb wrote:

koolkc107 wrote: Nope, not going to do your research for you.

I try not to get in the habit of proving the obvious.

I will give you a hint tho.

This website has rankings. Use them. You will see the fistful right away.

It's not my research, because I didn't make the outlandish claim.

So you can continue acting like a bitch, or you can simply name names.

But I think we both know what you'll do

Acting like a bitch?

I'm not the one having a period over someone besmirching the beloved Wlad Stiffco.

That would be you, lady.

Yep. making outrageous statements and then hiding is acting like an internet bitch. All you gotta do is name the names, since there's so many and all

punchoutsb wrote:

koolkc107 wrote:

punchoutsb wrote:
It's not my research, because I didn't make the outlandish claim.

So you can continue acting like a bitch, or you can simply name names.

But I think we both know what you'll do

Acting like a bitch?

I'm not the one having a period over someone besmirching the beloved Wlad Stiffco.

That would be you, lady.

Yep. making outrageous statements and then hiding is acting like an internet bitch. All you gotta do is name the names, since there's so many and all

Ok, I get it.

If it is something you don't agree with but are too lazy to investigate for yourself,
counter by calling it "outrageous" while also launching pitiful ad hominem attacks.

Good look.

If you don't get by now that I don't give a rat's ass about proving anything to you then you never will.

But the info is right here on this site for you to glean for yourself.

Again, you just cant aknowledge it can you ?

Brut, why don't you start firing from two guns posting as koolkrap and KBB at the same time.

koolkc107 wrote: Ok, I get it.

If it is something you don't agree with but are too lazy to investigate for yourself,
counter by calling it "outrageous" while also launching pitiful ad hominem attacks.

Good look.

If you don't get by now that I don't give a rat's ass about proving anything to you then you never will.

But the info is right here on this site for you to glean for yourself.

Why should I have to investigate YOUR outrageous claims?

You make the claim, provide the names. It's easy...for anybody but you it seems

Let me dumb it down for you:

If I say "I can name 50 guys who can beat Floyd all time" and you say "Prove it", which one of us holds the burden of proof?

punchoutsb wrote:

koolkc107 wrote: Ok, I get it.

If it is something you don't agree with but are too lazy to investigate for yourself,
counter by calling it "outrageous" while also launching pitiful ad hominem attacks.

Good look.

If you don't get by now that I don't give a rat's ass about proving anything to you then you never will.

But the info is right here on this site for you to glean for yourself.

Why should I have to investigate YOUR outrageous claims?

You make the claim, provide the names. It's easy...for anybody but you it seems

Let me dumb it down for you:

If I say "I can name 50 guys who can beat Floyd all time" and you say "Prove it", which one of us holds the burden of proof?

Clearly you don't believe what I am saying is that "outrageous".

You certainly are giving it more attention than "nonsense" deserves.

If you made that claim, my initial reaction would be to ask myself, "could that be true?"

If it was BS, I wouldnt need to ask for proof because I'd already have it.

If it was possibly true, I'd investigate for myself and then come back and tell you it is correct or incorrect and document why.

Like I said before, I don't like to get into the habit of proving the obvious.

And I am not about to start.

I am fine with you having another opinion and don't need to personally attack you simply because that is the case.

koolkc107 wrote:

punchoutsb wrote:

koolkc107 wrote: Ok, I get it.

If it is something you don't agree with but are too lazy to investigate for yourself,
counter by calling it "outrageous" while also launching pitiful ad hominem attacks.

Good look.

If you don't get by now that I don't give a rat's ass about proving anything to you then you never will.

But the info is right here on this site for you to glean for yourself.

Why should I have to investigate YOUR outrageous claims?

You make the claim, provide the names. It's easy...for anybody but you it seems

Let me dumb it down for you:

If I say "I can name 50 guys who can beat Floyd all time" and you say "Prove it", which one of us holds the burden of proof?

Clearly you don't believe what I am saying is that "outrageous".

You certainly are giving it more attention than "nonsense" deserves.

If you made that claim, my initial reaction would be to ask myself, "could that be true?"

If it was BS, I wouldnt need to ask for proof because I'd already have it.

If it was possibly true, I'd investigate for myself and then come back and tell you it is correct or incorrect and document why.

Like I said before, I don't like to get into the habit of proving the obvious.

And I am not about to start.

I am fine with you having another opinion and don't need to personally attack you simply because that is the case.

Wow, you sound like a real stand up guy!!

Now post the guys Wlad's ducking

kc is clearly trying to wind people up......very fergus like with his recent posting.

Might as well say that Floyd is ducking loads of guys that would have beaten him.

crusader wrote:kc is clearly trying to wind people up......very fergus like with his recent posting.

Might as well say that Floyd is ducking loads of guys that would have beaten him.

Isnt he doing just that ?

punchoutsb wrote:

KBB wrote:

punchoutsb wrote:OK I'll ask him: brut, please post the supposed mayweather hate and the "fistful of guys" that Klitschko is avoiding

Ok Bnovelist I will do it and make sure you tell your other alter ego CheapA$$ to do the same and don't forget to double space between sentences and write in all caps too.

