out of curiosity why do you guys allow assfuct to keep coming back?
I know he's been banned at least 3 times.
The last time for being a racist prlck
out of curiosity why do you guys allow assfuct to keep coming back?
What are they supposed to do about just these douches getting new screen names? There's no traceability available, unless you make each account get validated through email.tiny_acres wrote: ↑22 Dec 2018, 17:34out of curiosity why do you guys allow assfuct to keep coming back?
I know he's been banned at least 3 times.
The last time for being a racist prlck
I don't know who is a returning troll or a new poster. I have to just figure it out by their posting pattern. I don't know their IP address, and all that kinda jazz.tiny_acres wrote: ↑22 Dec 2018, 17:34out of curiosity why do you guys allow assfuct to keep coming back?
I know he's been banned at least 3 times.
The last time for being a racist prlck
ban ipsoogiebe wrote: ↑22 Dec 2018, 17:37What are they supposed to do about just these douches getting new screen names? There's no traceability available, unless you make each account get validated through email.tiny_acres wrote: ↑22 Dec 2018, 17:34out of curiosity why do you guys allow assfuct to keep coming back?
I know he's been banned at least 3 times.
The last time for being a racist prlck
gilgamesh wrote: ↑22 Dec 2018, 17:38I don't know who is a returning troll or a new poster. I have to just figure it out by their posting pattern. I don't know their IP address, and all that kinda jazz.tiny_acres wrote: ↑22 Dec 2018, 17:34out of curiosity why do you guys allow assfuct to keep coming back?
I know he's been banned at least 3 times.
The last time for being a racist prlck
I often have to approve or disapprove new posters to become a regular member I guess I should look for clues a lot closer with the new posters, I'll admit I often just approve just to get it the hell off of my notifications, but every now and then I'll shoot it down. Usually the only stuff that strikes me as an obvious troll right out the gate is the people that are hawking some Streaming site or trying to sell some sh*t or something, and putting up a link. I shoot those guys down straight away.
If that's something that I can do, I wouldn't know how so it's beyond my expertise I'll just say that. Trust me if I could keep the trolls from coming back I'd love to do so, but it's not something that I can do I don't believe or even if it is it's not something I know how to do.tiny_acres wrote: ↑22 Dec 2018, 17:38ban ipsoogiebe wrote: ↑22 Dec 2018, 17:37What are they supposed to do about just these douches getting new screen names? There's no traceability available, unless you make each account get validated through email.tiny_acres wrote: ↑22 Dec 2018, 17:34
out of curiosity why do you guys allow assfuct to keep coming back?
I know he's been banned at least 3 times.
The last time for being a racist prlck
Isn't that merely the location of the user? IDK...whatever.tiny_acres wrote: ↑22 Dec 2018, 17:38ban ipsoogiebe wrote: ↑22 Dec 2018, 17:37What are they supposed to do about just these douches getting new screen names? There's no traceability available, unless you make each account get validated through email.tiny_acres wrote: ↑22 Dec 2018, 17:34
out of curiosity why do you guys allow assfuct to keep coming back?
I know he's been banned at least 3 times.
The last time for being a racist prlck
Vitali's a former proficient kickboxer, tough as anyone who takes kicks all over his body, but, unlike most of the kickboxers-turned-boxers, could fit even in the more-refined noble art.Wuuupa wrote: ↑22 Dec 2018, 15:32Vitaly did what tyson and holyfield couldnt.
Tyson won maybe 1 rd and was schooled, i exoected more from (i know he was far from his prime but yet still he shouldve dine more). Holyfield was well trained in perfect shape and couldnt do nothing, rarly won a 1 single round. The judging was a farce. Vitaly was winning rounds in dominant fashion. Vitaly wss taller had similar reach better chin was simply tall and strong and mentality tough and lennox couldnt deal with that. Out of his breath, bloody nose. Close to prime holyfield was never close to doing such damage.
Yes definitely not Kalan. Even when talking bollocks he did so with a certain air of authority or gravitas. This guy claims to be an old timer but comes across as lacking that self assured manner.oogiebe wrote: ↑22 Dec 2018, 17:23You think? Doesn't he seem like he's 12 or something? Kalan had a bit of a flair, while this bloke is just plain stupid.
Foreman twice KO'ed Joe Frazier, who is likely a top 15 all-time heavyweight, and the best heavyweight swarmer of all-time. He KO'ed Ken Norton, who is possibly a top 25 all-time heavyweight. He KO'ed George Chuvalo and Ron Lyle. I'm pretty certain that he belongs in the conversation a lot more than Usyk currently does.
You don't seem to be aware that Tyson and Holyfield were past-it when they fought Lewis or that Holmes was past-it when he fought Tyson. So there is a good chance that you actually know a lot less about boxing than most everyone else.
tiny_acres wrote: ↑28 Aug 2022, 10:02 Well this thread aged terribly. I still wonder if Kalan killed himself when Joshua lost to Ruiz or did the 2 Usyk losses finish him off with a heart attack?
All Kalan threads dotiny_acres wrote: ↑28 Aug 2022, 10:02 Well this thread aged terribly. I still wonder if Kalan killed himself when Joshua lost to Ruiz or did the 2 Usyk losses finish him off with a heart attack?
Depending on the context, I’m not so sure he’s very good. I suppose if compared to all pro-fighters at all levels anyone who hits the upper echelon in any way is very good. If we’re looking at the top guys across the eras of boxing, he’s definitely on the low end.
My categories of fighters are 1) Great 2) Excellent 3) Very Good, and of course it gets lower from there. So "very good" might sound better than it is, another way of saying it is 3rd rate to the first 2 categories,punchoutsb wrote: ↑28 Aug 2022, 12:08Depending on the context, I’m not so sure he’s very good. I suppose if compared to all pro-fighters at all levels anyone who hits the upper echelon in any way is very good. If we’re looking at the top guys across the eras of boxing, he’s definitely on the low end.
I can definitely follow that processTony1244 wrote: ↑28 Aug 2022, 12:23My categories of fighters are 1) Great 2) Excellent 3) Very Good, and of course it gets lower from there. So "very good" might sound better than it is, another way of saying it is 3rd rate to the first 2 categories,punchoutsb wrote: ↑28 Aug 2022, 12:08Depending on the context, I’m not so sure he’s very good. I suppose if compared to all pro-fighters at all levels anyone who hits the upper echelon in any way is very good. If we’re looking at the top guys across the eras of boxing, he’s definitely on the low end.
Kind of like a sports card can be in very good condition, meaning it's not as good as mint or excellent.punchoutsb wrote: ↑28 Aug 2022, 12:44I can definitely follow that processTony1244 wrote: ↑28 Aug 2022, 12:23My categories of fighters are 1) Great 2) Excellent 3) Very Good, and of course it gets lower from there. So "very good" might sound better than it is, another way of saying it is 3rd rate to the first 2 categories,punchoutsb wrote: ↑28 Aug 2022, 12:08
Depending on the context, I’m not so sure he’s very good. I suppose if compared to all pro-fighters at all levels anyone who hits the upper echelon in any way is very good. If we’re looking at the top guys across the eras of boxing, he’s definitely on the low end.![]()
Definitely a very good Heavyweight.
Which goes to show how little they know about the sport.tiny_acres wrote: ↑28 Aug 2022, 13:43Definitely a very good Heavyweight.
You don't win the title and defend it multiple times and be called average.
Some fans think that if a fighter is not top 10 all time they suck