Page 65 of 180
Re: Boxrec Ratings - Read first before commenting on the ratings
Posted: 19 Aug 2009, 16:09
by computerrank
MatthewS wrote:im sure that a little while ago there was the option to look at a p4p list in the ratings link... wheres it gone?
... got lost with the new servers - John received the message ...
Re: Boxrec Ratings - Read first before commenting on the ratings
Posted: 19 Aug 2009, 16:18
by m1kee50
computerrank wrote:MatthewS wrote:im sure that a little while ago there was the option to look at a p4p list in the ratings link... wheres it gone?
... got lost with the new servers - John received the message ...
cool, i quite enjoyed looking at that.
Re: Boxrec Ratings - Read first before commenting on the ratings
Posted: 22 Aug 2009, 08:38
by m1kee50
I cant seem to see any of the ratings pages, if you werent already aware
Re: Boxrec Ratings - Read first before commenting on the ratings
Posted: 22 Aug 2009, 09:27
by John
MatthewS wrote:I cant seem to see any of the ratings pages, if you werent already aware
fixed

Re: Boxrec Ratings - Read first before commenting on the ratings
Posted: 24 Aug 2009, 08:18
by conan_the_cribber
computerrank wrote:This would be the all time ratings with all annual ratings converted to the all time division assigned by the editors:
Code: Select all
rank|division |first_name |last_name | rd
----|--------------------|--------------------|--------------------|-----
1|Heavyweight |Muhammad |Ali | 2115
2|Heavyweight |Joe |Louis | 1565
3|Heavyweight |Jack |Johnson | 1363
4|Heavyweight |Floyd |Patterson | 1276
5|Heavyweight |Harry |Wills | 1168
6|Heavyweight |Larry |Holmes | 1027
7|Heavyweight |Joe |Frazier | 838
8|Heavyweight |Rocky |Marciano | 816
9|Heavyweight |Sonny |Liston | 781
10|Heavyweight |Lennox |Lewis | 749
11|Heavyweight |Sam |Langford | 745
12|Heavyweight |Ezzard |Charles | 710
13|Heavyweight |Mike |Tyson | 695
14|Heavyweight |Max |Schmeling | 666
15|Heavyweight |Jimmy |Bivins | 638
16|Heavyweight |George |Foreman | 608
17|Heavyweight |Jack |Sharkey | 604
18|Heavyweight |James J |Jeffries | 581
19|Heavyweight |Sam |McVea | 527
20|Heavyweight |Ingemar |Johansson | 477
21|Heavyweight |Joe |Jeannette | 438
22|Heavyweight |Ken |Norton | 427
23|Heavyweight |Jack |Dempsey | 405
24|Heavyweight |Max |Baer | 381
25|Heavyweight |Marvin |Hart | 361
rank|division |first_name |last_name | rd
----|--------------------|--------------------|--------------------|-----
1|Cruiserweight |Carlos |De Leon | 622
2|Cruiserweight |Orlin |Norris | 438
3|Cruiserweight |Johnny |Nelson | 382
4|Cruiserweight |Anaclet |Wamba | 288
5|Cruiserweight |Jean Marc |Mormeck | 238
6|Cruiserweight |O'Neil |Bell | 232
7|Cruiserweight |Ossie |Ocasio | 222
8|Cruiserweight |Vassiliy |Jirov | 218
9|Cruiserweight |Marcelo Fabian |Dominguez | 186
10|Cruiserweight |Carl |Thompson | 165
11|Cruiserweight |Adolpho |Washington | 164
12|Cruiserweight |Nate |Miller | 161
13|Cruiserweight |Piet |Crous | 129
14|Cruiserweight |John |Odhiambho | 125
15|Cruiserweight |Alexander |Gurov | 125
16|Cruiserweight |Jeff |Lampkin | 103
17|Cruiserweight |Norbert |Ekassi | 101
18|Cruiserweight |Angelo |Rottoli | 99
19|Cruiserweight |ST |Gordon | 88
20|Cruiserweight |Sebastiaan |Rothmann | 85
21|Cruiserweight |Lou |Del Valle | 85
22|Cruiserweight |Glenn |McCrory | 79
23|Cruiserweight |Ralf |Rocchigiani | 77
24|Cruiserweight |Akim |Tafer | 77
25|Cruiserweight |Vincenzo |Cantatore | 76
rank|division |first_name |last_name | rd
----|--------------------|--------------------|--------------------|-----
1|Light Heavyweight |Archie |Moore | 2443
2|Light Heavyweight |Philadelphia Jack |O'Brien | 2191
3|Light Heavyweight |Tommy |Gibbons | 1835
4|Light Heavyweight |Gene |Tunney | 1500
5|Light Heavyweight |Melio |Bettina | 1178
6|Light Heavyweight |Tommy |Loughran | 1145
7|Light Heavyweight |Jack |Root | 1134
8|Light Heavyweight |Bob |Foster | 1111
9|Light Heavyweight |Bob |Fitzsimmons | 1073
10|Light Heavyweight |Michael |Spinks | 1044
11|Light Heavyweight |Harold |Johnson | 1034
12|Light Heavyweight |Billy |Conn | 907
13|Light Heavyweight |Billy |Miske | 905
14|Light Heavyweight |Battling |Levinsky | 899
15|Light Heavyweight |Virgil |Hill | 883
16|Light Heavyweight |Joey |Maxim | 869
17|Light Heavyweight |Tami |Mauriello | 831
18|Light Heavyweight |Charles Kid |McCoy | 728
19|Light Heavyweight |Maxie |Rosenbloom | 726
20|Light Heavyweight |Dariusz |Michalczewski | 706
21|Light Heavyweight |John Henry |Lewis | 694
22|Light Heavyweight |Jose |Torres | 641
23|Light Heavyweight |Dwight Muhammad |Qawi | 633
24|Light Heavyweight |Georges |Carpentier | 622
25|Light Heavyweight |Young |Stribling | 579
rank|division |first_name |last_name | rd
----|--------------------|--------------------|--------------------|-----
1|Super Middleweight |Joe |Calzaghe | 792
2|Super Middleweight |Steve |Collins | 399
