Page 10 of 11
Re: Wilder rejects Whyte
Posted: 30 Jun 2017, 16:19
by ValMar
candyslim wrote:I knew that ValMar.Sometimes I like to deliberately misunderstand for the sake of making a joke. I'm sixty now and I think my wife has given up waiting for me to grow up

I am always (or almost always) anxious writing on this forum, beacuse of my broken English, I am frightened that I would be misunderstood.
I would express myself much better on my native language, of course. So, please, do not be too strict, I am just a Balkaneros who has been lazy learning foreign languages during the childhood.
I was born 1965 ( Lennox Lewis, too), and, really, I have thought that I was the oldest (or almost oldest) here, on forum....And, I was wrong, again. You are lucky, you have to remember Kim Wilde when she was about twenty five....I hope that your wife does not read these posts..........
Re: Wilder rejects Whyte
Posted: 30 Jun 2017, 16:57
by candyslim
ValMar you do yourself an injustice regarding your English. I'll bet it has improved dramatically since you have been using this forum. Even my understanding has improved and I am English. Sometimes I can even understand Tanzio !
Kim Wilde eh? Yes I can see where you're coming from. When I was a boy there was a tv show called "The Avengers" where a beautiful young actress called Diana Rigg played a character called Emma Peel who would wear a skin-tight leather cat-suit. In theory I was too young to be interested but oh boy, was I interested. She recently appeared on "Game of thrones" but you'll need Google to understand why I was so impressed

Re: Wilder rejects Whyte
Posted: 30 Jun 2017, 17:17
by ValMar
candyslim wrote:ValMar you do yourself an injustice regarding your English. I'll bet it has improved dramatically since you have been using this forum. Even my understanding has improved and I am English. Sometimes I can even understand Tanzio !
Kim Wilde eh? Yes I can see where you're coming from. When I was a boy there was a tv show called "The Avengers" where a beautiful young actress called Diana Rigg played a character called Emma Peel who would wear a skin-tight leather cat-suit. In theory I was too young to be interested but oh boy, was I interested. She recently appeared on "Game of thrones" but you'll need Google to understand why I was so impressed

OMG, I saw her pics a few minutes ago, and I am not sure that I will sleep properly tonight ?
BTW, is Tanzio a Brit ?
I learned that you are Brit, and Best Coast and Saad are Americans, and that's it.
Re: Wilder rejects Whyte
Posted: 30 Jun 2017, 17:19
by Counter-puncher
Your English is fine, ValMar

Re: Wilder rejects Whyte
Posted: 30 Jun 2017, 17:22
by ValMar
Counter-puncher wrote:Your English is fine, ValMar

