BoxRec

Thomastearns wrote:

montrealsuper wrote:

boxing_rocks wrote:Isn't it clear by this time that the sides of this thread won't persuade each other ???

Truth always KOs propaganda eventually - however the brainwashed rope a doped propagandized have no idea they have all been rope a doped by the great deception - We truthers hope and believe the brainwashed can be awakened to understand the truth - We live in a world of TRUTH and propaganda

There is no chance of ever knowing the truth.

Human beings are irrational, devious, selfish, frightened, violent, immoral creatures driven by the need to survive and reproduce. Thousands of years of civilization have done little to change basic behaviour. It's just the level of propaganda that's evolving.

However if we must insist on believing in justice, then perhaps we could start by looking at the fairness of punishment handed out, and by whom. If we can establish a sense of fairness in human interactions - of course nature has its own idea of fairness - then we can begin to create a sense of community.

Its probably the best we can do.

Badhusker wrote:Mods, you seriously let this go on? Are you not entertained?

punchoutsb wrote:

Badhusker wrote:Mods, you seriously let this go on? Are you not entertained?

Start a post saying you have actually evidence of an anti-Povetkin conspiracy and after your initial post log off boxrec for two hours. Return two hours later and the thread will have over 100 pages

asdfjkl wrote:

Rob3_142 wrote:

asdfjkl wrote: WADA and VADA might not have a clue what they are doing, the rest of the world already does and know very well that Povetkin is right and innocent.

The rest of the world? You mean the people who are not responsible for testing urine samples? Or the people who are not responsible for keeping sport clean? It's amazing that all the people who are least informed on the details of Povetkin's case are the most qualified to pass judgement.

The laboratory in Lausanne are responsible for testing all kind of samples, and independent and are responsible for keeping sport clean.
They are informed in detail and in independent, they are people that know their facts and are qualified to give a fair judgement.

Rob3_142 wrote:

asdfjkl wrote:

Rob3_142 wrote:
The rest of the world? You mean the people who are not responsible for testing urine samples? Or the people who are not responsible for keeping sport clean? It's amazing that all the people who are least informed on the details of Povetkin's case are the most qualified to pass judgement.

The laboratory in Lausanne are responsible for testing all kind of samples, and independent and are responsible for keeping sport clean.
They are informed in detail and in independent, they are people that know their facts and are qualified to give a fair judgement.

Hold up, so Lausanne is credible, but Las Vegas is not? Just because you say so?

RScarf1 wrote:I'm amazed that a thread about Povetkin would be this long.

Enlightened-One wrote:Do you think that the attorneys for World of Boxing and Povetkin will be successful on the 21st April in their motions for a new trial or a judgement in it's favour?