Re: Floyd Mayweather lashes out after being ranked behind Sugar Ray Leonard in list of best welterweights
Posted: 10 Jul 2020, 21:46
The reason Manny lost is because his mom couldn't conjur up the right curse for Floyd, I blame dionesia
Sure, but you can't simply say that without admitting that Pacquiao's 2015 style was far safer than his 2010 style.gilgamesh wrote: ↑10 Jul 2020, 21:43Could just be a styles make fights thing.
I don't buy the shoulder excuse. I think that was just his way of lobbying for a rematch.
Yeah it was.IKSRTFO wrote: ↑10 Jul 2020, 21:47Sure, but you can't simply say that without admitting that Pacquiao's 2015 style was far safer than his 2010 style.
Floyd would've had more to counter, but Pacquiao also would had more chances to land.gilgamesh wrote: ↑10 Jul 2020, 21:49Yeah it was.
In 2010 he would've been a lot more aggressive, but that works both ways. Him being more aggressive means Floyd would've had more to counter.
It would've been a better fight all around.
Mayweather and Pacquiao’s handlers had agreed the financial terms, the venue and the date of the bout.Duran1970 wrote: ↑10 Jul 2020, 19:32X2...Thomastearns wrote: ↑10 Jul 2020, 15:27Enlightened-One wrote: ↑10 Jul 2020, 13:59 It seems that people are trying to bury inconvenient facts beneath irrelevant posts, because they find them embarrassing.
Pacquiao was too scared to take the Mayweather fight in 2010, because of drug testing.
Both teams had agreed the financial terms and drug testing was the only reason why the bout didn’t take place in 2010.
Whilst you're busy implying that Pacquiao was juicing, what about Mayweather?
As far as we know, neither failed a test, but do you believe he was clean?
A yes or no answer will do, thank you.
Anti PAC fans will say he was scared of a test but maybe that lowball 40 mill offer had something to do with it
margaret thatcher wrote: ↑10 Jul 2020, 20:40Ray clearly ahead, a good couple points at least, and taking more and more controlDuran1970 wrote: ↑10 Jul 2020, 19:29Fight was pretty much even at the time..maybe ray I round aheadmargaret thatcher wrote: ↑10 Jul 2020, 16:25 Leonard was outboxing him clearly and broke him in a way no one else ever did, it was a great win for Ray
PACs handlers never agreed to the 40 mill flat feeEnlightened-One wrote: ↑11 Jul 2020, 06:41Mayweather and Pacquiao’s handlers had agreed the financial terms, the venue and the date of the bout.Duran1970 wrote: ↑10 Jul 2020, 19:32X2...Thomastearns wrote: ↑10 Jul 2020, 15:27
Whilst you're busy implying that Pacquiao was juicing, what about Mayweather?
As far as we know, neither failed a test, but do you believe he was clean?
A yes or no answer will do, thank you.
Anti PAC fans will say he was scared of a test but maybe that lowball 40 mill offer had something to do with it
The only stumbling block was Pacquiao’s refusal to undergo drug testing.
There’s a YouTube video of Manny being interviewed and confirming his refusal to agree to the terms demanding he had to undergo PED testing.
The $40m purse agreed upon during 2010 definitely wasn’t a lowball offer.
Instead of making up fictional excuses, do your research.
What on earth are you talking about?world ranked wrote: ↑10 Jul 2020, 14:15He beat someone he ducked to that's impossible to refute as well. What actually happened in the ring is even more impossible to refute.Enlightened-One wrote: ↑10 Jul 2020, 14:06 I’ve made my point.
What I wrote is impossible to refute.
Pacquiao ducked Mayweather.
I really do hope someone is stupid enough to challenge me on this.![]()
I'm talking about the 2010 situation not the 2012 $40m flat fee offer Mayweather made.Duran1970 wrote: ↑11 Jul 2020, 09:25PACs handlers never agreed to the 40 mill flat feeEnlightened-One wrote: ↑11 Jul 2020, 06:41Mayweather and Pacquiao’s handlers had agreed the financial terms, the venue and the date of the bout.
The only stumbling block was Pacquiao’s refusal to undergo drug testing.
There’s a YouTube video of Manny being interviewed and confirming his refusal to agree to the terms demanding he had to undergo PED testing.
The $40m purse agreed upon during 2010 definitely wasn’t a lowball offer.
Instead of making up fictional excuses, do your research.
That in ring action is more concrete than why someone ducked someone then fight them. What your reason why he ducked him in 2010 and then fought him later? Usually when guys duck the never fight the guy.Enlightened-One wrote: ↑11 Jul 2020, 09:49What on earth are you talking about?world ranked wrote: ↑10 Jul 2020, 14:15He beat someone he ducked to that's impossible to refute as well. What actually happened in the ring is even more impossible to refute.Enlightened-One wrote: ↑10 Jul 2020, 14:06 I’ve made my point.
What I wrote is impossible to refute.
Pacquiao ducked Mayweather.
