BoxRec

Not quite on par with her performance on the Haye-Bellew card, but this is once again a joy to watch

LancashireLoyal wrote:

milpool wrote:

wesshaw1985 wrote:Anybody else think that tart with Linares is a good looking lass?

Dunno wasn't looking at her face...

ha effing none of us were!

great pair!

He has finished his training on the heavy bags and doing a pre-fight warm-up on the fun bags!

super kate

Ya, she looks good beating up these poor opponents.

sammy95 wrote:Not quite on par with her performance on the Haye-Bellew card, but this is once again a joy to watch

She is good but fighting journeywomen so far?

rossij8 wrote:

sammy95 wrote:Not quite on par with her performance on the Haye-Bellew card, but this is once again a joy to watch

She is good but fighting journeywomen so far?

journeywomen , ladies of the night?

rossij8 wrote:

sammy95 wrote:Not quite on par with her performance on the Haye-Bellew card, but this is once again a joy to watch

She is good but fighting journeywomen so far?

did the Macus Morrison fight prior to this not show Mr. Smith that building a record on bums doesn't really mean anything till you step up?

rossij8 wrote:

sammy95 wrote:Not quite on par with her performance on the Haye-Bellew card, but this is once again a joy to watch

She is good but fighting journeywomen so far?

Yep

She's obviously a good fighter, and anyone who saw her in the ams should know that. I can't really get into the 'wow, she's so special, this is a treat' mood against these types of opponents though.

crusader wrote:

rossij8 wrote:

sammy95 wrote:Not quite on par with her performance on the Haye-Bellew card, but this is once again a joy to watch

She is good but fighting journeywomen so far?

Yep

She's obviously a good fighter, and anyone who saw her in the ams should know that. I can't really get into the 'wow, she's so special, this is a treat' mood against these types of opponents though.

just to big up women's sport,but she is at a very good level

wesshaw1985 wrote:

rossij8 wrote:

sammy95 wrote:Not quite on par with her performance on the Haye-Bellew card, but this is once again a joy to watch

She is good but fighting journeywomen so far?

did the Macus Morrison fight prior to this not show Mr. Smith that building a record on bums doesn't really mean anything till you step up?

Milena Koleva is a former world title challenger lets not forget, hard to judge what the levels are in womens boxing are, as I have never followed it before. But, the Morrison point is a good one - though I suspect it wont be the same case with Taylor and her ridiculous talent and pedigree.

Taylor will never main event a show unless its a "really" stacked card.

crusader wrote:Ya, she looks good beating up these poor opponents.

She's only just turned pro.

Who is she meant to be fighting?

Fair enough women's boxing isn't the deepest (especially at 126+) but there are interesting match ups that could be made...
...still shocked we didn't see Taylor do a Hyun Mi Choi...

Horse wrote:

crusader wrote:Ya, she looks good beating up these poor opponents.

She's only just turned pro.

Who is she meant to be fighting?

Its not the fighters, its the hype

sammy95 wrote:

wesshaw1985 wrote:

rossij8 wrote:
She is good but fighting journeywomen so far?

did the Macus Morrison fight prior to this not show Mr. Smith that building a record on bums doesn't really mean anything till you step up?

Milena Koleva is a former world title challenger lets not forget, hard to judge what the levels are in womens boxing are, as I have never followed it before. But, the Morrison point is a good one - though I suspect it wont be the same case with Taylor and her ridiculous talent and pedigree.

shes got pedigree no doubt but the over exaggeration against this opposition just isn't necessary...

ThereByTheGrace wrote:Taylor will never main event a show unless its a "really" stacked card.

That girl with Linares was really stacked.

There's a lack of coverage of this card on Facebook which is disappointing...

Trudge wrote:

ThereByTheGrace wrote:Taylor will never main event a show unless its a "really" stacked card.

That girl with Linares was really stacked.

Agreed. She could breast feed a creche that one

Taylor won by ko ?

Horse wrote:

crusader wrote:Ya, she looks good beating up these poor opponents.

She's only just turned pro.

Who is she meant to be fighting?

It seems like her team means for her to face clubfighters and journeywomen. I understand that these types of opponents are standard for new pros (barrings Lomachenko anomalies), but I find it hard to get very excited over prospects bashing them up like this.

Her amateur experience is probably worth more than the overall experience most women pros have.

rossij8 wrote:

Horse wrote:

crusader wrote:Ya, she looks good beating up these poor opponents.

She's only just turned pro.

Who is she meant to be fighting?

Its not the fighters, its the hype

Yes. Because no male fighters have ever been hyped early.

littlepug wrote:Taylor won by ko ?

pts

wesshaw1985 wrote:

sammy95 wrote:

wesshaw1985 wrote: did the Macus Morrison fight prior to this not show Mr. Smith that building a record on bums doesn't really mean anything till you step up?

Milena Koleva is a former world title challenger lets not forget, hard to judge what the levels are in womens boxing are, as I have never followed it before. But, the Morrison point is a good one - though I suspect it wont be the same case with Taylor and her ridiculous talent and pedigree.

shes got pedigree no doubt but the over exaggeration against this opposition just isn't necessary...

I enjoy watching her box, and I am thoroughly looking forward to seeing her live at Wembley (though I am up in the Gods). I'm not saying she is the second coming etc yet, but I am enjoying her professional career thus far.

ILikeBeer wrote:

rossij8 wrote:

Horse wrote:She's only just turned pro.

Who is she meant to be fighting?

Its not the fighters, its the hype

Yes. Because no male fighters have ever been hyped early.

They have, and people often complain about them being overly hyped.

sgtcecil wrote:There's a lack of coverage of this card on Facebook which is disappointing...

If all else fails, Radio 5 coverage starts at 22:15