BoxRec

RonnyJ wrote: ↑29 Sep 2019, 01:20

margaret thatcher wrote: ↑29 Sep 2019, 01:18

Would Porter beat Crawford ? Cuz he was a match for Spence

Spence/porter/thurman/ortiz jr>crawford

great performance from Porter. Hard dude.

I had it 116-111 for Spence. Big last two rounds for him to pull this fight off. I see a few people giving it to Porter, I don't see how. I could see it being closer, but have a hard time giving Porter 7 rounds. The judge who had it 115-112 for Porter can join the idiots who gave Barrios the win.

I had it 114-113 Spence when watching it live, now I have rewatched the fight, I had 114-113 Porter, the result could went either way, I liked Porter more, but Spence ultimately deserved the win more at the end, Crawford UDs both of them.

Score cards if anyone is interested.

Only saw the last 3 rounds.

Im gonna rewatch it in its full. But it when I jumped in Spence and Porter where still going at it. Real need to see this. So pissed I oversleept.

Porter is never involved in a dull fight. That is my take away.

I had it at 114-113 for Spence, 6-6 in rounds. That KD was the mainfactor.

Great fight!

Ruthless-RKO wrote: ↑29 Sep 2019, 00:49 Hard to score Porter fights. I have a feeling we’ll have 2 wide cards for Spence and a close Porter card. If it goes the distance.

Credit where it’s due.

Good fight, and Spence deserved the win for sure. It would have been a wide UD if he boxed instead of brawled with Porter.

Pissed to hear D Garcia will be next over Crawford if Pac won't fight.

Delta Jay wrote: ↑29 Sep 2019, 06:10

Ruthless-RKO wrote: ↑29 Sep 2019, 00:49 Hard to score Porter fights. I have a feeling we’ll have 2 wide cards for Spence and a close Porter card. If it goes the distance.

Credit where it’s due.

Appreciate it.

Porter should rematch Ugas now

Great fight the last 2 rds sealed it for Spence as tough as Spence is I'd pick Crawford to beat him

I had it 116-111 for Spence. Not sure what fight the odd judge was watching. Fight was closer than I suspected. didn't disappoint.

That was an awful robbery. I was picking Spence to win wide, but eventually I had Porter 116-111. Judges are motherf*ckers yet again.

115-112 Porter is a bad, bad card. 8 of first 10 rds to Porter? What?

Porter is very good. He didn’t win that fight.

DrDuke wrote: ↑29 Sep 2019, 08:38 That was an awful robbery. I was picking Spence to win wide, but eventually I had Porter 116-111. Judges are motherf*ckers yet again.

The was no robbery it was a hard close fight. Tricky to score at times but the right man got his hand raised.

samwbr wrote: ↑29 Sep 2019, 08:45

DrDuke wrote: ↑29 Sep 2019, 08:38 That was an awful robbery. I was picking Spence to win wide, but eventually I had Porter 116-111. Judges are motherf*ckers yet again.

The was no robbery it was a hard close fight. Tricky to score at times but the right man got his hand raised.

I was scoring for Porter with confidence. He has been outfighting Spence for the vast majority of the fight. All the biggest shots were scored by Porter.

DrDuke wrote: ↑29 Sep 2019, 08:48

samwbr wrote: ↑29 Sep 2019, 08:45

The was no robbery it was a hard close fight. Tricky to score at times but the right man got his hand raised.

I was scoring for Porter with confidence. He has been outfighting Spence for the vast majority of the fight. All the biggest shots were scored by Porter.

Except the knockdown. Yea? I disagree, but that's what makes a forum!

DrDuke wrote: ↑29 Sep 2019, 08:48

samwbr wrote: ↑29 Sep 2019, 08:45

The was no robbery it was a hard close fight. Tricky to score at times but the right man got his hand raised.

I was scoring for Porter with confidence. He has been outfighting Spence for the vast majority of the fight. All the biggest shots were scored by Porter.

It wasnt as wide either way as the 2 judges had it. Both lads fought superbly.

samwbr wrote: ↑29 Sep 2019, 08:51

DrDuke wrote: ↑29 Sep 2019, 08:48

I was scoring for Porter with confidence. He has been outfighting Spence for the vast majority of the fight. All the biggest shots were scored by Porter.

It wasnt as wide either way as the 2 judges had it. Both lads fought superbly.

Well, they both fought good, but still Spence was waited to do much better. By many. Now it's fair to say, that Spence is overrated. And I'm very disappointed with the scores.

DrDuke wrote: ↑29 Sep 2019, 08:54

samwbr wrote: ↑29 Sep 2019, 08:51

It wasnt as wide either way as the 2 judges had it. Both lads fought superbly.

Well, they both fought good, but still Spence was waited to do much better. By many. Now it's fair to say, that Spence is overrated. And I'm very disappointed with the scores.

Overrated in what sense? It was clearly a tricky match up for Spence considering he was in against a durable, awkward fighter who was also in his prime and much more experienced when it comes to these types of fights. In reality Porter could have been undefeated going into this fight, because it's not like he's ever laid down and got beaten handedly, even by Brook or Thurman (there was a bit of controversy surrounding the aftermath of those fights as well.)

I've always favored Crawford over Spence and I still favor Spence over everyone else in the division.

I felt Spence deserved the nod last night. Did he look spectacular? No. But he looked less than invincible against possibly the 3rd best fighter in the division. I wouldn't call Spence overrated, he's a fine fighter.