Page 8 of 10
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Posted: 20 Apr 2014, 00:17
by diddy
columbo wrote:Shumenov got some long ass arms. Not helping him much though.
He's too slow for it to matter. He's not Dawson.
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Posted: 20 Apr 2014, 00:17
by expe
109-100 Hopkins
Shumenov down from a right hand in the 11th, could be looking at a first Hopkins KO win since De La Hoya 9 1/2 years ago.
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Posted: 20 Apr 2014, 00:17
by gilgamesh
Well Hopkins gets back the point from that even round. Makes the 12th round more interesting than it would've been otherwise.
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Posted: 20 Apr 2014, 00:17
by gilgamesh
JeanClaude Van Damme wrote:Joe still got dropped by an old man.
He got dropped by Jones after that too, but he got up and handle his business though.
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Posted: 20 Apr 2014, 00:18
by Baby Face Finster
JeanClaude Van Damme wrote:Joe still got dropped by an old man.
And still won.
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Posted: 20 Apr 2014, 00:19
by big train express
hopkins had shumenov at his mercy and still played it safe. smh. no entertainment value.
dominating performance nonetheless.
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Posted: 20 Apr 2014, 00:19
by lefty
Baby Face Finster wrote:JeanClaude Van Damme wrote:Joe still got dropped by an old man.
And still won.
Joe was about 36 himself at the time aswell. He wasnt in his prime.
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Posted: 20 Apr 2014, 00:20
by crusader
117-110 Hopkins
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Posted: 20 Apr 2014, 00:20
by lefty
big train express wrote:hopkins had shumenov at his mercy and still played it safe. smh. no entertainment value.
dominating performance nonetheless.
Dont see him doing that with Stevenson but could be wrong.
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Posted: 20 Apr 2014, 00:21
by gilgamesh
Hopkins still doing his thing.
118-110, The Legend continues
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Posted: 20 Apr 2014, 00:21
by expe
119-109 Hopkins
Completely dominated, took the piss out of Shumenov tonight. Amazing that he can still do it at 49, my Dad's the same age, he's currently led on the settee, pissed, half asleep and has probably spilled wine all over himself.
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Posted: 20 Apr 2014, 00:21
by Baby Face Finster
columbo wrote:Baby Face Finster wrote:JeanClaude Van Damme wrote:Joe still got dropped by an old man.
And still won.
Joe was about 36 himself at the time aswell. He wasnt in his prime.
Plus he made Hopkins fake a low blow from a body punch that would have led to a stoppage had the ref not bought his act.
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Posted: 20 Apr 2014, 00:21
by diddy
I don't like Bernard's chances against Adonis. Just being honest.
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Posted: 20 Apr 2014, 00:22
by MachoTime
Hopefully Jim Gray asks Hopkins about a potential Stevenson fight.
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Posted: 20 Apr 2014, 00:22
by expe
Baby Face Finster wrote:columbo wrote:Baby Face Finster wrote:
And still won.
Joe was about 36 himself at the time aswell. He wasnt in his prime.
Plus he made Hopkins fake a low blow from a body punch that would have led to a stoppage had the ref not bought his act.
It was a bit low, but Hopkins made the most of it he could, 5 minute rest was exactly what he needed at the time.
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Posted: 20 Apr 2014, 00:22
by gilgamesh
diddy wrote:I don't like Bernard's chances against Adonis. Just being honest.
I think he'd still be able to make it ugly, and difficult for Stevenson. I wouldn't be shocked if he beat him.
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Posted: 20 Apr 2014, 00:23
by lefty
Split decision!!!! WTF
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Posted: 20 Apr 2014, 00:23
by lefty
gilgamesh wrote:diddy wrote:I don't like Bernard's chances against Adonis. Just being honest.
I think he'd still be able to make it ugly, and difficult for Stevenson. I wouldn't be shocked if he beat him.
I think Stevenson would put him on his ass.
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Posted: 20 Apr 2014, 00:23
by Jaywheel
Wow.
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Posted: 20 Apr 2014, 00:23
by Baby Face Finster
More joke scoring. How the hell could a judge score that fight for Shumenov?
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Posted: 20 Apr 2014, 00:24
by big train express
SD????? that is disgraceful
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Posted: 20 Apr 2014, 00:24
by diddy
Unanimous decision bettors just killed
themselves.
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Posted: 20 Apr 2014, 00:24
by Jaywheel
That card.
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Posted: 20 Apr 2014, 00:24
by JCS
OMFG split?
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Posted: 20 Apr 2014, 00:24
by gilgamesh
Jesus dude, the blind judges in Boxing never fail to show up.
114-113 Shumenov give me a f*cking break.