BoxRec

To be honest, I don't mind that the US and Israel are tearing each other apart. Both largely deserved it, especially under Trump and Bibi.

Today's leaders simply suck. Give me Gorbachev, Bill Clinton, and Rabin. Miss the 90s.

Surprise surprise, looks like the peace agreement might be on the rocks.

https://www.politico.eu/article/iranus- ... postponed/

greg wrote: ↑19 Jun 2026, 09:03 To be honest, I don't mind that the US and Israel are tearing each other apart. Both largely deserved it, especially under Trump and Bibi.

Neither do I. They deserve each other. Two morally deficient and corrupt asswipes.

Baby Face Finster wrote: ↑19 Jun 2026, 09:39

greg wrote: ↑19 Jun 2026, 09:03 To be honest, I don't mind that the US and Israel are tearing each other apart. Both largely deserved it, especially under Trump and Bibi.

Neither do I. They deserve each other. Two morally deficient and corrupt asswipes.

They could end up at war with each other the way things are going, seems America is helping Isreal by giving Iran a $300 b war chest and lifting their sanctions. No doubt a sizeable chunk of that will make it's way to the Trump family.

What a blithering idiot. You know he's going to attack Trump whatever he does. It's either going to be "You let Iran win" or "You're a war monger"

Tony1244 wrote: ↑19 Jun 2026, 09:17 Today's leaders simply suck. Give me Gorbachev, Bill Clinton, and Rabin. Miss the 90s.

Thatcher too, more balls than any bloke.

Seamus wrote: ↑19 Jun 2026, 11:58 What a blithering idiot. You know he's going to attack Trump whatever he does. It's either going to be "You let Iran win" or "You're a war monger"

Maybe he shouldn't have started the war in tue first place, perhaps, maybe

banjo wrote: ↑19 Jun 2026, 12:20

Tony1244 wrote: ↑19 Jun 2026, 09:17 Today's leaders simply suck. Give me Gorbachev, Bill Clinton, and Rabin. Miss the 90s.

Thatcher too, more balls than any bloke.

She was an absolute pudendum, made it acceptable for eveyone to be a selfish pudendum.

Of course he never should have gotten involved, I made that clear from the start.

Seamus wrote: ↑19 Jun 2026, 12:31 Of course he never should have gotten involved, I made that clear from the start.

So he deserves all the criticism he gets then, he started a war that has killed people and cost hundreds of billions. And made billions for himself too out of illegal trades.

Nightmare Roy wrote: ↑19 Jun 2026, 12:37

Seamus wrote: ↑19 Jun 2026, 12:31 Of course he never should have gotten involved, I made that clear from the start.

So he deserves all the criticism he gets then, he started a war that has killed people and cost hundreds of billions. And made billions for himself too out of illegal trades.

...but he'll still love him no matter what

bmw hector wrote: ↑19 Jun 2026, 12:41

Nightmare Roy wrote: ↑19 Jun 2026, 12:37

Seamus wrote: ↑19 Jun 2026, 12:31 Of course he never should have gotten involved, I made that clear from the start.

So he deserves all the criticism he gets then, he started a war that has killed people and cost hundreds of billions. And made billions for himself too out of illegal trades.

...but he'll still love him no matter what

They are absolutely fcuking mental, anyone who supports that idiot should have been swallowed.

Nightmare Roy wrote: ↑19 Jun 2026, 12:28

banjo wrote: ↑19 Jun 2026, 12:20

Tony1244 wrote: ↑19 Jun 2026, 09:17 Today's leaders simply suck. Give me Gorbachev, Bill Clinton, and Rabin. Miss the 90s.

Thatcher too, more balls than any bloke.

She was an absolute pudendum, made it acceptable for eveyone to be a selfish pudendum.

You're absolutely right, she had f*cking balls though

Trump's doing a balancing act because an influential part of his base is fanatically pro-Israel, and another part is non-interventionist. He needs to dump the former because these pro-Zionists would think nothing of getting us involved in an all out War. If you think that's funny, the same thing will be happening in your country when lefty politicians have to walk a tight rope between Feminists-Homosexuals and Muslims.

I mean he has to walk a tightrope because he can't admit to anyone (particularly himself) that the entire situation has been a self-inflicted disaster.

Seamus wrote: ↑19 Jun 2026, 13:03 Trump's doing a balancing act because an influential part of his base is fanatically pro-Israel, and another part is non-interventionist. He needs to dump the former because these pro-Zionists would think nothing of getting us involved in an all out War. If you think that's funny, the same thing will be happening in your country when lefty politicians have to walk a tight rope between Feminists-Homosexuals and Muslims.

You are involved in a war, do you really for one minute think this "peace deal" will last? I don't give it a week.

banjo wrote: ↑19 Jun 2026, 12:48

Nightmare Roy wrote: ↑19 Jun 2026, 12:28

banjo wrote: ↑19 Jun 2026, 12:20

Thatcher too, more balls than any bloke.

She was an absolute pudendum, made it acceptable for eveyone to be a selfish pudendum.

You're absolutely right, she had f*cking balls though

Maybe the first English Trans Prime Minister.

Trump is so fucking stupid. The deal that Obama made with Iran was a good one that was keeping Iran from building a nuclear bomb, but because of Trump‘s hatred for Obama, he had to end it and now he’s got a far far worse deal in place.

He was slagging Obama off for the money that Obama released which actually belonged to Iran but now he is going to give them even more money that U.S. taxpayers will be on the hook for.

Seamus wrote: ↑19 Jun 2026, 12:31 Of course he never should have gotten involved, I made that clear from the start.

so why the f@ck are you so baffled at people criticizing him

Because they can't have it both ways. You can't say "We let Iran win" if it's peace, and "He's A War Monger" if it resumes. Is that so hard to understand ?

He started a pointless war, a war he said would never happen, killed thousands for no specific reason, so he's a warmonger.

He got his ass kicked and has conceded to Iran.

Looks like both are apt.

Seamus wrote: ↑19 Jun 2026, 16:36 Because they can't have it both ways. You can't say "We let Iran win" if it's peace, and "He's A War Monger" if it resumes. Is that so hard to understand ?

People can say he's an absolute pudendum for starting the war in the first place right?

Seamus wrote: ↑19 Jun 2026, 16:36 Because they can't have it both ways. You can't say "We let Iran win" if it's peace, and "He's A War Monger" if it resumes. Is that so hard to understand ?

sounds like he started a fight he shouldnt have, then f@cked it up

Seamus wrote: ↑19 Jun 2026, 16:36 Because they can't have it both ways. You can't say "We let Iran win" if it's peace, and "He's A War Monger" if it resumes. Is that so hard to understand ?

Both can be true. A bully can pick a fight, lose and be both