BoxRec

mickey1975 wrote:

dirk2686 wrote:

mickey1975 wrote: Are you gay, Dirk? Serious question. Or are you Greg Rutherford?

What a pathetic question. You need to get off the sauce.

Not on it, been off a fortnight, training, earning, pro show last night, taking 4 kids for medicals this morning, am show tonight. Then a chilling Sunday with my children. What are you doing, Greg? Yelling because Eubank Jr. is a tenner or Crolla-Burns is two years late? I bet your life is so tough.

What on earth are you on about.

dirk2686 wrote:

mickey1975 wrote:

dirk2686 wrote:
What a pathetic question. You need to get off the sauce.

Not on it, been off a fortnight, training, earning, pro show last night, taking 4 kids for medicals this morning, am show tonight. Then a chilling Sunday with my children. What are you doing, Greg? Yelling because Eubank Jr. is a tenner or Crolla-Burns is two years late? I bet your life is so tough.

What on earth are you on about.

I thought you were implying I was still drinking. Sorry, Greg.

mimmy123 wrote:Just on a side note, Fury was banned or was unable to box because of this drugs thing, ok. Lets say Fury did a Lance Armstrong, defended his title 7 times in great fashion then it came out he was a drug cheat all along right from his fight for the title. How would folks have felt about him then? Would people still be happy or would he have got the same attention as Armstrong?

Well one of his doping violations happened MONTHS BEFORE the Wlad fight. Feb 2015 before the Hammer fight.

Let's say he is found guilty of that. No contest ???

Because in reality if you fail a test you should be banned straight away. So if he is guilty he should have been serving a ban from Feb 2015 and the Wlad fight wouldn't have happened.

UKAD charged Tyson and Hughie 16 months later. No explanation on the gap between violation and charge has been given.

This can go so many ways it's just crazy it hasn't been resolved or even close to it.

samwbr wrote:The ankle injury before the signed rematch, genuine or not?

Well he instantly went on the pi55 in France jumping up and down with England fans.

Oh and UKAD charged him the day before the ankle injury was announced.

Naandrew wrote:

samwbr wrote:The ankle injury before the signed rematch, genuine or not?

Well he instantly went on the pi55 in France jumping up and down with England fans.

Oh and UKAD charged him the day before the ankle injury was announced.

Ah yes, all sounds familiar now.

His announcement he was cleared the other day, is that confirmed?

samwbr wrote:

Naandrew wrote:

samwbr wrote:The ankle injury before the signed rematch, genuine or not?

Well he instantly went on the pi55 in France jumping up and down with England fans.

Oh and UKAD charged him the day before the ankle injury was announced.

Ah yes, all sounds familiar now.

His announcement he was cleared the other day, is that confirmed?

Really ? Not heard that one.

Total rubbish anyway as UKAD put a statement out a couple of weeks ago.

https://www.ukad.org.uk/news/article/st ... yson-fury/

Not even had a hearing yet and the delay is because the Furys want evidence excluded.

UKAD should have just held the hearing and banned them or cleared them.

Naandrew wrote:

samwbr wrote:

Naandrew wrote:
Well he instantly went on the pi55 in France jumping up and down with England fans.

Oh and UKAD charged him the day before the ankle injury was announced.

Ah yes, all sounds familiar now.

His announcement he was cleared the other day, is that confirmed?

Really ? Not heard that one.

Total rubbish anyway as UKAD put a statement out a couple of weeks ago.

https://www.ukad.org.uk/news/article/st ... yson-fury/

Not even had a hearing yet and the delay is because the Furys want evidence excluded.

UKAD should have just held the hearing and banned them or cleared them.

Thought he tweeted that he was cleared?

samwbr wrote:

Naandrew wrote:

samwbr wrote: Ah yes, all sounds familiar now.

His announcement he was cleared the other day, is that confirmed?

Really ? Not heard that one.

Total rubbish anyway as UKAD put a statement out a couple of weeks ago.

https://www.ukad.org.uk/news/article/st ... yson-fury/

Not even had a hearing yet and the delay is because the Furys want evidence excluded.

UKAD should have just held the hearing and banned them or cleared them.

Thought he tweeted that he was cleared?

You can't take anything he does on twitter seriously.

