Re: Vasyl Lomachenko vs Teofimo Lopez 17/10/20
Posted: 18 Oct 2020, 05:37
He was surprised how skilled and fast Lopez was. He was barely missing counter bombs that loma avoided only with his skills. The speed, timing and fast twitch reflexes were what won this fight.handsofstone wrote: ↑18 Oct 2020, 05:37Maybe but Lomachenko is experienced and clever enough to know when he's losing rounds and he needs to change things up and take chances, reminded me of Hagler against Leonard, he waited to long to it was a simple case of not throwing punchesDrDuke wrote: ↑18 Oct 2020, 05:22It looked like Lomachenko was frustrated with Lopez' speed and also he felt Lopez' power, so he was forced to show some respect to those.handsofstone wrote: ↑18 Oct 2020, 05:11 I had it 115-114 Lopez at the end, he took the last round to nick on my card, fight of 2 halves Lopez first 6 then Lomachenko finally getting to work to take most rounds in the second half, bizarre tactics from Loma, I know a lots made out of him being a small Lightweight but Lopez never manhandled him and leant on him and Lopez wasnt as tall as Campbell so not sure why Loma never barely threw a shot in the 1st half a plenty feinting and upper body movement, didnt take too much clean but it was clear Lopez was winning things, threw more landed more, straight shots to the body, he looked composed and patient and TBH wasnt even in second gear, Loma wasnt doing anything offensively
I seen it same wayOnetimeonly wrote: ↑18 Oct 2020, 05:44He was surprised how skilled and fast Lopez was. He was barely missing counter bombs that loma avoided only with his skills. The speed, timing and fast twitch reflexes were what won this fight.handsofstone wrote: ↑18 Oct 2020, 05:37Maybe but Lomachenko is experienced and clever enough to know when he's losing rounds and he needs to change things up and take chances, reminded me of Hagler against Leonard, he waited to long to it was a simple case of not throwing punches
Loma was getting repeatedly tagged with counters during his rally.
I like Lopez but as a self confessed Loma fanboy I'm gutted he lost, just cant understand why it took him that long to change things up, at the same time Lopez still had a gears to go through himself I imagineOnetimeonly wrote: ↑18 Oct 2020, 05:44He was surprised how skilled and fast Lopez was. He was barely missing counter bombs that loma avoided only with his skills. The speed, timing and fast twitch reflexes were what won this fight.handsofstone wrote: ↑18 Oct 2020, 05:37Maybe but Lomachenko is experienced and clever enough to know when he's losing rounds and he needs to change things up and take chances, reminded me of Hagler against Leonard, he waited to long to it was a simple case of not throwing punches
Loma was getting repeatedly tagged with counters during his rally.
I’m the same. Kept thinking surely this round he’ll step it up and before you know it he’s arguably 6-0 downhandsofstone wrote: ↑18 Oct 2020, 06:33I like Lopez but as a self confessed Loma fanboy I'm gutted he lost, just cant understand why it took him that long to change things up, at the same time Lopez still had a gears to go through himself I imagineOnetimeonly wrote: ↑18 Oct 2020, 05:44He was surprised how skilled and fast Lopez was. He was barely missing counter bombs that loma avoided only with his skills. The speed, timing and fast twitch reflexes were what won this fight.handsofstone wrote: ↑18 Oct 2020, 05:37
Maybe but Lomachenko is experienced and clever enough to know when he's losing rounds and he needs to change things up and take chances, reminded me of Hagler against Leonard, he waited to long to it was a simple case of not throwing punches
Loma was getting repeatedly tagged with counters during his rally.
Yep, captures my sentiments as well. Even letting the 12th slip away from him was so disappointing given what was at stak. Definitely tarnishes his legacy, which hurts me to sayhandsofstone wrote: ↑18 Oct 2020, 06:33I like Lopez but as a self confessed Loma fanboy I'm gutted he lost, just cant understand why it took him that long to change things up, at the same time Lopez still had a gears to go through himself I imagineOnetimeonly wrote: ↑18 Oct 2020, 05:44He was surprised how skilled and fast Lopez was. He was barely missing counter bombs that loma avoided only with his skills. The speed, timing and fast twitch reflexes were what won this fight.handsofstone wrote: ↑18 Oct 2020, 05:37
Maybe but Lomachenko is experienced and clever enough to know when he's losing rounds and he needs to change things up and take chances, reminded me of Hagler against Leonard, he waited to long to it was a simple case of not throwing punches
Loma was getting repeatedly tagged with counters during his rally.
He didn't let anything go in the 12th, Lopez took that like Mosley/Oscar or bowe/holy. It was impressive he didn't go down.Deserter wrote: ↑18 Oct 2020, 06:43Yep, captures my sentiments as well. Even letting the 12th slip away from him was so disappointing given what was at stak. Definitely tarnishes his legacy, which hurts me to sayhandsofstone wrote: ↑18 Oct 2020, 06:33I like Lopez but as a self confessed Loma fanboy I'm gutted he lost, just cant understand why it took him that long to change things up, at the same time Lopez still had a gears to go through himself I imagineOnetimeonly wrote: ↑18 Oct 2020, 05:44
He was surprised how skilled and fast Lopez was. He was barely missing counter bombs that loma avoided only with his skills. The speed, timing and fast twitch reflexes were what won this fight.
Loma was getting repeatedly tagged with counters during his rally.