I really do hope someone is stupid enough to challenge me on this.![]()
I claimed that Pacquiao ducked Mayweather in 2010. Manny refused to undergo Olympic-style drug testing.
Some sections of the media claim that decision cost him $40m.
And when Mayweather finally got his hands on Pacquaio, the American absolutely dominated the Filipino.
Pacquiao ducked Mayweather Jr. in 2010.world ranked wrote: ↑11 Jul 2020, 12:22That in ring action is more concrete than why someone ducked someone then fight them. What your reason why he ducked him in 2010 and then fought him later? Usually when guys duck the never fight the guy.Enlightened-One wrote: ↑11 Jul 2020, 09:49What on earth are you talking about?world ranked wrote: ↑10 Jul 2020, 14:15
He beat someone he ducked to that's impossible to refute as well. What actually happened in the ring is even more impossible to refute.
I claimed that Pacquiao ducked Mayweather in 2010. Manny refused to undergo Olympic-style drug testing.
Some sections of the media claim that decision cost him $40m.
And when Mayweather finally got his hands on Pacquaio, the American absolutely dominated the Filipino.
I don't think regardless of what ever proof you have i refused to believe that a guy ducked someone only later to fight them in any case. It defeats the definition of ducking.Enlightened-One wrote: ↑11 Jul 2020, 13:31Pacquiao ducked Mayweather Jr. in 2010.world ranked wrote: ↑11 Jul 2020, 12:22That in ring action is more concrete than why someone ducked someone then fight them. What your reason why he ducked him in 2010 and then fought him later? Usually when guys duck the never fight the guy.Enlightened-One wrote: ↑11 Jul 2020, 09:49
What on earth are you talking about?
I claimed that Pacquiao ducked Mayweather in 2010. Manny refused to undergo Olympic-style drug testing.
Some sections of the media claim that decision cost him $40m.
And when Mayweather finally got his hands on Pacquaio, the American absolutely dominated the Filipino.
It happened. There’s nothing anybody can do about it.
Yet Pactards fanboys keep insisting Floyd kept running from Manny, whilst choosing to ignore real world facts no one can dispute.
Are you seriously claiming Pacquiao didn’t duck Mayweather in 2010?
Pacquiao ducked Mayweather Jr. during 2010, because he was a dirty drug cheat. He didn’t want to be tested.world ranked wrote: ↑11 Jul 2020, 13:38I don't think regardless of what ever proof you have i refused to believe that a guy ducked someone only later to fight them in any case. It defeats the definition of ducking.Enlightened-One wrote: ↑11 Jul 2020, 13:31Pacquiao ducked Mayweather Jr. in 2010.world ranked wrote: ↑11 Jul 2020, 12:22
That in ring action is more concrete than why someone ducked someone then fight them. What your reason why he ducked him in 2010 and then fought him later? Usually when guys duck the never fight the guy.
It happened. There’s nothing anybody can do about it.
Yet Pactards fanboys keep insisting Floyd kept running from Manny, whilst choosing to ignore real world facts no one can dispute.
Are you seriously claiming Pacquiao didn’t duck Mayweather in 2010?
If Pacquaio needed the money when they fought he needed the money in 2010. Please define the term "ducking". Again I've never knew an incident where a fighter duck someone and still fought them. Please named another fighter who ducked someone only latter to fight them?Enlightened-One wrote: ↑11 Jul 2020, 13:47Pacquiao ducked Mayweather Jr. during 2010, because he was a dirty drug cheat. He didn’t want to be tested.world ranked wrote: ↑11 Jul 2020, 13:38I don't think regardless of what ever proof you have i refused to believe that a guy ducked someone only later to fight them in any case. It defeats the definition of ducking.Enlightened-One wrote: ↑11 Jul 2020, 13:31
Pacquiao ducked Mayweather Jr. in 2010.
It happened. There’s nothing anybody can do about it.
Yet Pactards fanboys keep insisting Floyd kept running from Manny, whilst choosing to ignore real world facts no one can dispute.
Are you seriously claiming Pacquiao didn’t duck Mayweather in 2010?
He subsequently racked up a massive tax debt.
He needed the money so badly that he didn’t care about suffering defeat, so he changed his mind and took the payday.
Pactards keep pretending Floyd was running scared of Manny and only agreed to fight him after the Filipino became past-his-prime, despite what occurred during 2010 and 2012.
Nobody has a time machine.
Nobody can rewrite the course of history.
Pacquiao ducked Mayweather.
It happened!
Instead of making things up, prove it?world ranked wrote: ↑11 Jul 2020, 14:07If Pacquaio needed the money when they fought he needed the money in 2010. Please define the term "ducking". Again I've never knew an incident where a fighter duck someone and still fought them. Please named another fighter who ducked someone only latter to fight them?Enlightened-One wrote: ↑11 Jul 2020, 13:47Pacquiao ducked Mayweather Jr. during 2010, because he was a dirty drug cheat. He didn’t want to be tested.world ranked wrote: ↑11 Jul 2020, 13:38
I don't think regardless of what ever proof you have i refused to believe that a guy ducked someone only later to fight them in any case. It defeats the definition of ducking.