3|Super Middleweight |Chris |Eubank | 364
4|Super Middleweight |Nigel |Benn | 354
5|Super Middleweight |Sven |Ottke | 278
6|Super Middleweight |Frankie |Liles | 206
7|Super Middleweight |Thulani |Malinga | 202
8|Super Middleweight |Robin |Reid | 162
9|Super Middleweight |Christophe |Tiozzo | 128
10|Super Middleweight |Markus |Beyer | 117
11|Super Middleweight |In-Chul |Baek | 114
12|Super Middleweight |Henry |Wharton | 112
13|Super Middleweight |Fulgencio |Obelmejias | 106
14|Super Middleweight |Victor |Cordoba | 101
15|Super Middleweight |Eric |Lucas | 94
16|Super Middleweight |Thomas |Tate | 92
17|Super Middleweight |Darrin |Van Horn | 89
18|Super Middleweight |Sam |Soliman | 88
19|Super Middleweight |Charles |Brewer | 81
20|Super Middleweight |Richie |Woodhall | 78
21|Super Middleweight |Dana |Rosenblatt | 76
22|Super Middleweight |Guy |Waters | 75
23|Super Middleweight |James |Cook | 71
24|Super Middleweight |Mario |Veit | 68
25|Super Middleweight |Frederic |Seillier | 63
rank|division |first_name |last_name | rd
----|--------------------|--------------------|--------------------|-----
1|Middleweight |Marvin |Hagler | 1589
2|Middleweight |Sugar Ray |Robinson | 1509
3|Middleweight |Harry |Greb | 1464
4|Middleweight |Carlos |Monzon | 1446
5|Middleweight |Tommy |Ryan | 965
6|Middleweight |Dick |Tiger | 863
7|Middleweight |Michael |Nunn | 678
8|Middleweight |Mike |McCallum | 677
9|Middleweight |Mike |Gibbons | 629
10|Middleweight |Stanley |Ketchel | 484
11|Middleweight |Mike |O'Dowd | 472
12|Middleweight |Rodrigo |Valdez | 472
13|Middleweight |Gene |Fullmer | 471
14|Middleweight |Joey |Giardello | 447
15|Middleweight |George |Gardner | 446
16|Middleweight |Sumbu |Kalambay | 384
17|Middleweight |Bobo |Olson | 378
18|Middleweight |Charley |Burley | 365
19|Middleweight |Fred |Apostoli | 362
20|Middleweight |Nino |Benvenuti | 361
21|Middleweight |Jack (Twin) |Sullivan | 347
22|Middleweight |Leo |Houck | 313
23|Middleweight |Jimmy |Clabby | 303
24|Middleweight |Ceferino |Garcia | 303
25|Middleweight |Jack |Dillon | 299
rank|division |first_name |last_name | rd
----|--------------------|--------------------|--------------------|-----
1|Light Middleweight |Sandro |Mazzinghi | 1095
2|Light Middleweight |Terry |Norris | 790
3|Light Middleweight |Freddie |Little | 609
4|Light Middleweight |Wilfred |Benitez | 583
5|Light Middleweight |Maurice |Hope | 572
6|Light Middleweight |Ki Soo |Kim | 449
7|Light Middleweight |Ayub |Kalule | 352
8|Light Middleweight |Bruno |Visintin | 344
9|Light Middleweight |Denny |Moyer | 313
10|Light Middleweight |Rocky |Mattioli | 275
11|Light Middleweight |Laurent |Boudouani | 266
12|Light Middleweight |Javier |Castillejo | 247
13|Light Middleweight |Louis |Acaries | 182
14|Light Middleweight |Carlos |Santos | 181
15|Light Middleweight |Fernando |Vargas | 179
16|Light Middleweight |Daniel |Santos | 173
17|Light Middleweight |John |Mugabi | 164
18|Light Middleweight |Loucif |Hamani | 159
19|Light Middleweight |Buster |Drayton | 143
20|Light Middleweight |Harry |Simon | 141
21|Light Middleweight |Carmelo |Bossi | 139
22|Light Middleweight |Domenico |Tiberia | 136
23|Light Middleweight |Eckhard |Dagge | 131
24|Light Middleweight |Matthew |Hilton | 126
25|Light Middleweight |Bo |Hogberg | 125
rank|division |first_name |last_name | rd
----|--------------------|--------------------|--------------------|-----
1|Welterweight |Thomas |Hearns | 1696
2|Welterweight |Jose |Napoles | 1547
3|Welterweight |Oscar |De La Hoya | 1421
4|Welterweight |Emile |Griffith | 1364
5|Welterweight |Sugar Ray |Leonard | 1295
6|Welterweight |Luis Manuel |Rodriguez | 1045
7|Welterweight |Felix |Trinidad | 1028
8|Welterweight |Mickey |Walker | 917
9|Welterweight |Joe |Walcott | 866
10|Welterweight |Pernell |Whitaker | 857
11|Welterweight |Jimmy |Gardner | 838
12|Welterweight |Jack |Britton | 812
13|Welterweight |Young |Corbett III | 772
14|Welterweight |Mike Twin |Sullivan | 693
15|Welterweight |Donald |Curry | 671
16|Welterweight |Ted 'Kid' |Lewis | 664
17|Welterweight |Jimmy |McLarnin | 657
18|Welterweight |Carmen |Basilio | 543
19|Welterweight |Curtis |Cokes | 505
20|Welterweight |Al |Neill | 485
21|Welterweight |George |Cole | 473
22|Welterweight |George |Green | 467
23|Welterweight |Tommy |West | 458
24|Welterweight |Henry |Armstrong | 433
25|Welterweight |Lloyd |Honeyghan | 430
rank|division |first_name |last_name | rd
----|--------------------|--------------------|--------------------|-----
1|Light Welterweight |Julio Cesar |Chavez | 1197
2|Light Welterweight |Nicolino |Locche | 1174
3|Light Welterweight |Bruno |Arcari | 993
4|Light Welterweight |Antonio |Cervantes | 865
5|Light Welterweight |Kostya |Tszyu | 794
6|Light Welterweight |Eddie |Perkins | 730
7|Light Welterweight |Aaron |Pryor | 608
8|Light Welterweight |Carlos |Hernandez | 497
9|Light Welterweight |Barney |Ross | 478
