Burns v Gonzalez plus undercard

TheCobra
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3450
Joined: 01 Jan 2009, 15:11

Re: Burns v Gonzalez plus undercard

Post by TheCobra »

Burns at least got through it, he showed great heart to keep chipping away when he was having a hard time. Also took some big punches without going down. Certainly not a classic performance, but he won, he needs to take the broner fight or another big paying fight pretty soon before he finds one better than him from these lesser guys in lesser paying fights. Time to take he big cash and big risk.
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 16774
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Burns v Gonzalez plus undercard

Post by keithmoonhangover »

The bloke punched himself out, tried for two more rounds and then quit. Fair play to Burns, if the bloke hadn't quit, Ricky would have stopped him.
ShadrachSimmo
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4733
Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 05:42

Re: Burns v Gonzalez plus undercard

Post by ShadrachSimmo »

Gonzalez shat it. That's how it appears. He may have broken his wrist but those last 2 rounds he barely threw anything he looked disheartened. Ach well burns escapes with his title. Just..
el_grande_mauro_mina
Lightweight
Posts: 11215
Joined: 24 Dec 2017, 11:54

Re: Burns v Gonzalez plus undercard

Post by el_grande_mauro_mina »

jonnyyorkshu wrote:
Fat Git wrote:Can't stand Burns - he is everything that is wrong with boxing.

Yeah yeah, I know it was Gonzalez who quit - bring in Broner and knock this
'champion' out once and for all. :roll:
was that aimed at me tubs?
Not particulary - why would I aim it at you?

I haven't like this fradulent reign for a long time now, Nelson coming
on here lauding it doesn't help. No offence but you don't come into it. :D
thepocketrocket
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3283
Joined: 16 Jan 2003, 06:26

Re: Burns v Gonzalez plus undercard

Post by thepocketrocket »

Gonzalez wasn't getting caught though...that's why there is such surprise
TheCobra
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3450
Joined: 01 Jan 2009, 15:11

Re: Burns v Gonzalez plus undercard

Post by TheCobra »

Reminded me of Haye vs Thompson in a way, just totally puinched himself out. The guy was obviously a little inexperienced at top level and just had nothing left.
Kilburn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6573
Joined: 25 Jul 2002, 07:27

Re: Burns v Gonzalez plus undercard

Post by Kilburn »

keithmoonhangover wrote:The bloke punched himself out, tried for two more rounds and then quit. Fair play to Burns, if the bloke hadn't quit, Ricky would have stopped him.
You're probably right Keith. If only you could adopt such a realistic POV around Tyson Fury.
Finn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5509
Joined: 07 May 2009, 15:56

Re: Burns v Gonzalez plus undercard

Post by Finn »

ricky burns comes across very well in interviews, im glad he kept his belt tonight gonzalez was far better than expected, burns was miles off on his range finding but he broke that guy in there with that shot in the 7th after gonzalez thought burns was about to buckle. Gonzales would have got stopped on his feet if he had carried on i think he was firing nothing back and had slowed down.
Last edited by Finn on 11 May 2013, 18:22, edited 1 time in total.
MattVito
Cruiserweight
Posts: 15
Joined: 18 May 2011, 11:32

Re: Burns v Gonzalez plus undercard

Post by MattVito »

keithmoonhangover wrote:
J-C wrote:
Duran was getting schooled
I know mate, just having a little poke.
scored cards were 66-67, 66-68, 66-68 before the stoppage and Duran had just beaten Sugar Ray.

Burns v Gonzalez was pretty damn similar if Gonzalez doesn't have a broken wrist.
ThereByTheGrace
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4016
Joined: 04 Sep 2010, 05:22

Re: Burns v Gonzalez plus undercard

Post by ThereByTheGrace »

ShadrachSimmo wrote:Gonzalez shat it. That's how it appears. He may have broken his wrist but those last 2 rounds he barely threw anything he looked disheartened. Ach well burns escapes with his title. Just..
I'll be watching for Jose's extension on his house. Broken hand maybe but more backhanders than Boris Becker :-?
Finch
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1129
Joined: 01 Mar 2008, 08:14

Re: Burns v Gonzalez plus undercard

Post by Finch »

ShadrachSimmo wrote:Gonzalez shat it. That's how it appears. He may have broken his wrist but those last 2 rounds he barely threw anything he looked disheartened. Ach well burns escapes with his title. Just..
Perhaps he threw nothing because he was fighting with a broken wrist? To say Gonzales has no heart is such a knee jerk reaction. It's easier said than done fighting with a broken wrist.
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 16774
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Burns v Gonzalez plus undercard

Post by keithmoonhangover »

Kilburn wrote:
keithmoonhangover wrote:The bloke punched himself out, tried for two more rounds and then quit. Fair play to Burns, if the bloke hadn't quit, Ricky would have stopped him.
You're probably right Keith. If only you could adopt such a realistic POV around Tyson Fury.
:lol: I know I sound like a nutter when I talk about Fury.
thepocketrocket
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3283
Joined: 16 Jan 2003, 06:26

