Page 8 of 9

Re: Sam Eggington vs. Bradley Skeete and undercard

Posted: 06 Mar 2016, 03:41
by simonwalsh
Just finished watching it on catch up. Amazed at Sky in the 11th saying "Skeete is boxing like he's got this in the bag, he might be in for a shock" (or words to that effect).

I had Skeete winning comfortably by a wide margin. I only gave Eggington three rounds.

Re: Sam Eggington vs. Bradley Skeete and undercard

Posted: 06 Mar 2016, 03:41
by Boxerbeetle
It was a very predictable result, Eggington is absolutely made for Skeete. Did anyone really predict anything other than a Skeete points win?

Re: Sam Eggington vs. Bradley Skeete and undercard

Posted: 06 Mar 2016, 03:48
by mickey1975
Boxerbeetle wrote:It was a very predictable result, Eggington is absolutely made for Skeete. Did anyone really predict anything other than a Skeete points win?
Yes, Barry Hearn thought he was unbeatable.

Re: Sam Eggington vs. Bradley Skeete and undercard

Posted: 06 Mar 2016, 06:29
by keirw
Stylewise Skeete was always going to be a nightmare for Eggington.
Eggington is a young man and can still come back, although I doubt he will ever do much above domestic level.
Skeete looked good, good jab, good footwork, took some good shots too. Onwards and upwards for Bradley

Re: Sam Eggington vs. Bradley Skeete and undercard

Posted: 06 Mar 2016, 07:21
by expe
mickey1975 wrote:
Boxerbeetle wrote:It was a very predictable result, Eggington is absolutely made for Skeete. Did anyone really predict anything other than a Skeete points win?
Yes, Barry Hearn thought he was unbeatable.
Had £5k on it with Andy Ayling, who was straight over to him at the end of the fight.

Re: Sam Eggington vs. Bradley Skeete and undercard

Posted: 06 Mar 2016, 10:07
by Taansend
expe wrote:
mickey1975 wrote:
Boxerbeetle wrote:It was a very predictable result, Eggington is absolutely made for Skeete. Did anyone really predict anything other than a Skeete points win?
Yes, Barry Hearn thought he was unbeatable.
Had £5k on it with Andy Ayling, who was straight over to him at the end of the fight.
Barry probably had Eddie take it out of Sams purse :D

Re: Sam Eggington vs. Bradley Skeete and undercard

Posted: 06 Mar 2016, 10:24
by Horse
Shambles wrote:No, Skeete dominated, it was good to watch.
No, it was terrible.

Skeete ran away and was reluctant to throw anything apart from his jab. Not my idea of domination.

Re: Sam Eggington vs. Bradley Skeete and undercard

Posted: 06 Mar 2016, 10:26
by Tangerine
Disgusted by Barry Hearns comments,publicly questioning the commitment of Eggington.He's probably trying to give Eggington a kick up the arse but those. Comments were uncalled for IMO

Re: Sam Eggington vs. Bradley Skeete and undercard

Posted: 06 Mar 2016, 10:42
by Larrylefthook
Seriously shocked how some people did not enjoy and appreciate Skeete's performance last night, he boxed beautifully to his strengths what do people expect? He doesn't have any strength or power to be going forward so there's no point in it, why play into your opponents strengths just to please some fans, it would be stupid. If you want to see more action go and watch Lucas Browne.

Re: Sam Eggington vs. Bradley Skeete and undercard

Posted: 06 Mar 2016, 10:47
by Taansend
Horse wrote:
Shambles wrote:No, Skeete dominated, it was good to watch.
No, it was terrible.

Skeete ran away and was reluctant to throw anything apart from his jab. Not my idea of domination.
Boxing & moving is not the same as running away.

Skeete put on a good performance of the former. He stood there, drew the punch, dodged & countered, before moving on to keep his opponent from setting his feet. Excellent boxing.

Obviously not everyone's cup of tea but definitely NOT running away.

Re: Sam Eggington vs. Bradley Skeete and undercard

Posted: 06 Mar 2016, 11:44
by Boxerbeetle
Horse wrote:
Shambles wrote:No, Skeete dominated, it was good to watch.
No, it was terrible.

Skeete ran away and was reluctant to throw anything apart from his jab. Not my idea of domination.
Sounds remarkably similar to Fury's performance against Wlad which you rate so highly :o

Re: Sam Eggington vs. Bradley Skeete and undercard

Posted: 06 Mar 2016, 11:49
by Horse
Boxerbeetle wrote:Sounds remarkably similar to Fury's performance against Wlad which you rate so highly :o
Fury beat ATG W. Klitschko. Skeete beat Eggington.

Fury landed more power punches than jabs, I doubt that Skeete did the same.

Re: Sam Eggington vs. Bradley Skeete and undercard

Posted: 06 Mar 2016, 11:57
by Stuarty
Boxerbeetle wrote:It was a very predictable result, Eggington is absolutely made for Skeete. Did anyone really predict anything other than a Skeete points win?
I was on the fence to be honest. I thought they would both pick up rounds and it would end up coming down to the last four but Skeete was always in control. As I was watching it I was thinking 'why didn't I see this was going to happen'! Hindsight is a wonderful thing I suppose. I like Eggington so I was probably a bit bias beforehand. He's young and fearless and has done things the hard way. Was exposed last night but I hope he can come again. He's certainly young enough.