10|Light Welterweight |Juan Martin |Coggi | 368
11|Light Welterweight |Vinny |Pazienza | 306
12|Light Welterweight |Duilio |Loi | 246
13|Light Welterweight |Tippy |Larkin | 241
14|Light Welterweight |Saoul |Mamby | 229
15|Light Welterweight |Frankie |Randall | 229
16|Light Welterweight |Meldrick |Taylor | 222
17|Light Welterweight |Hector |Thompson | 210
18|Light Welterweight |Sharmba |Mitchell | 199
19|Light Welterweight |Saensak |Muangsurin | 196
20|Light Welterweight |Vince |Phillips | 189
21|Light Welterweight |Roger |Mayweather | 188
22|Light Welterweight |Bunny |Grant | 186
23|Light Welterweight |Joao |Henrique | 173
24|Light Welterweight |Ubaldo Nestor |Sacco | 156
25|Light Welterweight |Jo |Kimpuani | 155
rank|division |first_name |last_name | rd
----|--------------------|--------------------|--------------------|-----
1|Lightweight |Roberto |Duran | 1907
2|Lightweight |Benny |Leonard | 1484
3|Lightweight |Carlos |Ortiz | 1418
4|Lightweight |Joe |Gans | 1102
5|Lightweight |Lew |Tendler | 735
6|Lightweight |Ike |Williams | 693
7|Lightweight |Tony |Canzoneri | 655
8|Lightweight |Beau |Jack | 617
9|Lightweight |Lou |Ambers | 549
10|Lightweight |Esteban |De Jesus | 531
11|Lightweight |Sammy |Angott | 501
12|Lightweight |Bob |Montgomery | 496
13|Lightweight |Battling |Nelson | 472
14|Lightweight |Ismael |Laguna | 443
15|Lightweight |Jimmy |Britt | 422
16|Lightweight |Miguel Angel |Gonzalez | 421
17|Lightweight |Ken |Buchanan | 397
18|Lightweight |Packey |McFarland | 393
19|Lightweight |Freddie |Dawson | 392
20|Lightweight |Joe |Brown | 352
21|Lightweight |Lockport Jimmy |Duffy | 336
22|Lightweight |Kenny |Lane | 334
23|Lightweight |Jack |Blackburn | 326
24|Lightweight |Freddie |Welsh | 325
25|Lightweight |Billy |Petrolle | 323
rank|division |first_name |last_name | rd
----|--------------------|--------------------|--------------------|-----
1|Super Featherweight |Floyd |Mayweather Jr | 1444
2|Super Featherweight |Alexis |Arguello | 1140
3|Super Featherweight |Azumah |Nelson | 860
4|Super Featherweight |Flash |Elorde | 667
5|Super Featherweight |Samuel |Serrano | 649
6|Super Featherweight |Johnny |Dundee | 425
7|Super Featherweight |Rene |Barrientos | 416
8|Super Featherweight |Arturo |Gatti | 382
9|Super Featherweight |Hiroshi |Kobayashi | 377
10|Super Featherweight |Alfredo |Escalera | 364
11|Super Featherweight |John John |Molina | 326
12|Super Featherweight |Brian |Mitchell | 322
13|Super Featherweight |Nkosana |Mgxaji | 319
14|Super Featherweight |Kuniaki |Shibata | 308
15|Super Featherweight |Rocky |Lockridge | 307
16|Super Featherweight |Acelino |Freitas | 301
17|Super Featherweight |Diego |Corrales | 298
18|Super Featherweight |Love |Allotey | 297
19|Super Featherweight |Antonio |Amaya | 295
20|Super Featherweight |Barry |Michael | 282
21|Super Featherweight |Tony |Lopez | 279
22|Super Featherweight |Genaro |Hernandez | 272
23|Super Featherweight |Jesse James |Leija | 243
24|Super Featherweight |Ben |Villaflor | 230
25|Super Featherweight |Kang Il |Suh | 210
rank|division |first_name |last_name | rd
----|--------------------|--------------------|--------------------|-----
1|Featherweight |Willie |Pep | 1460
2|Featherweight |Vicente |Saldivar | 1002
3|Featherweight |Sugar |Ramos | 877
4|Featherweight |Davey |Moore | 863
5|Featherweight |Johnny |Kilbane | 851
6|Featherweight |Terry |McGovern | 823
7|Featherweight |Abe |Attell | 814
8|Featherweight |Naseem |Hamed | 802
9|Featherweight |Owen |Moran | 700
10|Featherweight |Young |Corbett II | 687
11|Featherweight |Jim |Driscoll | 653
12|Featherweight |Louis |Kaplan | 615
13|Featherweight |Leo |Rodak | 604
14|Featherweight |Sandy |Saddler | 582
15|Featherweight |Chalky |Wright | 565
16|Featherweight |Danny |Lopez | 548
17|Featherweight |Salvador |Sanchez | 504
18|Featherweight |Bobby |Ruffin | 500
19|Featherweight |Eusebio |Pedroza | 421
20|Featherweight |Jeff |Fenech | 373
21|Featherweight |Howard |Winstone | 364
22|Featherweight |Jose |Legra | 346
23|Featherweight |Petey |Sarron | 344
24|Featherweight |Frankie |Fleming | 337
25|Featherweight |Tom |Smith | 334
rank|division |first_name |last_name | rd
----|--------------------|--------------------|--------------------|-----
1|Super Bantamweight |Wilfredo |Gomez | 1388
2|Super Bantamweight |Erik |Morales | 1108
3|Super Bantamweight |Israel |Vazquez | 484
4|Super Bantamweight |Wilfredo |Vazquez | 432
5|Super Bantamweight |Daniel |Zaragoza | 343
6|Super Bantamweight |Ricardo |Cardona | 220
7|Super Bantamweight |Kennedy |McKinney | 216
8|Super Bantamweight |Sergio Victor |Palma | 190
9|Super Bantamweight |Tracy |Harris Patterson | 174
10|Super Bantamweight |Junior |Jones | 165
11|Super Bantamweight |Juan |Meza | 164
12|Super Bantamweight |Antonio |Cermeno | 157
13|Super Bantamweight |Victor |Callejas | 156
14|Super Bantamweight |Louie |Espinoza | 155
