Page 8 of 9
Re: Khan on Ringside.
Posted: 08 Oct 2012, 16:45
by banjo
safeerah wrote:mugabi wrote:i mean no offence LOS,but .....
Reference "in today's news the pakistani taliban attack shiite children...surely this must be the fault of the white race saf".
I wouldnt lay the blame at the white race but if a person has the time to do their history research into the murky world of politics in Asia Minor, our past colonial antics in the MIddle East are very much what sowed the seeds of the creation of the taliban movement and events such as the attacking of shiah muslims in todays world
Colonial Britain brokered a pact between Abdul Wahab and the Ibn Saud tribe, theirs agent and the dual founders of modern day wahabism (an extreme political movement) as personified by the taliban who are its modern day activists (taliban means students in arabic) Britain created the state of Saudia Arabia using Wahab and the Al Sauds, and ever since the 17th century the House of Saud have ruled Saudia Arabia and attempted to export wahabism to other muslim nations.
The only places they have had success are Somalia and Afghanistan and the afghan taliban has launced a covert campaign to spread its political poison to Pakistan the last 20 years and that has been through the Saudia Arabian Bin Laden and his henchmen.....the root beleif of Wahabiism is that Their form of Islam is the only correct one in a world or many islamic sects of which the shiah muslims are the most deviant and hence their sworn enemies and they are to be killed without impunity as they are in fact unbelievers so that the "true" principles of islam can be established and the islamic world purified. Much in the manner of sectarianism in the past in Ireland and elsewhere.
So In a nutshell sectarianism in Pakistan did not exist until the aftermath of the Afghan-Russian war, after which it spread to Pakistan as millions of afghan wahabis had been refugees in Pakistan during that war, and they had begun a process of spreading enforcing their beleifs on others and trying to start a holy war (jihad) on the many shiahs they saw living peacefully with sunni muslims in Pakistan.... so the reason those shiah women and children were killed today was in large part because our 17th century Imperial country meddled in Middle eastern affairs to create this nation (saudia arabia) with a pact they could force their wahabi islamic beleifs on other "deviant" muslims, and in return Saudia Arabia would be a staunch ally of Britain, which it has been to this very day.
In the first Gulf War it was a base to bomb Iraq and will be in a future war with Iran.
Good post Mugabi and very correct, do you feel educated LOS, also the British forced Yemen to lease land out to the saudis, when the term expired, Saudi kept the land and refused to hand it over backed by the might of Britain, nearly the same thing happened with palestine. Why are we responsible for everyone who escapes from war torn and politically unstable countries ? Because we caused the situation with our foreign policy.
The man on the street didn't cause it so the man on the street isn't responsible for it but as usual it's the man on the street who has to pay for it and I resent paying for other peoples problems.
Re: Khan on Ringside.
Posted: 08 Oct 2012, 16:48
by safeerah
banjo wrote:safeerah wrote:mugabi wrote:i mean no offence LOS,but .....
Reference "in today's news the pakistani taliban attack shiite children...surely this must be the fault of the white race saf".
I wouldnt lay the blame at the white race but if a person has the time to do their history research into the murky world of politics in Asia Minor, our past colonial antics in the MIddle East are very much what sowed the seeds of the creation of the taliban movement and events such as the attacking of shiah muslims in todays world
Colonial Britain brokered a pact between Abdul Wahab and the Ibn Saud tribe, theirs agent and the dual founders of modern day wahabism (an extreme political movement) as personified by the taliban who are its modern day activists (taliban means students in arabic) Britain created the state of Saudia Arabia using Wahab and the Al Sauds, and ever since the 17th century the House of Saud have ruled Saudia Arabia and attempted to export wahabism to other muslim nations.
The only places they have had success are Somalia and Afghanistan and the afghan taliban has launced a covert campaign to spread its political poison to Pakistan the last 20 years and that has been through the Saudia Arabian Bin Laden and his henchmen.....the root beleif of Wahabiism is that Their form of Islam is the only correct one in a world or many islamic sects of which the shiah muslims are the most deviant and hence their sworn enemies and they are to be killed without impunity as they are in fact unbelievers so that the "true" principles of islam can be established and the islamic world purified. Much in the manner of sectarianism in the past in Ireland and elsewhere.
So In a nutshell sectarianism in Pakistan did not exist until the aftermath of the Afghan-Russian war, after which it spread to Pakistan as millions of afghan wahabis had been refugees in Pakistan during that war, and they had begun a process of spreading enforcing their beleifs on others and trying to start a holy war (jihad) on the many shiahs they saw living peacefully with sunni muslims in Pakistan.... so the reason those shiah women and children were killed today was in large part because our 17th century Imperial country meddled in Middle eastern affairs to create this nation (saudia arabia) with a pact they could force their wahabi islamic beleifs on other "deviant" muslims, and in return Saudia Arabia would be a staunch ally of Britain, which it has been to this very day.
In the first Gulf War it was a base to bomb Iraq and will be in a future war with Iran.
Good post Mugabi and very correct, do you feel educated LOS, also the British forced Yemen to lease land out to the saudis, when the term expired, Saudi kept the land and refused to hand it over backed by the might of Britain, nearly the same thing happened with palestine. Why are we responsible for everyone who escapes from war torn and politically unstable countries ? Because we caused the situation with our foreign policy.
The man on the street didn't cause it so the man on the street isn't responsible for it but as usual it's the man on the street who has to pay for it and I resent paying for other peoples problems.
The man on the street pays the price, but the big companies, the rich get the fruits of battle.
Re: Khan on Ringside.
Posted: 08 Oct 2012, 16:52
by banjo
BTW forgive if I seem extremely apathetic but that's banjos philosophy on life, I overheard some woman who's husband died and she was going on about how she couldn't afford to pay the bills now she was a widow, I felt like turning around and telling her she shouldn't have married somebody who died prematurely then.
Re: Khan on Ringside.
Posted: 08 Oct 2012, 16:57
by ShadrachSimmo
banjo wrote:who the fucks Bunny?
Bunny Warren aka Frank the Tank.
Re: Khan on Ringside.
Posted: 08 Oct 2012, 16:58
by banjo
ShadrachSimmo wrote:banjo wrote:who the fucks Bunny?
Bunny Warren aka Frank the Tank.
Why Bunny though?
Re: Khan on Ringside.
Posted: 08 Oct 2012, 17:38
by banjo
The Dark Destroyer wrote:banjo wrote:
Why Bunny though?
Where do bunnies live?
In a hutch?
Re: Khan on Ringside.
Posted: 08 Oct 2012, 18:47
by Datsue
The Dark Destroyer wrote:banjo wrote:The Dark Destroyer wrote:
Where do bunnies live?
In a hutch?
Exactly.

Re: Khan on Ringside.
Posted: 08 Oct 2012, 21:03
by fasteddie
Exactly.[/quote][/quote]
hahahaha
Re: Khan on Ringside.
Posted: 08 Oct 2012, 21:07
by fasteddie
twenty six wrote:Because a No 1 spot is only worth something if it leads to a title tilt.
WBO - World Bunny Organisation.
If he couldn't manoeuvre him there he was never going to manoeuvre him anywhere.
thank fornicate for that someone who isnt up khans hoop,brook never got a title shot under bunny cause he was too busy shining khans ass hole to bother with any other boxer just like he done with naz,calzaghe and hatton and what did they all have in common? they all done one on bunny when he invested millions on them
Re: Khan on Ringside.
Posted: 09 Oct 2012, 03:13
by los2
safeerah wrote:mugabi wrote:i mean no offence LOS,but .....
Reference "in today's news the pakistani taliban attack shiite children...surely this must be the fault of the white race saf".
I wouldnt lay the blame at the white race but if a person has the time to do their history research into the murky world of politics in Asia Minor, our past colonial antics in the MIddle East are very much what sowed the seeds of the creation of the taliban movement and events such as the attacking of shiah muslims in todays world
Colonial Britain brokered a pact between Abdul Wahab and the Ibn Saud tribe, theirs agent and the dual founders of modern day wahabism (an extreme political movement) as personified by the taliban who are its modern day activists (taliban means students in arabic) Britain created the state of Saudia Arabia using Wahab and the Al Sauds, and ever since the 17th century the House of Saud have ruled Saudia Arabia and attempted to export wahabism to other muslim nations.
The only places they have had success are Somalia and Afghanistan and the afghan taliban has launced a covert campaign to spread its political poison to Pakistan the last 20 years and that has been through the Saudia Arabian Bin Laden and his henchmen.....the root beleif of Wahabiism is that Their form of Islam is the only correct one in a world or many islamic sects of which the shiah muslims are the most deviant and hence their sworn enemies and they are to be killed without impunity as they are in fact unbelievers so that the "true" principles of islam can be established and the islamic world purified. Much in the manner of sectarianism in the past in Ireland and elsewhere.
So In a nutshell sectarianism in Pakistan did not exist until the aftermath of the Afghan-Russian war, after which it spread to Pakistan as millions of afghan wahabis had been refugees in Pakistan during that war, and they had begun a process of spreading enforcing their beleifs on others and trying to start a holy war (jihad) on the many shiahs they saw living peacefully with sunni muslims in Pakistan.... so the reason those shiah women and children were killed today was in large part because our 17th century Imperial country meddled in Middle eastern affairs to create this nation (saudia arabia) with a pact they could force their wahabi islamic beleifs on other "deviant" muslims, and in return Saudia Arabia would be a staunch ally of Britain, which it has been to this very day.
In the first Gulf War it was a base to bomb Iraq and will be in a future war with Iran.
Good post Mugabi and very correct, do you feel educated LOS, also the British forced Yemen to lease land out to the saudis, when the term expired, Saudi kept the land and refused to hand it over backed by the might of Britain, nearly the same thing happened with palestine. Why are we responsible for everyone who escapes from war torn and politically unstable countries ? Because we caused the situation with our foreign policy.
thanks for educating me......so members of a peaceful religion murder some children who follow the same peaceful religion who they regard as animals...if we go back 500 years to the 17th century we can blame the british....a couple of weeks ago in nigeria a church was bombed by a suicide bomber who belonged to a group from a peaceful religion wanting sharia law.....i'm sure if your brain has been wired a certain way you can blame this on britain and usa
Re: Khan on Ringside.
Posted: 09 Oct 2012, 05:52
by JamesH
Imagine there's no heaven
It's easy if you try
Re: Khan on Ringside.
Posted: 09 Oct 2012, 06:04
by safeerah
los2 wrote:safeerah wrote:mugabi wrote:i mean no offence LOS,but .....
Reference "in today's news the pakistani taliban attack shiite children...surely this must be the fault of the white race saf".
I wouldnt lay the blame at the white race but if a person has the time to do their history research into the murky world of politics in Asia Minor, our past colonial antics in the MIddle East are very much what sowed the seeds of the creation of the taliban movement and events such as the attacking of shiah muslims in todays world
Colonial Britain brokered a pact between Abdul Wahab and the Ibn Saud tribe, theirs agent and the dual founders of modern day wahabism (an extreme political movement) as personified by the taliban who are its modern day activists (taliban means students in arabic) Britain created the state of Saudia Arabia using Wahab and the Al Sauds, and ever since the 17th century the House of Saud have ruled Saudia Arabia and attempted to export wahabism to other muslim nations.
The only places they have had success are Somalia and Afghanistan and the afghan taliban has launced a covert campaign to spread its political poison to Pakistan the last 20 years and that has been through the Saudia Arabian Bin Laden and his henchmen.....the root beleif of Wahabiism is that Their form of Islam is the only correct one in a world or many islamic sects of which the shiah muslims are the most deviant and hence their sworn enemies and they are to be killed without impunity as they are in fact unbelievers so that the "true" principles of islam can be established and the islamic world purified. Much in the manner of sectarianism in the past in Ireland and elsewhere.
So In a nutshell sectarianism in Pakistan did not exist until the aftermath of the Afghan-Russian war, after which it spread to Pakistan as millions of afghan wahabis had been refugees in Pakistan during that war, and they had begun a process of spreading enforcing their beleifs on others and trying to start a holy war (jihad) on the many shiahs they saw living peacefully with sunni muslims in Pakistan.... so the reason those shiah women and children were killed today was in large part because our 17th century Imperial country meddled in Middle eastern affairs to create this nation (saudia arabia) with a pact they could force their wahabi islamic beleifs on other "deviant" muslims, and in return Saudia Arabia would be a staunch ally of Britain, which it has been to this very day.
In the first Gulf War it was a base to bomb Iraq and will be in a future war with Iran.
Good post Mugabi and very correct, do you feel educated LOS, also the British forced Yemen to lease land out to the saudis, when the term expired, Saudi kept the land and refused to hand it over backed by the might of Britain, nearly the same thing happened with palestine. Why are we responsible for everyone who escapes from war torn and politically unstable countries ? Because we caused the situation with our foreign policy.
thanks for educating me......so members of a peaceful religion murder some children who follow the same peaceful religion who they regard as animals...if we go back 500 years to the 17th century we can blame the british....a couple of weeks ago in nigeria a church was bombed by a suicide bomber who belonged to a group from a peaceful religion wanting sharia law.....i'm sure if your brain has been wired a certain way you can blame this on britain and usa
I am afraid you just don't understand what is going on in this world, do some research instead of reading the Sun.