I don't think so, but, thank you.
Re: Wilder rejects Whyte
Posted: 30 Jun 2017, 17:52
by candyslim
Tanzio is American ValMar and when he says stuff like, let me see what was it now, forgive me if I get this wrong ... "The butt-hurt in here, is as thick as the gas at an indoor chilli and cherry-pie cook off"
I was a little bemused - I dread to think what you made of it. We are both getting an education on here
Glad you liked Mrs. Peel.
Signing off now. Night folks.
Re: Wilder rejects Whyte
Posted: 01 Jul 2017, 04:16
by ValMar
candyslim wrote:Tanzio is American ValMar and when he says stuff like, let me see what was it now, forgive me if I get this wrong ... "The butt-hurt in here, is as thick as the gas at an indoor chilli and cherry-pie cook off"
I was a little bemused - I dread to think what you made of it. We are both getting an education on here
Glad you liked Mrs. Peel.
Signing off now. Night folks.
Tanzio's narrative mode is a little bit strange, at least. It is something like a "stream of conciousness", but this is a forum, and we need different persons with their own opinions and writting style, of course.
So, I can not always understand (I mean literally) him, but, without him this forum would not be so interesting place -----something like HW division without Fury and Wilder.
Re: Wilder rejects Whyte
Posted: 01 Jul 2017, 06:51
by candyslim
This is true. He has given me some good laughs as well as contributing some interesting posts.
Re: Wilder rejects Whyte
Posted: 01 Jul 2017, 07:46
by SaadOffTheDeck
candyslim wrote:This is true. He has given me some good laughs as well as contributing some interesting posts.
Nobody is funnier than you, how about producing your claims?
Re: Wilder rejects Whyte
Posted: 01 Jul 2017, 09:40
by candyslim
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:candyslim wrote:This is true. He has given me some good laughs as well as contributing some interesting posts.
Nobody is funnier than you, how about producing your claims?
What does that mean? If you mean I should produce evidence to back up what I say you'll need to make it clear what claims you're referring to.
Obviously you can't be referring to the subject I've been discussing most in the last couple of days, the Povetkin drug test, I don't need to back up my claim because the WBC have retracted their claim that Povetkin ingested Meldonium after it became a banned substance, in other words they had no reason to prevent the fight going ahead.
You know this Saad, why are we even discussing it?
Or did you save this as a draft a while ago and then decided you'd post it anyway even though the discussion had moved forward since then?
Re: Wilder rejects Whyte
Posted: 01 Jul 2017, 17:09
by SaadOffTheDeck
The wbc has done no such thing.
Re: Wilder rejects Whyte
Posted: 01 Jul 2017, 21:04
by Badhusker
10 pages on a Wilder rejects Whyte thread?

Re: Wilder rejects Whyte
Posted: 01 Jul 2017, 21:32
by asdfjkl
Badhusker wrote:10 pages on a Wilder rejects Whyte thread?

It's interesting to see what he's going to do now isn't it? Ortiz is availeble and would be awesome to see, just like Whyte fight, but he seems to be waiting, doing absolutely nothing right now? Not getting rid of Stiverne, not showing any sign of trying to be active at all, does the weed have anything to deal with it? All the top contenders are busy, except Ortiz, but Wilder doesn't seem to like to face him I guess. Is Wilder just waiting till the moment unification seems to be possible again and just before that moment when it might be possible again schedule his fight with Stiverne or something?
Re: Wilder rejects Whyte
Posted: 01 Jul 2017, 22:15
by KiwiRider
asdfjkl wrote:Badhusker wrote:10 pages on a Wilder rejects Whyte thread?

It's interesting to see what he's going to do now isn't it? Ortiz is availeble and would be awesome to see, just like Whyte fight, but he seems to be waiting, doing absolutely nothing right now? Not getting rid of Stiverne, not showing any sign of trying to be active at all, does the weed have anything to deal with it? All the top contenders are busy, except Ortiz, but Wilder doesn't seem to like to face him I guess. Is Wilder just waiting till the moment unification seems to be possible again and just before that moment when it might be possible again schedule his fight with Stiverne or something?
I think that is exactly what will happen.
All talk, and C grade action.
Re: Wilder rejects Whyte
Posted: 02 Jul 2017, 04:40
by candyslim
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:The wbc has done no such thing.
See the other thread.
Re: Wilder rejects Whyte
Posted: 02 Jul 2017, 04:44
by gilgamesh
candyslim wrote:SaadOffTheDeck wrote:The wbc has done no such thing.
See the other thread.
You've never provided what you claim in any thread. The WBC didn't retract anything about Povetkin.
Re: Wilder rejects Whyte
Posted: 02 Jul 2017, 04:46
by asdfjkl
gilgamesh wrote:candyslim wrote:SaadOffTheDeck wrote:The wbc has done no such thing.
See the other thread.
You've never provided what you claim in any thread. The WBC didn't retract anything about Povetkin.
It's a matter of time, the WBC is retarded, you know that, or should know that. They probably do it after Wilder had his mandatory fight against Stiverne, so he doesn't have to fight Povetkin for another 1,5 year. Also note that Wilder is currently probably wasting as much time as possible till Parker/Hughie are boxing, then Wilder probably scheduled his fight around januari ish so Povetkin will be 41 or so once Wilder has to face him and Wilder has a good excuse to avoid the winner of Hughie/Parker by facing his mandatory. In the end Povetkin will probably get restored by februari 2018 or so, if he doesn't win any other belts or mandatory spots meanwhile.
Re: Wilder rejects Whyte
Posted: 02 Jul 2017, 04:49
by gilgamesh
asdfjkl wrote:gilgamesh wrote:candyslim wrote:
See the other thread.
You've never provided what you claim in any thread. The WBC didn't retract anything about Povetkin.
It's a matter of time, the WBC is retarded, you know that, or should know that. They probably do it after Wilder had his mandatory fight, so he doesn't have to fight Povetkin for another 1,5 year.
I thought it was already done? If it's a matter of time then you're both just full of sh*t.
Wilder is a complete p*ssy so I'm not taking up for that coward, but Povetkin screwed himself out of the fight with Wilder. He has only himself to blame, and all your whining is never gonna give him back the opportunity he pissed away when he pissed dirty.
A year from now, Povetkin probably won't be Top 10 anymore. Ever again.
Re: Wilder rejects Whyte
Posted: 02 Jul 2017, 04:51
by SaadOffTheDeck
candyslim wrote:SaadOffTheDeck wrote:The wbc has done no such thing.
See the other thread.