15|Super Bantamweight |Jaime |Garza | 140
16|Super Bantamweight |Leonardo |Cruz | 140
17|Super Bantamweight |Jesus |Salud | 137
18|Super Bantamweight |Seung Hoon |Lee | 135
19|Super Bantamweight |Carlos |Mendoza | 135
20|Super Bantamweight |Luis Enrique |Mendoza | 129
21|Super Bantamweight |Mike |Ayala | 123
22|Super Bantamweight |Wayne |McCullough | 119
23|Super Bantamweight |Loris |Stecca | 118
24|Super Bantamweight |Agapito |Sanchez | 111
25|Super Bantamweight |Samart |Payakaroon | 103
rank|division |first_name |last_name | rd
----|--------------------|--------------------|--------------------|-----
1|Bantamweight |Eder |Jofre | 893
2|Bantamweight |Manuel |Ortiz | 820
3|Bantamweight |Jimmy |Carruthers | 654
4|Bantamweight |Rush |Dalma | 647
5|Bantamweight |Willie |Toweel | 586
6|Bantamweight |Carlos |Zarate | 538
7|Bantamweight |Ruben |Olivares | 505
8|Bantamweight |Fighting |Harada | 496
9|Bantamweight |Frankie |Burns | 482
10|Bantamweight |Harry |Forbes | 471
11|Bantamweight |Joe |Bowker | 467
12|Bantamweight |Panama Al |Brown | 432
13|Bantamweight |Jimmy |Walsh | 415
14|Bantamweight |Orlando |Canizales | 397
15|Bantamweight |Rodolfo |Martinez | 395
16|Bantamweight |Kid |Williams | 386
17|Bantamweight |Chucho |Castillo | 383
18|Bantamweight |Mario |D'Agata | 366
19|Bantamweight |Paul |Ferreri | 363
20|Bantamweight |Bushy |Graham | 363
21|Bantamweight |KO |Morgan | 356
22|Bantamweight |Arnold |Taylor | 356
23|Bantamweight |Dick |Corbett | 356
24|Bantamweight |Jose |Medel | 353
25|Bantamweight |Rodolfo |Casanova | 343
rank|division |first_name |last_name | rd
----|--------------------|--------------------|--------------------|-----
1|Super Flyweight |Gilberto |Roman | 555
2|Super Flyweight |Jiro |Watanabe | 492
3|Super Flyweight |Khaosai |Galaxy | 450
4|Super Flyweight |Johnny |Tapia | 435
5|Super Flyweight |Sung-Kil |Moon | 401
6|Super Flyweight |Masamori |Tokuyama | 273
7|Super Flyweight |Samson |Dutch Boy Gym | 226
8|Super Flyweight |Gustavo |Ballas | 220
9|Super Flyweight |Sugar Baby |Rojas | 187
10|Super Flyweight |Jesus |Rojas | 180
11|Super Flyweight |Hiroshi |Kawashima | 149
12|Super Flyweight |Rafael |Orono | 141
13|Super Flyweight |Thanomsak |Sithbaobay | 133
14|Super Flyweight |Yokthai |Sithoar | 121
15|Super Flyweight |Jose |Ruiz | 114
16|Super Flyweight |Danny |Romero | 98
17|Super Flyweight |In-Joo |Cho | 92
18|Super Flyweight |Payao |Poontarat | 92
19|Super Flyweight |Satoshi |Iida | 83
20|Super Flyweight |Celes |Kobayashi | 83
21|Super Flyweight |Alimi |Goitia | 82
22|Super Flyweight |Ellyas |Pical | 80
23|Super Flyweight |Katsuya |Onizuka | 72
24|Super Flyweight |Alberto |Castro | 70
25|Super Flyweight |Katsushige |Kawashima | 70
rank|division |first_name |last_name | rd
----|--------------------|--------------------|--------------------|-----
1|Flyweight |Peter |Kane | 1330
2|Flyweight |Jimmy |Wilde | 1255
3|Flyweight |Jackie |Paterson | 1223
4|Flyweight |Fidel |LaBarba | 1122
5|Flyweight |Little |Pancho | 955
6|Flyweight |Little |Dado | 937
7|Flyweight |Pascual |Perez | 860
8|Flyweight |Midget |Wolgast | 787
9|Flyweight |Venice |Borkhorsor | 780
10|Flyweight |Efren |Torres | 726
11|Flyweight |Salvatore |Burruni | 721
12|Flyweight |Chartchai |Chionoi | 701
13|Flyweight |Horacio |Accavallo | 682
14|Flyweight |Newsboy |Brown | 633
15|Flyweight |Frankie |Genaro | 610
16|Flyweight |Benny |Lynch | 606
17|Flyweight |Rinty |Monaghan | 599
18|Flyweight |Pone |Kingpetch | 583
19|Flyweight |Ginger |Foran | 555
20|Flyweight |Pancho |Villa | 550
21|Flyweight |Masao |Ohba | 536
22|Flyweight |Chico |Morales | 494
23|Flyweight |Dai |Dower | 482
24|Flyweight |Miguel |Canto | 482
25|Flyweight |Hiroyuki |Ebihara | 480
rank|division |first_name |last_name | rd
----|--------------------|--------------------|--------------------|-----
1|Light Flyweight |Jung-Koo |Chang | 679
2|Light Flyweight |Humberto |Gonzalez | 569
3|Light Flyweight |Luis |Estaba | 467
4|Light Flyweight |Hilario |Zapata | 427
5|Light Flyweight |Yoko |Gushiken | 380
6|Light Flyweight |Michael |Carbajal | 372
7|Light Flyweight |Myung-Woo |Yuh | 354
8|Light Flyweight |Pichit |Chor Siriwat | 288
9|Light Flyweight |Leo |Gamez | 287
10|Light Flyweight |Sung Jun |Kim | 253
11|Light Flyweight |Saman |Sorjaturong | 227
12|Light Flyweight |Jacob |Matlala | 224
13|Light Flyweight |Joey |Olivo | 218
14|Light Flyweight |German |Torres | 198
15|Light Flyweight |Yo Sam |Choi | 186
16|Light Flyweight |Rolando |Pascua | 159
17|Light Flyweight |Amado |Ursua | 148
18|Light Flyweight |Katsuo |Tokashiki | 144
19|Light Flyweight |Lupe |Madera | 140
20|Light Flyweight |Victor |Burgos | 128
21|Light Flyweight |Beibis |Mendoza | 121
22|Light Flyweight |Jose |De Jesus | 114
23|Light Flyweight |Francisco |Quiroz | 113
24|Light Flyweight |Juan |Alvarez | 98
25|Light Flyweight |Hiroki |Ioka | 93
rank|division |first_name |last_name | rd
