Marquez/Bradley

For RBR threads only
Bobbyptsd
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1858
Joined: 24 Apr 2011, 00:58

Re: Marquez/Bradley

Post by Bobbyptsd »

SFW wrote:
crusader wrote:
diddy wrote:How do you score 7 rounds for Marquez?
I couldn't tell you. I think the scores on this forum are usually pretty good, but I didn't think JMM did nearly as well as several other posters did.
That's cuz he didn't.
x2 I just came in and wondered what some posters were watching. I saw Bradley pretty comfortably.
Srebmun
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1358
Joined: 20 Nov 2008, 10:23

Re: Marquez/Bradley

Post by Srebmun »

JCS wrote:I had Marquez winning 6 rounds, but Bradley won his rounds in a more convincing fashion.
Same here.
EduardosFist
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 238
Joined: 17 Feb 2010, 02:13

Re: Marquez/Bradley

Post by EduardosFist »

Fight was worse than Povetkin/Klitschko. I don't want to see Marquez or Bradley ever again. Good thing I didn't pay for this. :KO:
Bobbyptsd
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1858
Joined: 24 Apr 2011, 00:58

Re: Marquez/Bradley

Post by Bobbyptsd »

gilgamesh wrote:Did Lomachenko win his fight earlier on the card?
Yes, he stopped Ramirez in 4

Brutal body shots, looked good
SFW
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1246
Joined: 11 Sep 2009, 11:04

Re: Marquez/Bradley

Post by SFW »

At least the right guy won.
JCS
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6243
Joined: 17 Dec 2004, 13:27

Re: Marquez/Bradley

Post by JCS »

EduardosFist wrote:Fight was worse than Povetkin/Klitschko. I don't want to see Marquez or Bradley ever again. Good thing I didn't pay for this. :KO:
You're a troll. Two blind guys fighting in a 5 acre lot wouldn't be worse than Povetkin/Klitschko.
DMA1987
Cruiserweight
Posts: 2927
Joined: 04 Jun 2011, 17:05

Re: Marquez/Bradley

Post by DMA1987 »

JCS wrote:I had Marquez winning 6 rounds, but Bradley won his rounds in a more convincing fashion.

This is why there are 3 judges and not 1.
What rounds did you have Marquez winning?

I gave him 1, 4 and 9
JCS
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6243
Joined: 17 Dec 2004, 13:27

Re: Marquez/Bradley

Post by JCS »

DMA1987 wrote:
JCS wrote:I had Marquez winning 6 rounds, but Bradley won his rounds in a more convincing fashion.

This is why there are 3 judges and not 1.
What rounds did you have Marquez winning?

I gave him 1, 4 and 9
1,3,6,7,9,11
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Marquez/Bradley

Post by crusader »

Blodhemn wrote:
crusader wrote:
diddy wrote:How do you score 7 rounds for Marquez?
I couldn't tell you. I think the scores on this forum are usually pretty good, but I didn't think JMM did nearly as well as several other posters did.
Marquez landed the better shots in several of those earlier rounds where ppl gave them to Bradley by default.
I didn't see that. I thought people here were giving JMM too much credit and acting as if he was landing quality shots when he wasn't.
Goliath
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 187
Joined: 01 Aug 2007, 16:59

Re: Marquez/Bradley

Post by Goliath »

diddy wrote:How do you score 7 rounds for Marquez?
Jack Daniels...
Bobbyptsd
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1858
Joined: 24 Apr 2011, 00:58

Re: Marquez/Bradley

Post by Bobbyptsd »

JCS wrote:
DMA1987 wrote:
JCS wrote:I had Marquez winning 6 rounds, but Bradley won his rounds in a more convincing fashion.

This is why there are 3 judges and not 1.
What rounds did you have Marquez winning?

I gave him 1, 4 and 9
1,3,6,7,9,11
I can sort of see that, but that's about as nice to Marquez as I could see being.

As you said, that's why there's 3 judges, I didn't have Marquez winning much of anything in the middle rounds.
Baby Face Finster
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 17238
Joined: 29 Dec 2004, 23:34

Re: Marquez/Bradley

Post by Baby Face Finster »

I found this a very hard fight to score. Bradley spent a lot of time circling and throwing only jabs which looked flashy but were actually blocked. I think that could have influenced people in giving Bradley some of those early rounds.
EduardosFist
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 238
Joined: 17 Feb 2010, 02:13

Re: Marquez/Bradley

Post by EduardosFist »

JCS wrote:
EduardosFist wrote:Fight was worse than Povetkin/Klitschko. I don't want to see Marquez or Bradley ever again. Good thing I didn't pay for this. :KO:
You're a troll. Two blind guys fighting in a 5 acre lot wouldn't be worse than Povetkin/Klitschko.
Disagree. Bradley fights like a blind guy, and it was definitely worse than Klitschko/Povetkin.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Marquez/Bradley

Post by crusader »

Baby Face Finster wrote:I found this a very hard fight to score. Bradley spent a lot of time circling and throwing only jabs which looked flashy but were actually blocked. I think that could have influenced people in giving Bradley some of those early rounds.
Well he certainly landed two flush right hands in the second and you gave that to JMM.
Goliath
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 187
Joined: 01 Aug 2007, 16:59

Re: Marquez/Bradley

Post by Goliath »

Bobbyptsd wrote: x2 I just came in and wondered what some posters were watching. I saw Bradley pretty comfortably.

8-4 Bradley
JCS
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6243
Joined: 17 Dec 2004, 13:27

Re: Marquez/Bradley

Post by JCS »

Marquez doesn't belong at 147.
Bobbyptsd
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1858
Joined: 24 Apr 2011, 00:58

Re: Marquez/Bradley

Post by Bobbyptsd »

Baby Face Finster wrote:I found this a very hard fight to score. Bradley spent a lot of time circling and throwing only jabs which looked flashy but were actually blocked. I think that could have influenced people in giving Bradley some of those early rounds.
As opposed to what? Shots that Marquez didn't land, and often didn't even throw?
squiggy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2093
Joined: 04 Feb 2008, 03:35

Re: Marquez/Bradley

Post by squiggy »

Bobbyptsd wrote:
Baby Face Finster wrote:I found this a very hard fight to score. Bradley spent a lot of time circling and throwing only jabs which looked flashy but were actually blocked. I think that could have influenced people in giving Bradley some of those early rounds.
As opposed to what? Shots that Marquez didn't land, and often didn't even throw?
Exactly.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Marquez/Bradley

Post by crusader »

x3
Baby Face Finster
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 17238
Joined: 29 Dec 2004, 23:34

Re: Marquez/Bradley

Post by Baby Face Finster »

Bobbyptsd wrote:
Baby Face Finster wrote:I found this a very hard fight to score. Bradley spent a lot of time circling and throwing only jabs which looked flashy but were actually blocked. I think that could have influenced people in giving Bradley some of those early rounds.
As opposed to what? Shots that Marquez didn't land, and often didn't even throw?
I guess it's a fight to watch closely a second time for all of us, but a winner has already been announced, and I have no problem with the judges scores so I will pass on watching it again as I found it painful to score the first time around.
jrc26
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 271
Joined: 27 May 2009, 15:40

Re: Marquez/Bradley

Post by jrc26 »

Rematch with Pac and winner gets PBF. Assuming Manny has something left in the tank and wins his next fight. I wish Bradley wasn't built like a midget though, I just don't see him giving Floyd any issues other than great effort. Bradley-Hatton would have been good if their careers had come together. Anyhow, good job Tim, classy and hard working guy deserves everything he earns.
RadioElRadar
Super Middleweight
Posts: 292
Joined: 04 Dec 2012, 04:35

Re: Marquez/Bradley

Post by RadioElRadar »

Baby Face Finster wrote:I found this a very hard fight to score. Bradley spent a lot of time circling and throwing only jabs which looked flashy but were actually blocked. I think that could have influenced people in giving Bradley some of those early rounds.
Exactly. 1 out of 3 people on here had it really close, so to suggest (as they're doing on Sky) that Feldman should be made to explain his card is bs imo.

I thought Bradley won but I scored it really close (closer than I actually thought the fight was). Sky carrying on as if Bradley was the second coming of Willie Pep in there tonight ffs.
EduardosFist
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 238
Joined: 17 Feb 2010, 02:13

Re: Marquez/Bradley

Post by EduardosFist »

SouthpawStephen wrote:
EduardosFist wrote:
JCS wrote:
You're a troll. Two blind guys fighting in a 5 acre lot wouldn't be worse than Povetkin/Klitschko.
Disagree. Bradley fights like a blind guy, and it was definitely worse than Klitschko/Povetkin.
:lol: You act like a blind guy.
Hi Stinky Stephen. Enjoy the fights tonight?
Uppercut1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 302
Joined: 26 Jun 2008, 09:10

Re: Marquez/Bradley

Post by Uppercut1 »

I'm happy for Bradley.
Blodhemn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2848
Joined: 04 Jun 2006, 20:30

Re: Marquez/Bradley

Post by Blodhemn »

Baby Face Finster wrote:I found this a very hard fight to score. Bradley spent a lot of time circling and throwing only jabs which looked flashy but were actually blocked. I think that could have influenced people in giving Bradley some of those early rounds.
Yep. Marquez landed enough punches early to take some of those rounds. Fight could be scored either way, to pretend otherwise is being disingenuous.
Post Reply