Page 9 of 10
Re: Marquez/Bradley
Posted: 13 Oct 2013, 00:12
by Bobbyptsd
SFW wrote:crusader wrote:diddy wrote:How do you score 7 rounds for Marquez?
I couldn't tell you. I think the scores on this forum are usually pretty good, but I didn't think JMM did nearly as well as several other posters did.
That's cuz he didn't.
x2 I just came in and wondered what some posters were watching. I saw Bradley pretty comfortably.
Re: Marquez/Bradley
Posted: 13 Oct 2013, 00:13
by Srebmun
JCS wrote:I had Marquez winning 6 rounds, but Bradley won his rounds in a more convincing fashion.
Same here.
Re: Marquez/Bradley
Posted: 13 Oct 2013, 00:13
by EduardosFist
Fight was worse than Povetkin/Klitschko. I don't want to see Marquez or Bradley ever again. Good thing I didn't pay for this.
![[icon_knockout.gif] :KO:](./images/smilies/icon_knockout.gif)
Re: Marquez/Bradley
Posted: 13 Oct 2013, 00:13
by Bobbyptsd
gilgamesh wrote:Did Lomachenko win his fight earlier on the card?
Yes, he stopped Ramirez in 4
Brutal body shots, looked good
Re: Marquez/Bradley
Posted: 13 Oct 2013, 00:13
by SFW
At least the right guy won.
Re: Marquez/Bradley
Posted: 13 Oct 2013, 00:14
by JCS
EduardosFist wrote:Fight was worse than Povetkin/Klitschko. I don't want to see Marquez or Bradley ever again. Good thing I didn't pay for this.
![[icon_knockout.gif] :KO:](./images/smilies/icon_knockout.gif)
You're a troll. Two blind guys fighting in a 5 acre lot wouldn't be worse than Povetkin/Klitschko.
Re: Marquez/Bradley
Posted: 13 Oct 2013, 00:14
by DMA1987
JCS wrote:I had Marquez winning 6 rounds, but Bradley won his rounds in a more convincing fashion.
This is why there are 3 judges and not 1.
What rounds did you have Marquez winning?
I gave him 1, 4 and 9
Re: Marquez/Bradley
Posted: 13 Oct 2013, 00:15
by JCS
DMA1987 wrote:JCS wrote:I had Marquez winning 6 rounds, but Bradley won his rounds in a more convincing fashion.
This is why there are 3 judges and not 1.
What rounds did you have Marquez winning?
I gave him 1, 4 and 9
1,3,6,7,9,11
Re: Marquez/Bradley
Posted: 13 Oct 2013, 00:16
by crusader
Blodhemn wrote:crusader wrote:diddy wrote:How do you score 7 rounds for Marquez?
I couldn't tell you. I think the scores on this forum are usually pretty good, but I didn't think JMM did nearly as well as several other posters did.
Marquez landed the better shots in several of those earlier rounds where ppl gave them to Bradley by default.
I didn't see that. I thought people here were giving JMM too much credit and acting as if he was landing quality shots when he wasn't.
Re: Marquez/Bradley
Posted: 13 Oct 2013, 00:17
by Goliath
diddy wrote:How do you score 7 rounds for Marquez?
Jack Daniels...
Re: Marquez/Bradley
Posted: 13 Oct 2013, 00:17
by Bobbyptsd
JCS wrote:DMA1987 wrote:JCS wrote:I had Marquez winning 6 rounds, but Bradley won his rounds in a more convincing fashion.
This is why there are 3 judges and not 1.
What rounds did you have Marquez winning?
I gave him 1, 4 and 9
1,3,6,7,9,11
I can sort of see that, but that's about as nice to Marquez as I could see being.
As you said, that's why there's 3 judges, I didn't have Marquez winning much of anything in the middle rounds.
Re: Marquez/Bradley
Posted: 13 Oct 2013, 00:17
by Baby Face Finster
I found this a very hard fight to score. Bradley spent a lot of time circling and throwing only jabs which looked flashy but were actually blocked. I think that could have influenced people in giving Bradley some of those early rounds.
Re: Marquez/Bradley
Posted: 13 Oct 2013, 00:17
by EduardosFist
JCS wrote:EduardosFist wrote:Fight was worse than Povetkin/Klitschko. I don't want to see Marquez or Bradley ever again. Good thing I didn't pay for this.
![[icon_knockout.gif] :KO:](./images/smilies/icon_knockout.gif)
You're a troll. Two blind guys fighting in a 5 acre lot wouldn't be worse than Povetkin/Klitschko.