Re: Burns v Gonzalez plus undercard

Post by thepocketrocket »

Gonzalez is a fornicating pussy and a disgrace to all those fighters, all over the world who would walk through gunfire to win a world title
Looking On
Super Middleweight
Posts: 927
Joined: 12 Oct 2012, 13:50

Re: Burns v Gonzalez plus undercard

Post by Looking On »

Despite how that ended id be interested in seeing that guy again , Ive a feeling that wont be the last we hear of him .
Kilburn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6573
Joined: 25 Jul 2002, 07:27

Re: Burns v Gonzalez plus undercard

Post by Kilburn »

thepocketrocket wrote:Gonzalez wasn't getting caught though...that's why there is such surprise
What you reckon pocket?

Damn I can hear "We close our eyes" being played ringside. That make up for any dodginess.
thepocketrocket
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3283
Joined: 16 Jan 2003, 06:26

Re: Burns v Gonzalez plus undercard

Post by thepocketrocket »

If he was getting caught then yes, don't put a fighter in danger...he still had good lateral movement, even if he wasn't throwing
macaca
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1296
Joined: 25 Sep 2012, 07:49

Re: Burns v Gonzalez plus undercard

Post by macaca »

columbo wrote:Gonzales should be ashamed of himself I think because quitting like that in a world title fight like that is shameful.
Yes but lets see if the guy has a legit excuse, wasn't fit for 12 rounds or if he lost it mentally at the least Gonzalez could have got on his bike for the remainder of the fight and have more than a fighters chance of the belt

Well watching this guy from now on, interesting

Alex Arthur just said if he had two broken wrists he would have continued .... jejeje :KO:
JC
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4514
Joined: 07 Jan 2004, 13:04

Re: Burns v Gonzalez plus undercard

Post by JC »

MattVito wrote:
J-C wrote:
keithmoonhangover wrote:
Quit like Duran.
Duran was getting schooled
The fight was pretty close before Duran quit.... And Duran just beat Sugar a few months earlier. Your memory's foggy
Not watched it for years, but maybe schooled is a bit OTT. Still the impression I remember is Duran was hoping for a repeat of the first one but couldn't really get anything going.
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 16774
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Burns v Gonzalez plus undercard

Post by keithmoonhangover »

thepocketrocket wrote:If he was getting caught then yes, don't put a fighter in danger...he still had good lateral movement, even if he wasn't throwing
I thought his legs looked completely shot in the last round.
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Burns v Gonzalez plus undercard

Post by lefty »

thepocketrocket wrote:Gonzalez is a effing pussy and a disgrace to all those fighters, all over the world who would walk through gunfire to win a world title
X2!!!
misterpunch
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 1252
Joined: 13 Jan 2012, 17:48

Re: Burns v Gonzalez plus undercard

Post by misterpunch »

not exactly colin McMillan then
jonnyyorkshu
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 449
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:12

Re: Burns v Gonzalez plus undercard

Post by jonnyyorkshu »

Fat Git wrote:
jonnyyorkshu wrote:
Fat Git wrote:Can't stand Burns - he is everything that is wrong with boxing.

Yeah yeah, I know it was Gonzalez who quit - bring in Broner and knock this
'champion' out once and for all. :roll:
was that aimed at me tubs?
Not particulary - why would I aim it at you?

I haven't like this fradulent reign for a long time now, Nelson coming
on here lauding it doesn't help. No offence but you don't come into it. :D
i was the one who brought up Broner,harsh calling Burns a fraud,limited but no fraud.PS Broner is everything wrong with boxing.
thepocketrocket
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3283
Joined: 16 Jan 2003, 06:26

Re: Burns v Gonzalez plus undercard

Post by thepocketrocket »

Kilburn wrote:
thepocketrocket wrote:Gonzalez wasn't getting caught though...that's why there is such surprise
What you reckon pocket?

Damn I can hear "We close our eyes" being played ringside. That make up for any dodginess.
Total spin, I am pretty appaled.

It isn't Burn's fault Gonzo had no heart, but lets not pretend he had started working him over, because that is plain garbage from the SKY team
thepocketrocket
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3283
Joined: 16 Jan 2003, 06:26

Re: Burns v Gonzalez plus undercard

Post by thepocketrocket »

keithmoonhangover wrote:
thepocketrocket wrote:If he was getting caught then yes, don't put a fighter in danger...he still had good lateral movement, even if he wasn't throwing
I thought his legs looked completely shot in the last round.
He looked tired, not gione....big difference IMO
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Burns v Gonzalez plus undercard

Post by lefty »

To me it looked like Gonzalez had shit conditioning and no fighting spirit.
Post Reply