Page 10 of 11

Re: Burns v Zlaticanin - Undercard and RBR

Posted: 28 Jun 2014, 16:54
by expe
revporl wrote:Same score here. Ricky seemed gun shy, maybe his jaw injury is still troubling him.
If the jaws a problem, it will be a mental thing, possibly something to do with the memory of the pain he went through and sub consciously doing everything possible to avoid getting into that situation again. If he does decide to carry on, besides another change in trainer, I think they should get a sports psychologist in to try and help him, I'm not usually fan of that sort of thing, but in this case I think it might help.

Re: Burns v Zlaticanin - Undercard and RBR

Posted: 28 Jun 2014, 17:00
by ttornado
expe wrote: If the jaws a problem, it will be a mental thing,
Not necessarily mental, could be actual physical pain that he isn't adjusted to and knows his chin can take the impact

Re: Burns v Zlaticanin - Undercard and RBR

Posted: 28 Jun 2014, 17:17
by ILikeBeer
ThereByTheGrace wrote:My Sky has went kaput! Don't think I'm alone.
I was a bit squiffy last night. I had a go at Eddie Hearn on Twitter about it. :lol:

Re: Burns v Zlaticanin - Undercard and RBR

Posted: 28 Jun 2014, 18:01
by tedley
Maybe you have to look at the overall take on this.
Bad results so ditches trainer.
Goes to cockney land for superior knowalls.
Why didnt he go to Jimmy Tibbs ?
He would have told him that the basic right hand against a turnaround southpaw aint gonna work.
It doesnt matter how much sparring you do against heavys , middles , welters southpaws you must have a game plan .
Ricky is such a nice guy and I think he is taken in too much

Re: Burns v Zlaticanin - Undercard and RBR

Posted: 29 Jun 2014, 05:46
by MarkMcBurney
Manchester Hitman wrote:Sports Network went tits up oweing him money...?
Doesn't mean Fwank didn't sort it out with him privately which is my understanding what happened...again If someone owes you 2mill your hardly going to be sat ringside next to the fella all pally pally are you? When the last time Joe said anything about being owed money...[/quote]
What about the other fighters who have complained about not being paid?

Whether he paid Calzaghe late or not at all, he didn't pay the purse within 7 days as per BBBoC rules. The man is a dick.

Re: Burns v Zlaticanin - Undercard and RBR

Posted: 29 Jun 2014, 06:02
by mickey1975
I don't blame him for messing Joe about. He did an unbelievable job with Joe, he was hardly media friendly and had a history of pullouts. I thought it was a low trick of Joe to dump Fwank to be honest.

Re: Burns v Zlaticanin - Undercard and RBR

Posted: 29 Jun 2014, 08:00
by MarkMcBurney
Regardless of whether he paid Calzaghe late or not at all, there are lots of other fighters who have had similar payment problems from Warren, even after Sports Network.

You either adhere to BBBoC rules or you don't promote, simple.

The bloke is an arsehole.

In my opinion, of course.

Re: Burns v Zlaticanin - Undercard and RBR

Posted: 29 Jun 2014, 08:17
by fightscorecollector
ironically Ricky probably has not earned £200k for all 4 of his matchroom fights combined...?????????????



£200k for 4 fights, I know for a fact that in one of those fights that Burns made more than double that.

Re: Burns v Zlaticanin - Undercard and RBR

Posted: 29 Jun 2014, 08:27
by Manchester Hitman
fightscorecollector wrote:ironically Ricky probably has not earned £200k for all 4 of his matchroom fights combined...?????????????



£200k for 4 fights, I know for a fact that in one of those fights that Burns made more than double that.
Really, which fight is that then ?

Re: Burns v Zlaticanin - Undercard and RBR

Posted: 29 Jun 2014, 08:30
by Manchester Hitman
MarkMcBurney wrote:Regardless of whether he paid Calzaghe late or not at all, there are lots of other fighters who have had similar payment problems from Warren, even after Sports Network.

You either adhere to BBBoC rules or you don't promote, simple.

The bloke is an arsehole.

In my opinion, of course.
Who are these fighter's minus Calzaghe and Burns which is going to court?

Re: Burns v Zlaticanin - Undercard and RBR

Posted: 29 Jun 2014, 08:32
by mickey1975
Manchester Hitman wrote:
fightscorecollector wrote:ironically Ricky probably has not earned £200k for all 4 of his matchroom fights combined...?????????????



£200k for 4 fights, I know for a fact that in one of those fights that Burns made more than double that.
Really, which fight is that then ?
I guess he means Crawford. Perhaps, if it was on HBO. They basically bought the title.

Re: Burns v Zlaticanin - Undercard and RBR

Posted: 29 Jun 2014, 10:23
by DMA1987
Manchester Hitman wrote:
fightscorecollector wrote:ironically Ricky probably has not earned £200k for all 4 of his matchroom fights combined...?????????????



£200k for 4 fights, I know for a fact that in one of those fights that Burns made more than double that.
Really, which fight is that then ?
That's the thing when you just talk shite, eventually somebody notices.

Re: Burns v Zlaticanin - Undercard and RBR

Posted: 29 Jun 2014, 10:57
by JimJim2009
DMA1987 wrote:
Manchester Hitman wrote:
fightscorecollector wrote:ironically Ricky probably has not earned £200k for all 4 of his matchroom fights combined...?????????????



£200k for 4 fights, I know for a fact that in one of those fights that Burns made more than double that.
Really, which fight is that then ?
That's the thing when you just talk shite, eventually somebody notices.

