Page 7 of 7

Posted: 07 Dec 2006, 15:05
by Collins2000
pundit wrote:
The Great John L wrote:
pundit wrote:You brought this up in this thread, buddy, and as far as I can see totally unmotivated [Tue Dec 05, 2006 11:57 am].
Oh really? How about this post from 12/1?
pundit wrote:At least Vitali won his WBC belt fair and square after the previous champ retired.
Not sure of the specific context of the comment, because I really don’t want to read through all of your posts. I only add to these exchanges when you make really baseless or incomprehensible claims. Unfortunately for all of us that seems to happen quite often.
pundit wrote: Looks like a severe emotional disturbance bordering a clinical condition.
I agree. You should definitely seek help, because your abilities are clearly impaired, and you seem only capable of expressing yourself through outright hostility.
And goodbye.

Don't worry folks, pumpit will soon be back to entertain us with more tall tales of his heroes the legendary belarus botty boys.

:TU:

Posted: 07 Dec 2006, 15:13
by pundit
Collins2000 wrote:
pundit wrote:
The Great John L wrote: Oh really? How about this post from 12/1?
Not sure of the specific context of the comment, because I really don’t want to read through all of your posts. I only add to these exchanges when you make really baseless or incomprehensible claims. Unfortunately for all of us that seems to happen quite often.
I agree. You should definitely seek help, because your abilities are clearly impaired, and you seem only capable of expressing yourself through outright hostility.
And goodbye.

Don't worry folks, pumpit will soon be back to entertain us with more tall tales of his heroes the legendary belarus botty boys.

:TU:
Seems that among other things you need to get your geography in order.

Posted: 07 Dec 2006, 15:14
by The Great John L
Collins2000 wrote:
pundit wrote:And goodbye.

Don't worry folks, pumpit will soon be back to entertain us with more tall tales of his heroes the legendary belarus botty boys.

:TU:
We better hope so. Without him, it’d get pretty damn dull around here… :TU:

Posted: 07 Dec 2006, 15:34
by pundit
The Great John L wrote:
Collins2000 wrote:
pundit wrote:And goodbye.

Don't worry folks, pumpit will soon be back to entertain us with more tall tales of his heroes the legendary belarus botty boys.

:TU:
We better hope so. Without him, it’d get pretty damn dull around here… :TU:
Don't worry. I have no intention of leaving -- for this it would take more than your emotional obsession with Vitali Klitschko that forces you throw his name in at every occasion.

Posted: 07 Dec 2006, 15:41
by The Great John L
pundit wrote:
The Great John L wrote:
Collins2000 wrote:
Don't worry folks, pumpit will soon be back to entertain us with more tall tales of his heroes the legendary belarus botty boys.

:TU:
We better hope so. Without him, it’d get pretty damn dull around here… :TU:
Don't worry. I have no intention of leaving -- for this it would take more than your emotional obsession with Vitali Klitschko that forces you throw his name in at every occasion.
See what I mean folks. This guy is great.

ranking

Posted: 07 Dec 2006, 16:40
by Cojimar 1945
I think looking at wins is important in evaluating a fighter although a single win certainly should not be overemphasized. However, I personally think actual results are far more important than who people percieve to the best. Someone held in high esteem by the public may not turn out to be as good as hoped.

Re: ranking

Posted: 07 Dec 2006, 16:48
by pundit
Cojimar 1945 wrote:I think looking at wins is important in evaluating a fighter although a single win certainly should not be overemphasized. However, I personally think actual results are far more important than who people percieve to the best. Someone held in high esteem by the public may not turn out to be as good as hoped.
I'd rather look at performances. A superb fight with a narrow loss to a great opponent is arguably worth more than a narrow win over a third-tier fighter.

Re: ranking

Posted: 07 Dec 2006, 18:54
by Collins2000
pundit wrote:
Cojimar 1945 wrote:I think looking at wins is important in evaluating a fighter although a single win certainly should not be overemphasized. However, I personally think actual results are far more important than who people percieve to the best. Someone held in high esteem by the public may not turn out to be as good as hoped.
I'd rather look at performances. A superb fight with a narrow loss to a great opponent is arguably worth more than a narrow win over a third-tier fighter.
It's a pity Dr Anal Fist never had one of those.

:TU: