Re: Pac v Horn rbr
Posted: 02 Jul 2017, 01:47
I question the accuracy of those stats. As I posted in another thread, I first thought they were off during the undercard bouts.
I honestly cannot believe that you are pulling punch stats out your ass.diddy wrote:Horn got outlanded 182-92.
Sounds like 9-3 Horn to me.
I believe human beings are responsible for the stats that entered into Compubox. It'd be a hard nights work and you'd have to be vigilant watching one fighter and one fighter only and counting exactly what he throws and lands.diddy wrote:My ass doesn't compute them. A computer does. Those are actual real stats, genius.
No they aren't, not genius.diddy wrote:My ass doesn't compute them. A computer does. Those are actual real stats, genius.
No, you're right. the fighters don't have sensors on their bodies that report back to a computer. there is a clown clicking a button, unless Horn lands four shots while he's checking out some glorious Australian lady.gilgamesh wrote:I believe human beings are responsible for the stats that entered into Compubox. It'd be a hard nights work and you'd have to be vigilant watching one fighter and one fighter only and counting exactly what he throws and lands.diddy wrote:My ass doesn't compute them. A computer does. Those are actual real stats, genius.
At least that's the way compubox used to be. Maybe technology has updated somehow and they don't have human involvement anymore.
I guess Diddy like goose Teddy were way too busy counting punches & not watching the fightTanzio wrote:I honestly cannot believe that you are pulling punch stats out your ass.diddy wrote:Horn got outlanded 182-92.
Sounds like 9-3 Horn to me.
Care to tell what is a scoring punch??ldlamb wrote:Yes they do....and they know that PAC landed waaay more of them.
Sounds closeTanzio wrote:Looking back at it, I gave 10 and 11 to Pac and I see many people had one or another or both of those to Horn. On my card that would have made it 114-113 Horn. I cannot call this a robbery.