Burns v Gonzalez plus undercard
Re: Burns v Gonzalez plus undercard
Burns at least got through it, he showed great heart to keep chipping away when he was having a hard time. Also took some big punches without going down. Certainly not a classic performance, but he won, he needs to take the broner fight or another big paying fight pretty soon before he finds one better than him from these lesser guys in lesser paying fights. Time to take he big cash and big risk.
-
keithmoonhangover
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 16774
- Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42
Re: Burns v Gonzalez plus undercard
The bloke punched himself out, tried for two more rounds and then quit. Fair play to Burns, if the bloke hadn't quit, Ricky would have stopped him.
-
ShadrachSimmo
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 4733
- Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 05:42
Re: Burns v Gonzalez plus undercard
Gonzalez shat it. That's how it appears. He may have broken his wrist but those last 2 rounds he barely threw anything he looked disheartened. Ach well burns escapes with his title. Just..
-
el_grande_mauro_mina
- Lightweight
- Posts: 11215
- Joined: 24 Dec 2017, 11:54
Re: Burns v Gonzalez plus undercard
Not particulary - why would I aim it at you?jonnyyorkshu wrote:was that aimed at me tubs?Fat Git wrote:Can't stand Burns - he is everything that is wrong with boxing.
Yeah yeah, I know it was Gonzalez who quit - bring in Broner and knock this
'champion' out once and for all.
I haven't like this fradulent reign for a long time now, Nelson coming
on here lauding it doesn't help. No offence but you don't come into it.
-
thepocketrocket
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3283
- Joined: 16 Jan 2003, 06:26
Re: Burns v Gonzalez plus undercard
Gonzalez wasn't getting caught though...that's why there is such surprise
Re: Burns v Gonzalez plus undercard
Reminded me of Haye vs Thompson in a way, just totally puinched himself out. The guy was obviously a little inexperienced at top level and just had nothing left.
Re: Burns v Gonzalez plus undercard
You're probably right Keith. If only you could adopt such a realistic POV around Tyson Fury.keithmoonhangover wrote:The bloke punched himself out, tried for two more rounds and then quit. Fair play to Burns, if the bloke hadn't quit, Ricky would have stopped him.
Re: Burns v Gonzalez plus undercard
ricky burns comes across very well in interviews, im glad he kept his belt tonight gonzalez was far better than expected, burns was miles off on his range finding but he broke that guy in there with that shot in the 7th after gonzalez thought burns was about to buckle. Gonzales would have got stopped on his feet if he had carried on i think he was firing nothing back and had slowed down.
Last edited by Finn on 11 May 2013, 18:22, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Burns v Gonzalez plus undercard
scored cards were 66-67, 66-68, 66-68 before the stoppage and Duran had just beaten Sugar Ray.keithmoonhangover wrote:I know mate, just having a little poke.J-C wrote:
Duran was getting schooled
Burns v Gonzalez was pretty damn similar if Gonzalez doesn't have a broken wrist.
-
ThereByTheGrace
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 4016
- Joined: 04 Sep 2010, 05:22
Re: Burns v Gonzalez plus undercard
I'll be watching for Jose's extension on his house. Broken hand maybe but more backhanders than Boris BeckerShadrachSimmo wrote:Gonzalez shat it. That's how it appears. He may have broken his wrist but those last 2 rounds he barely threw anything he looked disheartened. Ach well burns escapes with his title. Just..
Re: Burns v Gonzalez plus undercard
Perhaps he threw nothing because he was fighting with a broken wrist? To say Gonzales has no heart is such a knee jerk reaction. It's easier said than done fighting with a broken wrist.ShadrachSimmo wrote:Gonzalez shat it. That's how it appears. He may have broken his wrist but those last 2 rounds he barely threw anything he looked disheartened. Ach well burns escapes with his title. Just..
-
keithmoonhangover
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 16774
- Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42
Re: Burns v Gonzalez plus undercard
Kilburn wrote:You're probably right Keith. If only you could adopt such a realistic POV around Tyson Fury.keithmoonhangover wrote:The bloke punched himself out, tried for two more rounds and then quit. Fair play to Burns, if the bloke hadn't quit, Ricky would have stopped him.
