Page 9 of 10
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Posted: 20 Apr 2014, 00:24
by crusader
holy fornicating shitt
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Posted: 20 Apr 2014, 00:24
by expe
Shumenov's bought the fight, split decision, ridiculous.
Hopkins gets it, but those judges have been paid off, Shumenov's backers have been upto something. 116-111 Hopkins is bad enough, but 114-113 Shumenov, no wonder he didn't bother to do anything, probably thought he had the fight in the bag with the judges.
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Posted: 20 Apr 2014, 00:24
by giacomino
Think the Campillo fight
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Posted: 20 Apr 2014, 00:24
by JCS
118-109 here, hahahha. split
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Posted: 20 Apr 2014, 00:25
by gilgamesh
columbo wrote:gilgamesh wrote:diddy wrote:I don't like Bernard's chances against Adonis. Just being honest.
I think he'd still be able to make it ugly, and difficult for Stevenson. I wouldn't be shocked if he beat him.
I think Stevenson would put him on his ass.
He might. I don't think so though.
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Posted: 20 Apr 2014, 00:25
by lefty
Hasnt Shumenov got some very wealthy connections and his family are very wealthy
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Posted: 20 Apr 2014, 00:25
by Baby Face Finster
I don't know if it means anything or not but Bernard thanked everyone but Oscar.
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Posted: 20 Apr 2014, 00:25
by ikorolev
Baby Face Finster wrote:More joke scoring. How the hell could a judge score that fight for Shumenov?
Easily if he was bribed or threatened.
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Posted: 20 Apr 2014, 00:26
by JeanClaude Van Damme
Baby Face Finster wrote:JeanClaude Van Damme wrote:Joe still got dropped by an old man.
And still won.
Yeah, in a split decision. As evidenced by tonights scorecards, judges are retarded. AP, ESPN and Yahoo all scored it for Hopkins.
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Posted: 20 Apr 2014, 00:26
by crusader
I thought Calzaghe clearly beat Hopkins. Bernard gets way too much credit for his supposed effectiveness in that fight.
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Posted: 20 Apr 2014, 00:27
by JCS
Calzaghe/Hopkins was anybody's fight.
The fact tonight's fight was a split was gross.
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Posted: 20 Apr 2014, 00:28
by crusader
Ya, BHOP gets outlanded by about 100 punches, but hey, he's crafty and all that.
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Posted: 20 Apr 2014, 00:28
by gilgamesh
JCS wrote:Calzaghe/Hopkins was anybody's fight.
The fact tonight's fight was a split was gross.
Yeah it was absurd.
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Posted: 20 Apr 2014, 00:28
by lefty
Hmm very interesting that Hopkins didnt mention Oscar once there but yet highly praised Schaefer and co.
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Posted: 20 Apr 2014, 00:29
by diddy
Lol at that Chris Byrd/Bob Marley looking mute behind Be Butt.
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Posted: 20 Apr 2014, 00:29
by Baby Face Finster
JeanClaude Van Damme wrote:Baby Face Finster wrote:JeanClaude Van Damme wrote:Joe still got dropped by an old man.
And still won.
Yeah, in a split decision. As evidenced by tonights scorecards, judges are retarded. AP, ESPN and Yahoo all scored it for Hopkins.
Yahoo. LMAO. You lost all credibility quoting Yahoo.
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Posted: 20 Apr 2014, 00:29
by JCS
diddy wrote:Lol at that Chris Byrd/Bob Marley looking mute behind Be Butt.
Dick James?
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Posted: 20 Apr 2014, 00:30
by big train express
bhop continuing to dominate is a testament to how great and underrated joe calzaghe really is
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Posted: 20 Apr 2014, 00:30
by crusader
The guy is Dewey Cooper I think. He was a world champion kicboxer and I think he went 19-3 as a pro boxer.
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Posted: 20 Apr 2014, 00:30
by Baby Face Finster
big train express wrote:bhop continuing to dominate is a testament to how great and underrated joe calzaghe really is
Was.
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Posted: 20 Apr 2014, 00:31
by Jaywheel
funny voice this shumenov dude...

Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Posted: 20 Apr 2014, 00:31
by MachoTime
columbo wrote:Hmm very interesting that Hopkins didnt mention Oscar once there but yet highly praised Schaefer and co.
Isn't Oscar like a lame duck as far as promoting goes. They just use his name..all the other's do the grunt work.
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Posted: 20 Apr 2014, 00:32
by Baby Face Finster
MachoTime wrote:columbo wrote:Hmm very interesting that Hopkins didnt mention Oscar once there but yet highly praised Schaefer and co.
Isn't Oscar like a lame duck as far as promoting goes. They just use his name..all the other's do the grunt work.
Oscar is the one who brought Hopkins into
HIS promotion.
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Posted: 20 Apr 2014, 00:33
by lefty
MachoTime wrote:columbo wrote:Hmm very interesting that Hopkins didnt mention Oscar once there but yet highly praised Schaefer and co.
Isn't Oscar like a lame duck as far as promoting goes. They just use his name..all the other's do the grunt work.
That's the impression I get. I dont think Oscar does anything aside from snorting a ton of coke and shagging whores most likely from the proceeds of the business

Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Posted: 20 Apr 2014, 00:33
by big train express
Baby Face Finster wrote:big train express wrote:bhop continuing to dominate is a testament to how great and underrated joe calzaghe really is
Was.
hes still great and underrated. resumes dont change with age.