Re: Bermane Stiverne v Deontay Wilder 17th Jan Vegas
Posted: 18 Jan 2015, 12:12
I'd rather see Fury fight wlad and Wilder fight Haye if he comes through a couple of warm ups. I think Wlad would pick Wilder apart if it came to it.
Ok, I got the result wrong.davie wrote:Completely serious mate. Not sure my detailed round for round plan for the fight will pan out as i've said but it seems a possible series of events.TheLeprechaun wrote:davie wrote:I'm going to be controversial here and predict a 12 rounder where 2 guys are a little gunshy being over cautious due to the other guys power.
Stivern to win the early rounds with Wilder doing little other than throw the odd hopeful bomb.
Stivern to survive a few hairy moments in the mid rounds and drop a couple rounds, but wilder will punch himself out trying to find the finish and his lack of 12 round experience will lead to stiverne taking the last few rounds to take the fight 115-112, Stiverne down once in the 5th.
Rematch scheduled for summer in Canada
I don't know whether or not you're being serious but I thought I was the only one who sees a 12 rounder here. They are not going to be taking risks with each others power. Stiverne will be waiting for Wilder to commit and meanwhile Wilder will be cognizant of not committing too much and getting countered. Meanwhile Wilder will be marginally winning the rounds. I don't really see fireworks in this one.
Too many times we see 2 bangers get into the ring and the assumption is there has to be a knockout.
The fans and pundits alike have told us there is no way on gods green earth this can go 12 rounds
But the reality is, they are bangers because they've been bowling over bums and when they face their first real challenger who also packs a dig, the plotline of their fights changes radically.
yes, both man hits hard, but it takes more than being heavy handed to knock guys out at a higher level. And this is the highest level either man has competed at
I might be wrong and there may be a quick stoppage. But i predict that it will not only be a 12 rounder it will be far from the explosive affair everyone predicts because both men will fight cautiously for the vast majority of the fight.
115-112 Stiverne!
See my post, he was crap. Talent wise Seldon was definately better - Stiverne doesn't have a win like an aging Tucker under his belt. However, no one can forgive Seldon for the Tyson stunt.reggaereggae wrote:No one is commenting in how uninterested and let's be honest, ordinary Stiverne was.
The most interesting thing about this fight is who is the worst heavyweight champ ever? Seldon or Stiverne?
Ps i have Seldon on points
Don't think anyone saw Stiverne as anything but average and a poor champion, but everyone thought that Wilder was shit, so he'd win. As it turned out, Stiverne is very, very average and Wilder is slightly less shit than most people thought.WildWaylon wrote:24 hours ago Stiverne had too much experience and was going to KO Wilder because Wilder had only fought bums. 24 hours later Stiverne is just average and probably the worst HW champion ever, and no credit given to Wilder because he beat yet another bum. My God you guys change your opinions pretty fast.
Not a lot of respect for people who train hard to do their best.expe wrote:Don't think anyone saw Stiverne as anything but average and a poor champion, but everyone thought that Wilder was poo, so he'd win. As it turned out, Stiverne is very, very average and Wilder is slightly less poo than most people thought.WildWaylon wrote:24 hours ago Stiverne had too much experience and was going to KO Wilder because Wilder had only fought bums. 24 hours later Stiverne is just average and probably the worst HW champion ever, and no credit given to Wilder because he beat yet another bum. My God you guys change your opinions pretty fast.
Only an utter imbecile doesn't change his views as new facts come to light.WildWaylon wrote:24 hours ago Stiverne had too much experience and was going to KO Wilder because Wilder had only fought bums. 24 hours later Stiverne is just average and probably the worst HW champion ever, and no credit given to Wilder because he beat yet another bum. My God you guys change your opinions pretty fast.
Understatement of the yearTuan_Jim wrote:
Seldon had talent and didn't give his all in the Tyson fight.
MightyWarrior wrote:Understatement of the yearTuan_Jim wrote:
Seldon had talent and didn't give his all in the Tyson fight.
Not only did people under estimate Wilders abilities, they are failing to give him credit for his intelligence as well. Some of the people on here are saying exactly what he anticipated they would say when he spoke before the fight.Tuan_Jim wrote:Only an utter imbecile doesn't change his views as new facts come to light.WildWaylon wrote:24 hours ago Stiverne had too much experience and was going to KO Wilder because Wilder had only fought bums. 24 hours later Stiverne is just average and probably the worst HW champion ever, and no credit given to Wilder because he beat yet another bum. My God you guys change your opinions pretty fast.
Tuan_Jim wrote:Only an utter imbecile doesn't change his views as new facts come to light.WildWaylon wrote:24 hours ago Stiverne had too much experience and was going to KO Wilder because Wilder had only fought bums. 24 hours later Stiverne is just average and probably the worst HW champion ever, and no credit given to Wilder because he beat yet another bum. My God you guys change your opinions pretty fast.
davie wrote: Ok, I got the result wrong.
But I must have been one of only 3 people on the internet who realised this might just go the distance.
Because if Chisora, Pulev and Stiverne can't do it - those three peaks of ring IQ, technical skill and bellyfire - then Muhammad Ali has no chance!rhino222 wrote:. As for ali and tyson not winning titles now...i agree that ali would not as he is/was too small,
palooka wrote:Ali decided not to dance around Foreman because he was too big.
And Ali was able to punch with Foreman because he was so much quicker and more precise than a power mad brute. Foreman would seem like lightspeed compared to these monstrosities who huff & puff about the ring today.TheLeprechaun wrote:palooka wrote:Ali decided not to dance around Foreman because he was too big.
I'm talking about prime Ali obviously.
And Foreman was only 6ft 3ins and 215lbs - a giant then but average now.TheLeprechaun wrote:palooka wrote:Ali decided not to dance around Foreman because he was too big.
I'm talking about prime Ali obviously.