??? If an oddsmaker gave out odds like that I wouldn't need to work again...Neil Gee wrote:Middleweight Title Fight
5/1 Andy Lee vs 6/1 Billy Joe Saunders
Official Lee vs Saunders RBR Thread
Re: Official Lee vs Saunders RBR Thread
Re: Official Lee vs Saunders RBR Thread
That's from https://promotions.betfair.com/uk-sport ... GwodsDwBZA mate.Supremo wrote:??? If an oddsmaker gave out odds like that I wouldn't need to work again...Neil Gee wrote:Middleweight Title Fight
5/1 Andy Lee vs 6/1 Billy Joe Saunders
Last edited by Neil Gee on 19 Dec 2015, 18:02, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Official Lee vs Saunders RBR Thread
Neil Gee wrote:That's from Betfair mate.Supremo wrote:??? If an oddsmaker gave out odds like that I wouldn't need to work again...Neil Gee wrote:Middleweight Title Fight
5/1 Andy Lee vs 6/1 Billy Joe Saunders
-
reggaereggae
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4723
- Joined: 21 Dec 2009, 17:01
Re: Official Lee vs Saunders RBR Thread
That's a special promotional price for new customers only with a max stake of prob no more than £20Neil Gee wrote:That's from Betfair mate.Supremo wrote:??? If an oddsmaker gave out odds like that I wouldn't need to work again...Neil Gee wrote:Middleweight Title Fight
5/1 Andy Lee vs 6/1 Billy Joe Saunders
Re: Official Lee vs Saunders RBR Thread
Fwank more or less has light middleweight locked down domestically. Williams, Kelly, Corcoran, Patterson, Selkirk, plus a few prospects that will come through to title level in the next couple of years, only one I can think of he doesn't have now that Rose has moved up is Scott Fitzgerald. Smith as world champion too. Seen talk of Selkirk-Corcoran next year, would be a good fight, hopefully Kelly gets an easy one for his comeback then into the mix for the British and Commonwealth titles, let them all fight each other and whoever comes out on top of the pile can fight Smith unless it's Selkirk, think they've both said they won't fight each other.Black Sam Bellamy wrote:Jimmy Kelly against Gary Corcoran would be a good fight for the future. More like Kelly's level
-
ThereByTheGrace
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 4016
- Joined: 04 Sep 2010, 05:22
Re: Official Lee vs Saunders RBR Thread
Still not sure who will win ! Could be a draw
-
PredatorHayds
- Super Welterweight
- Posts: 4891
- Joined: 08 Jul 2015, 08:23
Re: Official Lee vs Saunders RBR Thread
At domestic level I say Williams is the best of the bunch there excluding Smith.expe wrote:Fwank more or less has light middleweight locked down domestically. Williams, Kelly, Corcoran, Patterson, Selkirk, plus a few prospects that will come through to title level in the next couple of years, only one I can think of he doesn't have now that Rose has moved up is Scott Fitzgerald. Smith as world champion too. Seen talk of Selkirk-Corcoran next year, would be a good fight, hopefully Kelly gets an easy one for his comeback then into the mix for the British and Commonwealth titles, let them all fight each other and whoever comes out on top of the pile can fight Smith unless it's Selkirk, think they've both said they won't fight each other.Black Sam Bellamy wrote:Jimmy Kelly against Gary Corcoran would be a good fight for the future. More like Kelly's level
Fwank needs to get suitable opposition to make sure Smith keeps the belt . Even with a big name he's going to be the short end of a purse.
With the right promotion Smith-Williams could be a big fight.
I personally rate the Charlos higher than Smith. And wouldn't put him near a Lara or Cotto.
Maybe a Ishe Smith or Vanes.
-
Tuan_Jim
- Heavyweight

Re: Official Lee vs Saunders RBR Thread
Anyone bored of boxing and going for some late night fishing? If so please PM me.
Re: Official Lee vs Saunders RBR Thread
Carlos Molina was suggested for tonight, most places you look he's seen as top 10 in the division, that would be a good fight for Smith and enough to get US TV interested, even if it isn't HBO or Showtime.PredatorHayds wrote:At domestic level I say Williams is the best of the bunch there excluding Smith.expe wrote:Fwank more or less has light middleweight locked down domestically. Williams, Kelly, Corcoran, Patterson, Selkirk, plus a few prospects that will come through to title level in the next couple of years, only one I can think of he doesn't have now that Rose has moved up is Scott Fitzgerald. Smith as world champion too. Seen talk of Selkirk-Corcoran next year, would be a good fight, hopefully Kelly gets an easy one for his comeback then into the mix for the British and Commonwealth titles, let them all fight each other and whoever comes out on top of the pile can fight Smith unless it's Selkirk, think they've both said they won't fight each other.Black Sam Bellamy wrote:Jimmy Kelly against Gary Corcoran would be a good fight for the future. More like Kelly's level
Fwank needs to get suitable opposition to make sure Smith keeps the belt . Even with a big name he's going to be the short end of a purse.
With the right promotion Smith-Williams could be a big fight.
