BoxRec

what a f@cking fannie

Sleepless nights , WHY ? whats he doig now , saying Smith and someone from the board doctors his A results , which is the reason he does'nt want the B samples tested ,, think there just thinking if they shout long and hard enough they will sway people to believe him WITHOUT having to prove anything

But, the science!

coneye wrote: ↑12 Feb 2023, 07:33 Sleepless nights , WHY ? whats he doig now , saying Smith and someone from the board doctors his A results , which is the reason he does'nt want the B samples tested ,, think there just thinking if they shout long and hard enough they will sway people to believe him WITHOUT having to prove anything

Reports were initially suggesting they were going to blame vada contamination for the positive result. I just don't understand how two tests, over a month apart, could have been contaminated to the same level.

I personally believe he's 'innocent' in the fact he didn't knowingly take the drugs, but I don't get this vada theory.

bedreamin wrote: ↑10 Feb 2023, 06:22 Eddie Hearn came out yesterday and said people will be having 'sleepless nights' over the information in Conor's report. So much deflection it's almost easy to forget Benn was the one who failed two tests.

Aye I struggle to sleep when I think of poor Conor potentially getting a ban when all he’s done is fail 2 separate drug tests.

bedreamin wrote: ↑12 Feb 2023, 08:04

coneye wrote: ↑12 Feb 2023, 07:33 Sleepless nights , WHY ? whats he doig now , saying Smith and someone from the board doctors his A results , which is the reason he does'nt want the B samples tested ,, think there just thinking if they shout long and hard enough they will sway people to believe him WITHOUT having to prove anything

Reports were initially suggesting they were going to blame vada contamination for the positive result. I just don't understand how two tests, over a month apart, could have been contaminated to the same level.

I personally believe he's 'innocent' in the fact he didn't knowingly take the drugs, but I don't get this vada theory.

Did'nt intentonaly take them , what do you think happenned , would you go with my theory Robert Smith and a vad member held him down and stuffed dozens of comtamadated boiled eggs down his throat

bedreamin wrote: ↑12 Feb 2023, 08:04

coneye wrote: ↑12 Feb 2023, 07:33 Sleepless nights , WHY ? whats he doig now , saying Smith and someone from the board doctors his A results , which is the reason he does'nt want the B samples tested ,, think there just thinking if they shout long and hard enough they will sway people to believe him WITHOUT having to prove anything

Reports were initially suggesting they were going to blame vada contamination for the positive result. I just don't understand how two tests, over a month apart, could have been contaminated to the same level.

I personally believe he's 'innocent' in the fact he didn't knowingly take the drugs, but I don't get this vada theory.

It's a pretty difficult proposition to accidentally test positive twice for a drug that women with conception issues take to have a baby.
Look at his, and his promotors behavior since this first broke the news, right up until now.
He took the drug (twice minimum) he got caught (twice) he tried to cover it up, as did his promotor, and he is still clutching at straws
If he was innocent, he would have got a hair sample test done and posted it online for everyone to see.
That's what an innocent man, a man of God would have done.

never give a straight answer, promise smoking gun evidence constantly (but it never appears), send a f@cking 270 page war and peace report = sounds to me like a clearly innocent guy who isnt trying to obfuscate or gaslight people at all

margaret thatcher wrote: ↑12 Feb 2023, 21:23 never give a straight answer, promise smoking gun evidence constantly (but it never appears), send a f@cking 270 page war and peace report = sounds to me like a clearly innocent guy who isnt trying to obfuscate or gaslight people at all

Let’s him pass a polygraph test about previous PED usage! No, it’s all about the eggs of course.

polecateddy wrote: ↑13 Feb 2023, 03:46

margaret thatcher wrote: ↑12 Feb 2023, 21:23 never give a straight answer, promise smoking gun evidence constantly (but it never appears), send a f@cking 270 page war and peace report = sounds to me like a clearly innocent guy who isnt trying to obfuscate or gaslight people at all

Let’s him pass a polygraph test about previous PED usage! No, it’s all about the eggs of course.

Yeh, they’ll just ask him if he’s eaten eggs in the asr year. He’ll say yes, point proven. Boom!

It’s funny how the contamination defence hardly ever washes in athletics but works most of the time in boxing. Anyone would think boxing needs a world governing body! Lol

IF it was me and i was genuinly innoncent i would just publicly do two things to prove it , public lie detector , supply B sample for test , Get a hair folicle test .
I know thats 3 but i'd get carried away wanting to prove my innocence

I don’t really get why Eddie is standing so firmly with Benn on this. Love him or loathe him Eddie’s a big player in boxing presumably with a long future in the game, why risk his own reputation defending a guy who is clearly a cheat and who even juiced to the gills is nowhere near world level.

Initially I thought that it was down to a desire to keep the mega money Eubank fight alive somewhere down the line but that bubble burst when Liam Smith went to town on Junior. So what else could be keeping Eddie on Benn’s side ? Is it a fear of seeing Sims exposed as a drug cheat facilitator and then by association with him a fear of seeing the biggest cash cow of all, AJ, implicated ?

BBBofC's Robert Smith: "Benn Must Prove Innocence To Fight In UK Again"

“To be honest with you, I hope he can prove he’s innocent,” Smith told talkBOXING. “Because he’s great for the sport.

“Forget the name, forget his background, he’s a really good boxer and we need him. All the sport needs him.

“He attracts people because of his background, I hope he can prove he’s [innocent].”

“He will not box on one of our shows in this country until he proves his innocence,” Smith added. “To us and UKAD.

“UKAD acts on our behalf, so we take advice from UKAD. The difference between VADA and UKAD is VADA does the tests but doesn’t do any discipline.

“UKAD does the disciplinary matters and we take it on board because, like every other sport in the country, we’ve signed up with them.

“He will not box here in this country until he’s proved that there is an explanation. He was licensed by us at the time, he has to explain the reason.”

Benn is innocent. There is evidence coming next week according to the fastest of cars.

Been coming next week for 5 months now

The apology had better be as big as the disrespect !!

I don’t think it’s much of stretch to think in the style of a paedophile ring, there’s a doping ring of trainers, fighters and promoters involved in making sure fighters are on the correct drug cycles? How many fighters who are to quote Robert Smith, ‘great for the sport’ are built up with by-weekly injections in the butt?

Oh no!

Honest question, if conor is having 30 eggs a day how does he go for a dump? My guts would be in bits if I tried that.

honestly, Id be keen to see Benn vs Pac (dont love it but id buckle come fight night), but i just cant imagine the money being there for it, theres bigger fights to be made i think.

Could fight tank, ryan garcia, spence, craw, teo lopez, haney, lomachenko... floyd, mcgregor, nate diaz... just feel like better options compared the egg man.

Ruthless-RKO wrote: ↑19 Feb 2023, 11:53

Oh no!

They should both train in the Philippines together and bulk buy the PEDs. Who would they find to licence it though?

wrighty wrote: ↑19 Feb 2023, 11:55 Honest question, if conor is having 30 eggs a day how does he go for a dump? My guts would be in bits if I tried that.

He must drink a gallon of apple cider vinegar after to help the eggs on their way through.

no doubt, conor's sh!tter must be absolutely rank beyond all rankness

margaret thatcher wrote: ↑20 Feb 2023, 19:45 no doubt, conor's sh!tter must be absolutely rank beyond all rankess

Hopefully I never have the opportunity to fact check that.

margaret thatcher wrote: ↑20 Feb 2023, 19:45 no doubt, conor's sh!tter must be absolutely rank beyond all rankness

Some guy from ukad had to use the bog after him on the plane and was violently sick everywhere so he banned him. That's what's in the 270 page dossier