Page 9 of 20
Re: Carl Frampton (IBF) vs. Scott Quigg (WBA) - February 27th 2016
Posted: 25 Feb 2016, 11:19
by wesshaw1985
SNG wrote:ste1983 wrote:SNG wrote:Hopefully Quigg stands his ground, good luck explaining the fight being off cause you can't have the dressing room you want.
Hasn't Carl said they should lock that dressing room and both use different ones?
So? He could just not be such a massive egotist and let Quigg use his regular dressing room, it's just mind games but Framoton comes across extremely insecure trying stuff like this.
Why should Frampton let Quigg use his regular dressing room, just because?
Quigg already got the fight in Manchester, how much more comfort does he need?
its mind games, nothing too much to be read into it.
Toss a coin, winner gets the room...
Re: Carl Frampton (IBF) vs. Scott Quigg (WBA) - February 27th 2016
Posted: 25 Feb 2016, 11:23
by SNG
Nah fornicate that, Quigg is the home fighter he should get his usual dressing room. Carl should have sorted all this stuff out during negotiations if it bothered him, it's a Matchroom show and Frampton is the opponent coming to another country he should get the same treatment as the rest of the fighters Eddie brings over.
Re: Carl Frampton (IBF) vs. Scott Quigg (WBA) - February 27th 2016
Posted: 25 Feb 2016, 11:27
by ste1983
SNG wrote:Nah eff that, Quigg is the home fighter he should get his usual dressing room. Carl should have sorted all this stuff out during negotiations if it bothered him, it's a Matchroom show and Frampton is the opponent coming to another country he should get the same treatment as the rest of the fighters Eddie brings over.
He's not the 'home' fighter is he though its a co promotion, its not just a Matchroom show and its the same country (United Kingdom).
Re: Carl Frampton (IBF) vs. Scott Quigg (WBA) - February 27th 2016
Posted: 25 Feb 2016, 11:30
by jameswilson
I didn't think Frampton could look more gaunt than Tuesday but frig me he looks like skeletor now. And there's still another day before the weigh in.
Re: Carl Frampton (IBF) vs. Scott Quigg (WBA) - February 27th 2016
Posted: 25 Feb 2016, 11:31
by Marlo Stanfield
jameswilson wrote:I didn't think Frampton could look more gaunt than Tuesday but frig me he looks like skeletor now. And there's still another day before the weigh in.
thought he looked fine tbh
Re: Carl Frampton (IBF) vs. Scott Quigg (WBA) - February 27th 2016
Posted: 25 Feb 2016, 11:31
by expe
ste1983 wrote:SNG wrote:Nah eff that, Quigg is the home fighter he should get his usual dressing room. Carl should have sorted all this stuff out during negotiations if it bothered him, it's a Matchroom show and Frampton is the opponent coming to another country he should get the same treatment as the rest of the fighters Eddie brings over.
He's not the 'home' fighter is he though its a co promotion, its not just a Matchroom show and its the same country (United Kingdom).
And he's only used the dressing room three times in 33 fights, hardly a regular thing. It's the main dressing room in the arena, so in normal circumstances it goes to the headline act, in this case that's Frampton.
Re: Carl Frampton (IBF) vs. Scott Quigg (WBA) - February 27th 2016
Posted: 25 Feb 2016, 11:32
by SNG
ste1983 wrote:SNG wrote:Nah eff that, Quigg is the home fighter he should get his usual dressing room. Carl should have sorted all this stuff out during negotiations if it bothered him, it's a Matchroom show and Frampton is the opponent coming to another country he should get the same treatment as the rest of the fighters Eddie brings over.
He's not the 'home' fighter is he though its a co promotion, its not just a Matchroom show and its the same country (United Kingdom).
So if this fight was in Belfast you wouldn't consider Frampton the home fighter?
Listen, if it was an issue he should have brought it up during negotiations.
Re: Carl Frampton (IBF) vs. Scott Quigg (WBA) - February 27th 2016
Posted: 25 Feb 2016, 11:35
by wesshaw1985
SNG wrote:ste1983 wrote:SNG wrote:Nah eff that, Quigg is the home fighter he should get his usual dressing room. Carl should have sorted all this stuff out during negotiations if it bothered him, it's a Matchroom show and Frampton is the opponent coming to another country he should get the same treatment as the rest of the fighters Eddie brings over.
