Page 10 of 25

Re: Will you be subscribing to Allegedly channel?

Posted: 23 Nov 2011, 15:45
by Quixall
earsjohn wrote:
Counter-puncher wrote:
earsjohn wrote: It's the public nature of the rocket that riles. He needs/needed a kick up the arse, as does Frankie if they are to make the most of their obvious talents, But so publicly? Would it not have been better for Frank to have gone to press with an attitude along the lines of "frankies got a few issues and it's all come to a head and he's not able to fight. We're all disappointed but we (FWP) want the best for Frankie in the long term, so we'll stand by him and help him get the support he needs. In the meantime, I'd ask the public to respect the lads privacy and enjoy the fight that we'll be putting on instead"
true, however if i had spunked all the money out on getting that venue for Mitchell i may not have been that circumspect, either :TU:

anyways we have to stop this, because (1) it is polite constructive debate, it isn't childish diatribe so lets get back to what we're good at, eh? and (2) i refuse to post 3 consecutiv e messages in defence of FW

:TU:
Indeed - I have to get back to irking Buncey into another insult as having been called a pillock and pompous in recent times, I'm hoping for a 3rd P to complete the set. :box:
I was once called princess Quixall by Bunce, so it seems that he likes the initial P for insults

Re: Will you be subscribing to Allegedly channel?

Posted: 23 Nov 2011, 16:08
by 15829
MachoMan09 wrote:
diggler wrote:finally on virgin :TU:
Unless you show me the bloodied sheets, I won't believe you.


pm your address ill send you sheets and a video

Re: Will you be subscribing to Allegedly channel?

Posted: 23 Nov 2011, 16:35
by Horse
allegedly is only available on Virgin when we have to pay for it? Shouldn't they give Virgin customers a free trial to see what they have to offer?

Re: Will you be subscribing to Allegedly channel?

Posted: 23 Nov 2011, 16:37
by leforge
Horse wrote:Allegedly channel is only available on Virgin when we have to pay for it? Shouldn't they give Virgin customers a free trial to see what they have to offer?
Pay straight from word go. There one good night of boxing in December the others show look poor!

Re: Will you be subscribing to Allegedly channel?

Posted: 23 Nov 2011, 16:41
by Horse
leforge wrote:
Horse wrote:Allegedly channel is only available on Virgin when we have to pay for it? Shouldn't they give Virgin customers a free trial to see what they have to offer?
Pay straight from word go. There one good night of boxing in December the others show look poor!
Based on their schedule I won't pay for it next month. Maybe I will subscribe in January if they have some good shows booked.

Re: Will you be subscribing to Allegedly channel?

Posted: 23 Nov 2011, 16:51
by leforge
Horse wrote:
leforge wrote:
Horse wrote:Allegedly channel is only available on Virgin when we have to pay for it? Shouldn't they give Virgin customers a free trial to see what they have to offer?
Pay straight from word go. There one good night of boxing in December the others show look poor!
Based on their schedule I won't pay for it next month. Maybe I will subscribe in January if they have some good shows booked.
Dont you think December 3rd schedule worth a tenner?

Re: Will you be subscribing to Allegedly channel?

Posted: 23 Nov 2011, 17:06
by Horse
leforge wrote:Dont you think December 3rd schedule worth a tenner?
What are they showing from Finland? Their schedule only has the Povetkin vs Boswell fight, it doesn't have the Helenius vs Chisora or Sprott vs Gerber fights listed.

Re: Will you be subscribing to Allegedly channel?

Posted: 23 Nov 2011, 17:08
by leforge
Horse wrote:
leforge wrote:Dont you think December 3rd schedule worth a tenner?
What are they showing from Finland? Their schedule only has the Povetkin vs Boswell fight, it doesn't have the Helenius vs Chisora or Sprott vs Gerber fights listed.
I imagine it will, CHisora getting ko in few rounds!

Re: Will you be subscribing to Allegedly channel?

Posted: 23 Nov 2011, 17:14
by Horse
leforge wrote:I imagine it will, CHisora getting ko in few rounds!
Why isn't it on their schedule then? I don't understand why they wouldn't want to mention some of the better fights they have to offer.

Re: Will you be subscribing to Allegedly channel?

Posted: 23 Nov 2011, 17:16
by leforge
Horse wrote:
leforge wrote:I imagine it will, CHisora getting ko in few rounds!
Why isn't it on their schedule then? I don't understand why they wouldn't want to mention some of the better fights they have to offer.
The wholewebsite looks like it has been done on the cheap. Apart from us proper fans as Buncy calls them who else is looking at the site.

Re: Will you be subscribing to Allegedly channel?

Posted: 23 Nov 2011, 17:26
by Horse
leforge wrote:The wholewebsite looks like it has been done on the cheap. Apart from us proper fans as Buncy calls them who else is looking at the site.
They should be appealing to us by advertising the good fights they have.

How much does it cost to update a website? £1.00?

They should put some effort into an enterprise which could make or break the future of allegedly.

Re: Will you be subscribing to Allegedly channel?

Posted: 23 Nov 2011, 17:29
by leforge
Horse wrote:
leforge wrote:The wholewebsite looks like it has been done on the cheap. Apart from us proper fans as Buncy calls them who else is looking at the site.
They should be appealing to us by advertising the good fights they have.

