Re: Peter Quillin vs Andy Lee
Posted: 12 Apr 2015, 21:13
Yes, Cotto is faster but they are way bigger and more powerful than him. There is a reason why Cotto sits on the title for a year without defending it against top middleweights -- he doesn't like his chances.dempseyfire wrote:You must be joking. Cotto is by far the better boxer than both, of them and when he gets hit a good shot won't become a deer in the headlights like Quillin did. Vs Lee Cotto would be way too fast in the exchanges . . .Quillin was too fast as well too but way too tentative. After the knockdown he thought he was in a staring contest and not a boxing match.ikorolev wrote: Nah, Cotto gets killed by both of them.