Re: Khan on Ringside.
Posted: 09 Oct 2012, 06:13
by banjo
JamesH wrote:Imagine there's no heaven
It's easy if you try
There is no heaven, scientifically proven.
Re: Khan on Ringside.
Posted: 09 Oct 2012, 06:22
by JamesH
banjo wrote:JamesH wrote:Imagine there's no heaven
It's easy if you try
There is no heaven, scientifically proven.
No hell below us
Above us only sky
Re: Khan on Ringside.
Posted: 09 Oct 2012, 06:39
by los2
safeerah wrote:
Good post Mugabi and very correct, do you feel educated LOS, also the British forced Yemen to lease land out to the saudis, when the term expired, Saudi kept the land and refused to hand it over backed by the might of Britain, nearly the same thing happened with palestine. Why are we responsible for everyone who escapes from war torn and politically unstable countries ? Because we caused the situation with our foreign policy.
thanks for educating me......so members of a peaceful religion murder some children who follow the same peaceful religion who they regard as animals...if we go back 500 years to the 17th century we can blame the british....a couple of weeks ago in nigeria a church was bombed by a suicide bomber who belonged to a group from a peaceful religion wanting sharia law.....i'm sure if your brain has been wired a certain way you can blame this on britain and usa[/quote]
I am afraid you just don't understand what is going on in this world, do some research instead of reading the Sun.[/quote]
in my world people who murder children get taken to court...here a claim that something that happened 400 years ago is not an acceptable defence....anyway stop radicalising the threads....people don't like khan because they think he's a gobsh1te......simples
Re: Khan on Ringside.
Posted: 09 Oct 2012, 07:00
by Bricks
los2 wrote:safeerah wrote:mugabi wrote:i mean no offence LOS,but .....
Reference "in today's news the pakistani taliban attack shiite children...surely this must be the fault of the white race saf".
I wouldnt lay the blame at the white race but if a person has the time to do their history research into the murky world of politics in Asia Minor, our past colonial antics in the MIddle East are very much what sowed the seeds of the creation of the taliban movement and events such as the attacking of shiah muslims in todays world
Colonial Britain brokered a pact between Abdul Wahab and the Ibn Saud tribe, theirs agent and the dual founders of modern day wahabism (an extreme political movement) as personified by the taliban who are its modern day activists (taliban means students in arabic) Britain created the state of Saudia Arabia using Wahab and the Al Sauds, and ever since the 17th century the House of Saud have ruled Saudia Arabia and attempted to export wahabism to other muslim nations.
The only places they have had success are Somalia and Afghanistan and the afghan taliban has launced a covert campaign to spread its political poison to Pakistan the last 20 years and that has been through the Saudia Arabian Bin Laden and his henchmen.....the root beleif of Wahabiism is that Their form of Islam is the only correct one in a world or many islamic sects of which the shiah muslims are the most deviant and hence their sworn enemies and they are to be killed without impunity as they are in fact unbelievers so that the "true" principles of islam can be established and the islamic world purified. Much in the manner of sectarianism in the past in Ireland and elsewhere.
So In a nutshell sectarianism in Pakistan did not exist until the aftermath of the Afghan-Russian war, after which it spread to Pakistan as millions of afghan wahabis had been refugees in Pakistan during that war, and they had begun a process of spreading enforcing their beleifs on others and trying to start a holy war (jihad) on the many shiahs they saw living peacefully with sunni muslims in Pakistan.... so the reason those shiah women and children were killed today was in large part because our 17th century Imperial country meddled in Middle eastern affairs to create this nation (saudia arabia) with a pact they could force their wahabi islamic beleifs on other "deviant" muslims, and in return Saudia Arabia would be a staunch ally of Britain, which it has been to this very day.
In the first Gulf War it was a base to bomb Iraq and will be in a future war with Iran.