Re: Wilder rejects Whyte
Posted: 02 Jul 2017, 04:56
by asdfjkl
gilgamesh wrote:asdfjkl wrote:gilgamesh wrote:
You've never provided what you claim in any thread. The WBC didn't retract anything about Povetkin.
It's a matter of time, the WBC is retarded, you know that, or should know that. They probably do it after Wilder had his mandatory fight, so he doesn't have to fight Povetkin for another 1,5 year.
I thought it was already done? If it's a matter of time then you're both just full of sh*t.
Wilder is a complete p*ssy so I'm not taking up for that coward, but Povetkin screwed himself out of the fight with Wilder. He has only himself to blame, and all your whining is never gonna give him back the opportunity he pissed away when he pissed dirty.
A year from now, Povetkin probably won't be Top 10 anymore. Ever again.
No, Wada is to blame, Wada didn't have a clue what they were doing and Wilder knew that, that's why Wilder wanted them to be involved so badly.
Also note that Povetkin his samples have been tested in a currently suspended Wada lab.
https://www.wada-ama.org/en/media/news/ ... substances
Also note that the Meldonium case is now even more in Povetkin his advantage:
https://www.wada-ama.org/sites/default/ ... l-en_0.pdf
"Meldonium should not be reported at levels below 100 ng/mL; " (Povetkin had 70 nanogram)
And
"Meldonium 200 ng/mL" is still allowed
So in other words, the amount of Meldonium where from Wilder claimed it would make Povetkin an unnatural monster that might kill him with unhuman powers or whatever kind of similar words he used, is now suddenly allowed again by Wada.
In other words, if that same fight, with the same contract, was scheduled today, Wilder would have had 0 excuses to avoid the fight.
Re: Wilder rejects Whyte
Posted: 02 Jul 2017, 04:57
by gilgamesh
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:candyslim wrote:SaadOffTheDeck wrote:The wbc has done no such thing.
See the other thread.

It's funny that he reports bullsh*t and YOU'RE the asshole for calling him on it
Oh us Boxing fans and our troublesome facts