----|--------------------|--------------------|--------------------|-----
1|Minimumweight |Ricardo |Lopez | 1161
2|Minimumweight |Rosendo |Alvarez | 561
3|Minimumweight |Chana |Porpaoin | 331
4|Minimumweight |Fahlan |Sakkreerin | 211
5|Minimumweight |Eagle Den |Junlaphan | 140
6|Minimumweight |Yutaka |Niida | 129
7|Minimumweight |Hideyuki |Ohashi | 127
8|Minimumweight |Zolani |Petelo | 120
9|Minimumweight |Songkram |Porpaoin | 108
10|Minimumweight |Manny |Melchor | 107
11|Minimumweight |Eric |Chavez | 102
12|Minimumweight |Joma |Gamboa | 102
13|Minimumweight |Keitaro |Hoshino | 94
14|Minimumweight |Rocky |Lin | 92
15|Minimumweight |Ronnie |Magramo | 83
16|Minimumweight |Hi-Yong |Choi | 83
17|Minimumweight |Andy |Tabanas | 81
18|Minimumweight |Hector Luis |Patri | 69
19|Minimumweight |Fahsang |Pongsawang | 64
20|Minimumweight |Noel |Tunacao | 60
21|Minimumweight |Jin Ho |Kim | 59
22|Minimumweight |Ernesto |Rubillar | 57
23|Minimumweight |Satoshi |Kogumazaka | 55
24|Minimumweight |Yuichi |Hosono | 49
25|Minimumweight |Ala |Villamor | 46
Hi
I don’t usually get involved with the all-time and pfp stuff, but I read the last few posts from Monty and they got me thinking a bit. I’m not sure what the status quo is, or where I could read about the formulas, so excuse my ignorance.
Principally I think you have to differentiate between all-time ratings and pfp ratings. Obviously these ratings are trying to express different things.
First all the all-time weight division stuff. Here I’d be looking at a fighter’s performance in a weight division. The weight division assigned to the fight should not play any role in the discussion. That means of course, that a fighter can be ranked in multiple divisions. There is nothing wrong with saying that Ray Robinson was the greatest welter who ever lived and he was a top 10 middleweight as well. How the rest of the equation is done is up to you guys. Obviously for all-time ratings it should respect the duration of a career. It should also respect the peak or peaks of the fighter’s career.
For the eternally difficult all-time pfp ratings. You have to decide what you want to use as a basis. Critera such as; length of career, ability to dominate a division, ability to dominate multiple divisions (however, you have to factor in the heavyweights, who can’t move divisions) spring to mind. Monty’s points about Hopkins seem quite valid. Why should Hopkins’s all-time ranking be penalized for fighting Adamek at 200lbs. Personally I’d be looking at the number of divisions that a boxer did well in (criteria open), and not what some editor assigned to a fighter for some other purpose (namely forcing an active fighter to be ranked in only division). Back up that with the quality of the peak of a fighter’s career (??? Max pts) and you got a start.
I noticed in the rejigged ratings above, that Roy Jones doesn’t get a mention anywhere and Bernhard Hopkins doesn’t get a mention at middleweight. I’m not the historical expert, but that seems wrong. Henry Armstrong at #24 in welterweight is obviously a crime.
conan
Re: Boxrec Ratings - Read first before commenting on the ratings
Posted: 24 Aug 2009, 08:22
by JCS
I think active fighters were excluded from those lists Conan.
Re: Boxrec Ratings - Read first before commenting on the ratings
Posted: 24 Aug 2009, 09:15
by conan_the_cribber
JCS wrote:I think active fighters were excluded from those lists Conan.
Thanks for the explanation. AS I said, I'm unsure of the algorithms. That would explain hopkin and Jones, but not armstrong.
Re: Boxrec Ratings - Read first before commenting on the ratings
Posted: 24 Aug 2009, 09:18
by JCS
conan_the_cribber wrote:JCS wrote:I think active fighters were excluded from those lists Conan.
Thanks for the explanation. AS I said, I'm unsure of the algorithms. That would explain hopkin and Jones, but not armstrong.
Using "current" points in all-time rankings makes it tough, as the value of a point can change throughout time.
Re: Boxrec Ratings - Read first before commenting on the ratings
Posted: 25 Aug 2009, 15:54
by Asterix
MontyCircus wrote:The interesting bit is that...with 1908 points...Juan Manuel Marquez is the third best pound-for-pound fighter on the planet (Floyd would be 7th, wedged in between the Klitschko brothers).
...But in choosing to go up 2 more weight-classes and fight Floyd...Juan Manuel Marquez loses 299 points and becomes...the fifth best pound-for-pound fighter on the planet. That's right...he immediately drops two spots on the pound-for-pound list for going up 2 weight-classes to take on the former p4p king.
It doesn't make a lick of sense. Though I'll admit very little can be done about the "Current P4P" system in this regard...it would involve having editors choose a fighter's "true" class...DURING their careers...which is a bit much to ask I think...
