Froch upsets Nigel Benn

Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Froch upsets Nigel Benn

Post by Counter-puncher »

Fuzzy Warbles wrote:
mickey1975 wrote:Yes, our gym.
Bit vague though Mick, you seem to best friends with every boxer who's ever lived in Leeds and privy to the activities of every gym in Leeds.
what of it? you seem to be a gaping chasm of a pudendum.
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Froch upsets Nigel Benn

Post by palooka »

Fuzzy Warbles wrote:
palooka wrote:A very intelligent and complex man, he was very rare and unusual.
Indeed and he seemed a troubled soul in many ways, cursed with low self esteem. Here's the fight (poor quality though) KO is around 6.17 (right hander too, I thought it was a left hook for some reason)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=srVkQsf4OEk
:TU: thanks, I'd not seen the whole bout just the highlight - he was a dangerous puncher.
Fuzzy Warbles
Welterweight
Posts: 114
Joined: 11 Jul 2015, 10:07

Re: Froch upsets Nigel Benn

Post by Fuzzy Warbles »

Counter-puncher wrote:what of it? you seem to be a gaping chasm of a pudendum.
Image
Boxerbeetle
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32660
Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59

Re: Froch upsets Nigel Benn

Post by Boxerbeetle »

Counter-puncher wrote:
Fuzzy Warbles wrote:
mickey1975 wrote:Yes, our gym.
Bit vague though Mick, you seem to best friends with every boxer who's ever lived in Leeds and privy to the activities of every gym in Leeds.
what of it? you seem to be a gaping chasm of a pudendum.
As I mentioned on another thread, Fuzzy Warbles has obviously decided this particular online identity has gone on for long enough & decided he's going for another ban today.
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45213
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: Froch upsets Nigel Benn

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

[/quote]

As I mentioned on another thread, Fuzzy Warbles has obviously decided this particular online identity has gone on for long enough & decided he's going for another ban today.[/quote]

Sorry, is this the new incarnation of some other wind-up merchant?
orbtastic
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 12549
Joined: 05 Dec 2006, 11:22

Re: Froch upsets Nigel Benn

Post by orbtastic »

duh
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45213
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: Froch upsets Nigel Benn

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

Am I missing something obvious here?
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Froch upsets Nigel Benn

Post by Counter-puncher »

jamesmcdonnell wrote:Am I missing something obvious here?
The Force is not strong with this one...

you know that PIGG guy....... ?
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45213
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: Froch upsets Nigel Benn

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

PIGG? Ok, spell it out for me, I'm a little hungover today.
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Froch upsets Nigel Benn

Post by Counter-puncher »

jamesmcdonnell wrote:PIGG? Ok, spell it out for me, I'm a little hungover today.
posted as PIGG WILSON
Post Reply