BoxRec

the 117-111 card was far too wide , never 6 rounds in that fight

vargas wrote:118-110 Froch for me. Gave Johnson rounds 1 & 7 and Froch the rest.

lol

exittored wrote:

Jon Saxon wrote:

exittored wrote:JOHNSON faded badly at end, had him losing the last 4 rds.

shocking scoring by 2 of the judges but one judge got it right.

lol.

Ok well lets see your rd by rd scores or STFU.

As you can now see the people have spoken.
I was right you were wrong, now shut the fornicate up you biased cretin.

Jon Saxon wrote:

exittored wrote:

Jon Saxon wrote:
lol.

Ok well lets see your rd by rd scores or STFU.

As you can now see the people have spoken.
I was right you were wrong, now shut the eff up you biased cretin.

You're obviously some asshole fanboy of Froch. I don't give a fornicate if the people have spoken and am justified the one independent judge scored it a draw too, i just scored the fight rd by rd as i saw it and wasn't influenced by the biased Sky commentating team. I had Johnson winning 1(close but he landed some nice clean shots and jabs) 2,3 then had Froch winning 4 and 5 then Johnson 6,7,8 with the cleaner hitting to the head and body and effective agression and although Froch was throwing more during these rds most of his punches were being blocked. Froch clearly took 9,10,11 and 12 for me. Most of the people i respect on Boxrec saw it very close either as a draw or Froch by a round or two which i can live with.

Even though i had it a draw in rds, i'm glad Froch won as he'll make a better fight against ward in the final as Johnson just dosen't have enough to go 12 hard rds and as usual faded badly in the last quarter of the fight in a very similar way to the Clinton woods vs Johnson third fight.

I thought it was a landslide for Froch. Just thought he outpunched Johnson throughout and was landing two punces at least for ever one by Johnson, although I can see how someone might be swayed by Johnson coming forward all the time.

Just the way I saw it.

gobbles wrote:I thought it was a landslide for Froch. Just thought he outpunched Johnson throughout and was landing two punces at least for ever one by Johnson, although I can see how someone might be swayed by Johnson coming forward all the time.

Just the way I saw it.

Well that's just not good enough for me

It's funny how there are so many interpretations for the scoring of this fight. IMO, Johnson was outworking Froch in the first half of the fight, and then he faded and Froch came on strong. It definitely wasn't a draw. Froch won, but Johnson did win more than 3 rounds! 4 or 5, I reckon. I probably should have scored it, but I prefer to just enjoy watching.

exittored wrote:

Jon Saxon wrote:

exittored wrote: Ok well lets see your rd by rd scores or STFU.

As you can now see the people have spoken.
I was right you were wrong, now shut the eff up you biased cretin.

You're obviously some asshole fanboy of Froch. I don't give a eff if the people have spoken and am justified the one independent judge scored it a draw too, i just scored the fight rd by rd as i saw it and wasn't influenced by the biased Sky commentating team. I had Johnson winning 1(close but he landed some nice clean shots and jabs) 2,3 then had Froch winning 4 and 5 then Johnson 6,7,8 with the cleaner hitting to the head and body and effective agression and although Froch was throwing more during these rds most of his punches were being blocked. Froch clearly took 9,10,11 and 12 for me. Most of the people i respect on Boxrec saw it very close either as a draw or Froch by a round or two which i can live with.

Even though i had it a draw in rds, i'm glad Froch won as he'll make a better fight against ward in the final as Johnson just dosen't have enough to go 12 hard rds and as usual faded badly in the last quarter of the fight in a very similar way to the Clinton woods vs Johnson third fight.

Hey youngdick why dont you eat out of my asshole? watch your mouth & less of the insults.

"The People" being SHOWTIME TV & SKY TV and anyone else who knows how to score a fight.

There isn't even a case for a valid discusion Froch won pretty easily, Glen looked old end of.

Deal with it.

Jon Saxon wrote:

exittored wrote:

Jon Saxon wrote: As you can now see the people have spoken.
I was right you were wrong, now shut the eff up you biased cretin.

You're obviously some asshole fanboy of Froch. I don't give a eff if the people have spoken and am justified the one independent judge scored it a draw too, i just scored the fight rd by rd as i saw it and wasn't influenced by the biased Sky commentating team. I had Johnson winning 1(close but he landed some nice clean shots and jabs) 2,3 then had Froch winning 4 and 5 then Johnson 6,7,8 with the cleaner hitting to the head and body and effective agression and although Froch was throwing more during these rds most of his punches were being blocked. Froch clearly took 9,10,11 and 12 for me. Most of the people i respect on Boxrec saw it very close either as a draw or Froch by a round or two which i can live with.

Even though i had it a draw in rds, i'm glad Froch won as he'll make a better fight against ward in the final as Johnson just dosen't have enough to go 12 hard rds and as usual faded badly in the last quarter of the fight in a very similar way to the Clinton woods vs Johnson third fight.

Hey youngdick why dont you eat out of my asshole? watch your mouth & less of the insults.

"The People" being SHOWTIME TV & SKY TV and anyone else who knows how to score a fight.

There isn't even a case for a valid discusion Froch won pretty easily, Glen looked old end of.

Deal with it.

Listen you thick fornicating moron i've been contributing to this site since 2003 so you can feck right off and if you actually noticed quite a few other people in this thread had it the same or within a round of two of my scorecard. Next time do a rd by rd yourself rather then bitch and moan because someone else didn't see the fight the same way as you!

I actually like Froch and overall he deserved the win as he won the championship rds. He will make it a much better final against ward as he can bring it the full 12 rds.

exittored wrote:

Jon Saxon wrote:

exittored wrote: You're obviously some asshole fanboy of Froch. I don't give a eff if the people have spoken and am justified the one independent judge scored it a draw too, i just scored the fight rd by rd as i saw it and wasn't influenced by the biased Sky commentating team. I had Johnson winning 1(close but he landed some nice clean shots and jabs) 2,3 then had Froch winning 4 and 5 then Johnson 6,7,8 with the cleaner hitting to the head and body and effective agression and although Froch was throwing more during these rds most of his punches were being blocked. Froch clearly took 9,10,11 and 12 for me. Most of the people i respect on Boxrec saw it very close either as a draw or Froch by a round or two which i can live with.

Even though i had it a draw in rds, i'm glad Froch won as he'll make a better fight against ward in the final as Johnson just dosen't have enough to go 12 hard rds and as usual faded badly in the last quarter of the fight in a very similar way to the Clinton woods vs Johnson third fight.

Hey youngdick why dont you eat out of my asshole? watch your mouth & less of the insults.

"The People" being SHOWTIME TV & SKY TV and anyone else who knows how to score a fight.

There isn't even a case for a valid discusion Froch won pretty easily, Glen looked old end of.

Deal with it.

Listen you thick effing moron i've been contributing to this site since 2003 so you can feck right off and if you actually noticed quite a few other people in this thread had it the same or within a round of two of my scorecard. Next time do a rd by rd yourself rather then bitch and moan because someone else didn't see the fight the same way as you!

I actually like Froch and overall he deserved the win as he won the championship rds. He will make it a much better final against ward as he can bring it the full 12 rds.

In the spirit of fairness I will let you off this time.