Re: Wilder rejects Whyte
Posted: 02 Jul 2017, 04:58
by SaadOffTheDeck
asdfjkl wrote:gilgamesh wrote:asdfjkl wrote:
It's a matter of time, the WBC is retarded, you know that, or should know that. They probably do it after Wilder had his mandatory fight, so he doesn't have to fight Povetkin for another 1,5 year.
I thought it was already done? If it's a matter of time then you're both just full of sh*t.
Wilder is a complete p*ssy so I'm not taking up for that coward, but Povetkin screwed himself out of the fight with Wilder. He has only himself to blame, and all your whining is never gonna give him back the opportunity he pissed away when he pissed dirty.
A year from now, Povetkin probably won't be Top 10 anymore. Ever again.
No, Wada is to blame, Wada didn't have a clue what they were doing and Wilder knew that, that's why Wilder wanted them to be involved so badly.
Also note that Povetkin his samples have been tested in a currently suspended Wada lab.
https://www.wada-ama.org/en/media/news/ ... substances
Also note that the Meldonium case is now even more in Povetkin his advantage:
https://www.wada-ama.org/sites/default/ ... l-en_0.pdf
"Meldonium should not be reported at levels below 100 ng/mL; " (Povetkin had 70 nanogram)
And
"Meldonium 200 ng/mL" is still allowed
So in other words, the amount of Meldonium where from Wilder claimed it would make Povetkin an unnatural monster that might kill him with unhuman powers or whatever kind of similar words he used, is now suddenly allowed again by Wada.
You killed candyslim!!!! You dumb motherfucker.
Re: Wilder rejects Whyte
Posted: 02 Jul 2017, 04:59
by gilgamesh
asdfjkl wrote:
No, Wada is to blame, Wada didn't have a clue what they were doing and Wilder knew that, that's why Wilder wanted them to be involved so badly.
Also note that Povetkin his samples have been tested in a currently suspended Wada lab.
https://www.wada-ama.org/en/media/news/ ... substances
Also note that the Meldonium case is now even more in Povetkin his advantage:
https://www.wada-ama.org/sites/default/ ... l-en_0.pdf
"Meldonium should not be reported at levels below 100 ng/mL; " (Povetkin had 70 nanogram)
And
"Meldonium 200 ng/mL" is still allowed
So in other words,
I'll stop at nothing to defend Povetkin to the end of time no matter how clear it is that he was on PED's and how clear it was that today without them he wasn't the same fighter.
We hear ya guy
Re: Wilder rejects Whyte
Posted: 02 Jul 2017, 05:00
by SaadOffTheDeck
gilgamesh wrote:SaadOffTheDeck wrote:candyslim wrote:
See the other thread.

It's funny that he reports bullsh*t and YOU'RE the asshole for calling him on it
Oh us Boxing fans and our troublesome facts

Yeah, poor bastard runs his mouth and gets called on his bullshit and it's 'hate'. I tried to reason with him, dude wouldn't hear it. Kept quoting kalan and assforbrsinsjkgh. Oh well, good riddance.
Re: Wilder rejects Whyte
Posted: 02 Jul 2017, 05:01
by asdfjkl
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:asdfjkl wrote:gilgamesh wrote:
I thought it was already done? If it's a matter of time then you're both just full of sh*t.
Wilder is a complete p*ssy so I'm not taking up for that coward, but Povetkin screwed himself out of the fight with Wilder. He has only himself to blame, and all your whining is never gonna give him back the opportunity he pissed away when he pissed dirty.
A year from now, Povetkin probably won't be Top 10 anymore. Ever again.
No, Wada is to blame, Wada didn't have a clue what they were doing and Wilder knew that, that's why Wilder wanted them to be involved so badly.
Also note that Povetkin his samples have been tested in a currently suspended Wada lab.
https://www.wada-ama.org/en/media/news/ ... substances
Also note that the Meldonium case is now even more in Povetkin his advantage:
https://www.wada-ama.org/sites/default/ ... l-en_0.pdf
"Meldonium should not be reported at levels below 100 ng/mL; " (Povetkin had 70 nanogram)
And
"Meldonium 200 ng/mL" is still allowed
So in other words, the amount of Meldonium where from Wilder claimed it would make Povetkin an unnatural monster that might kill him with unhuman powers or whatever kind of similar words he used, is now suddenly allowed again by Wada.
You killed candyslim!!!! You dumb motherfucker.
I just show the facts, that's all, and your mum wasn't attractive enough for me anyway even when you wasn't born yet.