I personally rate the Charlos higher than Smith. And wouldn't put him near a Lara or Cotto.
Maybe a Ishe Smith or Vanes.
-
ShadrachSimmo
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 4738
- Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 05:42
Re: Official Lee vs Saunders RBR Thread
Need to do away with Jim Rosenthal he's an imbecile.
-
PredatorHayds
- Super Welterweight
- Posts: 4891
- Joined: 08 Jul 2015, 08:23
Re: Official Lee vs Saunders RBR Thread
Molina or Ishe Smith would be a great fight to get the us media interested.expe wrote:Carlos Molina was suggested for tonight, most places you look he's seen as top 10 in the division, that would be a good fight for Smith and enough to get US TV interested, even if it isn't HBO or Showtime.PredatorHayds wrote:At domestic level I say Williams is the best of the bunch there excluding Smith.expe wrote: Fwank more or less has light middleweight locked down domestically. Williams, Kelly, Corcoran, Patterson, Selkirk, plus a few prospects that will come through to title level in the next couple of years, only one I can think of he doesn't have now that Rose has moved up is Scott Fitzgerald. Smith as world champion too. Seen talk of Selkirk-Corcoran next year, would be a good fight, hopefully Kelly gets an easy one for his comeback then into the mix for the British and Commonwealth titles, let them all fight each other and whoever comes out on top of the pile can fight Smith unless it's Selkirk, think they've both said they won't fight each other.
Fwank needs to get suitable opposition to make sure Smith keeps the belt . Even with a big name he's going to be the short end of a purse.
With the right promotion Smith-Williams could be a big fight.
I personally rate the Charlos higher than Smith. And wouldn't put him near a Lara or Cotto.
Maybe a Ishe Smith or Vanes.
Re: Official Lee vs Saunders RBR Thread
Really like the Vanes fightPredatorHayds wrote:At domestic level I say Williams is the best of the bunch there excluding Smith.expe wrote:Fwank more or less has light middleweight locked down domestically. Williams, Kelly, Corcoran, Patterson, Selkirk, plus a few prospects that will come through to title level in the next couple of years, only one I can think of he doesn't have now that Rose has moved up is Scott Fitzgerald. Smith as world champion too. Seen talk of Selkirk-Corcoran next year, would be a good fight, hopefully Kelly gets an easy one for his comeback then into the mix for the British and Commonwealth titles, let them all fight each other and whoever comes out on top of the pile can fight Smith unless it's Selkirk, think they've both said they won't fight each other.Black Sam Bellamy wrote:Jimmy Kelly against Gary Corcoran would be a good fight for the future. More like Kelly's level
Fwank needs to get suitable opposition to make sure Smith keeps the belt . Even with a big name he's going to be the short end of a purse.
With the right promotion Smith-Williams could be a big fight.
I personally rate the Charlos higher than Smith. And wouldn't put him near a Lara or Cotto.
Maybe a Ishe Smith or Vanes.
Re: Official Lee vs Saunders RBR Thread
I'm picking Lee anyway.reggaereggae wrote:That's a special promotional price for new customers only with a max stake of prob no more than £20Neil Gee wrote:That's from Betfair mate.Supremo wrote:
??? If an oddsmaker gave out odds like that I wouldn't need to work again...
Re: Official Lee vs Saunders RBR Thread
Who was Frank talking about when he said he's going to have a few home truth's with?
-
dr_devious
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5349
- Joined: 29 Dec 2005, 09:19
Re: Official Lee vs Saunders RBR Thread
Disagree, he's an excellent presenter. Reminds me of the good old days when boxing was free on ITVShadrachSimmo wrote:Need to do away with Jim Rosenthal he's an imbecile.
-
Terminator666
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1665
- Joined: 06 Nov 2007, 10:18
Re: Official Lee vs Saunders RBR Thread
Saunders points win for me
Re: Official Lee vs Saunders RBR Thread
Mitchell Smith.digzee wrote:Who was Frank talking about when he said he's going to have a few home truth's with?
Re: Official Lee vs Saunders RBR Thread
Ah ok cheers.expe wrote:Mitchell Smith.digzee wrote:Who was Frank talking about when he said he's going to have a few home truth's with?
-
Boxerbeetle
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 32978
- Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59
Re: Official Lee vs Saunders RBR Thread
I'm sticking with Lee, but this is a genuine 50-50
Re: Official Lee vs Saunders RBR Thread
Billy Joe "No nick name" Saunders......
Re: Official Lee vs Saunders RBR Thread
Come on Andy!
-
Black Sam Bellamy
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1476
- Joined: 25 Sep 2008, 13:51
Re: Official Lee vs Saunders RBR Thread
BJS looks a bit fleshy to me, I hope he's ready for 12 rounds.
Re: Official Lee vs Saunders RBR Thread
Height difference 
-
MightyWarrior
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13355
- Joined: 23 Jan 2003, 14:01
Re: Official Lee vs Saunders RBR Thread
BJ not a big puncher but Andy Lee is a bit chinny....
Re: Official Lee vs Saunders RBR Thread
I give the first to Lee for at least sticking the jab out.