How much does it cost to update a website? £1.00?

They should put some effort into an enterprise which could make or break the future of allegedly.
Perhaps they don't think its needed. You don't like the look of the Degale/ Groves bill then?

Re: Will you be subscribing to Allegedly channel?

Posted: 23 Nov 2011, 17:35
by Horse
leforge wrote:
Horse wrote:They should be appealing to us by advertising the good fights they have.

How much does it cost to update a website? £1.00?

They should put some effort into an enterprise which could make or break the future of allegedly.
Perhaps they don't think its needed. You don't like the look of the Degale/ Groves bill then?
Who is Groves fighting? Groves and DeGale vs no marks doesn't interest me.

Re: Will you be subscribing to Allegedly channel?

Posted: 23 Nov 2011, 17:37
by leforge
Horse wrote:
leforge wrote:
Horse wrote:They should be appealing to us by advertising the good fights they have.

How much does it cost to update a website? £1.00?

They should put some effort into an enterprise which could make or break the future of allegedly.
Perhaps they don't think its needed. You don't like the look of the Degale/ Groves bill then?
Who is Groves fighting? Groves and DeGale vs no marks doesn't interest me.
No idea. Degale is fight is pointless for main fight.

Re: Will you be subscribing to Allegedly channel?

Posted: 23 Nov 2011, 17:47
by Horse
leforge wrote:No idea. Degale is fight is pointless for main fight.
I would prefer DeGale fought someone like Paul David rather than the guy he is scheduled to fight. David is higher ranked in the BoxRec rankings.

Re: Will you be subscribing to Allegedly channel?

Posted: 23 Nov 2011, 17:59
by leforge
Horse wrote:
leforge wrote:No idea. Degale is fight is pointless for main fight.
I would prefer DeGale fought someone like Paul David rather than the guy he is scheduled to fight. David is higher ranked in the BoxRec rankings.
Can't see this fight Lasting more than few rounds!

Re: Will you be subscribing to Allegedly channel?

Posted: 23 Nov 2011, 18:02
by Horse
leforge wrote:Can't see this fight Lasting more than few rounds!
At least it would mean more than a fight vs Guerrero.

Re: Will you be subscribing to Allegedly channel?

Posted: 23 Nov 2011, 18:06
by leforge
Horse wrote:
leforge wrote:Can't see this fight Lasting more than few rounds!
At least it would mean more than a fight vs Guerrero.
Dont know who they trying to fool by making fights like this! This is not going tondo degale any favours or will paying customers like a night of mismatches!

Re: Will you be subscribing to Allegedly channel?

Posted: 23 Nov 2011, 18:16
by Horse
leforge wrote:Dont know who they trying to fool by making fights like this! This is not going tondo degale any favours or will paying customers like a night of mismatches!
It might encourage others to subscribe, but it has put me off.

I want the best in Britain to fight. I don't want some new WBU vs British title like situation, were half of the best British guys go down a different path to the rest, to start again.

Re: Will you be subscribing to Allegedly channel?

Posted: 23 Nov 2011, 18:18
by leforge
Horse wrote:
leforge wrote:Dont know who they trying to fool by making fights like this! This is not going tondo degale any favours or will paying customers like a night of mismatches!
It might encourage others to subscribe, but it has put me off.

I want the best in Britain to fight. I don't want some new WBU vs British title like situation, were half of the best British guys go down a different path to the rest, to start again.
Think that could happen. The wbo inter belts then defend wbo world title in house could happen. Ormond fighting for lightweight wbo inter title in his next fight!

Re: Will you be subscribing to Allegedly channel?

Posted: 23 Nov 2011, 18:22
by Horse
leforge wrote:Think that could happen. The wbo inter belts then defend wbo world title in house could happen. Ormond fighting for lightweight wbo inter title in his next fight!
Who is Stephen Ormond? I don't think an Ormond vs Burns fight is going to be an attraction even if he does beat Johanneson.

Re: Will you be subscribing to Allegedly channel?

Posted: 23 Nov 2011, 18:26
by leforge
Horse wrote:
leforge wrote:Think that could happen. The wbo inter belts then defend wbo world title in house could happen. Ormond fighting for lightweight wbo inter title in his next fight!
Who is Stephen Ormond? I don't think an Ormond vs Burns fight is going to be an attraction even if he does beat Johanneson.
Think it be burns v Mitchell first!

Re: Will you be subscribing to Allegedly channel?

Posted: 23 Nov 2011, 18:32
by Horse
leforge wrote:Think it be burns v Mitchell first!
That would be a good fight. I wouldn't argue with that one.

Re: Will you be subscribing to Allegedly channel?

Posted: 23 Nov 2011, 18:33
by leforge
Horse wrote:
leforge wrote:Think it be burns v Mitchell first!
That would be a good fight. I wouldn't argue with that one.
It be cracker! Not sure if burns will have it next though.

Re: Will you be subscribing to Allegedly channel?

Posted: 23 Nov 2011, 19:04
by gobbles
Horse wrote:
leforge wrote:Dont you think December 3rd schedule worth a tenner?
What are they showing from Finland? Their schedule only has the Povetkin vs Boswell fight, it doesn't have the Helenius vs Chisora or Sprott vs Gerber fights listed.

Do you really think Chisora would be on that show if it wasn't on allegedly?