BoxRec

Ossyrules wrote:

Kalan wrote:

RScarf1 wrote:So you think Mike Tyson in his prime would lose to Tyson Fury? Mike Tyson beat guys taller than him. He was probably shorter than everyone or almost everyone he fought. Tony Tucker was a contender too back then even after he lost to Tyson by decision. A lot of depth in the division in those days. Fury would have a height advantage on all of them, but would that be enough to overcome their skills? Fury would probably have lost to Klitschko in the rematch and Joshua if he fought him.

Damned right he would lose... Tyson was too small and weak for even Evander Holyfield, Buster Douglas, and Lennox Lewis... They boxed the piss out of Mike because he didn't box that well... He style was walking straight in and eating punches.. When he ate their's He went down and out.. EAT THIS Mike!

As far as Fury losing to Klitschko in the rematch??? ... I doubt it -- and sometimes you get one bite at the apple... Joshua will probably get his bite sometime in the future -- that is if Fury ever rehabs from all his mental, emotional, and addiction health issues...

Reading boxrec records again with no context kalan

Mike was on the decline vs buster
Past it vs Holyfield
Completely shot vs lewis

It's a terrible base for an argument.

Mike Tyson knocks out tyson fury badly

dagilechia wrote:If someone ranks Dillian Whyte as HW #2 then the same person must admit that it's the worst division out there at the moment.

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:No thank you.

Heretic wrote:

ValMar wrote:

Heretic wrote:
Usyk does not have the power to beat Joshua. He would get walked down against the bigger and stronger man.

He should clean out cruiser and maybe then cash out in few final fights in HW.

I agree that Usyk has not enough power to KO Joshua, but if he is able to box cleverly, he might win by decision.

I think Usyk could out box him for some time but would get caught eventually. Bit like what GGG did to Brook.

HomicideHenry wrote:

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:No thank you.

Yeah cus you know that Weaver would tell the truth, that he couldn't have beaten Fury or Klitschko.

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:

HomicideHenry wrote:

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:No thank you.

Yeah cus you know that Weaver would tell the truth, that he couldn't have beaten Fury or Klitschko.

No, because I would never listen to your show. I'd be more interested what he thinks of you telling him that fury would make him cry like a bitch. Let me know what he says about that.

crusader wrote:Steve Cunningham is a far better and more accomplished boxer than Williams; did you give his word that kind of respect?

HomicideHenry wrote:

crusader wrote:Steve Cunningham is a far better and more accomplished boxer than Williams; did you give his word that kind of respect?

Cunningham is a mentally and emotionally fragile man who has never been the same since Fury. The losses have piled up. Seems all that character he allegedly had was mostly a facade. He's turned into an incredibly bitter and resentful man.

As for Rubin Williams, he may not be as good or great as some, but he's a man worthy of respect and he's got a huge IQ on the business. He sounds as knowledgeable as any trainer or insider in the business.

RScarf1 wrote:Weaver would have beaten Fury and I don't care if even Weaver doesn't believe it.

RScarf1 wrote:Weaver would have beaten Fury and I don't care if even Weaver doesn't believe it.

HomicideHenry wrote:

crusader wrote:Steve Cunningham is a far better and more accomplished boxer than Williams; did you give his word that kind of respect?

Cunningham is a mentally and emotionally fragile man who has never been the same since Fury. The losses have piled up. Seems all that character he allegedly had was mostly a facade. He's turned into an incredibly bitter and resentful man.

As for Rubin Williams, he may not be as good or great as some, but he's a man worthy of respect and he's got a huge IQ on the business. He sounds as knowledgeable as any trainer or insider in the business.

Tomasino wrote:

HomicideHenry wrote:

crusader wrote:Steve Cunningham is a far better and more accomplished boxer than Williams; did you give his word that kind of respect?

Cunningham is a mentally and emotionally fragile man who has never been the same since Fury. The losses have piled up. Seems all that character he allegedly had was mostly a facade. He's turned into an incredibly bitter and resentful man.

As for Rubin Williams, he may not be as good or great as some, but he's a man worthy of respect and he's got a huge IQ on the business. He sounds as knowledgeable as any trainer or insider in the business.

How can you even post this? A facade? Why do you feel the need to insult the man?

HomicideHenry wrote:

Tomasino wrote:

HomicideHenry wrote:
Cunningham is a mentally and emotionally fragile man who has never been the same since Fury. The losses have piled up. Seems all that character he allegedly had was mostly a facade. He's turned into an incredibly bitter and resentful man.

As for Rubin Williams, he may not be as good or great as some, but he's a man worthy of respect and he's got a huge IQ on the business. He sounds as knowledgeable as any trainer or insider in the business.

How can you even post this? A facade? Why do you feel the need to insult the man?

#1- Has he been the same since? No.
#2- Have the losses piled up since? Yes.
#3- Does he seem bitter and less humble since? Yes.

I said nothing wrong.

HomicideHenry wrote:

Tomasino wrote:

HomicideHenry wrote:
Cunningham is a mentally and emotionally fragile man who has never been the same since Fury. The losses have piled up. Seems all that character he allegedly had was mostly a facade. He's turned into an incredibly bitter and resentful man.

As for Rubin Williams, he may not be as good or great as some, but he's a man worthy of respect and he's got a huge IQ on the business. He sounds as knowledgeable as any trainer or insider in the business.

How can you even post this? A facade? Why do you feel the need to insult the man?

#1- Has he been the same since? No.
#2- Have the losses piled up since? Yes.
#3- Does he seem bitter and less humble since? Yes.

I said nothing wrong.

Tomasino wrote:

HomicideHenry wrote:

Tomasino wrote:

How can you even post this? A facade? Why do you feel the need to insult the man?

#1- Has he been the same since? No.
#2- Have the losses piled up since? Yes.
#3- Does he seem bitter and less humble since? Yes.

I said nothing wrong.

You are truly disgusting Rufus.