BoxRec

Horse wrote:I wanted to select John Conteh vs Chris Finnegan I as week 6's fight, but I can't find the footage.

Can anyone else find it?

can't see it on youtube

Horse wrote:I wanted to select John Conteh vs Chris Finnegan I as week 6's fight, but I can't find the footage.

Can anyone else find it?

Where's the USB port on a VCR tape?

Sklar wrote:

Horse wrote:I wanted to select John Conteh vs Chris Finnegan I as week 6's fight, but I can't find the footage.

Can anyone else find it?

Where's the USB port on a VCR tape?

Get Mimmy on the case pronto.

https://youtu.be/IRVcQlOASyw

Clearly not the full 15 rounds

Ive been planning on watching this fight anyways,i assumed it would all be available

What's happening then?
We found any footage or are we going for another fight?
Finnegan vs Foster is a good option and we'll have no shortage of Conteh fights to view.

davie wrote:What's happening then?
We found any footage or are we going for another fight?
Finnegan vs Foster is a good option and we'll have no shortage of Conteh fights to view.

Yes, I'll probably go with Finnegan vs Foster now.

I'll post it tomorrow.

Week 6 was Chris Finnegan vs Bob Foster.

I'm the only one to have commented so far. Did anyone else watch it?

Fight: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GFpQaBAMb2I
Thread: http://boxrec.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=197962

Horse wrote:Week 6 was Chris Finnegan vs Bob Foster.

I'm the only one to have commented so far. Did anyone else watch it?

Fight: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GFpQaBAMb2I
Thread: http://boxrec.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=197962

Sorry, I'm miles behind on this challenge now. Will try to catch-up soon.

Horse wrote:I'm the only one to have commented so far

Does that not tell you something?

Andy Paints Brian wrote:Does that not tell you something?

That I am a dismal failure and my 52 fight challenge is a farce?

Boxerbeetle wrote:Sorry, I'm miles behind on this challenge now. Will try to catch-up soon.

Horse wrote:That I am a dismal failure and my 52 fight challenge is a farce?

I wouldn't go that far Horse but from my (admittedly limited) experience of Boxing forums you were p*ssing in the wind with this:

A lovely community feeling for all of the many members of this forum

It's something I've yet to encounter (not do I expect to anytime soon)

Never mind here's a to cheer you up.

Horse wrote:That I am a dismal failure and my 52 fight challenge is a farce?

And how come you respond to every comment regarding you within 30 secs, it's a bit scary?

Andy Paints Brian wrote:

Horse wrote:That I am a dismal failure and my 52 fight challenge is a farce?

I wouldn't go that far Horse but from my (admittedly limited) experience of Boxing forums you were p*ssing in the wind with this:

A lovely community feeling for all of the many members of this forum

It's something I've yet to encounter (not do I expect to anytime soon)

Never mind here's a to cheer you up.

I suspect your experience of boxing forums is far from limited.

Boxerbeetle wrote:I suspect your experience of boxing forums is far from limited.

Oh ... okay then.

Any suggestions for week 7?

I would suggest Howard Winstone vs Vicente Saldivar I, but we haven't had an all British clash since week 2.

Horse wrote:Any suggestions for week 7?

I would suggest Howard Winstone vs Vicente Saldivar I, but we haven't had an all British clash since week 2.

Great technical fight between two excellent fighters.

If you're after an all British fight may I suggest Alan rudkin - Walter mcgowan, horse? Two great Brits.

Counter-puncher wrote:I suspect you're a well-known pudendum.

The 'pudendum' leimotiv strikes again ...

Ooh leitmotiv very good, aren't you clever dropping a word like that. You pudendum.

Counter-puncher wrote:Ooh leitmotiv very good, aren't you clever dropping a word like that. You pudendum.

I certainly am (especially in present company) I bet you had look it up as well.

Yes that's established now I'm 'pudendum' and it's becoming increasingly apparent that you're a repetitive bore who is very brave on the Internet and takes himself F A R too seriously.

I look forward to the next installment of this fascinating discourse.

Glad to call you a pudendum any time,PIGG.

I was being sarcastic, by the way.

Saying leitmotiv doesn't make you clever. In this company or any other.

Counter-puncher wrote:Glad to call you a pudendum any time,PIGG.

I was being sarcastic, by the way.

Saying leitmotiv doesn't make you clever. In this company or any other.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_p8GJN9KyJI

Ah, the using a youtube link as a riposte 'leitmotiv'. You've got previous with that, too.

When I say 'too', I mean 'along with having previous for being a pudendum, too', obviously, PIGG.

Counter-puncher wrote:Ah, the using a youtube link as a riposte 'leitmotiv'. You've got previous with that, too.

When I say 'too', I mean 'along with having previous for being a pudendum, too', obviously, PIGG.

I've clearly had a profound effect on your life for you to be so familiar with my work, I'm pleased and yet saddened at the same time.