:OhYes:

Re: Burns v Zlaticanin - Undercard and RBR

Posted: 29 Jun 2014, 12:50
by lefty
mickey1975 wrote:
Manchester Hitman wrote:
fightscorecollector wrote:ironically Ricky probably has not earned £200k for all 4 of his matchroom fights combined...?????????????



£200k for 4 fights, I know for a fact that in one of those fights that Burns made more than double that.
Really, which fight is that then ?
I guess he means Crawford. Perhaps, if it was on HBO. They basically bought the title.
:confused:

Re: Burns v Zlaticanin - Undercard and RBR

Posted: 29 Jun 2014, 13:00
by MarkMcBurney
Manchester Hitman wrote:
MarkMcBurney wrote:Regardless of whether he paid Calzaghe late or not at all, there are lots of other fighters who have had similar payment problems from Warren, even after Sports Network.

You either adhere to BBBoC rules or you don't promote, simple.

The bloke is an arsehole.

In my opinion, of course.
Who are these fighter's minus Calzaghe and Burns which is going to court?
Who said anything about court? There have been several fighters who have complained about not being paid weeks and weeks after the 7 day deadline imposed by the BBBoC. Kevin Mitchell off the top of my head fairly recently.

Re: Burns v Zlaticanin - Undercard and RBR

Posted: 29 Jun 2014, 13:15
by DMA1987
MarkMcBurney wrote:
Manchester Hitman wrote:
MarkMcBurney wrote:Regardless of whether he paid Calzaghe late or not at all, there are lots of other fighters who have had similar payment problems from Warren, even after Sports Network.

You either adhere to BBBoC rules or you don't promote, simple.

The bloke is an arsehole.

In my opinion, of course.
Who are these fighter's minus Calzaghe and Burns which is going to court?
Who said anything about court? There have been several fighters who have complained about not being paid weeks and weeks after the 7 day deadline imposed by the BBBoC. Kevin Mitchell off the top of my head fairly recently.
Bellew being another.

I seriously don't understand why people make excuses for his practices. It isn't a rumour.

Re: Burns v Zlaticanin - Undercard and RBR

Posted: 29 Jun 2014, 14:34
by Manchester Hitman
MarkMcBurney wrote:
Manchester Hitman wrote:
MarkMcBurney wrote:Regardless of whether he paid Calzaghe late or not at all, there are lots of other fighters who have had similar payment problems from Warren, even after Sports Network.

You either adhere to BBBoC rules or you don't promote, simple.

The bloke is an arsehole.

In my opinion, of course.
Who are these fighter's minus Calzaghe and Burns which is going to court?
Who said anything about court? There have been several fighters who have complained about not being paid weeks and weeks after the 7 day deadline imposed by the BBBoC. Kevin Mitchell off the top of my head fairly recently.
Is that the same Kevin Mitchell who when presented with a World title shot at West Ham at great expense by Frank was getting pissed up in Dagenham pubs instead of training? Even after fcuking that opportunity he gets another one shortly after against Burns?

If Frrank was struggling maybe Kevin should have showed him the same loyalty - he probably would have got another shot at home at the first opportunity Frrank could expertly guide him to one.

Re: Burns v Zlaticanin - Undercard and RBR

Posted: 29 Jun 2014, 14:47
by jameswilson
Junior Witter not long ago. Give us the terrible reasons why he deserves it?

Re: Burns v Zlaticanin - Undercard and RBR

Posted: 29 Jun 2014, 16:10
by chiggsy
Rocky fielding as well.

Re: Burns v Zlaticanin - Undercard and RBR

Posted: 29 Jun 2014, 16:31
by mickey1975
jameswilson wrote:Junior Witter not long ago. Give us the terrible reasons why he deserves it?
Crimes against boxing.

Re: Burns v Zlaticanin - Undercard and RBR

Posted: 29 Jun 2014, 16:36
by jameswilson
mickey1975 wrote:
jameswilson wrote:Junior Witter not long ago. Give us the terrible reasons why he deserves it?
Crimes against boxing.
By which definition Bradley Skeete is yet to be paid in the professional boxing game.

Re: Burns v Zlaticanin - Undercard and RBR

Posted: 29 Jun 2014, 16:37
by expe
jameswilson wrote:
mickey1975 wrote:
jameswilson wrote:Junior Witter not long ago. Give us the terrible reasons why he deserves it?
Crimes against boxing.
By which definition Bradley Skeete is yet to be paid in the professional boxing game.
Bradley is paying Frank to fight based on that definition.

Re: Burns v Zlaticanin - Undercard and RBR

Posted: 29 Jun 2014, 16:38
by Manchester Hitman
jameswilson wrote:Junior Witter not long ago. Give us the terrible reasons why he deserves it?
Witter??

Fcuking hell your scraping the barrel their aren't you mate...when was that 2001?

Re: Burns v Zlaticanin - Undercard and RBR

Posted: 29 Jun 2014, 16:39
by mickey1975
jameswilson wrote:
mickey1975 wrote:
jameswilson wrote:Junior Witter not long ago. Give us the terrible reasons why he deserves it?
Crimes against boxing.
By which definition Bradley Skeete is yet to be paid in the professional boxing game.
He probably hasn't been!

Re: Burns v Zlaticanin - Undercard and RBR

Posted: 29 Jun 2014, 16:40
by jameswilson
Manchester Hitman wrote:
jameswilson wrote:Junior Witter not long ago. Give us the terrible reasons why he deserves it?
Witter??

Fcuking hell your scraping the barrel their aren't you mate...when was that 2001?
No. He has fought on allegedly bills in the last few years you know?