-
thepocketrocket
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3283
- Joined: 16 Jan 2003, 06:26
Re: Burns v Gonzalez plus undercard
Gonzalez is a fornicating pussy and a disgrace to all those fighters, all over the world who would walk through gunfire to win a world title
-
Looking On
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 927
- Joined: 12 Oct 2012, 13:50
Re: Burns v Gonzalez plus undercard
Despite how that ended id be interested in seeing that guy again , Ive a feeling that wont be the last we hear of him .
Re: Burns v Gonzalez plus undercard
What you reckon pocket?thepocketrocket wrote:Gonzalez wasn't getting caught though...that's why there is such surprise
Damn I can hear "We close our eyes" being played ringside. That make up for any dodginess.
-
thepocketrocket
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3283
- Joined: 16 Jan 2003, 06:26
Re: Burns v Gonzalez plus undercard
If he was getting caught then yes, don't put a fighter in danger...he still had good lateral movement, even if he wasn't throwing
Re: Burns v Gonzalez plus undercard
Yes but lets see if the guy has a legit excuse, wasn't fit for 12 rounds or if he lost it mentally at the least Gonzalez could have got on his bike for the remainder of the fight and have more than a fighters chance of the beltcolumbo wrote:Gonzales should be ashamed of himself I think because quitting like that in a world title fight like that is shameful.
Well watching this guy from now on, interesting
Alex Arthur just said if he had two broken wrists he would have continued .... jejeje
Re: Burns v Gonzalez plus undercard
Not watched it for years, but maybe schooled is a bit OTT. Still the impression I remember is Duran was hoping for a repeat of the first one but couldn't really get anything going.MattVito wrote:The fight was pretty close before Duran quit.... And Duran just beat Sugar a few months earlier. Your memory's foggyJ-C wrote:Duran was getting schooledkeithmoonhangover wrote:
Quit like Duran.
-
keithmoonhangover
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 16774
- Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42
Re: Burns v Gonzalez plus undercard
I thought his legs looked completely shot in the last round.thepocketrocket wrote:If he was getting caught then yes, don't put a fighter in danger...he still had good lateral movement, even if he wasn't throwing
Re: Burns v Gonzalez plus undercard
X2!!!thepocketrocket wrote:Gonzalez is a effing pussy and a disgrace to all those fighters, all over the world who would walk through gunfire to win a world title
-
misterpunch
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 1252
- Joined: 13 Jan 2012, 17:48
Re: Burns v Gonzalez plus undercard
not exactly colin McMillan then
-
jonnyyorkshu
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 449
- Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:12
Re: Burns v Gonzalez plus undercard
i was the one who brought up Broner,harsh calling Burns a fraud,limited but no fraud.PS Broner is everything wrong with boxing.Fat Git wrote:Not particulary - why would I aim it at you?jonnyyorkshu wrote:was that aimed at me tubs?Fat Git wrote:Can't stand Burns - he is everything that is wrong with boxing.
Yeah yeah, I know it was Gonzalez who quit - bring in Broner and knock this
'champion' out once and for all.
I haven't like this fradulent reign for a long time now, Nelson coming
on here lauding it doesn't help. No offence but you don't come into it.
-
thepocketrocket
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3283
- Joined: 16 Jan 2003, 06:26
Re: Burns v Gonzalez plus undercard
Total spin, I am pretty appaled.Kilburn wrote:What you reckon pocket?thepocketrocket wrote:Gonzalez wasn't getting caught though...that's why there is such surprise
Damn I can hear "We close our eyes" being played ringside. That make up for any dodginess.
It isn't Burn's fault Gonzo had no heart, but lets not pretend he had started working him over, because that is plain garbage from the SKY team
-
thepocketrocket
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3283
- Joined: 16 Jan 2003, 06:26
Re: Burns v Gonzalez plus undercard
He looked tired, not gione....big difference IMOkeithmoonhangover wrote:I thought his legs looked completely shot in the last round.thepocketrocket wrote:If he was getting caught then yes, don't put a fighter in danger...he still had good lateral movement, even if he wasn't throwing
Re: Burns v Gonzalez plus undercard
To me it looked like Gonzalez had shit conditioning and no fighting spirit.