At 147 lbs he's worse
pound for
pound than he is at 135 lbs. Sorry, but it makes complete sense to me. Is Mayweather still the P4P king if he moves up to light heavyweight? No chance, unless, of course, he starts beating the top guys there.
Re: Boxrec Ratings - Read first before commenting on the ratings
Posted: 26 Aug 2009, 05:56
by conan_the_cribber
MontyCircus wrote:Hey Conan, long time no ratings quibbling eh? haha...I'll reply in-line so I don't miss anything...
conan_the_cribber wrote:
Hi
I don’t usually get involved with the all-time and pfp stuff, but I read the last few posts from Monty and they got me thinking a bit.
Yay! That's my job
I’m not sure what the status quo is, or where I could read about the formulas, so excuse my ignorance.
There's a brief explanation of the all-time ratings on the boxrec wiki dictionary page thingy...that's all I really needed to get an idea of what they do and their intention.
Principally I think you have to differentiate between all-time ratings and pfp ratings. Obviously these ratings are trying to express different things.
Yup...I think differently than you though. For example, I think a fighter's "current" division points and his "current" P4P points should be different scores...unless he's been in one division for his career (a la Hagler)
First all the all-time weight division stuff. Here I’d be looking at a fighter’s performance in a weight division. The weight division assigned to the fight should not play any role in the discussion. That means of course, that a fighter can be ranked in multiple divisions. There is nothing wrong with saying that Ray Robinson was the greatest welter who ever lived and he was a top 10 middleweight as well. How the rest of the equation is done is up to you guys. Obviously for all-time ratings it should respect the duration of a career. It should also respect the peak or peaks of the fighter’s career.
Then how would you feel about Sugar Ray being listed around #20 all-time welterweight and #20 all-time middleweight? No matter what kind of magical formula you create...he's going to lose points out of the deal...a loooooooot of points, and they'll be split up between the divisions. That's why the multiple division ranking idea needs to be thrown into the ol' bucket o' lost causes.
For the eternally difficult all-time pfp ratings. You have to decide what you want to use as a basis. Critera such as; length of career, ability to dominate a division, ability to dominate multiple divisions (however, you have to factor in the heavyweights, who can’t move divisions) spring to mind. Monty’s points about Hopkins seem quite valid. Why should Hopkins’s all-time ranking be penalized for fighting Adamek at 200lbs. Personally I’d be looking at the number of divisions that a boxer did well in (criteria open), and not what some editor assigned to a fighter for some other purpose (namely forcing an active fighter to be ranked in only division). Back up that with the quality of the peak of a fighter’s career (??? Max pts) and you got a start.
I think you're wrong about a boxer's assigned division being important. I think it should be HUGELY important. For example...Pacquiao moves up to heavyweight...knocks out both Klitschkos. According to the current system.....that's incredible. But according to Pacquiao's height, weight, body, reach, history...it's otherwordly. If Pacquiao then retired, was rated at say...130 lbs. and his all-time stats were "down-scaled" as I'm calling for...then his points would be off the damn charts...at least certainly hitting maximum for that year or years (which happens a little above 2000 ratings points last time I calculated it). The whole idea of pound for pound is that you're SUPPOSED to adjust a person's accomplishments based on his size. So figuring out where he naturally fit in is paramount here...
Another example. Let's say the champion of every weight class from straw to heavy are of equal value. I'm a new boxer. Little guy. Smallest of the small. 105 pounds. It takes me 13 fights but I get a fight at the champ. I knock out the strawweight champ. I move up to 108, KO him. I move up to 112, KO him. And on and on. I retire 30-0, with championships in all seventeen weight-classes. On Boxrec...I would have decent numbers. But in the boxing world I would be known as the greatest of all-time...hands down. Without question. Don't need to even think for one second about it.
The only way for the BoxRec computer to come to the same conclusion is if at the end of my illustrious career I am assigned as a straw-weight under P4P rankings that give benefits for fighting above your natural weight-class.
Henry Armstrong at #24 in welterweight is obviously a crime.
Well he's #15 under the current system. I'm sure you'd find that a crime too. But he fought over 2/3rds of his career UNDER welterweight...so it makes sense...perfect sense...that he wouldn't be regarded as highly at welter. He fought almost half of his career at featherweight for christ sake...not something that should benefit you...if at all...in "welterweight" ratings.
His is an interesting case though...where to stick him...seems he accomplished not all that much at featherweight...was at lightweight for a spell...and then accomplished a great deal at welter...but putting him there basically disregards points from half his career. In the P4P system tweaks I've proposed he would do a bit better...as all of his featherweight, lightweight and welterweight points would count in full (the 126 and 135 fights wouldn't be penalized).....although other boxers would still gain points for fights fought above their weight class (e.g. Hearns, Duran, the Light Heavyweight champs that beat Heavies, etc.)
In any event...if boxers were ranked in multiple weight-classes, I think Armstrong would be lucky to be ranked in the top 50 in anything...
Hi Monty,
Thanks for reminding me, why I should stay out of pfp and all-time ranking arguments. It’s really a no win situation.
I guess first all, you really have to define what you want the rankings to say. In the case of Ray Leonard, you want to make a statement saying, “look what he achieved at welter and then consider what he achieved at higher weights. Imagine if he continued at welter, he would’ve dominated for years and years, therefore, he was one of the best welters of all time”. That would be the same as your Pacman vs Klitschko argument. By defeating leading heavyweights, it proved that he was capable of destroying everyone at his own weight. Henry Armstrong is indeed difficult. What statement do you want to make for him in the all-time rankings. It’s more difficult to say “that because he did best at welter, he would’ve been amazing at lightweight” because he already had ample chance to be amazing there, but didn’t do enough in the division to be considered an all-time great. I guess the point where you change divisions should be an influencing factor. If you left a division at your peak for a new division and then continued on your merry way, it shows how good you could’ve been at the lower weight. If you started to peak after leaving a division, it may just indicate that the lower weight wasn’t good for you (unusual as it seems).
