Re: OT: BNP
Posted: 25 Oct 2009, 13:59
How does that change anything?sg1985 wrote:There is a massive difference, the 'indigenous' of this country are in the majority, by a long way.
How does that change anything?sg1985 wrote:There is a massive difference, the 'indigenous' of this country are in the majority, by a long way.
probably not, it doesnt fit his worldviewsg1985 wrote:Did you read the line you I highlighted before cutting it off?Horse wrote:How does that change anything?sg1985 wrote:There is a massive difference, the 'indigenous' of this country are in the majority, by a long way.
Yes.sg1985 wrote:Did you read the line you I highlighted before cutting it off?
That doesn't really make much sense, MatthewS.MatthewS wrote:probably not, it doesnt fit his worldview
So, if/when the 'indigenous people' of this country become a small minority then it will be okay to want self determination?sg1985 wrote:There is a massive difference, the 'indigenous' of this country are in the majority, by a long way.Smally Big Plums wrote:No body would dare say to a Native American or an Aborigine or a Maori, sorry but your campaign for self determination is just modern day Nazism, would they??????
I certainly thought so when I was a kid, I was approached that many times. Thankfully I was only grabbed the once, quite frightening when you are only ten. Obviously the things that happen in childhood do affect the way you think as an adult.sg1985 wrote:If someone tried to sexually attack you, they are a rapist, there is a massive difference. you do realise that not all homosexuals want to get in your pants don't you?
They all want to get in my pants, but that is because I am well fit.sg1985 wrote:If someone tried to sexually attack you, they are a rapist, there is a massive difference. you do realise that not all homosexuals want to get in your pants don't you?
In terms of this discussion, I'd say the criteria is being liked by a bunch of Nazi cnuts.banjo wrote:What makes an indigenous person? Britain has been invaded by the Romans, Vikings and French, they all settled here and reproduced. I always thought an indigenous person was pure as in untouched by other civilisations for example Native Americans are indigenous, the vast majority of the population of the USA isn't indigenous.
What I'm getting at is if Griffin and his monkeys looked back through their ancestry they'd probably find that they have foreign ancestry somewhere along the line so their "indigenous British" argument is a load of bollocks.Datsue wrote:In terms of this discussion, I'd say the criteria is being liked by a bunch of Nazi cnuts.banjo wrote:What makes an indigenous person? Britain has been invaded by the Romans, Vikings and French, they all settled here and reproduced. I always thought an indigenous person was pure as in untouched by other civilisations for example Native Americans are indigenous, the vast majority of the population of the USA isn't indigenous.
Anyway, careful Banjo, you're steering dangerously close to logic! I'm going to have to go now, & barricade my door against all the brown people who want to bum me. Oh yeah, & all those other white people who speak funny & want to take my job.
Seriously for a second, surely your post would highlight to most people why the BNP & co are so stupid: to keep their argument together, they have to shift the goalposts every five minutes.
One minute it's "AAARRRGGGGHHHHH, brown people!" Then it's "AAAAAAAARRRRRGGGGGGHHHH! White people! But y'know, they speak funny!" Then it's "AAAAARRRRGGGGHHHH! Brown/white people who speak funny & who don't fancy chicks!"
lol thats a bit of a reachman grenade wrote:Isnt griffin quite a common irish surname?indigenous aye nick
I got that, sorry, should've been more clear.banjo wrote: What I'm getting at is if Griffin and his monkeys looked back through their ancestry they'd probably find that they have foreign ancestry somewhere along the line so their "indigenous British" argument is a load of bollocks.
The east lancs does not run through urban areas, they are extremely suburban. Are you really suggesting there is no multi-cultural areas outside of London? That is laughable. There are mosques in Salford, and in Leigh which is a part of Wigan. I have no idea about widnes/runcorn and warrington. But what about places like Oldham? Bolton?[/quote]Carlos-Wigan wrote: That's the most interesting 'myth' that never seems to get challenged James and thats Britian is 'multi cultural'
The South Lancashire corridor (along the East Lancs Road) between Liverpool and Manchester - some of the most 'urban' and 'industrial' piece real estate in Europe that stretches 40 miles with towns such as Widnes, Runcorn, St Helens, Warrington, Wigan, Salford - its probably 99% white and British ethnicity - and I doubt there is a mosque in any of those towns.
I think people see multi-culturalism in the East end of London and think that its the same everywhere - and its not!![]()
There are large swathes of Britian outside the major cities where you would have a hard time finding anything other than a white face.
I think there might be a touch of tongue-in-cheekness about how easy it is to prove someones ancestry?Mensa07 wrote:lol thats a bit of a reachman grenade wrote:Isnt griffin quite a common irish surname?indigenous aye nick
I like you alreadyexittored wrote:Its amazing that people have wasted 11 pages on the BNP, I feel dirty just writing about them but i'm not going to pull my punches especially seeing as we are on a Boxing forum.
'In the kingdom of the blind, the one-eyed man is king'
The BNP are a FASCIST NAZI party, anyone doubting this is frankly too thick and stupid to bother with especially as there is so much recorded data proving this from their origins and what we know of Nick Griffin and and various disgusting underlings like Mark Collet.
I don't care if you vote for the BNP but understand this, if you vote for a Nazi fascist party then you are a Nazi fascist too so no excuses later that you didn't know.
This country lost many good people defeating fascism once and we will do it again and chase them like the dogs they are back to their Sespool of filth.
Its not the theories I don't understand - it's the names I cannot remember.Quixall wrote:to jamesmcdonnel
Keynesian economics and short term free markets are a contradiction. Stop using theories that you obviously do not understand. Your post was nonsensical.
They pulled in just under 1 million in the euro elections, are you saying there's currently just under a million Nazi fascists in Britain today?exittored wrote:Its amazing that people have wasted 11 pages on the BNP, I feel dirty just writing about them but i'm not going to pull my punches especially seeing as we are on a Boxing forum.
'In the kingdom of the blind, the one-eyed man is king'
The BNP are a FASCIST NAZI party, anyone doubting this is frankly too thick and stupid to bother with especially as there is so much recorded data proving this from their origins and what we know of Nick Griffin and and various disgusting underlings like Mark Collet.
I don't care if you vote for the BNP but understand this, if you vote for a Nazi fascist party then you are a Nazi fascist too so no excuses later that you didn't know.
This country lost many good people defeating fascism once and we will do it again and chase them like the dogs they are back to their Sespool of filth.
Well, my grandad voted BNP....before he died....cause the canditate had a nice name!!!!!!MatthewS wrote:No one who has voted BNP can be unaware of what they are voting for... there has been enough in the media about them. Therefore they either don't care about their bad side or support it.
WildWaylon wrote:I married a Griffin from Southampton, and she had strange views.
stujones wrote:Well, my grandad voted BNP....before he died....cause the canditate had a nice name!!!!!!MatthewS wrote:No one who has voted BNP can be unaware of what they are voting for... there has been enough in the media about them. Therefore they either don't care about their bad side or support it.