BoxRec

Posted: **01 Oct 2023, 07:56**

CompuBox Stats

Posted: **01 Oct 2023, 08:28**

I'm with Crawford on this one. Jermell laid a egg and fought extremely negative.

Posted: **01 Oct 2023, 08:44**

Mexi-Box wrote: ↑01 Oct 2023, 00:20 This should stop Crawford for trying to move up to 168 to fight Canelo. The dude would get eaten alive.

he wouldn't. different animal compared to whatever charlo.

whatever. it won't happen.

Posted: **01 Oct 2023, 16:29**

Well Canelo made that look like a walk in the park, seemed like Charlo just came for the payday and applied little to no effort.
Have to say, listening to Charlo saying he wants to fight Crawford is a bit rich, I want to see Crawford again but Charlo did himself no favours at all, who would want to see him after that performance.

Posted: **01 Oct 2023, 20:52**

Money grab for certain on Charlo's part.

BoxRec

Round-by-Round: Saul ‘Canelo’ Alvarez vs. Jermell Charlo - September 30, 2023

Re: Round-by-Round: Saul ‘Canelo’ Alvarez vs. Jermell Charlo - September 30, 2023

Re: Round-by-Round: Saul ‘Canelo’ Alvarez vs. Jermell Charlo - September 30, 2023

Re: Round-by-Round: Saul ‘Canelo’ Alvarez vs. Jermell Charlo - September 30, 2023

Re: Round-by-Round: Saul ‘Canelo’ Alvarez vs. Jermell Charlo - September 30, 2023

Re: Round-by-Round: Saul ‘Canelo’ Alvarez vs. Jermell Charlo - September 30, 2023

Re: Round-by-Round: Saul ‘Canelo’ Alvarez vs. Jermell Charlo - September 30, 2023

Re: Round-by-Round: Saul ‘Canelo’ Alvarez vs. Jermell Charlo - September 30, 2023