Page 10 of 26

Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*

Posted: 23 Nov 2013, 17:45
by keithmoonhangover
Was the stoppage the back of the head?

Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*

Posted: 23 Nov 2013, 17:46
by palooka
Quigg KO in 2nd round, big one punch finish

Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*

Posted: 23 Nov 2013, 17:46
by ajwesty13
Wow great finish...

Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*

Posted: 23 Nov 2013, 17:46
by keithmoonhangover
palooka wrote:Quigg KO in 2nd round, big one punch finish
He couldn't have done much more mate. Nice.

Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*

Posted: 23 Nov 2013, 17:47
by Kilburn
So who is up next?

Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*

Posted: 23 Nov 2013, 17:47
by Yes We Can
just me thats finds it a bit sickening watching Quigg spark this argie fella?

Theres nothing to celebrate in KOing a supremely out of his depth and smaller man.

Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*

Posted: 23 Nov 2013, 17:47
by palooka
The big N I think

Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*

Posted: 23 Nov 2013, 17:47
by Horse
keithmoonhangover wrote:Haye-Fury PPV would lose money? Give your head a shake. Also, when Fury injured his back, guess what? He pulled out of a fight.
Why wouldn't the PPV lose money?

Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*

Posted: 23 Nov 2013, 17:47
by Neil Gee
Datsue wrote:
expe wrote:Scott Quigg against a man who drew in a WBO Latino title fight against an opponent with a record of 22-7-1.
A more distressing exemplar of Silva's credentials is that he lasted less than three rounds with Fernando Montiel, at bantamweight. I know the Mexican can crack but it's the only recognisable name on the lad's record...
Proved absolutely right. That was awful, just a brutal mismatch!

Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*

Posted: 23 Nov 2013, 17:48
by keithmoonhangover
funtime wrote:just me thats finds it a bit sickening watching Quigg spark this argie fella?

Theres nothing to celebrate in KOing a supremely out of his depth and smaller man.
You can only beat who's put in front of you.

Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*

Posted: 23 Nov 2013, 17:49
by keithmoonhangover
Horse wrote:
keithmoonhangover wrote:Haye-Fury PPV would lose money? Give your head a shake. Also, when Fury injured his back, guess what? He pulled out of a fight.
Why wouldn't the PPV lose money?
If you can't work that out for yourself, you ain't worth talking to.

Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*

Posted: 23 Nov 2013, 17:50
by Yes We Can
keithmoonhangover wrote:
funtime wrote:just me thats finds it a bit sickening watching Quigg spark this argie fella?

Theres nothing to celebrate in KOing a supremely out of his depth and smaller man.
You can only beat who's put in front of you.
Not blaming Quigg.

but i find it repulsive that that KO is something to be celebrated. He should be doing that against a guy that much smaller, and frankly a level or 2 below.

If Amir fights Crolla next month should we rejoice when he scores a good looking KO?

Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*

Posted: 23 Nov 2013, 17:51
by Horse
Pathetic!

Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*

Posted: 23 Nov 2013, 17:51
by Ketchel
But Keith this is pay per view. Nothing so far tonight justifies PPV. No more than standard fair that Sky used to serve up with Warren. This is poor even by Matchroom standards.

Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*

Posted: 23 Nov 2013, 17:52
by Horse
keithmoonhangover wrote:If you can't work that out for yourself, you ain't worth talking to.
So PPVs never lose money?

Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*

Posted: 23 Nov 2013, 17:53
by Ketchel
Horse wrote:
keithmoonhangover wrote:If you can't work that out for yourself, you ain't worth talking to.
So PPVs never lose money?
They lost money tonight. I'm watching a stream.

Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*

Posted: 23 Nov 2013, 17:54
by taffytoon
Horse wrote:I post Pathetic posts!
yes you do

Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*

Posted: 23 Nov 2013, 17:55
by Horse
Ketchel wrote:They lost money tonight. I'm watching a stream.
I wanted to support Froch, but I wasn't going to pay for this abomination of an undercard.

Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*

Posted: 23 Nov 2013, 17:55
by keithmoonhangover
funtime wrote:
keithmoonhangover wrote:
funtime wrote:just me thats finds it a bit sickening watching Quigg spark this argie fella?

Theres nothing to celebrate in KOing a supremely out of his depth and smaller man.
You can only beat who's put in front of you.
Not blaming Quigg.

but i find it repulsive that that KO is something to be celebrated. He should be doing that against a guy that much smaller, and frankly a level or 2 below.

If Amir fights Crolla next month should we rejoice when he scores a good looking KO?
I agree mate, it was a soft match. There's nowt the matter with celebrating, it's natural.

Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*

Posted: 23 Nov 2013, 17:55
by expe
Gallagher talks shite, Frampton brings nothing to the table, what about 5x the support Quigg has and a European title, all Quigg has is a phoney world title belt and Martinez/Mathebula will fight Frampton in Belfast next, not Quigg. The offer to Frampton was also that it would be in Manchester, which is ridiculous when Quigg isn't a big draw and Frampton sells out in Belfast.

Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*

Posted: 23 Nov 2013, 17:56
by Horse
taffytoon wrote:yes you do
Desperate stuff.

Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*

Posted: 23 Nov 2013, 17:57
by Neil Gee
funtime wrote:
keithmoonhangover wrote:
funtime wrote:just me thats finds it a bit sickening watching Quigg spark this argie fella?

Theres nothing to celebrate in KOing a supremely out of his depth and smaller man.
You can only beat who's put in front of you.
Not blaming Quigg.

but i find it repulsive that that KO is something to be celebrated. He should be doing that against a guy that much smaller, and frankly a level or 2 below.

If Amir fights Crolla next month should we rejoice when he scores a good looking KO?
The way the commentary team are trying to give the challenger credibility is sad.

Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*

Posted: 23 Nov 2013, 17:59
by keithmoonhangover
Ketchel wrote:But Keith this is pay per view. Nothing so far tonight justifies PPV. No more than standard fair that Sky used to serve up with Warren. This is poor even by Matchroom standards.
I agree 100% mate. Undercard is sh1te, but I paid for the main event. I'd rather I didn't have to, but I think it's worth it.

Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*

Posted: 23 Nov 2013, 17:59
by rio
When does this mega undercard Hearn was talking about start?? All I have seen so far is one-sided mismatches.

Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*

Posted: 23 Nov 2013, 18:00
by jameswilson
Does the cameraman really need to close up on Carl in his pants while they are talking to McCracken.