Page 8 of 26
Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*
Posted: 23 Nov 2013, 16:29
by keithmoonhangover
jameswilson wrote:twunt.
What a word. Never seen or heard it before. Love it.
I myself pioneered and possibly invented the term ragitated.
Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*
Posted: 23 Nov 2013, 16:29
by taffytoon
Horse wrote:Horse wrote:Chuck Jones: 46th best lightweight in Britain.
Awful opponent.
Worst PPV undercard ever.
Knowing it is winding you up is worth every penny to me
Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*
Posted: 23 Nov 2013, 16:31
by lefty
Hopefully Foster jnr beats Crolla.
Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*
Posted: 23 Nov 2013, 16:33
by Horse
taffytoon wrote:Knowing it is winding you up is worth every penny to me
I'm not paying for it.
I would have if the undercard was not so insultingly poor.
Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*
Posted: 23 Nov 2013, 16:33
by Neil Gee
columbo wrote:Hopefully Foster jnr beats Crolla.
Not likely columbo. Crolla is on the way up!
Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*
Posted: 23 Nov 2013, 16:35
by lefty
Neil Gee wrote:columbo wrote:Hopefully Foster jnr beats Crolla.
Not likely columbo. Crolla is on the way up!
He's supposed to be at "world" level now.
Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*
Posted: 23 Nov 2013, 16:36
by taffytoon
Horse wrote:taffytoon wrote:Knowing it is winding you up is worth every penny to me
I'm not paying for it.
I would have if the undercard was not so insultingly poor.
So are you watching via stream= Tramp, or are you critiquing on what you think
Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*
Posted: 23 Nov 2013, 16:37
by Horse
columbo wrote:Hopefully Foster jnr beats Crolla.
I hope so too.
Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*
Posted: 23 Nov 2013, 16:38
by lefty
According to the Joe Gallagher interview the other day this was meant to Linares in there with Crolla but they couldnt agree on money. It's lucky that was the case as Linares would of boxed Crolla's head off.
Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*
Posted: 23 Nov 2013, 16:41
by iamasadlittleboy
columbo wrote:According to the Joe Gallagher interview the other day this was meant to Linares in there with Crolla but they couldnt agree on money. It's lucky that was the case as Linares would of boxed Crolla's head off.
Since when was that meant to have been made?
Linares HAD been set to fight Abril earlier this month so that whole chit-chat must have been very rushed...
Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*
Posted: 23 Nov 2013, 16:42
by lefty
iamasadlittleboy wrote:columbo wrote:According to the Joe Gallagher interview the other day this was meant to Linares in there with Crolla but they couldnt agree on money. It's lucky that was the case as Linares would of boxed Crolla's head off.
Since when was that meant to have been made?
Linares HAD been set to fight Abril earlier this month so that who chit-chat must have been very rushed...
It was last week apparantly! Couldnt agree on money.
Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*
Posted: 23 Nov 2013, 16:44
by iamasadlittleboy
TBF when you want a world class guy to come in on a weeks notice...they will be asking for a nice big payday...
Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*
Posted: 23 Nov 2013, 16:45
by Neil Gee
columbo wrote:Neil Gee wrote:columbo wrote:Hopefully Foster jnr beats Crolla.
Not likely columbo. Crolla is on the way up!
He's supposed to be at "world" level now.
I don't think he's quite that but he could get there. If he doesn't stop Foster I think it will be a disappointment.
Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*
Posted: 23 Nov 2013, 16:45
by expe
Froch looks a bit tired there and sounds it too, said he got 8 1/2 hours sleep, which is quite long for him, if that's true, it is possible to feel and look tired from sleeping too long, but I think it's more likely his sleep was interrupted.
Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*
Posted: 23 Nov 2013, 16:46
by Horse
columbo wrote:It was last week apparantly! Couldnt agree on money.
They were going to bring Linares in at one week's notice?
That seems silly.
Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*
Posted: 23 Nov 2013, 16:48
by lefty
Horse wrote:columbo wrote:It was last week apparantly! Couldnt agree on money.
They were going to bring Linares in at one week's notice?
That seems silly.
Just going on what Gallagher said.
Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*
Posted: 23 Nov 2013, 16:49
by Horse
columbo wrote:Just going on what Gallagher said.
I believe you, I just think it's silly.
Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*
Posted: 23 Nov 2013, 17:04
by rossij8
Anyway, the fights should start getting more competitive now.....
Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*
Posted: 23 Nov 2013, 17:06
by Horse
I hate Haye.
Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*
Posted: 23 Nov 2013, 17:07
by rossij8
Horse wrote:I hate Haye.
I was a fan - starting to think he is a c*nt
Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*
Posted: 23 Nov 2013, 17:07
by expe
rossij8 wrote:Anyway, the fights should start getting more competitive now.....
As Andy Lee fights a Hungarian that was stopped in a round by Rocky Fielding, followed by Scott Quigg against a man who drew in a WBO Latino title fight against an opponent with a record of 22-7-1.
Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*
Posted: 23 Nov 2013, 17:08
by keithmoonhangover
Haye talked a lot of sense there.
Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*
Posted: 23 Nov 2013, 17:11
by edgey2009
What has Haye done wrong tonight?
Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*
Posted: 23 Nov 2013, 17:11
by rossij8
expe wrote:rossij8 wrote:Anyway, the fights should start getting more competitive now.....
As Andy Lee fights a Hungarian that was stopped in a round by Rocky Fielding, followed by Scott Quigg against a man who drew in a WBO Latino title fight against an opponent with a record of 22-7-1.
Did you not detect the irony?
Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*
Posted: 23 Nov 2013, 17:12
by Datsue
expe wrote:Scott Quigg against a man who drew in a WBO Latino title fight against an opponent with a record of 22-7-1.
A more distressing exemplar of Silva's credentials is that he lasted less than three rounds with Fernando Montiel, at bantamweight. I know the Mexican can crack but it's the only recognisable name on the lad's record...