x2 I just came in and wondered what some posters were watching. I saw Bradley pretty comfortably.SFW wrote:That's cuz he didn't.crusader wrote:I couldn't tell you. I think the scores on this forum are usually pretty good, but I didn't think JMM did nearly as well as several other posters did.diddy wrote:How do you score 7 rounds for Marquez?
Marquez/Bradley
Re: Marquez/Bradley
Re: Marquez/Bradley
Same here.JCS wrote:I had Marquez winning 6 rounds, but Bradley won his rounds in a more convincing fashion.
-
EduardosFist
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 238
- Joined: 17 Feb 2010, 02:13
Re: Marquez/Bradley
Fight was worse than Povetkin/Klitschko. I don't want to see Marquez or Bradley ever again. Good thing I didn't pay for this. ![[icon_knockout.gif] :KO:](./images/smilies/icon_knockout.gif)
Re: Marquez/Bradley
Yes, he stopped Ramirez in 4gilgamesh wrote:Did Lomachenko win his fight earlier on the card?
Brutal body shots, looked good
Re: Marquez/Bradley
At least the right guy won.
Re: Marquez/Bradley
You're a troll. Two blind guys fighting in a 5 acre lot wouldn't be worse than Povetkin/Klitschko.EduardosFist wrote:Fight was worse than Povetkin/Klitschko. I don't want to see Marquez or Bradley ever again. Good thing I didn't pay for this.
Re: Marquez/Bradley
What rounds did you have Marquez winning?JCS wrote:I had Marquez winning 6 rounds, but Bradley won his rounds in a more convincing fashion.
This is why there are 3 judges and not 1.
I gave him 1, 4 and 9
Re: Marquez/Bradley
1,3,6,7,9,11DMA1987 wrote:What rounds did you have Marquez winning?JCS wrote:I had Marquez winning 6 rounds, but Bradley won his rounds in a more convincing fashion.
This is why there are 3 judges and not 1.
I gave him 1, 4 and 9
Re: Marquez/Bradley
I didn't see that. I thought people here were giving JMM too much credit and acting as if he was landing quality shots when he wasn't.Blodhemn wrote:Marquez landed the better shots in several of those earlier rounds where ppl gave them to Bradley by default.crusader wrote:I couldn't tell you. I think the scores on this forum are usually pretty good, but I didn't think JMM did nearly as well as several other posters did.diddy wrote:How do you score 7 rounds for Marquez?
Re: Marquez/Bradley
Jack Daniels...diddy wrote:How do you score 7 rounds for Marquez?
Re: Marquez/Bradley
I can sort of see that, but that's about as nice to Marquez as I could see being.JCS wrote:1,3,6,7,9,11DMA1987 wrote:What rounds did you have Marquez winning?JCS wrote:I had Marquez winning 6 rounds, but Bradley won his rounds in a more convincing fashion.
This is why there are 3 judges and not 1.
I gave him 1, 4 and 9
As you said, that's why there's 3 judges, I didn't have Marquez winning much of anything in the middle rounds.
-
Baby Face Finster
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 17238
- Joined: 29 Dec 2004, 23:34
Re: Marquez/Bradley
I found this a very hard fight to score. Bradley spent a lot of time circling and throwing only jabs which looked flashy but were actually blocked. I think that could have influenced people in giving Bradley some of those early rounds.
-
EduardosFist
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 238
- Joined: 17 Feb 2010, 02:13
Re: Marquez/Bradley
Disagree. Bradley fights like a blind guy, and it was definitely worse than Klitschko/Povetkin.JCS wrote:You're a troll. Two blind guys fighting in a 5 acre lot wouldn't be worse than Povetkin/Klitschko.EduardosFist wrote:Fight was worse than Povetkin/Klitschko. I don't want to see Marquez or Bradley ever again. Good thing I didn't pay for this.
Re: Marquez/Bradley
Well he certainly landed two flush right hands in the second and you gave that to JMM.Baby Face Finster wrote:I found this a very hard fight to score. Bradley spent a lot of time circling and throwing only jabs which looked flashy but were actually blocked. I think that could have influenced people in giving Bradley some of those early rounds.
Re: Marquez/Bradley
Bobbyptsd wrote: x2 I just came in and wondered what some posters were watching. I saw Bradley pretty comfortably.
8-4 Bradley
Re: Marquez/Bradley
Marquez doesn't belong at 147.
Re: Marquez/Bradley
As opposed to what? Shots that Marquez didn't land, and often didn't even throw?Baby Face Finster wrote:I found this a very hard fight to score. Bradley spent a lot of time circling and throwing only jabs which looked flashy but were actually blocked. I think that could have influenced people in giving Bradley some of those early rounds.
Re: Marquez/Bradley
Exactly.Bobbyptsd wrote:As opposed to what? Shots that Marquez didn't land, and often didn't even throw?Baby Face Finster wrote:I found this a very hard fight to score. Bradley spent a lot of time circling and throwing only jabs which looked flashy but were actually blocked. I think that could have influenced people in giving Bradley some of those early rounds.
-
Baby Face Finster
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 17238
- Joined: 29 Dec 2004, 23:34
Re: Marquez/Bradley
I guess it's a fight to watch closely a second time for all of us, but a winner has already been announced, and I have no problem with the judges scores so I will pass on watching it again as I found it painful to score the first time around.Bobbyptsd wrote:As opposed to what? Shots that Marquez didn't land, and often didn't even throw?Baby Face Finster wrote:I found this a very hard fight to score. Bradley spent a lot of time circling and throwing only jabs which looked flashy but were actually blocked. I think that could have influenced people in giving Bradley some of those early rounds.
Re: Marquez/Bradley
Rematch with Pac and winner gets PBF. Assuming Manny has something left in the tank and wins his next fight. I wish Bradley wasn't built like a midget though, I just don't see him giving Floyd any issues other than great effort. Bradley-Hatton would have been good if their careers had come together. Anyhow, good job Tim, classy and hard working guy deserves everything he earns.
-
RadioElRadar
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 292
- Joined: 04 Dec 2012, 04:35
Re: Marquez/Bradley
Exactly. 1 out of 3 people on here had it really close, so to suggest (as they're doing on Sky) that Feldman should be made to explain his card is bs imo.Baby Face Finster wrote:I found this a very hard fight to score. Bradley spent a lot of time circling and throwing only jabs which looked flashy but were actually blocked. I think that could have influenced people in giving Bradley some of those early rounds.
I thought Bradley won but I scored it really close (closer than I actually thought the fight was). Sky carrying on as if Bradley was the second coming of Willie Pep in there tonight ffs.
-
EduardosFist
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 238
- Joined: 17 Feb 2010, 02:13
Re: Marquez/Bradley
Hi Stinky Stephen. Enjoy the fights tonight?SouthpawStephen wrote:EduardosFist wrote:Disagree. Bradley fights like a blind guy, and it was definitely worse than Klitschko/Povetkin.JCS wrote:
You're a troll. Two blind guys fighting in a 5 acre lot wouldn't be worse than Povetkin/Klitschko.You act like a blind guy.
Re: Marquez/Bradley
I'm happy for Bradley.
Re: Marquez/Bradley
Yep. Marquez landed enough punches early to take some of those rounds. Fight could be scored either way, to pretend otherwise is being disingenuous.Baby Face Finster wrote:I found this a very hard fight to score. Bradley spent a lot of time circling and throwing only jabs which looked flashy but were actually blocked. I think that could have influenced people in giving Bradley some of those early rounds.