Again, I think a fighter should be ranked at multiple weights. Not as I wrote, by just evaluating the fights at that weight, but more like above, where Leonard’s accomplishments at middleweight are included in his evaluation as a welter. I still think it’s a valid statement to say, Leonard was a top 5 welterweight, but only a top 20 middleweight. Both statements are objectively derivable from the fighter’s record without needing to have an editor nominate an optimal body weight.
Anyhow, I’ll think I’ll bow out. I don’t really care too passionately about either of these ratings.
conan
Re: Boxrec Ratings - Read first before commenting on the ratings
Posted: 29 Aug 2009, 19:11
by Asterix
Pound is a weight measurement. Pound for Pound means that if you made everyone else the same weight as this boxer, how would they do? If Pacquiao is 147 lbs, then Pound for Pound he's worse than a 140 lbs version of himself. He's a stronger fighter at 140 lbs, where's he considered the best in the division. At 147 lbs, he is not considered the best in the division.
Quite straight forward, imo.
Re: Boxrec Ratings - Read first before commenting on the ratings
Posted: 03 Sep 2009, 11:56
by giacomino
Have a question on the light flyweight rankings that I haven't figured out even after reading how the point systems are done.
Ranked #13 is Ryo Miyazaki who is 9-0. He has beaten only one fighter with more than 10 wins (a 12-6 fighter) and has beaten no one who has ever been even a Japanese champion, let alone a regional or word champion. None of his opponents were highly ranked. Essentially, he's fought the typical fair for a young fighter in his first year or two in the sport.
He is somehow ranked two places ahead of Juan Carlos Reveco, who is 21-1, who won the WBA title by KO at home against an undefeated opponent two years ago, lost it on a close decision away in France against a highly rated opponent, then recently won the interim WBA title away in Mexico against another decent opponent.
Miyazaki is rated six places ahead of Cesar Canchilla, who is 28-2, split two fights in the past year with #4 ranked Giovanni Segura, and most recently Ko'd a 14-3 opponent who had a better record than anyone Miyazaki has faced.
I think I understand how the points systems work, but in this case, and in a few more in the light flyweight rankings, it makes no sense to me. This is one of several puzzling rankings in the lower weight classes
Re: Boxrec Ratings - Read first before commenting on the ratings
Posted: 03 Sep 2009, 12:02
by JCS
giacomino wrote:Have a question on the light flyweight rankings that I haven't figured out even after reading how the point systems are done.
Ranked #13 is Ryo Miyazaki who is 9-0. He has beaten only one fighter with more than 10 wins (a 12-6 fighter) and has beaten no one who has ever been even a Japanese champion, let alone a regional or word champion. None of his opponents were highly ranked. Essentially, he's fought the typical fair for a young fighter in his first year or two in the sport.
He is somehow ranked two places ahead of Juan Carlos Reveco, who is 21-1, who won the WBA title by KO at home against an undefeated opponent two years ago, lost it on a close decision away in France against a highly rated opponent, then recently won the interim WBA title away in Mexico against another decent opponent.
Miyazaki is rated six places ahead of Cesar Canchilla, who is 28-2, split two fights in the past year with #4 ranked Giovanni Segura, and most recently Ko'd a 14-3 opponent who had a better record than anyone Miyazaki has faced.
I think I understand how the points systems work, but in this case, and in a few more in the light flyweight rankings, it makes no sense to me. This is one of several puzzling rankings in the lower weight classes
Places like Japan have built up their own talent pools and for the most part, stay independent by not fighting the rest of the world's talent. They are probably good fighters, but no one has ever heard of them.
Its almost like countries such as Japan and South Africa have their own point totals.
Re: Boxrec Ratings - Read first before commenting on the ratings
Posted: 03 Sep 2009, 17:53
by giacomino
JCS wrote:giacomino wrote:Have a question on the light flyweight rankings that I haven't figured out even after reading how the point systems are done.
Ranked #13 is Ryo Miyazaki who is 9-0. He has beaten only one fighter with more than 10 wins (a 12-6 fighter) and has beaten no one who has ever been even a Japanese champion, let alone a regional or word champion. None of his opponents were highly ranked. Essentially, he's fought the typical fair for a young fighter in his first year or two in the sport.
He is somehow ranked two places ahead of Juan Carlos Reveco, who is 21-1, who won the WBA title by KO at home against an undefeated opponent two years ago, lost it on a close decision away in France against a highly rated opponent, then recently won the interim WBA title away in Mexico against another decent opponent.
Miyazaki is rated six places ahead of Cesar Canchilla, who is 28-2, split two fights in the past year with #4 ranked Giovanni Segura, and most recently Ko'd a 14-3 opponent who had a better record than anyone Miyazaki has faced.
I think I understand how the points systems work, but in this case, and in a few more in the light flyweight rankings, it makes no sense to me. This is one of several puzzling rankings in the lower weight classes
Places like Japan have built up their own talent pools and for the most part, stay independent by not fighting the rest of the world's talent. They are probably good fighters, but no one has ever heard of them.
Its almost like countries such as Japan and South Africa have their own point totals.
I think you've got to be right because the point totals for some Japanese fighters who fight only at the domestic level are amazingly high in the lower weight classifications
Re: Boxrec Ratings - Read first before commenting on the ratings
Posted: 03 Sep 2009, 23:05
by JCS
giacomino wrote:
Places like Japan have built up their own talent pools and for the most part, stay independent by not fighting the rest of the world's talent. They are probably good fighters, but no one has ever heard of them.
JCS wrote:
Its almost like countries such as Japan and South Africa have their own point totals.
I think you've got to be right because the point totals for some Japanese fighters who fight only at the domestic level are amazingly high in the lower weight classifications
Unfortunately, there's no good way to handle this.
Re: Boxrec Ratings - Read first before commenting on the ratings
Posted: 04 Sep 2009, 16:50
by Asterix
MontyCircus wrote:The long-reigning light heavyweight champion moves up to heavyweight and fights the heavyweight champion. They fight twice, each winning one a piece in two close bouts.
Which fighter is better pound for pound?
Correct Answer: The light heavyweight champion.