He's not the 'home' fighter is he though its a co promotion, its not just a Matchroom show and its the same country (United Kingdom).
So if this fight was in Belfast you wouldn't consider Frampton the home fighter?
Listen, if it was an issue he should have brought it up during negotiations.
If its in Belfast, Manchester or anywhere else in the World, Frampton is the A-Side, he should have the choice of dressing room...
Re: Carl Frampton (IBF) vs. Scott Quigg (WBA) - February 27th 2016
Posted: 25 Feb 2016, 11:37
by tigermoth87
Frampton seeming a bit rattled.
Honestly think Quigg is going to KO him. My prediction, 4th round KO.
Re: Carl Frampton (IBF) vs. Scott Quigg (WBA) - February 27th 2016
Posted: 25 Feb 2016, 11:38
by SNG
No, he should have negotiated that. This A-side nonsense tickles me, I was quite a fan till the build up of this show but their arrogance is frankly painful to watch, especially how smug they are about it.
Re: Carl Frampton (IBF) vs. Scott Quigg (WBA) - February 27th 2016
Posted: 25 Feb 2016, 11:43
by ste1983
SNG wrote:ste1983 wrote:SNG wrote:Nah eff that, Quigg is the home fighter he should get his usual dressing room. Carl should have sorted all this stuff out during negotiations if it bothered him, it's a Matchroom show and Frampton is the opponent coming to another country he should get the same treatment as the rest of the fighters Eddie brings over.
He's not the 'home' fighter is he though its a co promotion, its not just a Matchroom show and its the same country (United Kingdom).
So if this fight was in Belfast you wouldn't consider Frampton the home fighter?
Listen, if it was an issue he should have brought it up during negotiations.
No not really co-promotion = no home fighter.
As for bringing it up before maybe so but you could also say Quigg should have brought up having to have the usual dressing room before its Scott making that demand, as far as I'm aware Framptons said neither of them has it no?
Re: Carl Frampton (IBF) vs. Scott Quigg (WBA) - February 27th 2016
Posted: 25 Feb 2016, 11:46
by SNG
Why should neither of them have it? Cause Carl Frampton says so? Grow up. It's a dressing room, if you get so upset cause the other fighters dressing room is 'better' then you should have a word with yourself. I really hope Quigg doesn't cave, let Frampton call it off over a dressing room. It would be hilarious.
Re: Carl Frampton (IBF) vs. Scott Quigg (WBA) - February 27th 2016
Posted: 25 Feb 2016, 11:46
by wesshaw1985
SNG wrote:No, he should have negotiated that. This A-side nonsense tickles me, I was quite a fan till the build up of this show but their arrogance is frankly painful to watch, especially how smug they are about it.
Arrogance is Quigg stating "its my Arena"...
Re: Carl Frampton (IBF) vs. Scott Quigg (WBA) - February 27th 2016
Posted: 25 Feb 2016, 11:48
by ste1983
SNG wrote:Why should neither of them have it? Cause Carl Frampton says so? Grow up. It's a dressing room, if you get so upset cause the other fighters dressing room is 'better' then you should have a word with yourself. I really hope Quigg doesn't cave, let Frampton call it off over a dressing room. It would be hilarious.
But shouldn't Quigg therefore 'have a word' with himself for insisting on having it in the first place?
Re: Carl Frampton (IBF) vs. Scott Quigg (WBA) - February 27th 2016
Posted: 25 Feb 2016, 11:49
by wesshaw1985
SNG wrote:Why should neither of them have it? Cause Carl Frampton says so? Grow up. It's a dressing room, if you get so upset cause the other fighters dressing room is 'better' then you should have a word with yourself. I really hope Quigg doesn't cave, let Frampton call it off over a dressing room. It would be hilarious.
very one-sided view here I'm afraid my friend...
Re: Carl Frampton (IBF) vs. Scott Quigg (WBA) - February 27th 2016
Posted: 25 Feb 2016, 11:49
by SNG
wesshaw1985 wrote:SNG wrote:No, he should have negotiated that. This A-side nonsense tickles me, I was quite a fan till the build up of this show but their arrogance is frankly painful to watch, especially how smug they are about it.
Arrogance is Quigg stating "its my Arena"...
