Page 10 of 10
Re: Smokin Joe Frazier
Posted: 28 Apr 2010, 18:58
by granberry
The nonsense of Ali worshipper TheOne clutters boxrec.
Ali worshippers have only ad hominem posts to offer when faced with those who do not subscribe to their Religion of Ali.
Re: Smokin Joe Frazier
Posted: 28 Apr 2010, 19:55
by BoxBuzz
Ali worshipers have a right to be here, just as Young worshipers, Frazier worshipers, Bugner worshipers the list goes on. No points against having a favorite fighter that you want to talk up, even if you favor a fella like ( fill in the blank with your favorite fighter). You are welcome here. EVen if you just like boxing and worship no single fighter....this is a good place to be.
Me and Gberry welcome any and all opinions regarding this great sport, even if we reserve the right to disagree with you.
Re: Smokin Joe Frazier
Posted: 28 Apr 2010, 19:59
by ThatOne
BoxBuzz wrote:Ali worshipers have a right to be here, just as Young worshipers, Frazier worshipers, Bugner worshipers the list goes on. No points against having a favorite fighter that you want to talk up, even if you favor a fella like ( fill in the blank with your favorite fighter). You are welcome here. EVen if you just like boxing and worship no single fighter....this is a good place to be.
Me and Gberry welcome any and all opinions regarding this great sport, even if we reserve the right to disagree with you.
As the moderator of this board and the protector and guardian of its integrity you have a responsibility to ensure that posters don't fallaciously attribute quotes to deceased boxers and then provide apocryphal sources as references. I think when such behavior is discovered and it is proven beyond a reasonable doubt to have occurred you have a responsibility, an obligation if you will to discipline the offender.
Just saying...
Re: Smokin Joe Frazier
Posted: 28 Apr 2010, 20:12
by BoxBuzz
No points taken away for the misinformed, the imagineers, the dyslexic or the confused. Just chew the fat, state your thoughts, and if you get your facts upside down we have historians here who can help set us back on the path toward righteousness. Room for much diversity here!
Re: Smokin Joe Frazier
Posted: 29 Apr 2010, 04:45
by ThatOne
BoxBuzz wrote:No points taken away for the misinformed, the imagineers, the dyslexic or the confused. Just chew the fat, state your thoughts, and if you get your facts upside down we have historians here who can help set us back on the path toward righteousness. Room for much diversity here!
Roy Disney was an imagineer. I think I saw a space ship is "imagining" I saw Johnny rob a liquor store is "lying".
On what other monitored sites could you falsely attribute quotes to a major periodical and be called on it and not be disciplined?
Did I did or I not prove that a micreant poster fabricated quotes and attributed it to a major magazine beyond a reasonable doubt?
Where's the outrage?
Re: Smokin Joe Frazier
Posted: 29 Apr 2010, 07:08
by BoxBuzz
ThatOne wrote:BoxBuzz wrote:No points taken away for the misinformed, the imagineers, the dyslexic or the confused. Just chew the fat, state your thoughts, and if you get your facts upside down we have historians here who can help set us back on the path toward righteousness. Room for much diversity here!
Roy Disney was an imagineer. I think I saw a space ship is "imagining" I saw Johnny rob a liquor store is "lying".
On what other monitored sites could you falsely attribute quotes to a major periodical and be called on it and not be disciplined?
Did I did or I not prove that a micreant poster fabricated quotes and attributed it to a major magazine beyond a reasonable doubt?
Where's the outrage?
With great historians in our midst, the truth is never in any real danger. I'll let folks decide for themselves as long as we remain civil. I used to think that Jayne Mansfield was the centerfold for Playboy, I think I told a few people that....turns out she was on the cover and had quite a few pics published in that magazine, but perhaps never the centerfold. Sometimes it's just poor recollection or a bad memory.....in my case it was the poor recollection of good mammaries.
Re: Smokin Joe Frazier
Posted: 29 Apr 2010, 07:20
by ThatOne
BoxBuzz wrote:ThatOne wrote:BoxBuzz wrote:No points taken away for the misinformed, the imagineers, the dyslexic or the confused. Just chew the fat, state your thoughts, and if you get your facts upside down we have historians here who can help set us back on the path toward righteousness. Room for much diversity here!
Roy Disney was an imagineer. I think I saw a space ship is "imagining" I saw Johnny rob a liquor store is "lying".
On what other monitored sites could you falsely attribute quotes to a major periodical and be called on it and not be disciplined?
Did I did or I not prove that a micreant poster fabricated quotes and attributed it to a major magazine beyond a reasonable doubt?
Where's the outrage?
With great historians in our midst, the truth is never in any real danger. I'll let folks decide for themselves as long as we remain civil. I used to think that Jayne Mansfield was the centerfold for Playboy, I think I told a few people that....turns out she was on the cover and had quite a few pics published in that magazine, but perhaps never the centerfold. Sometimes it's just poor recollection or a bad memory.....in my case it was the poor recollection of good mammaries.
There is a difference between a conscious lie and a faulty recollection. In a court of law the former can get you a prison sentence while the latter will allow you to continue to enjoy the rarefied air of a free man. In this case, the offender has been afforded every opportunity to correct the record but refuses to do so. His continued defiance is a naked attack on the integrity of this fine site.
Re: Smokin Joe Frazier
Posted: 29 Apr 2010, 10:19
by granberry
Ali worshippers become desperate and hysterical
when anyone questions the overblown pr of their media created hero.
Re: Smokin Joe Frazier
Posted: 29 Apr 2010, 17:31
by Darling
granberry wrote:Ali worshippers become desperate and hysterical
when anyone questions the overblown pr of their media created hero.
![[icon_e_biggrin.gif] :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)