I think if Loma had pressed it earlier there’s a good chance he’d have ended up getting stopped.Boxerbeetle wrote: ↑18 Oct 2020, 09:39 Must admit I was very disappointed with Lomachenko’s showing, could have been a great fight if he hadn’t started so slow. Scorecards were a joke, but right man won for sure.
Speaking as a neutral, I’d be prepared for him to take that riskJ-C wrote: ↑18 Oct 2020, 11:05I think if Loma had pressed it earlier there’s a good chance he’d have ended up getting stopped.Boxerbeetle wrote: ↑18 Oct 2020, 09:39 Must admit I was very disappointed with Lomachenko’s showing, could have been a great fight if he hadn’t started so slow. Scorecards were a joke, but right man won for sure.
Lomachenko seemed gun shy to me in the first half of the fight. He's not used to fighting someone who is quicker than he is, and then you add the power on top of that, and he looked a little lost.handsofstone wrote: ↑18 Oct 2020, 05:11 I had it 115-114 Lopez at the end, he took the last round to nick on my card, fight of 2 halves Lopez first 6 then Lomachenko finally getting to work to take most rounds in the second half, bizarre tactics from Loma, I know a lots made out of him being a small Lightweight but Lopez never manhandled him and leant on him and Lopez wasnt as tall as Campbell so not sure why Loma never barely threw a shot in the 1st half a plenty feinting and upper body movement, didnt take too much clean but it was clear Lopez was winning things, threw more landed more, straight shots to the body, he looked composed and patient and TBH wasnt even in second gear, Loma wasnt doing anything offensively
Lomachenko did finally start to let his hands go in the middle rounds and it was him finally edging rounds, showing some angles bringing pressure and I thought he might be able to get thr draw at best but Lopez took the 12th for me, strange fight taking nothing away from Lopez fair play he deserved and got his tactics better, Lomachenko gave that away IMO though, to give away so many rounds is unforgivable at this level, that 119-109 card was an abomination
Not at all Loma is right up there with what he’s achieved. Let’s not forget he could still make Feather easily. For losing this fight at the back end of his Career against a fresher, bigger, stronger fighter doesn’t do a lot to tarnish his legacy in my eyes, especially if he gets the rematch and wins
Unfortunately I do because of the nature of the defeat - pretty much all the ATGs have been defined by that ability to reach down into the well and find something to turn a fight around, in many respects it's a measure of their greatness. Look at Leonard against Hearns, for example, where the master-boxer found himself being outboxed and found the courage, the spite and the sheer bloody-mindedness to put it all on the line to turn the trajectory of the fight.Onetimeonly wrote: ↑18 Oct 2020, 07:59 I don't see any tarnishing of his legacy. The people calling him the greatest ever were inventing their own legacy anyway. Not to mention Lopez isn't done impressing by a long shot. Loma could win a rematch and the whole thing enhance his legacy.
Interesting. What are his great wins? For instance Leonard has Benitez, Duran, Hearns and Hagler. What's Loma's equivalent?smiling assassin wrote: ↑18 Oct 2020, 14:07Not at all Loma is right up there with what he’s achieved. Let’s not forget he could still make Feather easily. For losing this fight at the back end of his Career against a fresher, bigger, stronger fighter doesn’t do a lot to tarnish his legacy in my eyes, especially if he gets the rematch and wins
I don't think loma is anywhere near the level of Leonard and hearns and as a fight that's a tall measuring stick.Deserter wrote: ↑18 Oct 2020, 14:21Unfortunately I do because of the nature of the defeat - pretty much all the ATGs have been defined by that ability to reach down into the well and find something to turn a fight around, in many respects it's a measure of their greatness. Look at Leonard against Hearns, for example, where the master-boxer found himself being outboxed and found the courage, the spite and the sheer bloody-mindedness to put it all on the line to turn the trajectory of the fight.Onetimeonly wrote: ↑18 Oct 2020, 07:59 I don't see any tarnishing of his legacy. The people calling him the greatest ever were inventing their own legacy anyway. Not to mention Lopez isn't done impressing by a long shot. Loma could win a rematch and the whole thing enhance his legacy.
It's not about the fact he lost, it's about how he lost. That's what impacts his legacy IMO.
But you're missing my point. Many were already regarding him as a candidate for the ATG ranks (and I was certainly of the view he had the potential to be). So judging through that lens, there's no question this has damaged his legacy.Onetimeonly wrote: ↑18 Oct 2020, 14:30I don't think loma is anywhere near the level of Leonard and hearns and as a fight that's a tall measuring stick.Deserter wrote: ↑18 Oct 2020, 14:21Unfortunately I do because of the nature of the defeat - pretty much all the ATGs have been defined by that ability to reach down into the well and find something to turn a fight around, in many respects it's a measure of their greatness. Look at Leonard against Hearns, for example, where the master-boxer found himself being outboxed and found the courage, the spite and the sheer bloody-mindedness to put it all on the line to turn the trajectory of the fight.Onetimeonly wrote: ↑18 Oct 2020, 07:59 I don't see any tarnishing of his legacy. The people calling him the greatest ever were inventing their own legacy anyway. Not to mention Lopez isn't done impressing by a long shot. Loma could win a rematch and the whole thing enhance his legacy.
It's not about the fact he lost, it's about how he lost. That's what impacts his legacy IMO.
I was surprised he was outboxed, Lopez is the better fighter. Happens, he was saying loma couldn't fight going backwards and he was right.