Re: Liam Smith vs. Liam Williams - April 8th 2017
Posted: 07 Apr 2017, 12:45
Priceless look by Warren



And from Gallagher.TheLeprechaun wrote:Priceless look by Warren![]()
TheLeprechaun wrote:Priceless look by Warren![]()
Yes it is on Kelly/Godding, must be Catchweight Kelly was 3lbs heavier I think at 11-3GlobalBox wrote:Joe knew, did not look like Frank did though tbh. Anyone know if Godding/Kelly still on, not seen the weigh in video anywhere yet although other lesser fights are up there, is that off as well?
He must be fornicating raging!TheLeprechaun wrote:Priceless look by Warren![]()
DAVE2005 wrote:Yeah,he never attempted to make the weight or couldn't and didn't get back on the scales.
Done it deliberately from the sounds of things. If one of Warren's fighters wins a world title it's an automatic 12 month extension, Gallagher's persuaded Smith to move over to Hearn and agreed a deal. Winning the belt would fornicate that up, so the plan is to win the fight, but not the belt, allowing his contract to run up.mickey1975 wrote:Tesco must know this. He's an obsessive about his boxers, I can't see him unaware his lad is 2lb over.
That might explain the look W gave him.expe wrote:Done it deliberately from the sounds of things. If one of Warren's fighters wins a world title it's an automatic 12 month extension, Gallagher's persuaded Smith to move over to Hearn and agreed a deal. Winning the belt would eff that up, so the plan is to win the fight, but not the belt, allowing his contract to run up.mickey1975 wrote:Tesco must know this. He's an obsessive about his boxers, I can't see him unaware his lad is 2lb over.
I just read that on another forum. Dog move by Smith and team, don't think warren done bad with Smith to be fair. Was picking Smith to put on a dominant display, hope I'm wrong will be cheering Williams on to iron him out nowexpe wrote:Done it deliberately from the sounds of things. If one of Warren's fighters wins a world title it's an automatic 12 month extension, Gallagher's persuaded Smith to move over to Hearn and agreed a deal. Winning the belt would eff that up, so the plan is to win the fight, but not the belt, allowing his contract to run up.mickey1975 wrote:Tesco must know this. He's an obsessive about his boxers, I can't see him unaware his lad is 2lb over.
Interesting stuff. Sneaky like.expe wrote:Done it deliberately from the sounds of things. If one of Warren's fighters wins a world title it's an automatic 12 month extension, Gallagher's persuaded Smith to move over to Hearn and agreed a deal. Winning the belt would eff that up, so the plan is to win the fight, but not the belt, allowing his contract to run up.mickey1975 wrote:Tesco must know this. He's an obsessive about his boxers, I can't see him unaware his lad is 2lb over.
Isnt the winner gonna get a shot at Cotto for the Real title when Conelo vacates though? That must be worth a few quid.expe wrote:Done it deliberately from the sounds of things. If one of Warren's fighters wins a world title it's an automatic 12 month extension, Gallagher's persuaded Smith to move over to Hearn and agreed a deal. Winning the belt would eff that up, so the plan is to win the fight, but not the belt, allowing his contract to run up.mickey1975 wrote:Tesco must know this. He's an obsessive about his boxers, I can't see him unaware his lad is 2lb over.
Hmmm interestingsamwbr wrote:Interesting stuff. Sneaky like.expe wrote:Done it deliberately from the sounds of things. If one of Warren's fighters wins a world title it's an automatic 12 month extension, Gallagher's persuaded Smith to move over to Hearn and agreed a deal. Winning the belt would eff that up, so the plan is to win the fight, but not the belt, allowing his contract to run up.mickey1975 wrote:Tesco must know this. He's an obsessive about his boxers, I can't see him unaware his lad is 2lb over.
Are you sure about that? Why would allegedly even put him in the fight in the first place if this was possible? Wasnt the belt not even up for grabs until a few weeks ago?expe wrote:Done it deliberately from the sounds of things. If one of Warren's fighters wins a world title it's an automatic 12 month extension, Gallagher's persuaded Smith to move over to Hearn and agreed a deal. Winning the belt would eff that up, so the plan is to win the fight, but not the belt, allowing his contract to run up.mickey1975 wrote:Tesco must know this. He's an obsessive about his boxers, I can't see him unaware his lad is 2lb over.
That's right. Smith took the fight in Spain a few weeks ago purely to make it for the World Title, so I don't think the fact he doesn't want to win one under FW holds much.ThereByTheGrace wrote:Are you sure about that? Why would allegedly even put him in the fight in the first place if this was possible? Wasnt the belt not even up for grabs until a few weeks ago?expe wrote:Done it deliberately from the sounds of things. If one of Warren's fighters wins a world title it's an automatic 12 month extension, Gallagher's persuaded Smith to move over to Hearn and agreed a deal. Winning the belt would eff that up, so the plan is to win the fight, but not the belt, allowing his contract to run up.mickey1975 wrote:Tesco must know this. He's an obsessive about his boxers, I can't see him unaware his lad is 2lb over.
Doesn't he have to forfeit a percentage of his purse to Williams for not making weight?rpms wrote:Would Smith be looking at a reduced purse for tonight`s fight now he`s not fighting for a title ?
Lots of possible permutations aren't there,thankfully it`s such a great match-up that all of the hearsay and conjecture is just a sub-plot
I think so yesStuarty30 wrote:Doesn't he have to forfeit a percentage of his purse to Williams for not making weight?rpms wrote:Would Smith be looking at a reduced purse for tonight`s fight now he`s not fighting for a title ?
Lots of possible permutations aren't there,thankfully it`s such a great match-up that all of the hearsay and conjecture is just a sub-plot
Definitely mate. He's not a big light middle so fukk knows what's went on.Oiky wrote:I think so yesStuarty30 wrote:Doesn't he have to forfeit a percentage of his purse to Williams for not making weight?rpms wrote:Would Smith be looking at a reduced purse for tonight`s fight now he`s not fighting for a title ?
Lots of possible permutations aren't there,thankfully it`s such a great match-up that all of the hearsay and conjecture is just a sub-plot
It's only right anyway