No, arrogance is flying round the country telling everyone I'm the A-side I'm the A-side. It's almost like they have to say it so they believe it. Fact is, neither in this country are household names and this fight will go a fair way to making that so, but Frampton isn't Ricky Hatton, and likely never will be.
Re: Carl Frampton (IBF) vs. Scott Quigg (WBA) - February 27th 2016
Posted: 25 Feb 2016, 11:49
by wesshaw1985
Re: Carl Frampton (IBF) vs. Scott Quigg (WBA) - February 27th 2016
Posted: 25 Feb 2016, 11:49
by SNG
ste1983 wrote:SNG wrote:Why should neither of them have it? Cause Carl Frampton says so? Grow up. It's a dressing room, if you get so upset cause the other fighters dressing room is 'better' then you should have a word with yourself. I really hope Quigg doesn't cave, let Frampton call it off over a dressing room. It would be hilarious.
But shouldn't Quigg therefore 'have a word' with himself for insisting on having it in the first place?
No, Frampton is the one with the issue saying he wants something Quigg has got.
Re: Carl Frampton (IBF) vs. Scott Quigg (WBA) - February 27th 2016
Posted: 25 Feb 2016, 11:50
by wesshaw1985
SNG wrote:wesshaw1985 wrote:SNG wrote:No, he should have negotiated that. This A-side nonsense tickles me, I was quite a fan till the build up of this show but their arrogance is frankly painful to watch, especially how smug they are about it.
Arrogance is Quigg stating "its my Arena"...
No, arrogance is flying round the country telling everyone I'm the A-side I'm the A-side. It's almost like they have to say it so they believe it. Fact is, neither in this country are household names and this fight will go a fair way to making that so, but Frampton isn't Ricky Hatton, and likely never will be.
But Frampton is the A-side though, It is Frampton vs. Quigg and he is getting a larger purse...
Re: Carl Frampton (IBF) vs. Scott Quigg (WBA) - February 27th 2016
Posted: 25 Feb 2016, 11:50
by wesshaw1985
SNG wrote:ste1983 wrote:SNG wrote:Why should neither of them have it? Cause Carl Frampton says so? Grow up. It's a dressing room, if you get so upset cause the other fighters dressing room is 'better' then you should have a word with yourself. I really hope Quigg doesn't cave, let Frampton call it off over a dressing room. It would be hilarious.
But shouldn't Quigg therefore 'have a word' with himself for insisting on having it in the first place?
No, Frampton is the one with the issue saying he wants something Quigg has got.
Something that Quigg isn't entitled to...
Re: Carl Frampton (IBF) vs. Scott Quigg (WBA) - February 27th 2016
Posted: 25 Feb 2016, 11:51
by SNG
So it's not arrogance to fly round saying it? That makes it even worse that he's got it and keeps saying it.
Re: Carl Frampton (IBF) vs. Scott Quigg (WBA) - February 27th 2016
Posted: 25 Feb 2016, 11:52
by SNG
Entitled?
Jesus.
Re: Carl Frampton (IBF) vs. Scott Quigg (WBA) - February 27th 2016
Posted: 25 Feb 2016, 11:54
by wesshaw1985
SNG wrote:So it's not arrogance to fly round saying it? That makes it even worse that he's got it and keeps saying it.
its not arrogance, its simply stating facts...
Re: Carl Frampton (IBF) vs. Scott Quigg (WBA) - February 27th 2016
Posted: 25 Feb 2016, 11:55
by ste1983
SNG wrote:ste1983 wrote:SNG wrote:Why should neither of them have it? Cause Carl Frampton says so? Grow up. It's a dressing room, if you get so upset cause the other fighters dressing room is 'better' then you should have a word with yourself. I really hope Quigg doesn't cave, let Frampton call it off over a dressing room. It would be hilarious.
But shouldn't Quigg therefore 'have a word' with himself for insisting on having it in the first place?
No, Frampton is the one with the issue saying he wants something Quigg has got.
Again that can just as easily be spinned around to Quigg's got the issue saying he must have that room
Re: Carl Frampton (IBF) vs. Scott Quigg (WBA) - February 27th 2016
Posted: 25 Feb 2016, 11:55
by wesshaw1985
SNG wrote:Entitled?
Jesus.
entitled -
believing oneself to be inherently deserving of privileges or special treatment.