Disagree. Bradley fights like a blind guy, and it was definitely worse than Klitschko/Povetkin.
Re: Marquez/Bradley
Posted: 13 Oct 2013, 00:18
by crusader
Baby Face Finster wrote:I found this a very hard fight to score. Bradley spent a lot of time circling and throwing only jabs which looked flashy but were actually blocked. I think that could have influenced people in giving Bradley some of those early rounds.
Well he certainly landed two flush right hands in the second and you gave that to JMM.
Re: Marquez/Bradley
Posted: 13 Oct 2013, 00:18
by Goliath
Bobbyptsd wrote:
x2 I just came in and wondered what some posters were watching. I saw Bradley pretty comfortably.
8-4 Bradley
Re: Marquez/Bradley
Posted: 13 Oct 2013, 00:19
by JCS
Marquez doesn't belong at 147.
Re: Marquez/Bradley
Posted: 13 Oct 2013, 00:19
by Bobbyptsd
Baby Face Finster wrote:I found this a very hard fight to score. Bradley spent a lot of time circling and throwing only jabs which looked flashy but were actually blocked. I think that could have influenced people in giving Bradley some of those early rounds.
As opposed to what? Shots that Marquez didn't land, and often didn't even throw?
Re: Marquez/Bradley
Posted: 13 Oct 2013, 00:20
by squiggy
Bobbyptsd wrote:Baby Face Finster wrote:I found this a very hard fight to score. Bradley spent a lot of time circling and throwing only jabs which looked flashy but were actually blocked. I think that could have influenced people in giving Bradley some of those early rounds.
As opposed to what? Shots that Marquez didn't land, and often didn't even throw?
Exactly.
Re: Marquez/Bradley
Posted: 13 Oct 2013, 00:20
by crusader
x3
Re: Marquez/Bradley
Posted: 13 Oct 2013, 00:22
by Baby Face Finster
Bobbyptsd wrote:Baby Face Finster wrote:I found this a very hard fight to score. Bradley spent a lot of time circling and throwing only jabs which looked flashy but were actually blocked. I think that could have influenced people in giving Bradley some of those early rounds.
As opposed to what? Shots that Marquez didn't land, and often didn't even throw?
I guess it's a fight to watch closely a second time for all of us, but a winner has already been announced, and I have no problem with the judges scores so I will pass on watching it again as I found it painful to score the first time around.
Re: Marquez/Bradley
Posted: 13 Oct 2013, 00:24
by jrc26
Rematch with Pac and winner gets PBF. Assuming Manny has something left in the tank and wins his next fight. I wish Bradley wasn't built like a midget though, I just don't see him giving Floyd any issues other than great effort. Bradley-Hatton would have been good if their careers had come together. Anyhow, good job Tim, classy and hard working guy deserves everything he earns.
Re: Marquez/Bradley
Posted: 13 Oct 2013, 00:24
by RadioElRadar
Baby Face Finster wrote:I found this a very hard fight to score. Bradley spent a lot of time circling and throwing only jabs which looked flashy but were actually blocked. I think that could have influenced people in giving Bradley some of those early rounds.
Exactly. 1 out of 3 people on here had it really close, so to suggest (as they're doing on Sky) that Feldman should be made to explain his card is bs imo.
I thought Bradley won but I scored it really close (closer than I actually thought the fight was). Sky carrying on as if Bradley was the second coming of Willie Pep in there tonight ffs.
Re: Marquez/Bradley
Posted: 13 Oct 2013, 00:27
by EduardosFist
SouthpawStephen wrote:EduardosFist wrote:JCS wrote:
You're a troll. Two blind guys fighting in a 5 acre lot wouldn't be worse than Povetkin/Klitschko.
Disagree. Bradley fights like a blind guy, and it was definitely worse than Klitschko/Povetkin.

You act like a blind guy.
Hi Stinky Stephen. Enjoy the fights tonight?
Re: Marquez/Bradley
Posted: 13 Oct 2013, 00:27
by Uppercut1
I'm happy for Bradley.
Re: Marquez/Bradley
Posted: 13 Oct 2013, 00:32
by Blodhemn
Baby Face Finster wrote:I found this a very hard fight to score. Bradley spent a lot of time circling and throwing only jabs which looked flashy but were actually blocked. I think that could have influenced people in giving Bradley some of those early rounds.
Yep. Marquez landed enough punches early to take some of those rounds. Fight could be scored either way, to pretend otherwise is being disingenuous.