Sheffield RBR 26th March
-
Black Sam Bellamy
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1476
- Joined: 25 Sep 2008, 13:51
Re: Sheffield RBR 26th March
The sport is absolutely on its knees. No credibility in any of this tonight. Talentless Eastern European punchbags, out of shapes American heavies and joke mandatories. Same old rubbish time after time.
Re: Sheffield RBR 26th March
glad I don't pay for this $hite 
Re: Sheffield RBR 26th March
Brook / Garcia is a cracking fight, if it could be made.
-
smoothmoves
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 287
- Joined: 05 Jun 2010, 14:48
Re: Sheffield RBR 26th March
http://boxrec.com/boxer/72705brian13 wrote:Brook / Garcia is a cracking fight, if it could be made.
More likely to be this one though
Re: Sheffield RBR 26th March
No DeGale?
-
reggaereggae
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4723
- Joined: 21 Dec 2009, 17:01
Re: Sheffield RBR 26th March
Wow. Can't believe I thought Bizier might last the distance. I must've been having an 'episode'
Pure rubbish...
At least they didn't put it on PPV. SKY just need to pull out of boxing, they clearly don't care for it
At least they didn't put it on PPV. SKY just need to pull out of boxing, they clearly don't care for it
-
mickey1975
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 23138
- Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54
Re: Sheffield RBR 26th March
Non PPV shows seem like a chore for everyone at Sky and Matchroom.
Re: Sheffield RBR 26th March
Watched both Brook and Campbell replays this morning.
Brook did what was required. Can really only blame the IBF for having Bizier there in the first place. I still stand by comments in another thread though that Brook would have beat Bizier in the same way be the fight in Sheffield, London, a back lane or Brooklyn. Why not take this in America and let them get over-excited about it and give him some name recognition there?
They monetary gains would be a lot smaller, but it would -- I think anyway -- lead to him being able to pull the strings with the "names" of the division in late 2016 or 2017, and make a really big pay day with home advantage.
Campbell again did what was required. I've nothing against him personally, but I think we're seeing he's not as great as some might have hoped. I'd back most of the consensus world top 20 Lightweights over Campbell. Sykes never looked in it and it looked like age had beaten him as well as Campbell.
In an aside some of the cheerleading from Sky was atrocious. Notably on Campbell... "It's official, Luke Campbell is BACK!"... Yep, takes the Commonwealth title from an ageing, British, also-ran. I mean that with no disrespect to Sykes, but all the British top five and possible more would take him out at this point in time. to declare that as Campbell being ."..BACK!" is somewhat laughable.
EDIT: Also just watched Allen v Gavern now. F--k me, I know Gavern is barely a shade above club fighter, he's had an injury and took it on short notice, but what medication was he taking for the injury? On the looks of that 'performance' I'd guess it was a crate of Special Brew. Really quite ridiculous and feel a bit sorry for Allen having to put up with it all.
Brook did what was required. Can really only blame the IBF for having Bizier there in the first place. I still stand by comments in another thread though that Brook would have beat Bizier in the same way be the fight in Sheffield, London, a back lane or Brooklyn. Why not take this in America and let them get over-excited about it and give him some name recognition there?
They monetary gains would be a lot smaller, but it would -- I think anyway -- lead to him being able to pull the strings with the "names" of the division in late 2016 or 2017, and make a really big pay day with home advantage.
Campbell again did what was required. I've nothing against him personally, but I think we're seeing he's not as great as some might have hoped. I'd back most of the consensus world top 20 Lightweights over Campbell. Sykes never looked in it and it looked like age had beaten him as well as Campbell.
In an aside some of the cheerleading from Sky was atrocious. Notably on Campbell... "It's official, Luke Campbell is BACK!"... Yep, takes the Commonwealth title from an ageing, British, also-ran. I mean that with no disrespect to Sykes, but all the British top five and possible more would take him out at this point in time. to declare that as Campbell being ."..BACK!" is somewhat laughable.
EDIT: Also just watched Allen v Gavern now. F--k me, I know Gavern is barely a shade above club fighter, he's had an injury and took it on short notice, but what medication was he taking for the injury? On the looks of that 'performance' I'd guess it was a crate of Special Brew. Really quite ridiculous and feel a bit sorry for Allen having to put up with it all.
-
Boxerbeetle
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 32967
- Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59
Re: Sheffield RBR 26th March
Give the Yanks some credit mate - they wouldn't get over-excited about watching Brook pulverise someone like Bizier, they'd slate the matchmaking just as much as we would.BigSexy wrote: Brook did what was required. Can really only blame the IBF for having Bizier there in the first place. I still stand by comments in another thread though that Brook would have beat Bizier in the same way be the fight in Sheffield, London, a back lane or Brooklyn. Why not take this in America and let them get over-excited about it and give him some name recognition there?
They monetary gains would be a lot smaller, but it would -- I think anyway -- lead to him being able to pull the strings with the "names" of the division in late 2016 or 2017, and make a really big pay day with home advantage.
But I agree with the general point. They could have tried to get Brook on the Ward card last night, at least it would have put him back in the spotlight in the US, and he could have called out Thurman etc in his post-fight interview (or GGG, if he's still feeling brave enough
-
Nightmare Roy
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 16933
- Joined: 18 May 2003, 17:29
Re: Sheffield RBR 26th March
I got to see the Brook fight, absolute garbage as we all knew it would be and then saw Eddie saying they will pull all the stops to get a great opponent over here for him. Garcia, Thurman etc ain't coming to the UK no way at all. Didn't see the undercard but people are saying it was a new low even for Sky so it must have been pish. I feel a bit sorry for Kell not sure what's going to happen inorder for him to get a big fight.
Re: Sheffield RBR 26th March
True, the US have slated it also. But I feel not as harshly. I doubt too many sat through Brook v Dan or Gavin, so it would kind of just be a "First Strike" for them, but at least they'd be talking.Boxerbeetle wrote:Give the Yanks some credit mate - they wouldn't get over-excited about watching Brook pulverise someone like Bizier, they'd slate the matchmaking just as much as we would.BigSexy wrote: Brook did what was required. Can really only blame the IBF for having Bizier there in the first place. I still stand by comments in another thread though that Brook would have beat Bizier in the same way be the fight in Sheffield, London, a back lane or Brooklyn. Why not take this in America and let them get over-excited about it and give him some name recognition there?
They monetary gains would be a lot smaller, but it would -- I think anyway -- lead to him being able to pull the strings with the "names" of the division in late 2016 or 2017, and make a really big pay day with home advantage.
But I agree with the general point. They could have tried to get Brook on the Ward card last night, at least it would have put him back in the spotlight in the US, and he could have called out Thurman etc in his post-fight interview (or GGG, if he's still feeling brave enough).
I agree he'd be helped being over there. Call someone out, have someone call him out. It would build potential fights and bank for Brook.
Certainly achieve more than Sky asking "Kell, once again that was amazing. What is it that makes you just so brilliant?"
Calling out Thurman, Garcia et al means little several thousand miles away.