Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*

For RBR threads only
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 17236
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*

Post by keithmoonhangover »

Was the stoppage the back of the head?
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*

Post by palooka »

Quigg KO in 2nd round, big one punch finish
ajwesty13
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*

Post by ajwesty13 »

Wow great finish...
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 17236
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*

Post by keithmoonhangover »

palooka wrote:Quigg KO in 2nd round, big one punch finish
He couldn't have done much more mate. Nice.
Kilburn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6789
Joined: 25 Jul 2002, 07:27

Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*

Post by Kilburn »

So who is up next?
Yes We Can
Cruiserweight
Posts: 2087
Joined: 29 Sep 2010, 17:16

Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*

Post by Yes We Can »

just me thats finds it a bit sickening watching Quigg spark this argie fella?

Theres nothing to celebrate in KOing a supremely out of his depth and smaller man.
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*

Post by palooka »

The big N I think
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*

Post by Horse »

keithmoonhangover wrote:Haye-Fury PPV would lose money? Give your head a shake. Also, when Fury injured his back, guess what? He pulled out of a fight.
Why wouldn't the PPV lose money?
Neil Gee
Super Middleweight
Posts: 4257
Joined: 06 Jul 2013, 15:37

Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*

Post by Neil Gee »

Datsue wrote:
expe wrote:Scott Quigg against a man who drew in a WBO Latino title fight against an opponent with a record of 22-7-1.
A more distressing exemplar of Silva's credentials is that he lasted less than three rounds with Fernando Montiel, at bantamweight. I know the Mexican can crack but it's the only recognisable name on the lad's record...
Proved absolutely right. That was awful, just a brutal mismatch!
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 17236
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*

Post by keithmoonhangover »

funtime wrote:just me thats finds it a bit sickening watching Quigg spark this argie fella?

Theres nothing to celebrate in KOing a supremely out of his depth and smaller man.
You can only beat who's put in front of you.
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 17236
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*

Post by keithmoonhangover »

Horse wrote:
keithmoonhangover wrote:Haye-Fury PPV would lose money? Give your head a shake. Also, when Fury injured his back, guess what? He pulled out of a fight.
Why wouldn't the PPV lose money?
If you can't work that out for yourself, you ain't worth talking to.
Yes We Can
Cruiserweight
Posts: 2087
Joined: 29 Sep 2010, 17:16

Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*

Post by Yes We Can »

keithmoonhangover wrote:
funtime wrote:just me thats finds it a bit sickening watching Quigg spark this argie fella?

Theres nothing to celebrate in KOing a supremely out of his depth and smaller man.
You can only beat who's put in front of you.
Not blaming Quigg.

but i find it repulsive that that KO is something to be celebrated. He should be doing that against a guy that much smaller, and frankly a level or 2 below.

If Amir fights Crolla next month should we rejoice when he scores a good looking KO?
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*

Post by Horse »

Pathetic!
Ketchel
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 868
Joined: 17 Nov 2008, 14:18

Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*

Post by Ketchel »

But Keith this is pay per view. Nothing so far tonight justifies PPV. No more than standard fair that Sky used to serve up with Warren. This is poor even by Matchroom standards.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*

Post by Horse »

keithmoonhangover wrote:If you can't work that out for yourself, you ain't worth talking to.
So PPVs never lose money?
Ketchel
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 868
Joined: 17 Nov 2008, 14:18

Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*

Post by Ketchel »

Horse wrote:
keithmoonhangover wrote:If you can't work that out for yourself, you ain't worth talking to.
So PPVs never lose money?
They lost money tonight. I'm watching a stream.
taffytoon
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1762
Joined: 17 Nov 2009, 18:15

Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*

Post by taffytoon »

Horse wrote:I post Pathetic posts!
yes you do
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*

Post by Horse »

Ketchel wrote:They lost money tonight. I'm watching a stream.
I wanted to support Froch, but I wasn't going to pay for this abomination of an undercard.
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 17236
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*

Post by keithmoonhangover »

funtime wrote:
keithmoonhangover wrote:
funtime wrote:just me thats finds it a bit sickening watching Quigg spark this argie fella?

Theres nothing to celebrate in KOing a supremely out of his depth and smaller man.
You can only beat who's put in front of you.
Not blaming Quigg.

but i find it repulsive that that KO is something to be celebrated. He should be doing that against a guy that much smaller, and frankly a level or 2 below.

If Amir fights Crolla next month should we rejoice when he scores a good looking KO?
I agree mate, it was a soft match. There's nowt the matter with celebrating, it's natural.
expe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6871
Joined: 07 Oct 2012, 10:10

Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*

Post by expe »

Gallagher talks shite, Frampton brings nothing to the table, what about 5x the support Quigg has and a European title, all Quigg has is a phoney world title belt and Martinez/Mathebula will fight Frampton in Belfast next, not Quigg. The offer to Frampton was also that it would be in Manchester, which is ridiculous when Quigg isn't a big draw and Frampton sells out in Belfast.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*

Post by Horse »

taffytoon wrote:yes you do
Desperate stuff.
Neil Gee
Super Middleweight
Posts: 4257
Joined: 06 Jul 2013, 15:37

Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*

Post by Neil Gee »

funtime wrote:
keithmoonhangover wrote:
funtime wrote:just me thats finds it a bit sickening watching Quigg spark this argie fella?

Theres nothing to celebrate in KOing a supremely out of his depth and smaller man.
You can only beat who's put in front of you.
Not blaming Quigg.

but i find it repulsive that that KO is something to be celebrated. He should be doing that against a guy that much smaller, and frankly a level or 2 below.

If Amir fights Crolla next month should we rejoice when he scores a good looking KO?
The way the commentary team are trying to give the challenger credibility is sad.
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 17236
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*

Post by keithmoonhangover »

Ketchel wrote:But Keith this is pay per view. Nothing so far tonight justifies PPV. No more than standard fair that Sky used to serve up with Warren. This is poor even by Matchroom standards.
I agree 100% mate. Undercard is sh1te, but I paid for the main event. I'd rather I didn't have to, but I think it's worth it.
rio
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1173
Joined: 22 Oct 2012, 16:48

Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*

Post by rio »

When does this mega undercard Hearn was talking about start?? All I have seen so far is one-sided mismatches.
jameswilson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13520
Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01

Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*

Post by jameswilson »

Does the cameraman really need to close up on Carl in his pants while they are talking to McCracken.
Post Reply