Good post Mugabi and very correct, do you feel educated LOS, also the British forced Yemen to lease land out to the saudis, when the term expired, Saudi kept the land and refused to hand it over backed by the might of Britain, nearly the same thing happened with palestine. Why are we responsible for everyone who escapes from war torn and politically unstable countries ? Because we caused the situation with our foreign policy.
thanks for educating me......so members of a peaceful religion murder some children who follow the same peaceful religion who they regard as animals...if we go back 500 years to the 17th century we can blame the british....a couple of weeks ago in nigeria a church was bombed by a suicide bomber who belonged to a group from a peaceful religion wanting sharia law.....i'm sure if your brain has been wired a certain way you can blame this on britain and usa
and im equally sure someone like you is going to beleive whatever ignorant crap he wants as he isnt ready to handle the truth and educate himself, so i wont bother either. Just the next time u come on here spouting nonsense and claiming to speak for the "ordinary man" dont bother, as your views are ill educated nonsense to say the least
Re: Khan on Ringside.
Posted: 09 Oct 2012, 07:33
by Khaosai-Galaxy
Best thread ever!
Re: Khan on Ringside.
Posted: 09 Oct 2012, 09:41
by los2
mugabi wrote:
Good post Mugabi and very correct, do you feel educated LOS, also the British forced Yemen to lease land out to the saudis, when the term expired, Saudi kept the land and refused to hand it over backed by the might of Britain, nearly the same thing happened with palestine. Why are we responsible for everyone who escapes from war torn and politically unstable countries ? Because we caused the situation with our foreign policy.
thanks for educating me......so members of a peaceful religion murder some children who follow the same peaceful religion who they regard as animals...if we go back 500 years to the 17th century we can blame the british....a couple of weeks ago in nigeria a church was bombed by a suicide bomber who belonged to a group from a peaceful religion wanting sharia law.....i'm sure if your brain has been wired a certain way you can blame this on britain and usa[/quote]
and im equally sure someone like you is going to beleive whatever ignorant crap he wants as he isnt ready to handle the truth and educate himself, so i wont bother either. Just the next time u come on here spouting nonsense and claiming to speak for the "ordinary man" dont bother, as your views are ill educated nonsense to say the least[/quote]
can't you think of a way to blame the uk and usa for the nigerian suicide bomber?....or are you upset that i won't condone the taliban for murdering innocent children.....if you're blaming the british can't we blame the danish (vikings) or the italians (romans)?
Re: Khan on Ringside.
Posted: 09 Oct 2012, 10:49
by safeerah
Los I would laugh at your comments, because you are so funny, but I can't because you are not joking, you actually believe your shit. " We take them to court " Priceless !
Re: Khan on Ringside.
Posted: 09 Oct 2012, 11:01
by clubberlang
Had to laugh at some of the posts in this thread, the reason people don’t like Khan is because he’s a big headed, delusional c*nt who constantly refers to himself in the third person, it’s got nothing to do with him being Pakistani or a Muslim.
A bit of arrogance is to be expected with elite professional athletes and its acceptable while there still successful, but if for instance Carl Froch was to lose his next two (against opponents he’s excepted to handily beat) and then was to go on ringside with the same attitude that he has now then you can guarantee that he would get a massive amount of sh*t on these boards.
It really p*sses me off that some people are so weak that they hide behind the race card rather than accepting their own short comings.
Re: Khan on Ringside.
Posted: 09 Oct 2012, 13:09
by Final round
banjo wrote:JamesH wrote:Imagine there's no heaven
It's easy if you try
There is no heaven, scientifically proven.
I'm so offended I 'may' go and burn down an embassy.
Re: Khan on Ringside.
Posted: 09 Oct 2012, 14:51
by magnus
MachoMan09 wrote:
I've heard some people combine internet use and masturbation, but I don't think it'll catch on.
Re: Khan on Ringside.
Posted: 09 Oct 2012, 14:56
by Khaosai-Galaxy
magnus wrote:MachoMan09 wrote:
I've heard some people combine internet use and masturbation, but I don't think it'll catch on.
I remember a time, back in the late 90's, when the phrase "using the internet" meant 1 thing and 1 things only...
"Self love"
Re: Khan on Ringside.
Posted: 09 Oct 2012, 16:31
by los2
safeerah wrote:Los I would laugh at your comments, because you are so funny, but I can't because you are not joking, you actually believe your shit. " We take them to court " Priceless !
you brought slavery into this.......no wonder you wouldn't answer questions on islamic slavery...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islam_and_slavery
![[icon_shame.gif] :shame:](./images/smilies/icon_shame.gif)
Re: Khan on Ringside.
Posted: 09 Oct 2012, 17:33
by Tomasino
JamesH wrote:banjo wrote:JamesH wrote:Imagine there's no heaven
It's easy if you try
There is no heaven, scientifically proven.
No hell below us
Above us only sky
