lillywhite14 wrote: ↑27 Jul 2019, 09:06
Warren is right. Problem is, he’s no different. He spends all day championing a drug cheat in Tyson Fury, even to the point where he is talking about Jarrell Miller, another drug cheat, being Fury’s potential next opponent! The sport is a joke
Don't forget BJS.
The Fury situation is different. He didn't receive a ban after he'd attended his hearing. He was able to resume his career as soon as he and his cousin met with UKAD/BBBofC.
And Saunders didn't breach any rules stipulated by WADA, UKAD and the BBBofC. In fact, Billy Joe didn't lose his license either.
You may feign outrage about my response and issue all sorts of personal insults about me to dishonestly try to discredit me, but there’s absolutely fornicate áll you can do to undermine the factual accuracy of the both of the above two sentences!
You can try though! Bring it on!
Re: Dillian Whyte Tests Positive For Banned Substance
lillywhite14 wrote: ↑27 Jul 2019, 09:06
Warren is right. Problem is, he’s no different. He spends all day championing a drug cheat in Tyson Fury, even to the point where he is talking about Jarrell Miller, another drug cheat, being Fury’s potential next opponent! The sport is a joke
Don't forget BJS.
The system is broke. Despite Warren's underlying agenda and apparent hypocrisy, he was spot on in his article.
Re: Dillian Whyte Tests Positive For Banned Substance
Posted: 28 Jul 2019, 03:25
by candyslim
Yup
Re: Dillian Whyte Tests Positive For Banned Substance
The Fury situation is different. He didn't receive a ban after he'd attended his hearing. He was able to resume his career as soon as he and his cousin met with UKAD/BBBofC.
And Saunders didn't breach any rules stipulated by WADA, UKAD and the BBBofC. In fact, Billy Joe didn't lose his license either.
You may feign outrage about my response and issue all sorts of personal insults about me to dishonestly try to discredit me, but there’s absolutely eff áll you can do to undermine the factual accuracy of the both of the above two sentences!
You can try though! Bring it on!
BJS failed a VADA test, which abides by WADA regulations. He didn't lose his licence in the UK, but was denied a license to fight in Massachusetts if I remember right. Since he was denied, he vacated the belt because he was about to be stripped. Since VADA follows WADA guidelines, to say BJS didn't breach any rules of WADA is a stretch of the imagination.
Re: Dillian Whyte Tests Positive For Banned Substance
Posted: 28 Jul 2019, 06:58
by Paci
Well, boxing is corrupt at all levels, who knew?
Re: Dillian Whyte Tests Positive For Banned Substance
The Fury situation is different. He didn't receive a ban after he'd attended his hearing. He was able to resume his career as soon as he and his cousin met with UKAD/BBBofC.
And Saunders didn't breach any rules stipulated by WADA, UKAD and the BBBofC. In fact, Billy Joe didn't lose his license either.
You may feign outrage about my response and issue all sorts of personal insults about me to dishonestly try to discredit me, but there’s absolutely eff áll you can do to undermine the factual accuracy of the both of the above two sentences!
Read what I fûckîng said, and don’t bother attacking a minute extract of it. FFS! Don’t act like a fûckîng twàt, be honest!
If you can’t read an entire sentence, then ask your carer to read them to you! FFS!
I can dissect your flawed sentence if you'd like?
He didn't receive a ban after he'd attended his hearing.
Why would he receive a ban after the hearing? Surely he'd receive a ban at the hearing. Which he did. A backdated ban.
What you may have meant, while your carer wasn't checking your sentences, was that he didn't receive a ban which prevented him from competing subsequent to the hearing taking place. Care to explain why that's important here?
Re: Dillian Whyte Tests Positive For Banned Substance
Posted: 28 Jul 2019, 16:23
by Ilya Muromets
Paci wrote: ↑28 Jul 2019, 06:58
Well, boxing is corrupt at all levels, who knew?
I am shocked! Shocked!
Re: Dillian Whyte Tests Positive For Banned Substance
Enlightened-One wrote: ↑28 Jul 2019, 15:49
Read what I fûckîng said, and don’t bother attacking a minute extract of it. FFS! Don’t act like a fûckîng twàt, be honest!
If you can’t read an entire sentence, then ask your carer to read them to you! FFS!
Sounds like someone is pissed because he or she got called on some BS?
Re: Dillian Whyte Tests Positive For Banned Substance
Posted: 29 Jul 2019, 03:10
by adislav123
amazing oogle! You did it again, the best!
Re: Dillian Whyte Tests Positive For Banned Substance
Posted: 29 Jul 2019, 03:50
by Ruthless-RKO
SHOCK accusation of Oscar Rivas positive test dismissed
Promoter for Oscar Rivas, Yvon Michel has opened up on his astonishment surrounding the current issues with Dillian Whyte.
Michel has admitted he’s been amazed to find out what went on behind the scenes in the days leading up to the July 20 clash.
Whyte tested positive for a banned substance, which is still unconfirmed or denied by his own representative Eddie Hearn.
‘The Body Snatcher’ was then given a hastily-arranged hearing by UK Anti-Doping (UKAD) and the British Boxing Board of Control in order to be cleared for the Pay-Per-View event.
At no stage was Michel, Rivas or any member of the team notified of the situation.
Instead, Michel found out from subsequent media reports which uncovered what transpired.
Speaking on social media, Michel described his mood. Also his plans to investigate further.
“We are still amazed by what has happened. And more, we don’t understand what has been the overall process,” said Michel.
“If Whyte tested positive for PED why he has been cleared to fight, on what ground or rules?
That decision has certainly made a huge impact on Rivas’s future in and out of the ring!”
He continued: “Nobody told us anything regarding this situation before the fight or after. We’ve only learned from information through media.
“We are now collecting information wherever it is available. We will take advises in order to protect Oscar Rivas’s interest.”
TEST
Furthermore, an astounding accusation has been made that Rivas himself tested positive. Something Michel was keen to label a deflection from Whyte.
“Anybody who pretends Oscar tested positive on anything is just throwing smokescreen and is simply lying.
“Anyone who will pretend it cannot have any serious evidence.
“Rivas never tested positive on anything during his successful amateur career and his ten plus years as a professional,” Michel exclusively told World Boxing News.
At present, the world is awaiting news of a ‘B’ sample involving Whyte in order to gauge what the eventual fallout my be.
World Boxing Council chiefs, who sanctioned the fight as an eliminator for Deontay Wilder, have requested all the information from the BBBofC.
There’s real risk Whyte could lose his mandatory status if the WBC conclude there were grounds for serious grievance on the part of Rivas.
Re: Dillian Whyte Tests Positive For Banned Substance
Enlightened-One wrote: ↑28 Jul 2019, 15:49
Read what I fûckîng said, and don’t bother attacking a minute extract of it. FFS! Don’t act like a fûckîng twàt, be honest!
If you can’t read an entire sentence, then ask your carer to read them to you! FFS!
Reported.
Lol. I'm starting to think it actually is him now.