Just like both your egos to avoid giving proof...AGAIN

Honestly you are no more than an annoying little Stalker. Talk boxing or do not talk to me at all.

KBB wrote: Honestly you are no more than an annoying little Stalker. Talk boxing or do not talk to me at all.

You addressed me first in this thread. I wasn't even talking to you

But if you want to talk boxing, go ahead and post any of my Mayweather hate so we can break it down!

crusader wrote:kc is clearly trying to wind people up......very fergus like with his recent posting.

He got it. I am all wound up

Butterbean wrote:

crusader wrote: Might as well say that Floyd is ducking loads of guys that would have beaten him.

Isnt he doing just that ?

Yes, he is

AND HE CLAIMS TO BE TBE

Pureist wrote:No worse than when Pac fought Algieri.

Given the circumstances, it's quite a bit worse. Berto stands no chance at all and recently got smoked by Karass and Guerrero. At least Chris was undefeated when Manny faced him. This is possibly Floyd's last bout. And he claims he is the best ever. Piss poor move. It's hard to believe even his loyalest supporters supporting this.[/quote]

Quite a bit worse? Imagine the backlash Floyd would have got if he fought Rios and Algieri. Neither are even true 147 pounders. Algieri was unbeaten, yes, but only had 20 fights total in his lifetime.

Berto is a career welter, champion for 2 years, the number 1 WBA contender (I think most of the rankings are BS), but lost to Guerrero and Karass. You did however fail to mention his re-dedication and 2 impressive wins after the losses. His latest was a KO of Joseito Lopez, which in my mind is as good as Rios or Algieri. Berto took him out about the same way Canelo and Maidana did. None of the 3 are elite competition. No, Berto is not elite either, but like I said in another post, this fight is not about the biggest challenges or legacies. Its about giving the fans an entertaining fight for free. If Floyd wanted the biggest PPV draw, he wouldn't be fighting Berto, you can bank on that. Floyd says he is the best ever, yes, but we all know this may be his last fight and he is a lot closer to 40 than 35. Maybe Berto KO's Floyd, then you can rejoice.[/quote]
An entertaining fight for free, watching floyd tag Berto at will, is that your idea of an entertaining fight, far from mine[/quote]

Maybe if you watch the fight 3 times in slow motion you might enjoy it.

Most people give their favorites of recent vintage a pass when it comes to their "weak fights," but Floyd is such a polarized figure, that'll never happen. I remember seeing Dougie Fischer go on a rant about how he basically refused to listen to similar criticism of Sugar Ray Leonard prior to Pac/May because he felt some way as a kid. I was amused. He's no different than anyone else, though.

Counter-puncher wrote:so anyway, matches like this are why we all really like the little guys who actually fight each other, right?

take Segura for example. dude got his face smashed in by Viloria and went on and fought Sosa, Marquez and Estrada.

that's why we love 'em.

Not watched Berto since he got knocked out by Karass. Has he improved any since then or is he still a D level drug cheat?

crusader wrote:kc is clearly trying to wind people up......very fergus like with his recent posting.

He lives for it, he was jumping in bigging up & defending our resident conspiracy theorist anti-semite wingnut loon (Hi, Brut!) when the latter decided anyone who didn't like Mayweather was a racist.

I don't think he's actually Brut, though, he's just trolltastic. He doesn't seem as clearly mentally ill as Brut, for a start.

Datsue wrote:

crusader wrote:kc is clearly trying to wind people up......very fergus like with his recent posting.

He lives for it, he was jumping in bigging up & defending our resident conspiracy theorist anti-semite wingnut loon (Hi, Brut!) when the latter decided anyone who didn't like Mayweather was a racist.

I don't think he's actually Brut, though, he's just trolltastic. He doesn't seem as clearly mentally ill as Brut, for a start.

Brut's been really quiet since I screenshotted the PM he sent me, maybe in his embarrassment he thought he'd rack up the post count on koolkc.

To Vicky
Wow you really think too much of your own tiny ego but I've only been quiet because unlike you i actually have a life that includes family and going on vacation.

You and the other little twits that joined you in your own pathetic chorus only need to remember one thing that will piss you off the rest of your miserable lives:
Floyd beat Manny easily.

KBB wrote:To Vicky
Wow you really think too much of your own tiny ego but I've only been quiet because unlike you i actually have a life that includes family and going on vacation.

You and the other little twits that joined you in your own pathetic chorus only need to remember one thing that will piss you off the rest of your miserable lives:
Floyd beat Manny easily.

Some short vacations your mom sends you on. Or arent you old enough to stay the night at summer camp ?

I see so little chance of anyone beating him that I really don't care who he fights now. The only person who can beat Floyd now is Father Time.

KBB wrote:To Vicky
Wow you really think too much of your own tiny ego but I've only been quiet because unlike you i actually have a life that includes family and going on vacation.

You and the other little twits that joined you in your own pathetic chorus only need to remember one thing that will piss you off the rest of your miserable lives:
Floyd beat Manny easily.

Tell me again how "butthurt" i am that a go starting threads about Ronda Rousey trashing talking..... oh.... wait. Dumbass. Go back into hiding