Re: Sam Eggington vs. Bradley Skeete and undercard

Posted: 06 Mar 2016, 12:01
by keithmoonhangover
Horse wrote:
Boxerbeetle wrote:Sounds remarkably similar to Fury's performance against Wlad which you rate so highly :o
Fury beat ATG W. Klitschko. Skeete beat Eggington.

Fury landed more power punches than jabs, I doubt that Skeete did the same.
You're not in the slightest bit biased are you.

Re: Sam Eggington vs. Bradley Skeete and undercard

Posted: 06 Mar 2016, 12:18
by Stuarty
keithmoonhangover wrote:
Horse wrote:
Boxerbeetle wrote:Sounds remarkably similar to Fury's performance against Wlad which you rate so highly :o
Fury beat ATG W. Klitschko. Skeete beat Eggington.

Fury landed more power punches than jabs, I doubt that Skeete did the same.
You're not in the slightest bit biased are you.
Who Horse? Never!! He's the most level headed, impartial poster on this forum and we should have more like him!! Carlsberg don't do bulls***.......

Re: Sam Eggington vs. Bradley Skeete and undercard

Posted: 06 Mar 2016, 12:18
by Boxerbeetle
Horse wrote:
Boxerbeetle wrote:Sounds remarkably similar to Fury's performance against Wlad which you rate so highly :o
Fury beat ATG W. Klitschko. Skeete beat Eggington.

Fury landed more power punches than jabs, I doubt that Skeete did the same.
Fury only landed 86 total punches in the entire fight. Relatively speaking, Skeete was more entertaining against Eggington than Fury was against Wlad.

Re: Sam Eggington vs. Bradley Skeete and undercard

Posted: 06 Mar 2016, 12:22
by Horse
keithmoonhangover wrote:You're not in the slightest bit biased are you.
If Skeete had just beaten Manny Pacquiao in the same manner then I'd be lauding him.

He didn't though did he? He beat Sam Eggington.

He got a good domestic win by jabbing a lot on the back foot. Not really a performance worth going on about.

Re: Sam Eggington vs. Bradley Skeete and undercard

Posted: 06 Mar 2016, 12:22
by Horse
Boxerbeetle wrote:Fury only landed 86 total punches in the entire fight. Relatively speaking, Skeete was more entertaining against Eggington than Fury was against Wlad.
To you maybe.

Re: Sam Eggington vs. Bradley Skeete and undercard

Posted: 06 Mar 2016, 12:30
by keithmoonhangover
Horse wrote:Not really a performance worth going on about.
Well, why don't you shut up then.

Re: Sam Eggington vs. Bradley Skeete and undercard

Posted: 06 Mar 2016, 12:33
by Horse
keithmoonhangover wrote:Well, why don't you shut up then.
I'm responding to other people's posts.

Stop talking to me.

Re: Sam Eggington vs. Bradley Skeete and undercard

Posted: 06 Mar 2016, 13:55
by rd350lc
Horse wrote:
Shambles wrote:No, Skeete dominated, it was good to watch.
No, it was terrible.

Skeete ran away and was reluctant to throw anything apart from his jab. Not my idea of domination.
Spot-on assesment Horse :TU: , had it maybe 2-3 round to Skeete

Re: Sam Eggington vs. Bradley Skeete and undercard

Posted: 06 Mar 2016, 13:59
by rd350lc
Boxerbeetle wrote:
Horse wrote:
Shambles wrote:No, Skeete dominated, it was good to watch.
No, it was terrible.

Skeete ran away and was reluctant to throw anything apart from his jab. Not my idea of domination.
Sounds remarkably similar to Fury's performance against Wlad which you rate so highly :o
and I have to agree with this too ,if anything Skeete engaged ever so slightly more and didn't showboat as much , very similar in the negativity stakes .

Re: Sam Eggington vs. Bradley Skeete and undercard

Posted: 06 Mar 2016, 13:59
by Horse
rd350lc wrote:Spot-on assesment Horse :TU: , had it maybe 2-3 round to Skeete
:TU:

Re: Sam Eggington vs. Bradley Skeete and undercard

Posted: 06 Mar 2016, 14:04
by Horse
Pulmo Bailly wrote:How about this for a thriller?

Bradley Skeete vs Paulie Malignaggi

One for the 'purists' as they say :TU:
Malignaggi is generally entertaining when he has a decent opponent.

Re: Sam Eggington vs. Bradley Skeete and undercard

Posted: 06 Mar 2016, 14:13
by rd350lc
Pulmo Bailly wrote:How about this for a thriller?

Bradley Skeete vs Paulie Malignaggi

One for the 'purists' as they say :TU:
Nice one Pulmo , i'm hand weeding my block paving that night . ;-)