How anyone can disagree with that is beyond my comprehension. But somehow I'm sure you do. So I guess we'll agree to disagree on this 1+1=2 debate
![[icon_witsend.gif] :witzend:](./images/smilies/icon_witsend.gif)
Of course, I agree with that.
Re: Boxrec Ratings - Read first before commenting on the ratings
Posted: 04 Sep 2009, 19:10
by John
Asterix wrote:MontyCircus wrote:The long-reigning light heavyweight champion moves up to heavyweight and fights the heavyweight champion. They fight twice, each winning one a piece in two close bouts.
Which fighter is better pound for pound?
Correct Answer: The light heavyweight champion.
How anyone can disagree with that is beyond my comprehension. But somehow I'm sure you do. So I guess we'll agree to disagree on this 1+1=2 debate
![[icon_witsend.gif] :witzend:](./images/smilies/icon_witsend.gif)
Of course, I agree with that.
So the light heavyweight champion won the first bout, lost the second but is rated higher ?
Re: Boxrec Ratings - Read first before commenting on the ratings
Posted: 04 Sep 2009, 19:14
by Asterix
John wrote:Asterix wrote:MontyCircus wrote:The long-reigning light heavyweight champion moves up to heavyweight and fights the heavyweight champion. They fight twice, each winning one a piece in two close bouts.
Which fighter is better pound for pound?
Correct Answer: The light heavyweight champion.
How anyone can disagree with that is beyond my comprehension. But somehow I'm sure you do. So I guess we'll agree to disagree on this 1+1=2 debate
![[icon_witsend.gif] :witzend:](./images/smilies/icon_witsend.gif)
Of course, I agree with that.
So the light heavyweight champion won the first bout, lost the second but is rated higher ?
Nah, the light heavy won the second bout. ;;-)
Re: Boxrec Ratings - Read first before commenting on the ratings
Posted: 22 Sep 2009, 18:50
by pankajnagarkoti56
Its all about the competition. Its not the point system's fault that there are less history and competitiveness in that division, its just the way that boxing works.
Re: Boxrec Ratings - Read first before commenting on the ratings
Posted: 09 Oct 2009, 04:35
by conan_the_cribber
Hi Boxingranks,
Getting back to a previous point of mine, the algorithm for the number of stars that female matchups needs a work over. On Saturday, we have
Susi Kentikian vs Julia Sahin, which is a five star bout in the female boxing world. Undefeated and #1 ranked flyweight champ vs the undefeated (previous) jnr flyweight champ. Both fights have 20 wins on their record.
Ina Menzer vs Esther Schouten is a four bout in the female boxing world. Nr 1 ranked Menzer in a unification bout against Schouten.
Yet both of these bouts rank an unbelievably shitty 2 stars. Compare that to three star bouts on the men’s card….
Denis Boystov vs “I fornicating drew with Zack Page” Jason Gaven
Manuel Charr vs “37yo washed up” Sherman Williams and
Phil Lo Greco vs “hopelessly mismatched #153 in the word” Albert Stiffdick.
Honestly. It’s almost a crime to place the names Gaven/Williams and Stiffdick in any three star match anywhere! Especially when the two star bouts on the card are excellent women’s bouts.
To put in perspective. On the same night Frederick Tripp is fighting Lazlo Komjathi in France. I’ve never heard of either fighter, probably because they have a combined 43 losses between them. Yet this is also rated 2 stars! I guess that should mean, it as significant a fight as the Kentikian vs Sahin fight. Right?
I know it’s a real minor code change to put a better number of stars for a women’s bout. How about implementing it.
Cheers
Conan
Re: Boxrec Ratings - Read first before commenting on the ratings
Posted: 11 Oct 2009, 11:39
by jujigatame
I'd like to point out that Paipharob Por Nobnom is now the #5 flyweight despite being 1-0. I know the guy he KOed had just KOed Vorapin, but it's still a bit wacky. That's gotta be the highest a 1-0 fighter has ever been ranked before.
Re: Boxrec Ratings - Read first before commenting on the ratings
Posted: 11 Oct 2009, 18:41
by JCS
jujigatame wrote:I'd like to point out that Paipharob Por Nobnom is now the #5 flyweight despite being 1-0. I know the guy he KOed had just KOed Vorapin, but it's still a bit wacky. That's gotta be the highest a 1-0 fighter has ever been ranked before.
Question there is probably.. why was Vorapin so high?
Re: Boxrec Ratings - Read first before commenting on the ratings
Posted: 11 Oct 2009, 19:15
by Asterix
jujigatame wrote:I'd like to point out that Paipharob Por Nobnom is now the #5 flyweight despite being 1-0. I know the guy he KOed had just KOed Vorapin, but it's still a bit wacky. That's gotta be the highest a 1-0 fighter has ever been ranked before.
That's wicked.
![[icon_e_biggrin.gif] :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
Re: Boxrec Ratings - Read first before commenting on the ratings
Posted: 14 Oct 2009, 09:17
by computerrank
conan_the_cribber wrote:Hi Boxingranks,
Getting back to a previous point of mine, the algorithm for the number of stars that female matchups needs a work over. On Saturday, we have
Susi Kentikian vs Julia Sahin, which is a five star bout in the female boxing world. Undefeated and #1 ranked flyweight champ vs the undefeated (previous) jnr flyweight champ. Both fights have 20 wins on their record.
Ina Menzer vs Esther Schouten is a four bout in the female boxing world. Nr 1 ranked Menzer in a unification bout against Schouten.
Yet both of these bouts rank an unbelievably shitty 2 stars. Compare that to three star bouts on the men’s card….
....
I know it’s a real minor code change to put a better number of stars for a women’s bout. How about implementing it.
Cheers
Conan
Conan,
Kentikian vs. Sahin was a 3 stars bout.
3 stars is the maximum rating a bout can get at the current low competition level in women boxing - and it represents it, as the intention behind is.
Best regards
Martin
Re: Boxrec Ratings - Read first before commenting on the ratings
Posted: 14 Oct 2009, 13:21
by conan_the_cribber
No it wasn't. I wish I had done a screen grab. But in the schedule listings, it was clearly 2 star, hence my longish mail.