He subsequently racked up a massive tax debt.
He needed the money so badly that he didn’t care about suffering defeat, so he changed his mind and took the payday.
Pactards keep pretending Floyd was running scared of Manny and only agreed to fight him after the Filipino became past-his-prime, despite what occurred during 2010 and 2012.
Nobody has a time machine.
Nobody can rewrite the course of history.
Pacquiao ducked Mayweather.
It happened!
Again please tell me anyone else who has ducked someone they fought. That makes no sense. Please define ducking please you yet to. You so focus on your theories or "facts" that you seem to forget they actually fought. You can't not need money and then need it. Fighters always need money and a big reason why they fight so that's exclude your he needed money claim.Enlightened-One wrote: ↑11 Jul 2020, 14:22Instead of making things up, prove it?world ranked wrote: ↑11 Jul 2020, 14:07If Pacquaio needed the money when they fought he needed the money in 2010. Please define the term "ducking". Again I've never knew an incident where a fighter duck someone and still fought them. Please named another fighter who ducked someone only latter to fight them?Enlightened-One wrote: ↑11 Jul 2020, 13:47
Pacquiao ducked Mayweather Jr. during 2010, because he was a dirty drug cheat. He didn’t want to be tested.
He subsequently racked up a massive tax debt.
He needed the money so badly that he didn’t care about suffering defeat, so he changed his mind and took the payday.
Pactards keep pretending Floyd was running scared of Manny and only agreed to fight him after the Filipino became past-his-prime, despite what occurred during 2010 and 2012.
Nobody has a time machine.
Nobody can rewrite the course of history.
Pacquiao ducked Mayweather.
It happened!
How much debt was Manny in during 2010 and back it up with evidence?
I’ve backed up every single claim, using proof, but you clearly can’t.
It’s fun seeing you squirm and creativity fabricate excuses for Manny’s ducking during 2010.
Come on kid, instead of lying, tell the truth by admitting that Pacquiao ducked Mayweather in 2010.
Enlightened-One wrote: ↑11 Jul 2020, 06:41Mayweather and Pacquiao’s handlers had agreed the financial terms, the venue and the date of the bout.Duran1970 wrote: ↑10 Jul 2020, 19:32X2...Thomastearns wrote: ↑10 Jul 2020, 15:27
Whilst you're busy implying that Pacquiao was juicing, what about Mayweather?
As far as we know, neither failed a test, but do you believe he was clean?
A yes or no answer will do, thank you.
Anti PAC fans will say he was scared of a test but maybe that lowball 40 mill offer had something to do with it
The only stumbling block was Pacquiao’s refusal to undergo drug testing.
There’s a YouTube video of Manny being interviewed and confirming his refusal to agree to the terms demanding he had to undergo PED testing.
The $40m purse agreed upon during 2010 definitely wasn’t a lowball offer.
Instead of making up fictional excuses, do your research.
There was nothing last-minute about the March 12th 2010 fight-date that GBP & Top Rank had agreed to, because the terms were negotiated and everything agreed in 2009, except for the PED testing.BroughtonRulesRefuge wrote: ↑11 Jul 2020, 19:45Enlightened-One wrote: ↑11 Jul 2020, 06:41Mayweather and Pacquiao’s handlers had agreed the financial terms, the venue and the date of the bout.
The only stumbling block was Pacquiao’s refusal to undergo drug testing.
There’s a YouTube video of Manny being interviewed and confirming his refusal to agree to the terms demanding he had to undergo PED testing.
The $40m purse agreed upon during 2010 definitely wasn’t a lowball offer.
Instead of making up fictional excuses, do your research.
- Your pretentious boxing expert facade has developed so many cracks in it that you no longer know which one to do your daily squat that informs forms your current soiled mess.
The purse terms were quickly hammered out in 2010 with Floydsy reserving the date and venue that fit in with Manny's political schedule. It was a 50/50 split with a record setting purse guarantee much like Ali/Frazier I and Ali/Foreman were. Fight fans everywhere were estatic over this first ever Ring P4P shootout, but then...
At the witching hour Floydsy inserts his infamous non standard "Olympic drug testing" demand that Floydsy never once adhered to in his boxing or promotional life, actually becoming a notorious drug cheats in both endeavors.
They entered into last minute offers as Floydsy went down and Manny went up until they were down to the final blood testing date.
Manny has obviously met every drug testing requirement in his career with nary a single failed test, whisper of a failed test, or refusal of a test.
So time for you to get out your Sharpie Permanent Marker to draw a circle around your primary offending crack so you can chose the correct one to squat to that will save you your current state of embarrassing circumstances.
And remember, 6 yrs later Floydsy refused to sign drug testing penalty contract of a paltry $5k in a fight netting him over $200 mil that aptly earned him his Backdated TUE moniker when not referring to his baby mama beater days, but hey ho, no biggie in EnFrightenedOne world, right?
Yeah![]()