He is far from cleared by UKAD the only way he can get cleared is by having a hearing.

Naandrew wrote:

samwbr wrote:

Naandrew wrote:

Really ? Not heard that one.

Total rubbish anyway as UKAD put a statement out a couple of weeks ago.

https://www.ukad.org.uk/news/article/st ... yson-fury/

Not even had a hearing yet and the delay is because the Furys want evidence excluded.

UKAD should have just held the hearing and banned them or cleared them.

Thought he tweeted that he was cleared?

You can't take anything he does on twitter seriously.

He is far from cleared by UKAD the only way he can get cleared is by having a hearing.

I usually don't but thought he'd had some news. I've been out of the loop for one reason and another this week.

mickey1975 wrote:

dirk2686 wrote:

mickey1975 wrote: Not on it, been off a fortnight, training, earning, pro show last night, taking 4 kids for medicals this morning, am show tonight. Then a chilling Sunday with my children. What are you doing, Greg? Yelling because Eubank Jr. is a tenner or Crolla-Burns is two years late? I bet your life is so tough.

What on earth are you on about.

I thought you were implying I was still drinking. Sorry, Greg.

I don't care about your drinking or lack of it but what does me being or not being gay have to do with anything?

dirk2686 wrote:

mickey1975 wrote:

dirk2686 wrote:
What on earth are you on about.

I thought you were implying I was still drinking. Sorry, Greg.

I don't care about your drinking or lack of it but what does me being or not being gay have to do with anything?

Well what's with the "keep off the sauce" comment mean? I don't mind if you're gay, at all, it would go a long way to explain your irrational dislike of the champ and the misinterpretation of his comments. Maybe you've suffered from homophobia.

mimmy123 wrote:

Wa1nuts wrote:

TopGun wrote:

Poor comment from a MOD mate, clearly not the worst heavyweight that ever lived. Bit embarrassing comment isn't it? Who Mods the Mods these days?

He called him a f a t sack of sh t in another thread. I'm pretty sure the sack of sh t beat Wlad convincingly but don't see him slating Wlad in that way

Did he call him a fat sack of sh1t in another thread? Bloody hell, dont tell anyone else.

I don't get what you mean? I just find it funny when people who supposedly big boxing fans disrespect boxers who have achieved a lot in their career. Except for casual football type fans obviously

Nobody expected fury to beat wlad but he did. Regardless of how boring the fight was.

Wa1nuts wrote:

mimmy123 wrote:

Wa1nuts wrote:
He called him a f a t sack of sh t in another thread. I'm pretty sure the sack of sh t beat Wlad convincingly but don't see him slating Wlad in that way

Did he call him a fat sack of sh1t in another thread? Bloody hell, dont tell anyone else.

I don't get what you mean? I just find it funny when people who supposedly big boxing fans disrespect boxers who have achieved a lot in their career. Except for casual football type fans obviously

Nobody expected fury to beat wlad but he did. Regardless of how boring the fight was.

You can criticise someone without diminishing their achievements. Fury did well to beat Wlad in a stinker. Since then he's been a joke.

dirk2686 wrote:

Wa1nuts wrote:

mimmy123 wrote:

Did he call him a fat sack of sh1t in another thread? Bloody hell, dont tell anyone else.

I don't get what you mean? I just find it funny when people who supposedly big boxing fans disrespect boxers who have achieved a lot in their career. Except for casual football type fans obviously

Nobody expected fury to beat wlad but he did. Regardless of how boring the fight was.

You can criticise someone without diminishing their achievements. Fury did well to beat Wlad in a stinker. Since then he's been a joke.

He's a mess now I agree but who know what's going on in his brain. He suffered depression at some point didn't he?

Regarding the depression I personally don't believe Fury. He was asked to provide evidence to the WBA and WBO back in September 2016 of his condition in other to essentially enter champion in recess status and not be stripped. His team said this would be provided and that he would categorically not be stripped. He was, and the evidence was never provided.

Indeed, the only evidence we have is Fury's. Has he been treated by a psychologist? Has he sought help? Has he been diagnosed? My view is he won the title, failed a load of drug tests and knew he was getting beaten in a Wlad rematch, so he made the excuse that he wasn't well mentally.